Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:59:21 -0800
Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net wrote:

 I hooked up a linear triple-output bench supply to run the Thunderbolt, and
 now the 8040C locked up perfectly on the 1 PPS signal.  Since I don't want
 to tie up one of my bench power supplies to run the Thunderbolt, I plan to
 try adding some filters to the outputs of the T-30B switcher.  I'm thinking
 that some low-ESR tantalum capacitors might do the trick.  Rather than
 re-invent the wheel, I wonder if others found this problem, and what their
 solution was. 

The usual way to filter such low frequency noise components is to
use T or Pi filters. But it also depends on how the noise looks like.
Is it spikes? Is it a sine? Or triangles?

If there are spikes, add some ceramic capacitors as well, depending
on the nature of the spikes something between 10n and 10u. Having
10n, 1u, 10u is mostly a good compromise for high frequency clamping.

If the noise is sine or triangle like, try with the mentioned
T and Pi filters, maybe multiples of those.

 I also wonder if this T-30B power supply requires a minimum
 load on any of its outputs, for it to operate properly.  Hmmm.

Yes, all switching power supplies (and DC/DC converters) have a
minimum load requirement. What it is, depends on the controller used.
Modern controllers change from PWM mode to PFM (aka pulse skip) to
keep the efficiency high. Some (notably chips from Linear) have something
they call burst mode, ie they do a few switching cycles to drive the voltage
up, then sleep for an extended time.
If you can figure out what chip your power supply is using, you can probably
force it to PWM mode, but then you have to ensure that you enhance the
cooling of the switching transistors as they will run much hotter.

Alternatively, you can use a power supply that gives you an intermediate
voltage (somewhere between 10 and 15V) and use high speed DC/DC converters
that work with switching frequencis in the MHz range instead of 100-300kHz
of an AC/DC supply to generate the voltages needed by the thunderbolt.
This should reduce the noise quite a bit.

If you are really time-nutty, you can let the DC/DC converters produce
a voltage about 1V above what you need and use low noise LDOs (ie not
the 78xx or LM317  Co) to produce the voltages for the thunderbolt.
This should give you a 60-80dB damping of the noice produced by the
DC/DC converters.


Attila Kinali
-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Fwd: FE-5680A Contact FEI

2012-02-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:07:04 -0500
Peter Gottlieb n...@verizon.net wrote:

 Do you believe there may be a problem for those who are 
 reverse-engineering, and posting on the open net, items which may be 
 covered under these regulations?

Not unless you live in the US. Then you are bound by the laws
of your country. But then again, most of the stuff we deal with
is not of clasified nature, it's just that the companies who work
in the arms, military and defense business are paranoid. Checking
each bit of information whether it would be export restricted or not
would mean a lot more work than just to declare everything as classified.

That in the long term they hurt themselves by this is an other issue
and because it cannot be numberd in $$$ for this quaters budget, not
of the concern of those who decide such policy.

Attila Kinali

-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] ebay warning

2012-02-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:06:18 -0800
Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
  Sadly I heard recently that the US is 27th in Math and 25th in
  Science. I challenge the old DXers too name 25 countries smarter
  then we are. I cannot.
 
 Does it really matter?  If you are building iPhones what you need are
 only a half dozen really smart leaders, a few hundred good engineers
 and thousands of semi-skilled assembly line workers and another
 thousand who can work cash registers and swipe credit cards.
 Everyone does not need to have an advanced degree from Harvard.It
 has been like that for ages:  One cave man figured out how to make
 fire then 100 others said fire good.  I make fire too.

Yes it does matter:

http://wulffmorgenthaler.com/2012/02/18/


Attila Kinali

-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] ebay warning

2012-02-27 Thread Steve
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:10:26 +0100
Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:

 On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:06:18 -0800
 Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com
  wrote:
  
   Sadly I heard recently that the US is 27th in Math and 25th in
   Science. I challenge the old DXers too name 25 countries smarter
   then we are. I cannot.
  
  Does it really matter?  If you are building iPhones what you need
  are only a half dozen really smart leaders, a few hundred good
  engineers and thousands of semi-skilled assembly line workers and
  another thousand who can work cash registers and swipe credit cards.
  Everyone does not need to have an advanced degree from Harvard.
  It has been like that for ages:  One cave man figured out how to
  make fire then 100 others said fire good.  I make fire too.
 
 Yes it does matter:
 
 http://wulffmorgenthaler.com/2012/02/18/
 
 
   Attila Kinali
 

I realize someone already mention Idiocracy..

[bump]Yes it does matter[bump]

Steve

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread gary



On 2/27/2012 12:48 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:


If you are really time-nutty, you can let the DC/DC converters produce
a voltage about 1V above what you need and use low noise LDOs (ie not
the 78xx or LM317  Co) to produce the voltages for the thunderbolt.
This should give you a 60-80dB damping of the noice produced by the
DC/DC converters.


Attila Kinali



Having designed LDO chips, people expect them to perform miracles well 
beyond reality. If you have a PNP pass and you are sitting near dropout, 
you get control loops that are an ugly combination of a path to keep the 
PNP from getting saturated plus one to control the voltage. With P-fet 
pass devices, the control is better (no sat killer needed with a fet), 
but still you are trying to regulate with what amount to be a variable 
resistor.


You really don't get that much filtering at switcher frequencies with 
LDOs, plus some regulators can't handle too low of an ESR. If you care 
about noise, screw efficiency and go with a shunt regulator. There are 
hack circuits on the net to take 431s plus external components to roll a 
decent shunt. Note the shunt regulator makes the DC/DC happy by 
presenting a uniform load.


If you do a shunt right, the bypass capacitor will do all the work. This 
is somewhat true with a P-fet pass regulator, where Cds is forming a cap 
divider with your bypass. I never really warmed up to PNP pass devices, 
but they are best for high voltage applications.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Schematic capture, anyone?

