[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Friday, June 15, 2018 at 1:28:12 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: > > Sounding really good, but I hope the "limitations do not restrict our > futures" > Which limitations? > To clarify, You said you did not understand my line > > I can still progress the matter but presenting a possible specificatio

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Marion, Sounding really good, but I hope the "limitations do not restrict our futures" To clarify, You said you did not understand my line I can still progress the matter but presenting a possible specification, some detailed requirements or research that specifies relevant tiddlers that make

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 4:21:48 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: > > This all sounds great. Perhaps you have addressed this but as a super user > rather than developer, if I see or submit a feature I would really like, > but do not have the dev skills to implement it > The feature-request

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Mario, This all sounds great. Perhaps you have addressed this but as a super user rather than developer, if I see or submit a feature I would really like, but do not have the dev skills to implement it I can still progress the matter but presenting a possible specification, some detailed requi

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 1:13:25 AM UTC+2, PMario wrote: > > > >> That's all the videos so far. More general comments: >> >>- This system will enable something I think is incredibly important >>and currently missing: More experienced developers can now mark feature >>requests

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Monday, June 11, 2018 at 11:54:30 PM UTC+2, Diego Mesa wrote: > > > As always - *thank you* for this. Side note - I requested access to > everything before getting to video 09, so I understand if that is not > granted. > I think, I'll grant Guest or Reporter to basically anyone, that I know

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Mario, As always - *thank you* for this. Side note - I requested access to everything before getting to video 09, so I understand if that is not granted. I can be more specific. My feedback on the videos: - 02 TiddlyWiki Landing Page Proposal - I think this is a great idea, and I love

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Hi folks, you may be interested in a new Video series I did upload today. ... It' about improving Community Communication. The whole thing is an "experiement", so we can heavily test it, without damaging anything. It would be nice, if you guyes would request access to the different groups,

Re: [twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Ciao PMario I emailed David about this thread ... he replied ... *I would hope that the people to whom you wrote would feel free to use the > info in my toolmap to create similar things according to the criteria they > set.* > A notable point about Dynalist is that its exportable as OPML. Just

Re: [twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 2:59:31 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: ... > So whilst "you" (no pointing) may see a need for all this to be under an > umbrella, until such time as you provide both the mechanism and people to > do it, I'd say people like David are still our best bet. > I pointed o

Re: [twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

> > PMario ... > eg: GifMex'es tw-dynalist is a great resource: > https://dynalist.io/d/zUP-nIWu2FFoXH-oM7L7d9DM ... But he had to tell the > community, that he's on holyday, so the list won't be extended for several > days! ... That's a problem. ... Not the holydays, but the "helpnessless" of

Re: [twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 11:12:56 AM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: ... > I am, frankly, feeling some of this effort could be wasted because IMO the > single biggest danger with TW is *yet more fragmentation*. The GitHub > side is the most integrated and consistent at the moment. > You are rig

Re: [twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Ciao Jeremy and all This is a comment slightly from a weird position (probably) from your point of view. I'm not thinking here as a developer. I'm thinking as a social anthropologist. I am reading several discussions at the moment about proposals for innovation in development process, document

Re: [twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Hi Diego > Correct me if Im worng, but cant we just split the repo into the part Jeremy > wants people to help with, and have that be a submodule of the main project > that only he can access? My point wasn't about access control. It was that I am not in favour of splitting the TW5 repo up (e.

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 11:22:28 PM UTC+2, Diego Mesa wrote: > > Correct me if Im worng, but cant we just split the repo into the part > Jeremy wants people to help with, and have that be a *submodule* of the > main project that only he can access? > use google and search about submodule

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Hey Mario, Correct me if Im worng, but cant we just split the repo into the part Jeremy wants people to help with, and have that be a *submodule* of the main project that only he can access? Diego On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 5:17:33 AM UTC-5, PMario wrote: > > Hi Stephan, > > Imported repos

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Hi Stephan, Imported repositories per hour ... since it started to get crazy :) It's interesting, to see how the overal page performance behaves. .. I did do a lot of

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

Am Montag, 4. Juni 2018 08:50:56 UTC+2 schrieb Simon Huber: > > Hi, with the rumors or facts about MS buying GitHub I've seen projects > discussing moving over to GitLab > For the records: "13,000 Projects Ditched GitHub for GitLab Monday Morning" https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ywe

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 11:39:00 AM UTC+2, Simon Huber wrote: > > >> I did grab "tiddlywiki5" and "tiddlywiki.org" >> >> I'll invite you, to the .org and we can play around with it, if you want. >> > > Ok, sounds fun. Cannot find them on GitLab atm, I'm BurningTreeC over > there, too > I did

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:44:05 PM UTC+2, PMario wrote: > > > >>> I can also invite you to https://github.com/tiddlywiki-org/ at GitHub, >>> if you want. >>> >> >> What are the things to explore/do there? >> > > How we can create a new structure, that is easy for devs and users. ... > > Fir

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 11:39:00 AM UTC+2, Simon Huber wrote: > > >> I'll invite you, to the .org and we can play around with it, if you want. >> > > Ok, sounds fun. Cannot find them on GitLab atm, I'm BurningTreeC over > there, too > I'll invite you. > >> I can also invite you to https

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 11:39:00 AM UTC+2, Simon Huber wrote: > > >> ... But we (TiddlyWiki community) have a functionality problem. I'm not >> sure, if GitLab can fix it. >> >> >> Jeremy wants to keep the repository structure. .. Which in my opinion >> can't be managed with github. ... I pe

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

> > > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:50:56 AM UTC+2, Simon Huber wrote: >> >> Hi, with the rumors or facts about MS buying GitHub I've seen projects >> discussing moving over to GitLab >> > > ... Let's wait and see, when they make something official. ... > > >> Because TiddlyWiki5 already wants

[twdev] Re: Should TiddlyWiki consider moving to GitLab?

On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:50:56 AM UTC+2, Simon Huber wrote: > > Hi, with the rumors or facts about MS buying GitHub I've seen projects > discussing moving over to GitLab > ... Let's wait and see, when they make something official. ... > Because TiddlyWiki5 already wants to move to anoth