Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2012-01-01 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The answer is (as always) no free lunch. An op amp simulating a capacitor is always going to be performance limited. Different limitations come in with different circuits, but they all suffer from noise / drift / leakage. Put another way - for a long time constant, you are just as good off

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2012-01-01 Thread Tom Harris
Kasper, I like your style! Small ROM = no inessential features! I shall be studying this code, getting capture working with no capture hardware is a real pain. On 2 January 2012 00:53, Kasper Pedersen time-n...@kasperkp.dk wrote: On 01/01/2012 12:23 PM, Tom Harris wrote: I too have been

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2012-01-01 Thread Bob Camp
: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? Looks to be a reasonable solution. Not spectacular, cost wise . just reasonable. Plug and play with multivoltage PS, active antenna, and T'Bolt. All you will need is Lady Heather to whip things into shape. Stan, W1LE Cape Cod On 12/28/2011 7:50

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2012-01-01 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you do a quick Google search for insulation resistance you get to: http://www.electrocube.com/support/insulation_resistance.asp or a bunch of similar information. The capacitor it's self (no external resistance at all) has a time constant between it's capacitance and internal leakage.

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2012-01-01 Thread WarrenS
Here is another analog control example based on the quick and dirty example below. It is a simple and Very poor GPSDO Rb design as far as noise jitter goes because of the nonlinear and high Phase detector gain, and high 1e-8 noise jitter on the PPS, but still no problem to do with cheap

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2012-01-01 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
My FE-5680A and Thunderbolt have been well behaved for the last 16 hours. The Thunderbolt is using 3.00 FW and had its feedback settings optimized by Lady Heather. AMU mask is 7.0. No adjustments were made to the Rb during this run. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread Azelio Boriani
PI controllers can be implemented analog only. For the PPS they need large capacitors that are the equivalent of averaging (sum and accumulate) in a software implemented controller. On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread EWKehren
In my opinion you have to look at it from the point of application. Hopefully I will be able to share the test results soon. For us DNL is key, INL is specked over the full range and since we use it in a filter application, based on the data that I have, can be ignored. In a Rb application

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread WarrenS
Chris Here is a GPSDO I built that better fits Your definition of Simple. I used this as my freq standard before getting a TBolt. 1) Feed the PPS output of an oncore GPS timing engine which has 1 Hz or better yet 100 Hz output to the clk of a D FlipFlop (74HC74) 2) Feed the FF's D from a

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread Chris Albertson
I think this is the simplest design that can still work, just one flip flop, divider and a capacitor. What level of performance did you get?I think it depends on how big the integrating capacitor is and how stable the VCXO is. I guess if you switched to using the t-bolt the performance was

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread WarrenS
this to measure and/or manually set a Rb Osc to be on frequency if you have an accurate 1PPS signal. ws [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) Chris Albertson albertson.chris at gmail.com Sat Dec 31 20:34:14 UTC 2011 I think this is the simplest design that can still work, just

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread Don Latham
of D FF as a basic ns hi-low Phase detector for low freq signals. Remove the EFC feedback, Reduce the 100 to 1 divider to two or so and you can use this to measure and/or manually set a Rb Osc to be on frequency if you have an accurate 1PPS signal. ws [time-nuts] Thunderbolt

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread Hal Murray
As soon as you say Software the device is no longer simple.Even a microprocessor is a very complex device and so is its development system. The software inside the uP is not simple either if you count the number of possible paths through the code (2 raided to the power of the number of

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread David
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:56:46 -0800, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: This looks like fun to me, but I like writing that sort of code. Note that it doesn't need an OS or even any libraries. Both designs look fun to me but for different reasons. The analog design requires attention to

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-31 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: As soon as you say Software the device is no longer simple.Even a microprocessor is a very complex device and so is its development system. The software inside the uP is not simple either if you count the number

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Azelio Boriani
: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) One of the designs using the 10 kHz output from a Jupiter gps engine and a simple PLL to discipline an ocxo might be good starting point if suitable gps engines are still available. There won't be much to tweak but the performance could be quite

