That would be a great idea.

> On Dec 13, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Peter Astrand <astr...@cendio.se> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi. Yes, we are aware of that WinVNC needs some work. Unfortunately, we at 
> Cendio does not have any time to work on this now. Thus, unless someone 
> else volunteers to fix this, three options remains:
> 
> 1. Do nothing, keep it anyway. Might be useful to some people, for example 
> those running Windows XP.
> 
> 2. Remove it.
> 
> 3. Sponsor someone else to fix it.
> 
> Although we do not use WinVNC at Cendio, we understand that it's an 
> important component, so 3) is what remains. My plan is to post a project 
> on https://www.bountysource.com/ next week, hoping to attract someone that 
> can do this work, and possibly other sponsors. Goal for the project would 
> be to get the same level of functionality on Windows 7 as is already 
> available on Windows XP.
> 
> Does this make sense?
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> 
>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> As I said before, given that I'm only just starating out with this
>> thing (TigerVNC) I shouldn't really be throwing out suggestions to
>> the developers at this point, but as that has never stopped me
>> before...
>> 
>> I'm not sure what the target market / user base is for this package,
>> but if the developers hope to make this into a mainstream mass market
>> kind of thing, then I do believe that it would be most helpful to make
>> it rather more of a "no brainer", specifically on the Windows (server)
>> side.
>> 
>> I mean seriously, in an ideal universe, I'd just be able to tell my
>> friend Jessica in Palm Beach (who has very meager understanding of
>> computers generally, and who I would like to be able to help, remotely,
>> with her occasional computer glitches) "Look, go to this web site,
>> download this thing, install it, following the prompts, tell me the
>> password, and then I'll connect to you and get your problem sorted out."
>> 
>> I dunno if any of you folks have ever interacted with Dell software
>> support, but this is pretty much how their system works.  They tell
>> you to run this (pre-installed) then and they give you a magic cookie
>> and then within 5 minutes they are controlling your Windows PC and
>> are seeing everything that you are seeing.  It's smooth, a no-brainer,
>> and it works.  I know.  I've seen it.  The Windows end-luser doesn't
>> have to diddle around with any firewall settings, and in fact never
>> even has to set-up a password.
>> 
>> And as long as I'm on this rant, allow me to just mention a couple
>> of other unexpected oddities that cropped up as I was trying to get
>> this thing going on the Windows (server) side...
>> 
>> After receiveing a clue or three here on this list, I properly ran
>> the Windows server configurator tool/thingy and set a password and
>> other options.  (Actually, I _did not_ set any other options, because
>> all of the defaults looked entirely sensible to me.)  Then I did what
>> I almost always do with newly installed programs on my Windows system
>> that I may want to re-run later on... I put a fresh shortcut/icon on
>> my desktop for the thing... in this case the TigerVNC (User-mode) server
>> itself.  Of course, then I wanted to run the thing, so I double clicked
>> it.  Nothing happened.  This is often an indication that I failed to
>> tap that second click in fast enough to make Windows happy.  So what
>> did I do?  (What would _you_ do?)  I double-clicked the thing again,
>> of course.
>> 
>> Well, come to find out a bit later on that the effect of all this was
>> that (unbeknownst to me) I ended up having not one but *two* copies of
>> the TigerVNC server running on the Windows system simultaneously!  Yikes!
>> I quickly rebooted in order to clean out this flotsam, and thus returned
>> to a more normal state, but the more I think about it, the more the very
>> notion of having two of these things running at the same time is deeply
>> puzzling.  I mean why didn't the second one notice that there was one
>> copy already running (and just exit)?  And perhaps even more mysteriously,
>> how the bleep could two of these even manage to run (without one of them
>> erroring out) anyway?  Maybe this is just my UNIX networking experience
>> getting in the way of my understanding (of Windows networking) again,
>> but where I come from, if a given server process starts listening to/on
>> a given port, that port becomes the exclusive property of that specific
>> process for as long as the process is running.  If some other process
>> starts up and tries to listen to that port also, it should get an error,
>> either in the call to socket() or in the call to listen().  So anyway,
>> _something_ is wrong with this picture, and I'll be damned if I know
>> what it is.  Is the second running instance of the TigerVNC server (on
>> Windows) failing to receive proper errors from the kernel, or is it
>> receiving them but then (improperly) ignoring them?
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> rfg
>> 
>> 
>> P.S.  Oh!  And by the way, the _way_ I found out that I had two running
>> instances of the TigerVNC srever on my Win7 systems was _not_ via the
>> method that one would expect.  Sure, I could have looked and seen this
>> odd state of affairs in the Task Manager process list, but I didn't.
>> In fact I would never have known what had happened if I hadn't, on a
>> whim, taken a quick look at the baby-sized icons that reside over toward
>> the right hand side of the task bar.  (I'm not really a Windows guy so
>> I don't even know what the proper name for these things is/are.  Are those
>> called "notifications"?)  Anyway, I clicked on the little up-arrow that
>> always appears just to the left of those things, and then clicked on
>> "Configure" and started scrolling down through the list of notification
>> do-dads that I could configure.  It was then that I noticed that there
>> were _two_ of these things in the list, each with a little tiger-face
>> icon attached to it.  That's how I deduced that I must have been running,
>> totally unintentionally, two separate instances of the TigerVNC server
>> at the same time on the Windows box.
>> 
>> (I'm still sitting here scratching my head, trying to figure out what
>> the semantics would be of having two of these running in parallel on a
>> single Windows box.)
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
>> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
>> Download it for free now!
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tigervnc-users mailing list
>> Tigervnc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-users
>> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Peter Astrand        ThinLinc Chief Developer
> Cendio AB        http://cendio.com
> Teknikringen 8        http://twitter.com/ThinLinc
> 583 30 Linkoping    http://facebook.com/ThinLinc
> Phone: +46-13-214600    http://google.com/+CendioThinLinc
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Tigervnc-users mailing list
> Tigervnc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-users mailing list
Tigervnc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-users

Reply via email to