Re: [Tigervnc-users] The WinVNC Windows Server

2013-12-13 Thread DRC
That would be a great idea. On Dec 13, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Peter Astrand astr...@cendio.se wrote: Hi. Yes, we are aware of that WinVNC needs some work. Unfortunately, we at Cendio does not have any time to work on this now. Thus, unless someone else volunteers to fix this, three options

Re: [Tigervnc-users] The WinVNC Windows Server

2013-12-13 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message alpine.lrh.2.03.1312101425560.31...@cendio.se, Peter Astrand astr...@cendio.se wrote: Hi. Yes, we are aware of that WinVNC needs some work. Unfortunately, we at Cendio does not have any time to work on this now. Thus, unless someone else volunteers to fix this, three options

Re: [Tigervnc-users] The WinVNC Windows Server

2013-12-13 Thread DRC
On 12/13/13 7:16 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Who are you asking? Me? I've moved on already, so don't do anything just on my acount. Also, I guess I'm confused about something. One of the reasons... actually the main reason why I stareted my experimenting with TigerVNC in particular,

Re: [Tigervnc-users] The WinVNC Windows Server

2013-12-13 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message 52abc2b4.3030...@users.sourceforge.net, DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Red Hat was one of the founding members of the project. They had a representative (Adam) who contributed a lot to TigerVNC in the early days, then (in 2012, IIRC) he announced that he wasn't going