Hans:
I use TW5 in a medical setting that does not allow me to share either. The
IT environment is very "locked down" and does not permit using USB thumb
drives or CDs without elaborate importing protocols. I do use it for data
retrieval and live demonstration. People routinely ask "how did
>
> Before people become full tiddlywikians, then need to decide if they want
> to try out TW to begin with. At that stage, impressions and feelings matter
> a lot. Things that look abandoned or outdated are generally less appealing
> than things that look up to date and alive. I'm pretty sure
Yeah, I did ask what nicely designed means. Design theories, as you
mentionned, is one great answer. Having all related resources for that in
this thread just feels a bit too much for the context of the original post.
A discussion about criteria for nice design (along with the related
Well you did ask "What does “nicely designed” mean?". Imo it only has two
meaning - following "universal" design rules and/or personal preferences.
Rather than discouraging, showing how we can make TiddlyWiki beautiful
could inspire people to be more creative, especially since TW community is
very
Oh good lord, please don't. Good design has been part of my bread and
butter since 1995, and I enjoy it very much in that context, but it is an
annoying topic for me outside of work.
However, that kind of stuff might be of interest to a whole bunch of other
folk, but really should be in a
http://atlas-disciplines.unige.ch/ is a beautiful example of what can be
done with TW.
I've learned about it thanks to Soren Bjornstad in his book GrokTiddlywiki
: https://groktiddlywiki.com/read/#Public%20Wikis
@Charlie_Veniot while beauty is indeed subjective, it is possible to use
things
Cade:
I appreciate your interesting comments, perhaps because my age has advanced
to the stage that my medical data is of much greater importance to me.
Also, I have become much more cynical about medical practitioners who share
data with the BigPharma oligopoly and the inevitable
Siniy-Kit,
Beautiful and functional.
I do not think though, that we would see many more example wikis, if held
to such a high standard.
On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 at 9:38:47 AM UTC+2 Siniy-Kit wrote:
> му "nicely designed" TW5 https://heeg.ru/ about using TW5 as on-line
> store.
му "nicely designed" TW5 https://heeg.ru/ about using TW5 as on-line
store. http://heeg.ru/heeg.html - without static cut.
Every day people make sites on my templates :)
вторник, 19 октября 2021 г. в 19:22:29 UTC+3, Mat:
> Just throwing out a problem I've thought about:
>
> It would
On Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 10:47:18 PM UTC+2 TiddlyTweeter wrote:
> It is not so much about shiny wiki as about "*fit for purpose*".
> *IF I am an anthropologist which version should I use? *
>
An ancient one?
-m
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I wish I could share the TWs we generate for our cardiovascular Data Mart
product here. We generate the data dictionary/manual in a TW and all our
test outputs are in a few TWs organized by test groupings. It definitely
satisfies 2 and 3, as far as 1, I am still tweaking it to be more and
I'm not clear on what exactly the problem is.
What problem are we trying to solve, how will making TW appear alive solve
it? Alive to who? And alive how?
Yeah, I think I'm either over-analyzing things or things are too
broad/unclear for me to contribute anything useful.
I do look forward to
Ciao Mat
I think the whole *Showcase *thing is central to getting TW used more.
It is not so much about shiny wiki as about "*fit for purpose*".
*IF I am an anthropologist which version should I use? *
Early comment
TT
On Tuesday, 19 October 2021 at 18:22:29 UTC+2 Mat wrote:
> Just throwing
>
> What does "nicely designed" mean? I may find something wonderfully
> designed, while 99% of normal folk find the same thing awful.
>
So I'm talking about appealing to the 99%. If we look at, say, the "clothes
design industry" we should realize how incredibly narrow our tastes are if
we
Silly questions from me:
What does "nicely designed" mean? I may find something wonderfully
designed, while 99% of normal folk find the same thing awful. Same vice
versa. That is really a subjective matter. Better to have a gallery and
let folk be drawn to what they individually consider
15 matches
Mail list logo
