Thanks for all the suggestions. Especial the „Aven colored by error“ is a
superb starting point.
We do not always practice paperless caving but Disto X1/X2 devices are used
for everything.
So we get a SD from
Calibrating - although to my understanding this value is something different
then
I second Ollies advice.
I'm a Therion user (not Survex), although I use survex loop closure. That
gives some additional statistics in the Therion log file, but not the loop
error standard deviations. I wonder if Therion (or Cavern) could incorporate
these in the log file, or if Aven could be
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:17:00AM +0200, MD wrote:
> I wonder what people use to find errors. For example im I have too
> loops L1 and L2 and L1 is “good” (0.1% error) while L2 is “bad” (4%
> error) i can assume that the error is in the stations/shots which are
> part of L2 but not L1. Is there
... forgot to mention, survex can display the errors visually, when generated
from therion this way. When you marked the surveys accordingly you can see
which loops are bad and which ones are good in the polylines. This greatly aids
in finding problematic or faulty measurements.
For
To expand a little in this, you could also use the standard „grade“ to tell
theriob which centerline data has which quality. We use this to mark the
centerlines we have surveyed with distox and traditional way and therion uses
this to put more of the errors towards the more bad survey.
See
Somebody else could answer you more detailed.
> 15. 8. 2019 v 10:17, MD :
>
> Our current project is nearing 2000 Stations in a labyrinth and things start
> to get cumbersome. We have more than 100 Loops detected by therion.
>
> I wonder what people use to find errors. For example im I have
Our current project is nearing 2000 Stations in a labyrinth and things start to
get cumbersome. We have more than 100 Loops detected by therion.
I wonder what people use to find errors. For example im I have too loops L1 and
L2 and L1 is “good” (0.1% error) while L2 is “bad” (4% error) i can
