Riz,
I think it is because every discussion has had a tendency to mix the plugin
with the exe version of Bob.
I also think I might not have been the only one having problems with some
of the latest versions. The last version is very good, lots of good
explanations. Still Jed might be
Ain't nobody gonna tell me why Bob is not there with savers? Is there a
particular reason? Or did the community collectively forgot to put it there
because everyone knows Bob already. It would be amusing of the reason is that.
Makes us wonder what other thing we all take for common knowledge is
It's going to be tricky to get everyone to agree, it looks like ^-^'
>
>
This!! This alone!
I am not at all touching the text beyond correcting a few spelling mistakes
and categorization. Everything as it is now - but a visually upgraded
version. Just some CSS and check-boxes.
We all have
It's going to be tricky to get everyone to agree, it looks like ^-^'
I agree with Mohammad's opinion so that in the layout we chooses as a
preliminary between the official version of TW: standalone *or *node.js?
Then I like the idea of offering the OS and browser, but finally even if
you check
I think the only "Basic" entry level way to get started with TW should be
TiddlyDesktop. This handles everything well for a new user who wants to
quickly try TW for a few days and install nothing else, or read nothing
else.
The "advanced/minimal" can be the empty+any saving mechanism, and the
Download and Emergency saver qn only makes sense in context of single file
tiddlywikis, right? So shouldn't the user be asked to choose that first?
Again, ideally the first thing user should view is a feature comparison
table between advanced savers. But this would require a discussion on what
Hi Riz,
I'm in favor of your approach, to make the "list of possible savers" more
accessible for new users.
Let's put the styling side of things out of the way at the beginning ;)
I think, the first question / checkbox should be
- basic savers
- advanced savers
... The rest should stay
Riz,
On Wednesday, May 6, 2020 at 5:01:22 PM UTC+4:30, Riz wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> 1. There is python server not documented see here:
>> https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Easy%20local%20saving%20with%20Python
>>
>
> Technically this is documented - in the sense that it is a WebDAV server.
> But I
>
>
> 1. There is python server not documented see here:
> https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Easy%20local%20saving%20with%20Python
>
Technically this is documented - in the sense that it is a WebDAV server.
But I get what you are saying. We need to document more and more practical
examples of
Riz wrote:
>
> Minor: The rounded corners in the demo. If you show them to PMario he will
>> bring out his shotgun ;-)
>>
>
> border-radius property has 97.5% global coverage according to caniuse. Is
> there a particular reason this is frowned upon?
>
I'll leave the question to fellow PMario
>
>
Hi Mat
>
> I think you're 100% on the right path in your reasoning. You have both the
> know-how and the aesthetic sense so please continue to push forward on this
> newcomer-roadblock.
>
Thank you. Will be only glad to contribute. Keep giving your inputs
Minor: The rounded corners in the
Riz wrote:
>
> The idea is to give the user what all can he use depending on his
> platform,
>
My general idea of saver methods are to classify them to following
> categories
>
I think you're 100% on the right path in your reasoning. You have both the
know-how and the aesthetic sense
The idea is to give the user what all can he use depending on his platform,
even if it is a little tough to setup. Ruby Server can be setup with termux
in android. So a ruby developer using windows and Android might want to see
that.
My general idea of saver methods are to classify them to
Yeah. That is something I wanted too. I thought about it like -
With Tiddlywiki you can choose to save your notes in one of the following.
1. All your notes in a single HTML file which you can carry and open in
any browser
2. Each of your notes in a separate text file with embedded metadata
14 matches
Mail list logo
