I apologize for that horrid mess of code. Wish there was a way to edit. Oh,
it's email. Even though I'm entering this from a web page.
Reason # 1,475 why I hate Google Groups :(
/rant
On Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 5:38:31 AM UTC-5 Glenn Dixon wrote:
> I guess this is what happens when you
I guess this is what happens when you keep a project going this long...
Ah it was called
https://twitter.com/TiddlyWiki?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw;>@TiddlyWiki ,
and its still around. (cool!) Before mobile though it was just an HTML
file with js that did FS operations to rewrite itself. I think? Was
Jeremy et al..
If we were to use Xememex please tell me how to say it?, Which syllables
are emphasised?. As in my prior post the issue is ease of use and speaking.
If when introducing tiddlywiki (by another name) do you really want to be
forced to spell it?. With a surname like mine,
Hi Ed
> Re-reading this message (and studiously avoiding making any suggestions for
> new names) the idea of "targeting more modern JavaScript engines" makes me
> wonder about the question of "how modern a browser do you need to have to
> have a working Tiddlywiki?"
>
> With regards to
Late to the party, again.
Tiddlywiki - the product has outgrown the name. Did so a long time ago,
even before TW5.
Xememex - what a beautiful word! Bad name for a product. That's as much of
a "bump" as describing Tiddlywiki to a newcomer.
Fundamental unit = tiddler? I've never agreed to this
Dear all, I confess that I sometimes rename 'tiddler' for my professional
projects, *but* I also recall that "google" also sounded super-silly until
it simply rewired our brains...
I'll honor Jeremy's suggestion that this thread not descend into a popcorn
of name candidates... and yet I do
Don't mind me. I just finished my first oh-so-excellent cup o' coffee for
the day, and I'm in a zen mood.
Just waxing a little philosophical: I don't see anything as a mistake. I
see a thing as the culmination of a series of intertwingled things that
came together into a particular result
> I highly believe in a new fork not only to use modern JS but also the full
power of CSS3 and HTML5.
*And more important*: lets correct the past design mistakes!
I am sure Jeremy and all developers DO KEEP TW5 in the present state and
maintain it with bug fixing!
*One important point* always
>
> Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>> Every time this topic comes up we end up going round in circles with people
>> proposing new names. Let’s try to avoid that, it just gets in the way of the
>> much more complex discussion that we actually need about why and how we want
>> to do this.
>
> Fair
Hi Glenn
> If xememex is the only alternative, then stick with the current name. At
> least you never have to explain how to pronounce it or spell it.
All I'm trying to point out is that even though it's fun to think up new names,
every time we get to the point where people are just shouting
Jeremy Ruston wrote:
> Every time this topic comes up we end up going round in circles with
> people proposing new names. Let’s try to avoid that, it just gets in the
> way of the much more complex discussion that we actually need about why and
> how we want to do this.
>
Fair enuff (but the
If xememex is the only alternative, then stick with the current name. At
least you never have to explain how to pronounce it or spell it.
On Monday, December 28, 2020 at 5:10:50 AM UTC-6 jeremy...@gmail.com wrote:
> Every time this topic comes up we end up going round in circles with
> people
Every time this topic comes up we end up going round in circles with people
proposing new names. Let’s try to avoid that, it just gets in the way of the
much more complex discussion that we actually need about why and how we want to
do this.
Best wishes
Jeremy.
> On 28 Dec 2020, at 10:59,
Hi Thomas,
If you make a search you will find at least two threads discussing the name
and rebranding!
One is this long thread
https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/MKVwkEmCimQ/m/AEj6J534AQAJ
I think the person who can make this important decision is Jeremy and I
myself respect what he
I couldn't find if this topic has already been re-hashed this decade. But I
was wondering if there is any value in discussing alternative names to the
"Tiddly" part of the TiddlyWIki project. This project has been around for
so long that renaming / rebranding would be quite an effort. And the
15 matches
Mail list logo