2012-02-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:41:37 -0800
Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:

 A good feature to look for is autorouting.  and design rule checking.
  Of course every engineer thinks he is smarter than this kind of
 software.  Mostly he is but it is good to use software that simply
 will not allow some kinds of errors.  Design rules generally are
 things like following the schematic and the geometry of traces and
 limits of the PCB fab like line widths.
 
 I've used rat's nest routing too.  This allows you to place the
 parts on the PCB and then does the interconnects with as the crow
 flies  traces that cross and can't possibly work but they are drawn
 in red.  you click them one at a time and  rout them.   As you place
 components you can see the rats net and you move them around to
 minimize the crossings.

I advice against the use of autorouting. It's not that the engineer
is so much smarter than the router, but it's that the engineer has
much more knowledge than the router to know what those wires carry
and which ones should be short, which wide, which do not really matter
if they have a small trip around the PCB...

Of course, you can annotate the schematics with all that info in order
to get the autorouter to the point it can beat you. But it'll take much
longer than doing it yourself.

The usual way i do routing, is to use rats nest place the parts and see
whether i can route the important signals nicely. Then route those first.

If the PCB is complex (either too many highly interconnected componets,
or not enough space) i often do a first run to asses how the connections
will look like when routed and after that a second run with adjusted placement.

Attila inali

-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread Steve

 
 Having designed LDO chips, people expect them to perform miracles
 well beyond reality. If you have a PNP pass and you are sitting near
 dropout, you get control loops that are an ugly combination of a path
 to keep the PNP from getting saturated plus one to control the
 voltage.
 
 I never really warmed up to
 PNP pass devices, but they are best for high voltage applications.
 
 

I was under the impression that the industry as a whole got away from
PNP pass back in the 80s. Off the top, I can't think of any PNP pass
regulation designs worth using.

You've got my curiosity when you mentioned high voltage. Seems to me
that PNP is even worse at high voltage, owing to the majority holes as
carriers rather than majority electrons as in NPN.

Why are PNP better for high voltage than NPN?  (I've been using PNP for
nearly everything for about 20 years) .. every now and then i get lazy
and grab a PNP, but that's beyond the context ;)

Steve

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread Steve

 
 Having designed LDO chips, people expect them to perform miracles
 well beyond reality. If you have a PNP pass and you are sitting near
 dropout, you get control loops that are an ugly combination of a path
 to keep the PNP from getting saturated plus one to control the
 voltage.
 
 I never really warmed up to
 PNP pass devices, but they are best for high voltage applications.
 
 

I was under the impression that the industry as a whole got away from
PNP pass back in the 80s. Off the top, I can't think of any PNP pass
regulation designs worth using.

You've got my curiosity when you mentioned high voltage. Seems to me
that PNP is even worse at high voltage, owing to the majority holes as
carriers rather than majority electrons as in NPN.

Why are PNP better for high voltage than NPN?  (I've been using PNP for
nearly everything for about 20 years) .. every now and then i get lazy
and grab a PNP, but that's beyond the context ;)

No matter how many times i read something, I miss a major typo and
don't see it until right after I hit send! 
Should read:
(I've been using NPN for nearly everything for about 20 years)

Steve

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A Repair

2012-02-27 Thread Roberto Barrios
Hi Bob,

I wonder what the other oscillators that others are receiving look like in
the SA. Replacing all the capacitors would take a serious effort, not sure
if it would be justified.

Can I ask how can you know all that by looking at the spectrum plot?

Thank you,
Roberto EB4EQA

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: sábado, 25 de febrero de 2012 23:55
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A Repair

Hi

The spectrum you show in the middle is the correct one. It shows the 10 MHz
output and the sub-harmonics related to the 5 MHz crystal oscillator. The
other two are a bit broken. One appears to have a stage oscillating. The
other is more interesting. It has a stage oscillating that is injection
locked to the 5 MHz crystal oscillator. I suspect more than one capacitor
went bad in these OCXO's. Somebody may have sold Morion a bad reel of bypass
caps.

Bob



On Feb 25, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Roberto Barrios rbarri...@msn.com wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 
 
 I spent this evening repairing a MV89A that had a weak output, output 
 cap was bad:
 
 
 
 http://www.rbarrios.com/projects/MV89A
 
 
 
 I also found while comparing with other two MV89A's that they show 
 different output spectra, as can be seen.  Test conditions were 
 identical but one appears much cleaner than the others. What are the
reasons for this?
 
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Roberto EB4EQA
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:29:11 -0800
gary li...@lazygranch.com wrote:

 On 2/27/2012 12:48 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
 
  If you are really time-nutty, you can let the DC/DC converters produce
  a voltage about 1V above what you need and use low noise LDOs (ie not
  the 78xx or LM317  Co) to produce the voltages for the thunderbolt.
  This should give you a 60-80dB damping of the noice produced by the
  DC/DC converters.
 
 Having designed LDO chips, people expect them to perform miracles well 
 beyond reality. If you have a PNP pass and you are sitting near dropout, 
 you get control loops that are an ugly combination of a path to keep the 
 PNP from getting saturated plus one to control the voltage. With P-fet 
 pass devices, the control is better (no sat killer needed with a fet), 
 but still you are trying to regulate with what amount to be a variable 
 resistor.

Hmm.. i had the impression if you stayed beyond two times the drop out
voltage that the regulation loop could take most of everything?

And afaik all modern LDOs are FET types? Aren't they?

 
 You really don't get that much filtering at switcher frequencies with 
 LDOs, plus some regulators can't handle too low of an ESR.

Modern LDOs all handle zero ESR. And they have to.
But yes, switcher frequency filtering is something you should do with
lots of Cs and maybe some Ls. That's another reason why i said to use
DC/DC converters with MHz switching frequency. It makes it much easier
to filter them out.

 If you care 
 about noise, screw efficiency and go with a shunt regulator. There are 
 hack circuits on the net to take 431s plus external components to roll a 
 decent shunt. Note the shunt regulator makes the DC/DC happy by 
 presenting a uniform load.


