Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

My opener for ten.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Tiddly Wiki is a personal notebook which can be used to store all your thoughts in an easy to manage flash cards style system. You can easily link from one card to another as well as group topics and thoughts with tags #nohashtagneeded. It comes in a single file which can be opened and edited

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Its an alarming trend, given that Chrome is so crap on facilities. (Me: gnostic in a wood with wi-fi since 1957). J. Arlen Beiler wrote: > > Just an interesting graphic on the browser market: > https://www.w3counter.com/trends > > Notice Firefox goes from slightly upward to significantly

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Assign me a task for one item. J Riz wrote: > > Now somebody got to write the answers. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Now somebody got to write the answers. On 26-Sep-2017 11:43 PM, "Arlen Beiler" wrote: > How can i say PINNED THREAD when so many people here would never see it on >> GG? > > > I don't think it really matters if *I* don't see it. What matters is that > I know it is there and

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

> > How can i say PINNED THREAD when so many people here would never see it on > GG? I don't think it really matters if *I* don't see it. What matters is that I know it is there and every new person that goes to join the group is going to see it. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:10 PM, @TiddlyTweeter

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Slightly tech point ... (you people FORCED me to think more nerdish) FF 57, so I'm told, by #Mozilla folk who don't care about file saving, will attract Chrome users because its looks like Chrome+. I am highly sceptical. J. Riz wrote: > > PS: It is official I guess - FF 57 aka FF Quantum is

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

TiddlyTweeter et al, > Noted. I apologise for referring to it a few times as "Retired". I > genuinely formed the idea that TiddlyServer was its nemesis. I had formed that opinion as well based on comments in one of the last TiddlyWiki hangouts about TiddlyDesktop. There was a TiddlyServer

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Ciao Jeremy & tutti, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > To kick off, for a long time my ambition for migrating from Google Groups > has been to eat our own dog food and move to a TiddlyWiki-based discussion > board... > Brilliant. The only problem is the starving dog :-). The downside is whilst we wait

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Again, thanks to everyone for contributing to another interesting thread. To kick off, for a long time my ambition for migrating from Google Groups has been to eat our own dog food and move to a TiddlyWiki-based discussion board. Part of the motivation is that I believe we could build a tool

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

I didn't know there was a Reddit for tiddlywiki. I will go stealth reading it for a while. I use reddit to get very specific news about very specific things. sub-reddits that turn into a forum (like this) I drop pretty quickly. But, that's just my useage pattern. I am fully away others work

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Its here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TiddlyWiki5/ ... and Riz is doing a few posts again after his resurrection from wage slavery & pissed-offness at the state of the world... On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 22:57:47 UTC+2, Arlen Beiler wrote: > > So how do I sign up for the Reddit group and

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

So how do I sign up for the Reddit group and actually start using it? On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:39 PM, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > I totally agree. AND disagree. BEFORE tiddlywiki.com how about PINNING > here? The problem with talking about tiddlywiki.com is its one step

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

EXACTLY. We are here in this camp. Like it or lump it. One thing I do keep pointng at is PINNING of a few threads here... like ... -- NEW HERE? and -- WAYS TO SAVE YOUR TIDDLYWIKI. and maybe a few others like ... -- SHOWCASE LINKS and -- GREAT PLUGINS But so far I never got anyone

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Aren't we just circling the drain? Riz campaigned for a Reddit group worked hard to set it up and then watched as nothing happened.. We have that other thing that still needs votes (stack exchange?) which is going nowhere fast but we do have yet another thread calling for better documentation,

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

What about trying a forum ? We can easily bring up a forum on any free tier, for example an heroku app and if it suceeds we can port it to whatever paid plan fits out needs, and maybe Jeremy could create an a record like forum.tiddlywiki.com for it. All are very straightforward and small steps

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Ciao dg I agree with you that many *SEARCHES for TiddlyWiki bring up both Classic & TW5*. Since TW5 is NOT fully downwardly compatible *it can create confusion* having those results. *Different names should have been used, really* as they are different things. They weren't named so

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Pinned threads would be very helpful! Since most of the great TW tutorial sites are for TWC, sorting out what works for the current incarnation is a real problem. I don't know how applicable that material is, so I stay away from it. A source of current, curated content would help a lot.

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

Ciao Arlen One of the pains with StackExchange is the hoops you have to go through. I thought I voted already? Now I have to do it AGAIN? This process is slower than a snail with a heavy weight on its back :-). Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [tw] Re: Home Sweet Home ... are TiddlyWikiDev & TiddlyWikiDocs worth keeping?

I feel like putting a plug in here for the Area51 proposal for a dedicated TiddlyWiki Stack Exchange site. It's in the commit stage now, so all you have to do is sign in and commit. It will help the proposal if you use the same account you use on the rest of the stack exchange network if you have