Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

Mario, Including such a thing is beyond my skills, however I have always felt such tools including a custom dictionary, glossary would be very useful for Authors. I hope also to scan all non system tiddlers and extract all English words to build a word glossary and allow additional metadata

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 3:28:05 PM UTC+2 TW Tones wrote: ... I would not be surprised if there were data sets one could import for > English at least to search for equivalents. > You are right, there are javascript libraries that know how to handle singular / plural rules. The code is

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

Folks, This issue, with the different forms of a word such as foot and feet when it comes to searching or linking is no doubt a problem that has occurred before. I would not be surprised if there were data sets one could import for English at least to search for equivalents. Once found a

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

Ahh OK that shouldn't have confused me as much as it did... >>> The problem is, that I would need to add a generic way. It may work for your, but an other user would probably have fun to link to [[foot]] ;) ... IMO this isn't that much of a problem. If the filter was added by the user, they

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 9:13:16 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: > >>> The problem is, that I would need to add a generic way. It may work > for your, but an other user would probably have fun to link to [[foot]] ;) > ... > > I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here! Is "[[foot]]" an >

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

>>> I did add a github issue: https://github.com/wikilabs/plugins/issues/101 .. so it's not forgotten. Cool, thanks! >>> The problem is, that I would need to add a generic way. It may work for your, but an other user would probably have fun to link to [[foot]] ;) ... I'm not sure I

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

I did add a github issue: https://github.com/wikilabs/plugins/issues/101 .. so it's not forgotten. -m On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 6:37:35 PM UTC+2 PMario wrote: > On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 5:49:48 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: > > For example take [[books|??]]. By default this will work as it currently

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 5:49:48 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: For example take [[books|??]]. By default this will work as it currently > does, but from a global config the user could add the filter > trim:suffix[s]. This would be applied to [[books]] and then the result > used as the search term. >

Re: [tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

Hi Mario, thanks for the response. There is a little work around, that looks a bit strange. eg: I found some > [[book|??]]s. So the link will only cover the book text. I know that's > not pretty but it creates valid sentences. Thanks, this is probably the best workaround. The question is

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

PMario wrote: > That's right, because languages haven't been designed to be expressed by > algorithms. They have been designed by the human brain. And it seems humans > do like "exceptions" from the norm, which tend to cause problems for > programs. > Ha! Great reply! The way I put it is

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

There is one thing, which is also interesting. Browsers have a lot of different built in functions already. The problem is, we don't have wikitext representations for them. This is a whole new field for

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 11:18:29 AM UTC+2 TiddlyTweeter wrote: While it is possible to emulate *natural language usage* (i.e. code for > variations of plurals; or passive v. active voice) I'm not sure it is ever > satisfying. > That's right, because languages haven't been designed to be

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

PMario wrote: > Si wrote: > ... > >> I only just noticed your Uni-link Search feature! Very handy - I have >> been frequently writing things like [[really good idea|Really Good Ideas]], >> so this will save me a lot of time. >> > > >> I'm wondering if there is a way to use Uni-link search,

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

On Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 10:58:41 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: ... > I only just noticed your Uni-link Search feature! Very handy - I have > been frequently writing things like [[really good idea|Really Good Ideas]], > so this will save me a lot of time. > There is a little work around, that looks a

[tw5] Re: [UPDATE] uni-link pugin V2.1.0 released

Hi Mario, I only just noticed your Uni-link Search feature! Very handy - I have been frequently writing things like [[really good idea|Really Good Ideas]], so this will save me a lot of time. I have a question however: Is there any way to customise exactly how the search is applied? Many of