Yes, that would be also a possibility. But it only makes sense if
you have a more or less constant power consumption. Otherwise you'll
just waste the peak current (plus some headroom) permanently.

Eg, with a OCXO you'd have to design the regulator for the heating
current. And when the OCXO goes into steady state, you waste ~80%
of the energy to heat the enclosure.

 If you do a shunt right, the bypass capacitor will do all the work. This 
 is somewhat true with a P-fet pass regulator, where Cds is forming a cap 
 divider with your bypass.

I don't exactly see how the Cds helps with regulation as a capacitive
divider. Could you elaborate this a little bit.

 I never really warmed up to PNP pass devices, 
 but they are best for high voltage applications.

While the notion of high voltage is constantly moving up :-)

Attila Kinali

-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A Repair

2012-02-27 Thread EWKehren
Roberto
It is called tens of years of experience
Bert Kehren
 
 
In a message dated 2/27/2012 5:16:28 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
rbarri...@msn.com writes:

Hi  Bob,

I wonder what the other oscillators that others are receiving look  like in
the SA. Replacing all the capacitors would take a serious effort,  not sure
if it would be justified.

Can I ask how can you know all  that by looking at the spectrum plot?

Thank you,
Roberto  EB4EQA

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com  [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: sábado,  25 de febrero de 2012 23:55
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency  measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A  Repair

Hi

The spectrum you show in the middle is the correct  one. It shows the 10 MHz
output and the sub-harmonics related to the 5 MHz  crystal oscillator. The
other two are a bit broken. One appears to have a  stage oscillating. The
other is more interesting. It has a stage  oscillating that is injection
locked to the 5 MHz crystal oscillator. I  suspect more than one capacitor
went bad in these OCXO's. Somebody may have  sold Morion a bad reel of 
bypass
caps.

Bob



On Feb 25,  2012, at 4:01 PM, Roberto Barrios rbarri...@msn.com wrote:

  Hi all,
 
 
 
 I spent this evening repairing a  MV89A that had a weak output, output 
 cap was bad:
 
  
 
 http://www.rbarrios.com/projects/MV89A
 
  
 
 I also found while comparing with other two MV89A's that  they show 
 different output spectra, as can be seen.  Test  conditions were 
 identical but one appears much cleaner than the  others. What are the
reasons for this?
 
 
 
  Regards,
 
 Roberto EB4EQA
 
  ___
 time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions  there.

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go  to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow  the instructions  there.


___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread lists
Those were bicmos designs where the LDO was to provide voltage for running 
controller chips. 

I've only done PMOS for stand alone LDO. 
-Original Message-
From: Steve iteratio...@gmail.com
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:54:20 
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS


 
 Having designed LDO chips, people expect them to perform miracles
 well beyond reality. If you have a PNP pass and you are sitting near
 dropout, you get control loops that are an ugly combination of a path
 to keep the PNP from getting saturated plus one to control the
 voltage.
 
 I never really warmed up to
 PNP pass devices, but they are best for high voltage applications.
 
 

I was under the impression that the industry as a whole got away from
PNP pass back in the 80s. Off the top, I can't think of any PNP pass
regulation designs worth using.

You've got my curiosity when you mentioned high voltage. Seems to me
that PNP is even worse at high voltage, owing to the majority holes as
carriers rather than majority electrons as in NPN.

Why are PNP better for high voltage than NPN?  (I've been using PNP for
nearly everything for about 20 years) .. every now and then i get lazy
and grab a PNP, but that's beyond the context ;)

Steve

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread lists
The p-fet LDO can never do better than a cap divider formed by Cds and the 
load. Just draw the circuit and this is obvious. There is always a feedthrough 
path via Cds. 

I'm not so sure LDOs can handle perfect caps. ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:23:22 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:29:11 -0800
gary li...@lazygranch.com wrote:

 On 2/27/2012 12:48 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
 
  If you are really time-nutty, you can let the DC/DC converters produce
  a voltage about 1V above what you need and use low noise LDOs (ie not
  the 78xx or LM317  Co) to produce the voltages for the thunderbolt.
  This should give you a 60-80dB damping of the noice produced by the
  DC/DC converters.
 
 Having designed LDO chips, people expect them to perform miracles well 
 beyond reality. If you have a PNP pass and you are sitting near dropout, 
 you get control loops that are an ugly combination of a path to keep the 
 PNP from getting saturated plus one to control the voltage. With P-fet 
 pass devices, the control is better (no sat killer needed with a fet), 
 but still you are trying to regulate with what amount to be a variable 
 resistor.

Hmm.. i had the impression if you stayed beyond two times the drop out
voltage that the regulation loop could take most of everything?

And afaik all modern LDOs are FET types? Aren't they?

 
 You really don't get that much filtering at switcher frequencies with 
 LDOs, plus some regulators can't handle too low of an ESR.

Modern LDOs all handle zero ESR. And they have to.
But yes, switcher frequency filtering is something you should do with
lots of Cs and maybe some Ls. That's another reason why i said to use
DC/DC converters with MHz switching frequency. It makes it much easier
to filter them out.

 If you care 
 about noise, screw efficiency and go with a shunt regulator. There are 
 hack circuits on the net to take 431s plus external components to roll a 
 decent shunt. Note the shunt regulator makes the DC/DC happy by 
 presenting a uniform load.


Yes, that would be also a possibility. But it only makes sense if
you have a more or less constant power consumption. Otherwise you'll
just waste the peak current (plus some headroom) permanently.

Eg, with a OCXO you'd have to design the regulator for the heating
current. And when the OCXO goes into steady state, you waste ~80%
of the energy to heat the enclosure.

 If you do a shunt right, the bypass capacitor will do all the work. This 
 is somewhat true with a P-fet pass regulator, where Cds is forming a cap 
 divider with your bypass.

I don't exactly see how the Cds helps with regulation as a capacitive
divider. Could you elaborate this a little bit.

 I never really warmed up to PNP pass devices, 
 but they are best for high voltage applications.

