[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2018-01-15 Thread Diego Mesa
This is a good tool - any thoughts of contributing some/most/all of this functionality into the "tiddler manager"? On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 7:49:51 AM UTC-5, Mat wrote: > > Yeah, the TWaddler gives thee > > Batch Manipulator > *~ bigly manipulate

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2018-01-15 Thread Furicle
This is a nifty tool - I've got all these mis matched case tags Thanks Mat! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-10 Thread Mat
Updated I had fallen into my usual favourite trap of not dealing with tiddlers or tags etc that contain quote marks. @Joshua - does it work now? <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-09 Thread Mat
Joshua, thanks for reporting. Do you think you could make a screen dump and post here so I know which table (the input table, the single data table or the relations table) and also so I can see more in detail what happens and what tags it is you're applygin? Again, thanks for reporting! <:-)

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-09 Thread Joshua Fontany
Hmm, I seem to be breaking something when I click the "up arrow" icon next to tags in the table. It adds the "[tag[bb bb]]" text to the filter, but the table header breaks and displays code (breaking the layout). Tested on Chrome 3 times with different tags added to the filter. Best, Joshua

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-09 Thread Mat
Updated I believe the final piece - for now - is in place, thanks to help from Mark S: It is now possible to remove individual items from the list. This is useful when you e.g want to delete all of [tag[foo]] ...except for X and Y that you note in

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-09 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Mat I been playing with latest. FYI, I think there's a bug in this filter ... [tag[frotz]tags[]tagging[]] +[limit[10]] J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread Mat
Updated Hopefully everyone can see the "add to filter arrows" now (thanks Josiah!) A function I realized I needed but still miss is a button next to each listed title to remove it from the filter (i.e add -mytitle or -[[my title]] to the filter).

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
would / do? they both work for me in Chrome & Firefox and seem to be in most common fonts. On Friday, 8 September 2017 18:28:40 UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Mat, > > there is a Unicode guide to font support for arrows here ... > >

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Mat, there is a Unicode guide to font support for arrows here ... https://www.key-shortcut.com/en/writing-systems/35-symbols/arrows/ Maybe it shed some light on the issue? Hex 2BA5 has virtually no wide support in common fonts according to the charts there. J. -- You received this message

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Neither work on tiddlywiki.com in Firefox OR Chrome for me. Windows 7 Pro. Weird. Are they dependent on LOCAL font files? J, x Both work in Chrome On Friday, 8 September 2017 17:40:22 UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > I get a character encoding problem with the latest on Firefox ... > > > Josiah, thanks

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread Mat
> > I get a character encoding problem with the latest on Firefox ... Josiah, thanks for reporting. This is a bit surprising as I'm using the utf hex format, specifically would you mind seeing if the HTML decimal format works for you: i.e simply put this in a tiddler it should show a

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Mat I get a character encoding problem with the latest on Firefox ... Best wishes Josiah Mat wrote: > > Updated > > main change: quick buttons to add e.g a title to the filter (the blue > arrows) and buttons to empty out the filter. > -- You received this message because you are

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread Mat
Updated main change: quick buttons to add e.g a title to the filter (the blue arrows) and buttons to empty out the filter. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread Mat
> > Have to admit I was slightly thrown by the thread title "Batch Manipulator > - mass tagging" ... > You're right. That was the original premise but it has since expanded. Unfortunately it's not possible to edit thread titles AFAIK @moderator - if possible, could it be changed into

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread Mat
@TiddlyTweeter I am, in spite of what I said, doing some tweaking on it so you may want to wait just a little with evaluation. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Mat *Footnote ...* Have to admit I was slightly thrown by the thread title "Batch Manipulator - mass tagging" ... I think that sells it short of what it does. Best Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-08 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Mat I took a closer look. The BATCH MANIPULATOR is seriously useful for maintenance. It did take me a while to figure out how to use it. That's likely because of its flexibility combined with my slowness in learning. I do a few more tests & then, all being well, will replace several

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-06 Thread TonyM
Mat, Wow leaps and bounds ahead. I will be depending on it to migrate my Personal organiser from TWC to TW5, when I "get around to it", lets hope I can find "a round tooit" because those tooits are quite rare :) I am a little less trepidatious (apprehensive or nervous; filled with

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Allora, Mat, thanks for the clarification. It looks like I will have to incite EXTERNAL FORCES to cleanse me of Perry Mason. J. @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > >> Will it be able to find all instances of "Perry Mason" in Tiddler texts >> and delete him (for the sake of humanity). >> > > Mat

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-06 Thread Mat
@TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > > Will it be able to find all instances of "Perry Mason" in Tiddler texts > and delete him (for the sake of humanity). > He he! If you mean to delete the full tiddlers then yes, that's doable. Or, if you'd want to clear out the text fields (fully) then that's also

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Mat Will it be able to find all instance of "Perry Mason" in Tiddler texts and delete him (for the sake of humanity). Josiah On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 20:40:23 UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > Updated bigly to manipulate > even more masses even. > > The

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-09-06 Thread Mat
Updated bigly to manipulate even more masses even. The main news (yes, *real* news!) is that you can now batch manipulate fields in a similar way as the tags. Believe me, Batch Manipulator will be great when you want to convert imported TWC tids to

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-08-27 Thread Mat
Tony, yeah, that sounds like it would make for a lot of tiddlers and complexity ;-) I also procrastinated conversion of my main TWC because if was way deep and complex and with special solutions and plugins. I expect I will get to know Batch Manipulator >

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-08-26 Thread TonyM
Mat, I have been building a single TWC for more than 10 years. It does much of what I need but is not so "responsive" for mobile use, and yes the firefox timeout is set from 10 up to 80 and occasionally I loose a days work (every 6-12 months), It actually contains around 16,000 tiddlers.

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-08-26 Thread Mat
Hi Tony and thanks for kind words and feedback! > > >- Constructive Feedback: It feels "sensitive", with immediate >responses we could loose information, I need to use it cautiously. > > Anything specific you're thinking of? One problem is that in a complex wiki with many tags, the

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-08-25 Thread TonyM
Post Script; I too have a plan to *convert a big TWC into TW5.* I Think it may result in multiple TW5 so I am working on interaction between wikis, A 17mb TWC with my life embedded in it. Regards Tony On Saturday, August 26, 2017 at 10:29:57 AM UTC+10, TonyM wrote: > > Mat, > > >- Thanks

[tw] Re: Presenting: Batch Manipulator - mass tagging

2017-08-25 Thread TonyM
Mat, - Thanks very much for your work, this will be a valuable tool. It is very powerful and responsive, perhaps this could be an issue. - Constructive Feedback: It feels "sensitive", with immediate responses we could loose information, I need to use it cautiously. - However I