[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-11-05 Thread TonyM
Adam, Have a look at Marios tocP which uses the "parent" field rather than tags to build and list a Table of Contents. Comes with a custom new here button. Also I am using my own custom "new from template tool", I hope to publish one day. Regards Tony On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 11:31:20

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-11-05 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
AdamS wrote: > > I've come to TiddlyWiki as a potential platform for writing. I'm still > trying to get it setup to do what I want it to do. I'm not really a > programmer. So there isn't much I know how to contribute there, but I can > think of some features that I think would improve ease for w

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-11-05 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao S. S. That's a very interesting wiki illustrating that writers need Templates and confidence getting on to solve it. By "templates", ultimately, I guess the nicest way would be to be able to do something like Word does ... like "save this as a template" .. in TW its not yet quite that easy

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-11-01 Thread AdamS
Yes! That's just what I had in mind. On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:21:09 PM UTC, S. S. wrote: > > > > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 7:31:20 PM UTC+7, AdamS wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Tongerner also has a "new template tiddler" button. I wonder if that >> could be adapted to easily make multip

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-11-01 Thread S. S.
On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 7:31:20 PM UTC+7, AdamS wrote: > > ... > > Tongerner also has a "new template tiddler" button. I wonder if that could > be adapted to easily make multiple new custom template buttons for > initializing different kinds of tiddlers with ease. > > I realize this is

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-11-01 Thread Adam Sherwood
I've come to TiddlyWiki as a potential platform for writing. I'm still trying to get it setup to do what I want it to do. I'm not really a programmer. So there isn't much I know how to contribute there, but I can think of some features that I think would improve ease for writers. So far, I've i

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-29 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Mark S. I am still playing around with this and thinking about it. I think its *really* good. More than anything its suggestive of a potential full design to be able to handle "placeholders" of all types. So you don't need a footnote plugin, or a stretch-text plugin, or manually typing c

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-17 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Mark S. Thanks! That is an hugely interesting, working, prototype. It looks like it will match a bunch of writers' concerns. I will use it a bit more and get back to you in more detail. (One small teething point I noticed is that currently on "Publish" all items end up as "T"s.) Best wishes

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-15 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Here's a start that has most of the mentioned features: \define linkfullname() $(target)$!!linktype \define makelink() <$reveal type="nomatch" state="""$(target)$!!caption""" text=""> <$set name=title tiddler="""$(target)$""" field="caption"> <$link to="$(target)$"><> <$reveal type="match" stat

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-04 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao PMario Thanks for the notes related to performance. PMario wrote: > > - spell-checking is built into browsers as plugins for a reason ... The > needed databases are huge in size and the algorithms are language specific > My comment was just a "riff". I agree spell-check should be browser

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-03 Thread PMario
On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 4:27:54 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: ... I'm wondering about what an auto spell-checking, word-counting, > keyboard-driven, fully edit-driven (i.e. like BTC's pre-transclusion > placeholder thing), fuzzy-searching, TW thingamy might look like, optimised > for

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-03 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Mark S. wrote: > > From a mechanical perspective, I find too much in TW requires the mouse in > order to function. Ideally, your fingers would never have to leave the > keyboard, interrupting the train of thought that would lead to the next > Great Ankporkian novel. > Of course I want to write

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-03 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
If you're actually using TW for a writing tool, then perhaps you have the write (right?) kit ?? >From a mechanical perspective, I find too much in TW requires the mouse in order to function. Ideally, your fingers would never have to leave the keyboard, interrupting the train of thought that wou

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-03 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao TonyM TonyM wrote: > > I imagined using an outlier view with a toc in the left hand panel with > the tools to add siblings view edit etc... wrapped around a Custom > view/edit template. > I have seen fantastic work by someone privately that uses a kind of outliner/Table of contents as a c

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-03 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Mark S. I thought your comments very astute. >From my point of view when writing the "document" is the "emergent whole concept". The less I have to go out of it the better. Having tools and methods WITHIN it that let me, say create a link to a transclusion, footnote, expansion etc the bet

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-03 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
TonyM wrote: > > As a "want to be writer", > > I think anything is possible here, the trick is knowing what is most > important to us. > Ciao Tony There are a lot of tools in TW that aid writer's both for scholarly writing and for literary endeavours. I think its an area of usage ripe for an

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-09-03 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Thanks BTC Wow! Very neat. It took me a bit to work out how it works. For others reading: here are the components with a bit more detail... Global Macro Tiddler, i.e. tagged: $:/tags/Macro titled: anything you want \define trl(text) {{$text$||transcludilinktemplate}} \end Tiddler titled: "tran

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-08-30 Thread TonyM
All, As a "want to be writer", I imagined using an outlier view with a toc in the left hand panel with the tools to add siblings view edit etc... wrapped around a Custom view/edit template. a toggle to display the whole or part tree, as a transcluded "preview" with in line editing with a cli

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-08-30 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Nice! The next step would be to have a button next to each item that allows you to switch from link to transclusion. And/or a small link when displayed as a transclusion so you could quickly edit the text. The current status would be stored in a flag in the tiddler. The macro might also need a

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-08-30 Thread BurningTreeC
I'm just adding my 2cents with an idea: a small macro that displays a link if the tiddler is missing, but transcludes the tiddler if it's not: in a macro-tiddler: \define trl(text) {{$text$||transcludilinktemplate}} \end in the "transcludilinktemplate": <$list filter="[is[missing]]"> <$link t

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-08-30 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Mark S. wrote: > > By placeholders, you mean links, right? > This a bit weird but works for drafting well for me .. Crusoe is cruising near [[Crusoe Island]] looking for Crusoe. Crusoe sees Crusoe with {{binoculars}} looking for Crusoe. Even though "binoculars" don't appear yet. The problem is

[tw5] Re: [Outreach] Communicating to writers the benefits of TW -- #21 FUTURE TIDDLERS

2018-08-30 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
By placeholders, you mean links, right? The problem is, what do you do when you want to assemble a final doc? Also, when I write, I don't necessarily want to "jump" from one context to the next. I want to sweep my eyes back and forth to make sure I've maintained tone, voice, wording. The "sma