While the notion of high voltage is constantly moving up :-)

Attila Kinali

-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Odetics 365 date/1024 week problem fix

2012-02-27 Thread Rob Kimberley
I was working for Zyfer (Odetics) when they did this mod. Yes, the only
difference between the 365 and 565 models is the GPS engine, firmware and
different front panel.

And yes, that backlight control has caught quite a few people out in the
past!!

Rob Kimberley

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Arthur Dent
Sent: 27 February 2012 00:22
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Odetics 365 date/1024 week problem fix

I have owned an Odetics 365 GPStar Plus Time And Frequency System for some
time and it  works fine except for the annoying date problem that apparently
has something to do with the fairly common 1024 weeks limit where older GPS
receivers display 2012 as 1992 and the day of the year is not correct.  I
couldn't just change receivers because there appeared to be some routines in
the firmware that checked the receiver model and interpreted the data for
specific models that Odetics could have used in the late 1990s. This 365
used a Magellan 5000 OEM receiver.

I recently got a good deal on a FEI-Zyfer (Odetics) 565 that looks like the
365 and it was sold as-is because there was just a backlight but no display
and the keypad was dead. What it turned out to be was the display contrast
was turned way down and the 'beep' was turned off. The unit worked properly
but as it was received it did look dead. I bought the 'dead' 565 hoping that
maybe I could compare the two units and find a way to fix the 365 to display
the date properly.
Getting a fully operational 565 was a bonus.

What was very interesting to me was that the 365 (~1998) and the 565 (~2005)
had basically identical motherboards. The only difference I could see was
one
27c010 eprom and the receiver and its adaptor board. I put the 565 eprom and
receiver into the 365 and it became a 565 displaying the correct time and
date and working exactly like the 565.

The receiver in the 565 was a Motorola M12+ on a Synergy Systems adaptor
board that made the M12+ look like an older and larger Motorola UT+ board to
the 565. I tried a UT+ in place of the M12+ and it worked fine and the unit
identified it properly as a UT+ V2.2. I then duplicated the eprom and made
an adaptor board for the
UT+ board because the  Synergy Systems adaptor board for the M12+ would 
UT+ be
too difficult to copy. The adaptor board I made just has the UT+, a 7805
3-terminal 5V regulator, a back-up super cap, and a 7404 buffer (1 inverter
driving 3 in more in parallel) for the 1 PPS out. The RX and TX from the UT+
receiver are also connected so the 365 with the new eprom and receiver sees
all the proper signals and works as a 565 should. I've attached a photo of
the M12+ factory made board and the UT+ board I made so you can see what
they look like. I thought that others who have run into this same problem
might find this information helpful.

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7052/6787095870_1199bfd85d_b.jpg

-Arthur
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A Repair

2012-02-27 Thread Roberto Barrios
Hi Bert,

I've googled for that and didn't find a related paper :-)

Regards,
Roberto EB4EQA

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of ewkeh...@aol.com
Sent: lunes, 27 de febrero de 2012 11:44
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A Repair

Roberto
It is called tens of years of experience Bert Kehren
 
 
In a message dated 2/27/2012 5:16:28 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rbarri...@msn.com writes:

Hi  Bob,

I wonder what the other oscillators that others are receiving look  like in
the SA. Replacing all the capacitors would take a serious effort,  not sure
if it would be justified.

Can I ask how can you know all  that by looking at the spectrum plot?

Thank you,
Roberto  EB4EQA

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com  [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: sábado,  25 de febrero de 2012 23:55
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency  measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A  Repair

Hi

The spectrum you show in the middle is the correct  one. It shows the 10 MHz
output and the sub-harmonics related to the 5 MHz  crystal oscillator. The
other two are a bit broken. One appears to have a  stage oscillating. The
other is more interesting. It has a stage  oscillating that is injection
locked to the 5 MHz crystal oscillator. I  suspect more than one capacitor
went bad in these OCXO's. Somebody may have  sold Morion a bad reel of
bypass caps.

Bob



On Feb 25,  2012, at 4:01 PM, Roberto Barrios rbarri...@msn.com wrote:

  Hi all,
 
 
 
 I spent this evening repairing a  MV89A that had a weak output, output 
 cap was bad:
 
  
 
 http://www.rbarrios.com/projects/MV89A
 
  
 
 I also found while comparing with other two MV89A's that  they show 
 different output spectra, as can be seen.  Test  conditions were 
 identical but one appears much cleaner than the  others. What are the
reasons for this?
 
 
 
  Regards,
 
 Roberto EB4EQA
 
  ___
 time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to  
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions  there.

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go  to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow  the instructions  there.


___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A Repair

2012-02-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

...or my lack of experience. I think I first saw problems like these in 1975. 
Somehow they keep showing up :)

Bob



On Feb 27, 2012, at 5:44 AM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:

 Roberto
 It is called tens of years of experience
 Bert Kehren
 
 
 In a message dated 2/27/2012 5:16:28 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
 rbarri...@msn.com writes:
 
 Hi  Bob,
 
 I wonder what the other oscillators that others are receiving look  like in
 the SA. Replacing all the capacitors would take a serious effort,  not sure
 if it would be justified.
 
 Can I ask how can you know all  that by looking at the spectrum plot?
 
 Thank you,
 Roberto  EB4EQA
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com  [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Bob Camp
 Sent: sábado,  25 de febrero de 2012 23:55
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency  measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Morion MV89A  Repair
 
 Hi
 
 The spectrum you show in the middle is the correct  one. It shows the 10 MHz
 output and the sub-harmonics related to the 5 MHz  crystal oscillator. The
 other two are a bit broken. One appears to have a  stage oscillating. The
 other is more interesting. It has a stage  oscillating that is injection
 locked to the 5 MHz crystal oscillator. I  suspect more than one capacitor
 went bad in these OCXO's. Somebody may have  sold Morion a bad reel of 
 bypass
 caps.
 