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-30 Thread Azelio Boriani
The analog computer is the standard good-old-PLL: if you have the 10KHz from a Jupiter than your analog filter will be simple to build. If you have only the PPS (or 100PPS from an Oncore) your analog filter will require more attention (and large capacitors) but I think it is realizable. You analog

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread shalimr9
time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) One of the designs using the 10 kHz output from a Jupiter gps engine and a simple PLL to discipline an ocxo might be good starting point if suitable gps engines are still available. There won't be much to tweak

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mark Spencer mspencer12...@yahoo.ca wrote: One of the designs using the 10 kHz output from a Jupiter gps engine and a simple PLL to discipline an ocxo might be good starting point if suitable gps engines are still available.  There won't be much to tweak but

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Mark Spencer
PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) One of the designs using the 10 kHz output from a Jupiter gps engine and a simple PLL to discipline an ocxo might be good starting point if suitable gps

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, it can be done based on a PPS only timing. You must design a PI (maybe PID) regulator: the EFC must stay steady when the phase difference between the two PPSes is zero (integral action). Then you must move the EFC (when there is a difference) proportionally with the difference itself and only

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread David
There is no reason you can not do that. It is tricky because the low comparison frequency limits the loop bandwidth like any sampled data system and the analog requirements for the low frequency design become an issue do to leakage and the impedance levels needed. The long time constants

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Hal Murray
What is the simplest design for a GPSDO that uses only the PPS signal from a modern GPS? Some sort of oscillator with a voltage control. CPU with a timer/counter that can capture the PPS. DAC. Software. Drive the CPU from the osc so you can count cycles between PPS pulses. Use the DAC to

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Mark Spencer
acquired used on an auction site. --- On Fri, 12/30/11, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: From: Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Received: Friday

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Robert LaJeunesse
, see www.dlpdesign.com/images/bit-bang-usb.pdf  From: Mark Spencer mspencer12...@yahoo.ca To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Fri, December 30, 2011 2:13:41 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread bg
Hi Chris, I just finished reading about that one. It requires no longer available GPS reciever. Maybe I should r-phrase the question: Most of us get (re)used stuff... Ebay #300437642776 has some Rockwell era receivers. Many time-nuts find HP5065A rubidiums and 5370 counters available and

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Stanley
What is the simplest design for a GPSDO that uses only the PPS signal from a modern GPS? Some sort of oscillator with a voltage control. CPU with a timer/counter that can capture the PPS. DAC. Software. How about MSC1200 : http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/msc1200y3.pdf Stanley

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
www.dlpdesign.com/images/bit-bang-usb.pdf From: Mark Spencermspencer12...@yahoo.ca To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com Sent: Fri, December 30, 2011 2:13:41 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) On a related

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Don Latham
May I suggest use of small controllers such as the Picaxe series? I find them very useful around the lab for small tasks such as this. Easily programmed, very reliable, and the software application can be as simple or complex as needed, for example the suggested PID controller. No soldering, no

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Richard W. Solomon
I believe those Rockwells have a 10 KHz output. Not a bad price. 73 es HNY, Dick, W1KSZ -Original Message- From: b...@lysator.liu.se Sent: Dec 30, 2011 12:42 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Azelio Boriani
, 2011 12:42 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) Hi Chris, I just finished reading about that one. It requires no longer available GPS reciever. Maybe I should r-phrase the question

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Stanley
The DAC and it's voltage reference looks to be the weak link in the digital control and the simple goal. The CPU I mentioned before on closer look doesn't have a good DAC. The 20 bit TI DAC1220 looks better but not sure you can find it in the same package as the CPU. The cheap Rb standards with

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Jim Lux
On 12/30/11 11:39 AM, Robert LaJeunesse wrote: How about USB to an FT232 that talks SPI to a low-cost DAC or digital pot? Would need a stable reference, though. There's a bunch of eval boards from LTC, etc. which use this strategy. Looks like a serial port to the computer, simple ASCII

