TT & Mario,
*TT*
I see how this could confuse someone, however the reason it was not stated
is I believe because "wikitext is what tiddlywiki is", there is not harm
however making it explicit. A vast majority of new users or casual users of
someone elses wiki may never need to know this.
PMario wrote:
>
> @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>>
>>
>>- It took me 6 months to realise that a "blank" ContentType is
>>actually "text/vnd.tiddlywiki" (yes?). BTW, WHY can it be BLANK?
>>
>> It can be blank, because TW uses sensible defaults for "missing"
> parameters. The default type for
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:26:07 AM UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> Before I completely lose "Beginners Mind" I thought to comment that ...
>
>- It took me 6 months to realise that a "blank" ContentType is
>actually "text/vnd.tiddlywiki" (yes?). BTW, WHY can it be BLANK?
>
> It
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 12:34:16 PM UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
> Heft of it is maybe the docs are assuming something? I am not sure IF I am
> a bad reader or, actually, they implicitly assume something that a #newbie
> needs to explicitly know or not.
>
See the WikiText docs.
A Gloom wrote:
>
>
>- TT: took me 6 months to realise that a "blank" ContentType is
>actually "text/vnd.tiddlywiki" (yes?). BTW, WHY can it be BLANK?
>
> I believe not type set defaults to text/vnd.tiddlywiki but in my building
> the Tiddler Explorer, using type[] brings up some
- t took me 6 months to realise that a "blank" ContentType is actually
"text/vnd.tiddlywiki" (yes?). BTW, WHY can it be BLANK?
I believe not type set defaults to text/vnd.tiddlywiki but in my building
the Tiddler Explorer, using type[] brings up some tiddlers with no type set
that
Repeat for emailers ...
On Saturday, 16 November 2019 09:26:07 UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> Before I completely lose "Beginners Mind" I thought to comment that ...
>
>- It took me 6 months to realise that a "blank" ContentType is
>actually "text/vnd.tiddlywiki" (yes?). BTW, WHY can
7 matches
Mail list logo