 Bob
 
 
 
 On Feb 25,  2012, at 4:01 PM, Roberto Barrios rbarri...@msn.com wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 
 
 I spent this evening repairing a  MV89A that had a weak output, output 
 cap was bad:
 
 
 
 http://www.rbarrios.com/projects/MV89A
 
 
 
 I also found while comparing with other two MV89A's that  they show 
 different output spectra, as can be seen.  Test  conditions were 
 identical but one appears much cleaner than the  others. What are the
 reasons for this?
 
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Roberto EB4EQA
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions  there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go  to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow  the instructions  there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to  
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] 5061's on ebay - FIXED IT

2012-02-27 Thread paul swed
Joe
Good to hear that you recovered the 5061. A couple of comments.
Ground screws do indeed oxidize and it can be a very good fix for older
gear to simply loosen and re-tighten those screws or to replace pop riveted
terminal lugs with real screws and lock washers.

Nicads
My experience with modern nicads are they are real crud.I spent $45 for a
new set from a major supplier and they lasted a year before starting down
the failed path. I believe that any nicads on the shelf are getting pretty
old these days. Other amazing thing is I have tested those 30 year old
nicads and amazingly they really do hold up very well.  So someplace along
the line the manufacturers figured out how to make them a
re-occurring revenue stream.
Granted today there are alternates to those evil nicads. So perhaps they
have a respectable life.
Regards
Paul.
WB8TSL

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:24 PM, J. L. Trantham jlt...@att.net wrote:

 Not being able to suppress my interests for too long, I explored my newly
 acquired 5061A this weekend.

 The problem was an oscillation in the A7 assembly, as determined by looking
 at the output at A7J6.

 I am not sure what I did to fix it but I removed all connections to the A7
 and A8 assemblies, reconnected them, and no joy.

 I then removed the A7 assembly, checked the components that have frequently
 failed in the past on my other 5061A's, found no problems, loosened all the
 mounting screws for the PCB then re-tightened them, cleaned all the
 connections, reinstalled it, switched the 'HI' and 'LO' switch back and
 forth half a zillion times, left it in 'HI', adjusted the 2nd Harmonic to
 '40' on the meter, and, magically, everything worked.

 I suspect the problem will be back.  I suspect a 'marginal' connection or a
 marginal component in the A7 assembly.  I have some 'parts units' available
 for the next time the unit fails.

 Nonetheless, it has 'locked' for the past hour with a Beam I of about 13
 nAmp, if my calculation is correct (-131.50 mV from the CS tube as
 connected
 to the cable from the tube to A7J1 and as measured with my Fluke 8050A with
 a 10 MOhm input resistance), and the output is 'locked' on my scope with
 it's trigger coming from my TBolt.

 I have ordered new batteries for the Option 02 battery pack although it
 even
 worked with only one 'dead' cell.  I replaced the 'dead' cell with one that
 'kinda works' from another old battery pack, and now even the backup
 battery
 pack is working, 'kinda'.

 Happy to answer any questions.

 Joe

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of J. L. Trantham
 Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:25 PM
 To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 5061's on ebay

 I'll do it.

 I work full time and this is my hobby.  So, it may be a while before I get
 into it though.

 Joe

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of paul swed
 Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:22 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 5061's on ebay

 Interested




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 5061's on ebay - FIXED IT

2012-02-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:59:02 -0500
paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Granted today there are alternates to those evil nicads. So perhaps they
 have a respectable life.

Not really. NiCd and NiMH are optimized for price these days, not
to last long. Li-Ion and Li-Poly are even worse (optimized for power
and price, not taking into account their inherently shorter life).

If you want to have long lasting akkus buy those that are rated for
such use. But they cost a premium. The only alternative are Pb batteries.
Especially the Pb-Gel ones. Those are made to last a couple of years
if not a decade or two before getting a too high internal resistance.

Attila Kinali

-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] UK: MSF 60 KHz outages notice: March 8, March 26-April 6

2012-02-27 Thread David J Taylor

Folks, I have received the following notices:

__
Notice of Interruption to MSF 60 kHz Time and Frequency Signal

The MSF 60 kHz time and frequency signal broadcast from Anthorn Radio 
Station will be shut down over the periods:


 8 March 2012 from 10:00 UTC until 14:00 UTC

 08:00 UTC on Monday 26 March until 20:00 UTC on Friday 6 April
__


This will affect mainly UK users.

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.eu
Email:  david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread gary
Digging through the literature online, I see the high voltage LDOs are 
still PNP, at least for the manufacturers that show representative 
circuits. I was pretty such of this when you did your post, mostly 
because I couldn't see how you would drive the NPN and maintain a low 
dropout. [You would need circuitry to drive the base that would have to 
function a VBE above dropout.] If low droput wasn't required, then by 
all means, I'd design with a NPN pass device to avoid the saturation 
killer circuit.


Some random TI parts:

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm9076.pdf

About 30 to 40db rejection at switcher frequencies.


http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm2931-n.pdf

About 55 to 70dB rejection at switcher frequencies.

Note the rejection graphs are a bit misleading since they are measured 
with sine inputs, while the switcher noise has plenty of harmonics.


When I build a project for myself, I always use the P-fet based LDOs. 
Usually TI designs, though I never worked for them, so I have no inside 
knowledge of their design. They test fine. I just know it is 
substantially easier to design a LDO with a P-fet in terms of stability, 
simply because there is one feedback path, and MOS modeling is better 
than bipolar.


Some of the worst LDOs I've come across are from Micrel. I can't imagine 
how that company stays in business. [Look at their financials and the 
market agrees with me.] TI, LTC, Maxim, generally good stuff, though you 
can usually find a stinker device if you look hard enough. Something 
like a LDO is usually a solo project so it depends a lot on the designer.


Surprisingly, the wiki is pretty decent for LDOs, paying homage to Bob 
Dobkin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-dropout_regulator





On 2/27/2012 2:46 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:

Those were bicmos designs where the LDO was to provide voltage for running 
controller chips.