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, the DAC+reference is challenging and one way to go may be the coarse+fine approach to avoid large (18bit and beyond) DAC. My last GPSDO has an 18bit DAC but now I'm thinking to try the 8bit digital pot + 16bit DAC op-amp combined. The reference can't be overlooked anyway. On Fri, Dec 30,

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Hal Murray
Yes, the DAC+reference is challenging and one way to go may be the coarse+fine approach to avoid large (18bit and beyond) DAC. My last GPSDO has an 18bit DAC but now I'm thinking to try the 8bit digital pot + 16bit DAC op-amp combined. The reference can't be overlooked anyway. Be careful,

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread EWKehren
Over the last two years along with two list members that may want to pipe in, I have spend a large amount of time on D/A's and we went as far as developing a test board using the LTC 2440 and testing numerous D/A's taking in to consideration performance, solderability, cost, availability

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Azelio Boriani
No free lunch, of course, but I want to avoid dithering DACs. The 18bit DAC (AD5680) is a 16bit+dithering, I think to use the AD5660 + AD5241 (already available) the pot has a tempco of 30ppm/degree and a noise of 14nV/sqr(Hz). Maybe I have to find something better but to make the first try is

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Robert LaJeunesse
...@megapathdsl.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Fri, December 30, 2011 5:35:56 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) Yes, the DAC+reference is challenging and one way to go may be the coarse+fine approach to avoid large (18bit

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread shalimr9
: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:48:24 To: time-nuts@febo.com Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) Over the last two years along with two list members that may want

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
I was thinking ... starting with a 5680a and a GPS with accurate 1pps but no 10 MHz ... Feed both 1pps signals to a 74ls123 to stretch the pulses to something longer. A 74ls74 is strobed by one of the one-shots, its D input being the other one-shot. Connect both one-shots and the 74 to an

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread David
Did you test the LTC1655 INL? The data sheet says plus or minus 20 counts maximum. I suspect Linear Technology designed those low DNL high INL parts for just this sort of application where only monotonic behavior really matters. Their equivalent current output DAC costs about twice as much not

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Don Latham
Don't need to stretch, use the two hardware interrupt pins... Don Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R I was thinking ... starting with a 5680a and a GPS with accurate 1pps but no 10 MHz ... Feed both 1pps signals to a 74ls123 to stretch the pulses to something longer. A 74ls74 is strobed by one of

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-30 Thread Chris Albertson
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: What is the simplest design for a GPSDO that uses only the PPS signal from a modern GPS? Some sort of oscillator with a voltage control. CPU with a timer/counter that can capture the PPS. DAC. Software. As soon as

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-29 Thread Chris Albertson
The era of cheap Thunderbolts appears to be history. What is the simplest GPSDO you can build? There are many designs around but when the T-Bolts came out I think people lost interesting building. I think something very simple could work. If your local oscillator is at all decent it will

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-29 Thread Mark Spencer
One of the designs using the 10 kHz output from a Jupiter gps engine and a simple PLL to discipline an ocxo might be good starting point if suitable gps engines are still available. There won't be much to tweak but the performance could be quite good. My first gpsdo was a manufactured version

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-29 Thread Richard W. Solomon
@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) One of the designs using the 10 kHz output from a Jupiter gps engine and a simple PLL to discipline an ocxo might be good starting point if suitable gps engines are still available. There won't be much to tweak but the performance

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.)

2011-12-29 Thread Mark Spencer
Spencer mspencer12...@yahoo.ca Sent: Dec 29, 2011 9:24 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? (re simple gpsdo.) One of the designs using the 10 kHz output from a Jupiter gps engine and a simple PLL to discipline

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread Peter Gottlieb
I am interested in increasing my lab accuracy from the Rb units by using a Thunderbolt. I see kits advertised on feebay, such as http://www.ebay.com/itm/270515147719 and I was wondering if this was a good choice. I would certainly have to get a compatible antenna anyhow, and the power

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread Stan, W1LE
Looks to be a reasonable solution. Not spectacular, cost wise . just reasonable. Plug and play with multivoltage PS, active antenna, and T'Bolt. All you will need is Lady Heather to whip things into shape. Stan, W1LE Cape Cod On 12/28/2011 7:50 PM, Peter Gottlieb wrote: I am

