I meant the tags-macro, sorry^^ Doing it myseld right now =)
Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2012 04:00:51 UTC+2 schrieb Mr. Flix:
>
> Is it maybe possible to rewrite the alltags-macro to not output an list,
> but only the tags in one line? As it can also output the tags of other
> plugins.
--
You rec
Is it maybe possible to rewrite the alltags-macro to not output an list,
but only the tags in one line? As it can also output the tags of other
plugins.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
ht
In this case, it doesn't matter, as the transcluding tiddler will not have
any tags by itself. The example I gave was a bid bad^^"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com
I do understand, what you want but imo it is not trivial to implement.
eg:
tid a is tagged 1
tid b is tagged 2
* tid a transcludes tid b
* tid a is tagged: 1 2 -> OK
* now remove the transclusion tib b from tid a
what should the program do? IMO it needs to remove tag 2 from tid a.
right?
but w
I finally ended up with both iframes and objects and to display my menus in
front of them, I put an iframe shim in a tiddler and transclude that
tiddler into my menu. It was a little trick with the search plugin im using
but i used the div examples in pagetemplate for displaying tiddlers and it
wor
It's up. It's down. It's up. It's down... It's yo-yo hosting without
the string. Can it do "walk the dog?"
I've been using TiddlySpot for a few years now and I don't remember any
other time when I rely on it. Is anybody else as frustrated as me?
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:16:07 AM UTC-5
Am Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 17:37:57 UTC+2 schrieb PMario:
Does it mean, if the <> macro is gone from a tiddler, the
> tags should be gone too?
> -m
No, just the opposite way: Let's say tiddler a has the tags tag1 and tag2,
and tiddler b has the tag tag3. When I now use <> in b, the
content
Thank you Jeremy and Eric for that.
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:56:34 AM UTC-5, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> "Classic" TiddlyWiki runs on pretty much any browser since around 2004,
> and the plan is that it will continue alongside TW5. Eric Shulman is taking
> over as lead developer.
>
> TiddlyWi
"Classic" TiddlyWiki runs on pretty much any browser since around 2004, and
the plan is that it will continue alongside TW5. Eric Shulman is taking
over as lead developer.
TiddlyWiki5 can also generate classic TW documents from their constituent
tiddlers, giving some interesting options for dual p
Thanx, Jeremy.
What version of TiddlyWiki will work in any browser? And will that version
always be available? (I hope so.)
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:17:12 AM UTC-5, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> > Thank you for posting this, Jeremy. Hope all is well.
> >
> > What will happen with this ver
> Thank you for posting this, Jeremy. Hope all is well.
>
> What will happen with this version if I bring it up on a browser, or maybe
> an older version of a browser, that doesn't recognize/process HTML5?
TiddlyWiki5 itself will require HTML5 to fully function, and will only
run on reasonably m
Thanks Mario, that is awesome, and useful. I'm still working on the
story visualisation framework, but won't be able to complete it for a
week or so.
Cheers
Jeremy
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:26 PM, PMario wrote:
> Hi did some win7 testing:
>
> ie9 (9.0.8112.16421):
> a) problem with inside butt
> As some posts were focused on the interface, I found a blog which I think
> has some great ways of presenting articles.
> Maybe it'll be inspiring :
>
> http://myogen.blogspot.fr/
Thank you, yes, these presentations were added to blogger some time
ago, and are pretty cool. I think they were rath
Thank you for posting this, Jeremy. Hope all is well.
What will happen with this version if I bring it up on a browser, or maybe
an older version of a browser, that doesn't recognize/process HTML5?
On Saturday, June 23, 2012 11:13:21 AM UTC-5, Ruzz wrote:
>
>
> On 22 June 2012 16:52, Jeremy Ru
I didn't note how long TiddlySpot was up, but I got in a couple of entries
this morning before it went down. I think it's been about 1/2 hour since
then.
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:16:07 AM UTC-5, ramkikura wrote:
>
> Is anyone else having problems with Tiddlyspot? The main page
> tiddlyspot
I don't know a macro like this.
Does it mean, if the <> macro is gone from a tiddler, the
tags should be gone too?
-m
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
16 matches
Mail list logo