I've only done PMOS for stand alone LDO.
-Original Message-
From: Steveiteratio...@gmail.com
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:54:20
To:time-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS




Having designed LDO chips, people expect them to perform miracles
well beyond reality. If you have a PNP pass and you are sitting near
dropout, you get control loops that are an ugly combination of a path
to keep the PNP from getting saturated plus one to control the
voltage.

I never really warmed up to
PNP pass devices, but they are best for high voltage applications.




I was under the impression that the industry as a whole got away from
PNP pass back in the 80s. Off the top, I can't think of any PNP pass
regulation designs worth using.

You've got my curiosity when you mentioned high voltage. Seems to me
that PNP is even worse at high voltage, owing to the majority holes as
carriers rather than majority electrons as in NPN.

Why are PNP better for high voltage than NPN?  (I've been using PNP for
nearly everything for about 20 years) .. every now and then i get lazy
and grab a PNP, but that's beyond the context ;)

Steve

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread Eric Lemmon
Attila,

It turns out that the MeanWell T-30B switching power supply does, indeed,
require a minimum load on each output- but especially so on the +5 volt
output, which powers the Thunderbolt's 10 MHz and 1 PPS output circuitry.
The specs for this power supply are:  +5V, 0.5-3.0A; +12V, 0.1-1.0A; and
-12V, 0.1-0.5A.  The actual steady-state current draws of my Thunderbolt
are:  +5V, 0.23A; +12V, 0.15A; and -12V, 0.003A.

In order to increase the respective loads above the minimum specified
levels, I added a 16 ohm 5 watt resistor on the +5 volt output, and an 82
ohm 5 watt resistor on the -12 volt output.  Voila!  The Thunderbolt settled
down and the 8040C locked up to the 1 PPS.  I really don't like to use
resistors for this purpose, since they do produce some heat and waste
energy- a bit less than 2 watts apiece in this instance- but it did prove
that too little load on a switching power supply can be a bad thing.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this matter.  I enjoy reading your many
postings, and I have learned a lot from the subjects discussed on this list.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Attila Kinali
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 12:48 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:59:21 -0800
Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net wrote:

 I hooked up a linear triple-output bench supply to run the Thunderbolt,
and
 now the 8040C locked up perfectly on the 1 PPS signal.  Since I don't want
 to tie up one of my bench power supplies to run the Thunderbolt, I plan to
 try adding some filters to the outputs of the T-30B switcher.  I'm
thinking
 that some low-ESR tantalum capacitors might do the trick.  Rather than
 re-invent the wheel, I wonder if others found this problem, and what their
 solution was. 

The usual way to filter such low frequency noise components is to
use T or Pi filters. But it also depends on how the noise looks like.
Is it spikes? Is it a sine? Or triangles?

If there are spikes, add some ceramic capacitors as well, depending
on the nature of the spikes something between 10n and 10u. Having
10n, 1u, 10u is mostly a good compromise for high frequency clamping.

If the noise is sine or triangle like, try with the mentioned
T and Pi filters, maybe multiples of those.

 I also wonder if this T-30B power supply requires a minimum
 load on any of its outputs, for it to operate properly.  Hmmm.

Yes, all switching power supplies (and DC/DC converters) have a
minimum load requirement. What it is, depends on the controller used.
Modern controllers change from PWM mode to PFM (aka pulse skip) to
keep the efficiency high. Some (notably chips from Linear) have something
they call burst mode, ie they do a few switching cycles to drive the voltage
up, then sleep for an extended time.
If you can figure out what chip your power supply is using, you can probably
force it to PWM mode, but then you have to ensure that you enhance the
cooling of the switching transistors as they will run much hotter.

Alternatively, you can use a power supply that gives you an intermediate
voltage (somewhere between 10 and 15V) and use high speed DC/DC converters
that work with switching frequencis in the MHz range instead of 100-300kHz
of an AC/DC supply to generate the voltages needed by the thunderbolt.
This should reduce the noise quite a bit.

If you are really time-nutty, you can let the DC/DC converters produce
a voltage about 1V above what you need and use low noise LDOs (ie not
the 78xx or LM317  Co) to produce the voltages for the thunderbolt.
This should give you a 60-80dB damping of the noice produced by the
DC/DC converters.


Attila Kinali
-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

2012-02-27 Thread James Robbins
Just wanted to mention a terrific Thunderbolt Monitor design by  
VK4GHZ Adam Maurer (http://www.vklogger.com/forum).  It monitors the  
Thunderbolt output on 4 screens (4x20 display) so no computer hookup  
is necessary to follow the GPS.  A companion Commander makes use of  
a PICAXE to cause the Thunderbolt to initiate various functions such  
as a survey or change from 3D to over determined, among others.  Adam  
sells the Monitor unit assembled and tested, while the Commander is  
easily home brewed.  He's done a great job.


Jim Robbins
N1JR

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

2012-02-27 Thread Peter Gottlieb

One has to go through their sign-up process just to take a look.



On 2/27/2012 10:20 PM, James Robbins wrote:
Just wanted to mention a terrific Thunderbolt Monitor design by VK4GHZ Adam 
Maurer (http://www.vklogger.com/forum).  It monitors the Thunderbolt output on 
4 screens (4x20 display) so no computer hookup is necessary to follow the 
GPS.  A companion Commander makes use of a PICAXE to cause the Thunderbolt 
to initiate various functions such as a survey or change from 3D to over 
determined, among others.  Adam sells the Monitor unit assembled and tested, 
while the Commander is easily home brewed.  He's done a great job.


Jim Robbins
N1JR

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2113/4836 - Release Date: 02/27/12




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

2012-02-27 Thread Richard W. Solomon
That doesn't seem to be the case on this side of the pond.

I could read anything posted, just cannot post without signing up.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


-Original Message-
From: Peter Gottlieb n...@verizon.net
Sent: Feb 27, 2012 8:26 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

One has to go through their sign-up process just to take a look.



