Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread Adam Tkac
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 03:02:07PM +0100, Peter Åstrand wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Peter Åstrand wrote: > >> I'm working on it as well :) > > The attached patch adds a script (plus a helper script) that downloads > Xorg 7.4 and builds it together with Xvnc. By using these scripts, I've > man

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Peter Åstrand wrote: I'm working on it as well :) The attached patch adds a script (plus a helper script) that downloads Xorg 7.4 and builds it together with Xvnc. By using these scripts, I've managed to build Xvnc on a standard RHEL5 system. Does this make sense, shoul

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Adam Tkac wrote: However, I also am OK with using build-xorg-git, if it can be made to work with Xorg 1.5. Yes, I discussed this solution with Pierre on IRC and it will be the preferred solution. I'm working on it. I'm working on it as well :) Regards, --- Peter Åstra

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread Adam Tkac
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:18:11AM -0500, DRC wrote: > I don't see this as something we have to "support" in the sense of > shipping binaries based on it. It's more for developers who need to > build on systems that have Xorg 1.1. Can't you just #ifdef around the > offending code? You could try

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread DRC
I don't see this as something we have to "support" in the sense of shipping binaries based on it. It's more for developers who need to build on systems that have Xorg 1.1. Can't you just #ifdef around the offending code? However, I also am OK with using build-xorg-git, if it can be made to work

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread Peter Åstrand
I checked in a patch which seems to allow me to build Xvnc on RHEL 5 using the Xorg server 1.1 branch. Using this patch, I do: Hm, I think more about this issue and in the end it seems that older releases of Xorg are not so good idea. Main problem is that they are unmaintained and might contain

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread Adam Tkac
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:15:40AM -0500, DRC wrote: > I checked in a patch which seems to allow me to build Xvnc on RHEL 5 > using the Xorg server 1.1 branch. Using this patch, I do: Hm, I think more about this issue and in the end it seems that older releases of Xorg are not so good idea. Main

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread Adam Tkac
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:15:40AM -0500, DRC wrote: > I checked in a patch which seems to allow me to build Xvnc on RHEL 5 > using the Xorg server 1.1 branch. Using this patch, I do: > > git clone git://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/xserver xorg > cd xorg > git checkout origin/server-1_1-branch >

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-18 Thread DRC
I checked in a patch which seems to allow me to build Xvnc on RHEL 5 using the Xorg server 1.1 branch. Using this patch, I do: git clone git://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/xserver xorg cd xorg git checkout origin/server-1_1-branch cd .. cp -r xorg/* xserver cd xserver patch -p1 <../xserver11.patc

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-17 Thread Adam Tkac
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 05:22:10AM -0500, DRC wrote: > Am I the only one that thinks this is nasty and a big turn-off to > potential developers? I mean, I understand why it is done this way -- > so that Linux distributions can build VNC against the same X11 codebase > as the regular X server, but

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-17 Thread Peter Åstrand
Am I the only one that thinks this is nasty and a big turn-off to potential developers? I mean, I understand why it is done this way -- so that Linux distributions can build VNC against the same X11 codebase as the regular X server, but it seems like we need to support some "default" version of

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-17 Thread DRC
Am I the only one that thinks this is nasty and a big turn-off to potential developers? I mean, I understand why it is done this way -- so that Linux distributions can build VNC against the same X11 codebase as the regular X server, but it seems like we need to support some "default" version of Xo

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-17 Thread Peter Åstrand
cd tigervnc/unix/ git clone git://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/xserver xorg cd xorg git checkout origin/server-1.5-branch cp -r xorg/* xserver cd xserver patch -p1 < ../xserver15.patch cd xserver ./configure --host i686-pc-linux-gnu --with-included-jpeg CFLAGS=-m32 CXXFLAGS=-m32 LDFLAGS=-m32 --dis

[Tigervnc-devel] Building Xvnc

2009-03-16 Thread DRC
For some reason, I am unable to build Xvnc on my machine (RHEL 5 64-bit) Steps taken: cd tigervnc/unix/ git clone git://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/xserver xorg cd xorg git checkout origin/server-1.5-branch cp -r xorg/* xserver cd xserver patch -p1 < ../xserver15.patch cd xserver ./configure --h