On 2/27/2012 10:20 PM, James Robbins wrote:
 Just wanted to mention a terrific Thunderbolt Monitor design by VK4GHZ Adam 
 Maurer (http://www.vklogger.com/forum).  It monitors the Thunderbolt output 
 on 
 4 screens (4x20 display) so no computer hookup is necessary to follow the 
 GPS.  A companion Commander makes use of a PICAXE to cause the Thunderbolt 
 to initiate various functions such as a survey or change from 3D to over 
 determined, among others.  Adam sells the Monitor unit assembled and tested, 
 while the Commander is easily home brewed.  He's done a great job.

 Jim Robbins
 N1JR

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 -
 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2113/4836 - Release Date: 02/27/12



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

2012-02-27 Thread Chris Albertson
I'm (slowly) working on one based on Arduino.  No plan to use anything
like four screens.  I think the way to go is one but with a rotary
knob so you can scroll and click the knob to make menu selections.
But then for even less cost you can make it web based.  You save the
cost and size of the display and control it with an iPhone or the
like.

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:20 PM, James Robbins jsrobb...@earthlink.net wrote:
 Just wanted to mention a terrific Thunderbolt Monitor design by VK4GHZ Adam
 Maurer (http://www.vklogger.com/forum).  It monitors the Thunderbolt output
 on 4 screens (4x20 display) so no computer hookup is necessary to follow the
 GPS.  A companion Commander makes use of a PICAXE to cause the Thunderbolt
 to initiate various functions such as a survey or change from 3D to over
 determined, among others.  Adam sells the Monitor unit assembled and tested,
 while the Commander is easily home brewed.  He's done a great job.

 Jim Robbins
 N1JR

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

2012-02-27 Thread Sam
I have known about this project for a while, I was excited at first but was put 
off by the price tag,
the fact that it is closed source and that it's not available as a kit.

There is another project on the horizon by James M1DST that is based on the 
Netduino platform which will be open source.
http://m1dst.co.uk/ I have spoke to James via Email and the project is further 
ahead than what is published on his site.


Direct links for the VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Display.
http://www.vklogger.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71t=10282
http://www.vklogger.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71t=10277


Sam.



- Original Message -
From: Peter Gottlieb
[mailto:n...@verizon.net]
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tue, 28 Feb 2012
14:26:09 +1100
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and
Commander


 One has to go through their sign-up process just to take a look.
 
 
 
 On 2/27/2012 10:20 PM, James Robbins wrote:
  Just wanted to mention a terrific Thunderbolt Monitor design by VK4GHZ
 Adam 
  Maurer (http://www.vklogger.com/forum).  It monitors the Thunderbolt
 output on 
  4 screens (4x20 display) so no computer hookup is necessary to follow the 
  GPS.  A companion Commander makes use of a PICAXE to cause the
 Thunderbolt 
  to initiate various functions such as a survey or change from 3D to over 
  determined, among others.  Adam sells the Monitor unit assembled and
 tested, 
  while the Commander is easily home brewed.  He's done a great job.
 
  Jim Robbins
  N1JR
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 
  -
  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2113/4836 - Release Date: 02/27/12
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

2012-02-27 Thread Chris Albertson
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Sam li...@digitalelectric.com.au wrote:
 I have known about this project for a while, I was excited at first but was 
 put off by the price tag,
 the fact that it is closed source and that it's not available as a kit.

 There is another project on the horizon by James M1DST that is based on the 
 Netduino platform which will be open source.


Why does everyone think alike?  This describes what I want to do also.
 Netduino is the Arduino with an Ethernet interface on it.   It makes
a good platform for this because there is no need to make a PCB or
distribute a kit.   The Arduino already has all the required
connectors.


Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

2012-02-27 Thread Sam
Netduino is the Arduino with an Ethernet interface on it.

Not quite, The Netduino is an open-source platform using the .NET Micro 
Framework.
http://www.netduino.com

The Netduino Plus shield has on-board Ethernet. 
http://www.netduino.com/netduinoplus/

Sam

- Original Message -
From: Chris Albertson
[mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
To: Discussion of precise time and
frequency measurement [mailto:time-nuts@febo.com]
Sent: Tue, 28 Feb 2012
15:22:49 +1100
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and
Commander


 On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Sam li...@digitalelectric.com.au wrote:
  I have known about this project for a while, I was excited at first but
 was put off by the price tag,
  the fact that it is closed source and that it's not available as a kit.
 
  There is another project on the horizon by James M1DST that is based on
 the Netduino platform which will be open source.
 
 
 Why does everyone think alike?  This describes what I want to do also.
  Netduino is the Arduino with an Ethernet interface on it.   It makes
 a good platform for this because there is no need to make a PCB or
 distribute a kit.   The Arduino already has all the required
 connectors.
 
 
 Chris Albertson
 Redondo Beach, California
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread ed breya
The PNP bipolar and P-channel MOSFET architectures do provide the 
best low-dropout performance, but as I understand, do not provide the 
best HF line rejection. Looking at the overall circuit - a high gain, 
band-limited amplifier driving a P pass device puts it in a 
common-base (or -gate) mode, with respect to the amplifier's output 
port. It provides excellent DC performance, but high frequency noise 
(beyond the control loop bandwidth) at the emitter (or source) has a 
large voltage gain available. This is of course for positive supplies.


An N device operates as a follower, and needs more overhead voltage 
to activate the gain as a common-collector (or -drain) amplifier, but 
is able to reject the input supply noise much more effectively, given 
the same band-limited control loop amplifier.


So, for best HF noise performance where the input noise may be large, 
it's best to use a follower or shunt regulator topology, despite the 
lower efficiency - unless efficiency is more important.


Ed


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz

Ed wrote:

So, for best HF noise performance where the input noise may be 
large, it's best to use a follower or shunt regulator topology, 
despite the lower efficiency - unless efficiency is more important.


To put it more bluntly, the last time I looked (it has been a while, 
so there may be something new I haven't seen) LDOs were all 
substantially inferior to standard regulators in terms of noise 
feedthrough and HF load regulation.  The rule of thumb has always 
been to avoid LDOs unless low dropout was the paramount concern.  Has 
something changed with current LDO designs to make them competitive 
with standard regulators in terms of noise feedthrough and HF load regulation?


Best regards,

Charles







___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] 2 out of 3 bad 5680As?

2012-02-27 Thread Dave hartzell
Hello,

I have two units that don't produce any output and the lock pin floats
around +2.3 volts continuously.  The +15v load starts at about 1.8A
and drops down to about 0.7A on both units, but I never get a +5V or
0V on the lock or a 10MHz out signal.  (I'm not using an LED on the
lock pin, just a high-impedance DVM.)

I'm relatively confident in my connection setup, since I do have one
unit that works as advertised.  In fact, one of the bad units was a
replacement from nichegeek, received about three weeks after the
original first order of two units (from Amazon.com instead of China).

Sorry if this is covered somewhere, but I couldn't find my symptoms on
the list...  any thoughts are appreciated.

Thanks,

Dave

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 2 out of 3 bad 5680As?

2012-02-27 Thread Chris Stake
Hi,
I gather that some of these units require a +5V supply on pin 4 of the
connector and some do not. Could that be the problem here?
Chris

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Dave hartzell
 Sent: 28 February 2012 05:18
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] 2 out of 3 bad 5680As?
 
 Hello,
 
 I have two units that don't produce any output and the lock pin floats
 around +2.3 volts continuously.  The +15v load starts at about 1.8A
 and drops down to about 0.7A on both units, but I never get a +5V or
 0V on the lock or a 10MHz out signal.  (I'm not using an LED on the
 lock pin, just a high-impedance DVM.)
 
 I'm relatively confident in my connection setup, since I do have one
 unit that works as advertised.  In fact, one of the bad units was a
 replacement from nichegeek, received about three weeks after the
 original first order of two units (from Amazon.com instead of China).
 
 Sorry if this is covered somewhere, but I couldn't find my symptoms on
 the list...  any thoughts are appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Dave
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-
 nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 2 out of 3 bad 5680As?

2012-02-27 Thread WB6BNQ
Hi Dave,

A silly question, although you did not indicate, you are supplying a separate 5
volts to the unit are you not ?

BillWB6BNQ


Dave hartzell wrote:

 Hello,

 I have two units that don't produce any output and the lock pin floats
 around +2.3 volts continuously.  The +15v load starts at about 1.8A
 and drops down to about 0.7A on both units, but I never get a +5V or
 0V on the lock or a 10MHz out signal.  (I'm not using an LED on the
 lock pin, just a high-impedance DVM.)

 I'm relatively confident in my connection setup, since I do have one
 unit that works as advertised.  In fact, one of the bad units was a
 replacement from nichegeek, received about three weeks after the
 original first order of two units (from Amazon.com instead of China).

 Sorry if this is covered somewhere, but I couldn't find my symptoms on
 the list...  any thoughts are appreciated.

 Thanks,

 Dave

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 2 out of 3 bad 5680As?

2012-02-27 Thread Dave hartzell
Bill,

Yes, +5v  but I was doing it incorrectly (bad hookup wire on both
units).  I haven't checked the second bad unit, but it will probably
work now too.

Sometimes I have to hit the send button before I find my errors.

Thanks for the thoughts,

Dave

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:31 PM, WB6BNQ wb6...@cox.net wrote:
 Hi Dave,

 A silly question, although you did not indicate, you are supplying a separate 
 5
 volts to the unit are you not ?

 BillWB6BNQ


 Dave hartzell wrote:

 Hello,

 I have two units that don't produce any output and the lock pin floats
 around +2.3 volts continuously.  The +15v load starts at about 1.8A
 and drops down to about 0.7A on both units, but I never get a +5V or
 0V on the lock or a 10MHz out signal.  (I'm not using an LED on the
 lock pin, just a high-impedance DVM.)

 I'm relatively confident in my connection setup, since I do have one
 unit that works as advertised.  In fact, one of the bad units was a
 replacement from nichegeek, received about three weeks after the
 original first order of two units (from Amazon.com instead of China).

 Sorry if this is covered somewhere, but I couldn't find my symptoms on
 the list...  any thoughts are appreciated.

 Thanks,

 Dave

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Power Supply Noise Affects Thunderbolt 1 PPS

2012-02-27 Thread gary
Well this is the granddaddy with 3V of dropout. Not much rejection at 
high frequency, but the design is old. Modern LDOs are better, 
especially with P-fet pass device.

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm317-n.pdf




On 2/27/2012 9:13 PM, Charles P. Steinmetz wrote:

Ed wrote:


So, for best HF noise performance where the input noise may be large,
it's best to use a follower or shunt regulator topology, despite the
lower efficiency - unless efficiency is more important.


To put it more bluntly, the last time I looked (it has been a while, so
there may be something new I haven't seen) LDOs were all substantially
inferior to standard regulators in terms of noise feedthrough and HF
load regulation. The rule of thumb has always been to avoid LDOs unless
low dropout was the paramount concern. Has something changed with
current LDO designs to make them competitive with standard regulators in
terms of noise feedthrough and HF load regulation?

Best regards,

Charles







___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] VK4GHZ Thunderbolt Monitor and Commander

2012-02-27 Thread Don Latham
Gosh, and I just bought one from Sparkfun for another project :-)
Don

Chris Albertson
 On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Sam li...@digitalelectric.com.au
 wrote:
 I have known about this project for a while, I was excited at first
 but was put off by the price tag,
 the fact that it is closed source and that it's not available as a
 kit.

 There is another project on the horizon by James M1DST that is based
 on the Netduino platform which will be open source.


 Why does everyone think alike?  This describes what I want to do also.
  Netduino is the Arduino with an Ethernet interface on it.   It makes
 a good platform for this because there is no need to make a PCB or
 distribute a kit.   The Arduino already has all the required
 connectors.


 Chris Albertson
 Redondo Beach, California

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.