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread shalimr9
measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? Looks to be a reasonable solution. Not spectacular, cost wise . just reasonable. Plug and play with multivoltage PS, active antenna, and T'Bolt. All you will need is Lady Heather to whip things into shape. Stan, W1LE

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? Looks to be a reasonable solution. Not spectacular, cost wise . just reasonable. Plug and play with multivoltage PS

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread lists
and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? The era of cheap Thunderbolts appears to be history. On 12/28/2011 05:07 PM, shali...@gmail.com wrote: All you will need is Lady Heather to whip things into shape. Don't forget my Thunderbolt Monitor

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread Stan, W1LE
Looks to be a reasonable solution. Not spectacular, cost wise . just reasonable. Plug and play with multivoltage PS, active antenna, and T'Bolt. All you will need is Lady Heather to whip things into shape. Stan, W1LE Cape Cod On 12/28/2011 7:50 PM, Peter Gottlieb wrote: I am

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread Pete Lancashire
       time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt? The era of cheap Thunderbolts appears to be history. On 12/28/2011 05:07 PM, shali...@gmail.com wrote: All you will need is Lady Heather to whip things into shape. Don't forget my Thunderbolt Monitor if you do not want to keep a PC

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread Pete Lancashire
I still think anything under $250 for a full kit with a decent antenna is a great price. -pete On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Stan, W1LE stanw...@verizon.net wrote: Looks to be a reasonable solution. Not spectacular, cost wise . just reasonable. Plug and play with multivoltage PS,

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt?

2011-12-28 Thread Mark Spencer
For that money I'd want to know the make and model of the antenna (: -- On Wed, 28 Dec, 2011 9:39 PM EST Pete Lancashire wrote: I still think anything under $250 for a full kit with a decent antenna is a great price. -pete On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Stan,

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-12-05 Thread Paul_group
On 25/11/2011 22:55, Justin Pinnix wrote: Nuts, A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC for cheap at an auction. Recently, I wrote a program for it that reads the time and health information from a Thunderbolt and displays it in real-time. More info available here:

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-28 Thread Paul_group
On 28/11/2011 04:00, Justin Pinnix wrote: Sounds like a good idea for a modern handheld, but the relics we are talking about don't have WiFi or any means of networking except for serial and IR. I've been wondering what to do with an old HP HX4700 for ages so it looks like it may have a new

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-28 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Justin Pinnix jus...@fuzzythinking.com wrote: Sounds like a good idea for a modern handheld, but the relics we are talking about don't have WiFi or any means of networking except for serial It's 2011, almost 2012. I assumed every human over the age of 10

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-28 Thread Justin Pinnix
Chris, I think you and I are trying to accomplish different goals. I want to be able to glance up and see (exactly) what time it is. It's just a glorified wall clock that's always on and displaying a time. The health information is just to validate the time. I do have an iPad. Yes, the same

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-27 Thread Justin Pinnix
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC Nuts, A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC for cheap at an auction. Recently, I wrote a program for it that reads the time and health information from

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Robert Atkinson
. From: Justin Pinnix jus...@fuzzythinking.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Friday, 25 November 2011, 22:55 Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC Nuts, A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Justin Pinnix
cost. Thank you for making this avialable. Robert G8RPI. From: Justin Pinnix jus...@fuzzythinking.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Friday, 25 November 2011, 22:55 Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
On Nov 25, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Justin Pinnix wrote: A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC for cheap at an auction. Recently, I wrote a program for it that reads the time and health information from a Thunderbolt and displays it in real-time. More info available here:

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Robin Kimberley
...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Rosenberg Sent: 26 November 2011 17:13 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC On Nov 25, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Justin Pinnix wrote: A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC for cheap

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Robert Atkinson
: Saturday, 26 November 2011, 17:12 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC On Nov 25, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Justin Pinnix wrote: A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC for cheap at an auction.  Recently, I wrote a program for it that reads the time and health information

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Don Latham
: Kevin Rosenberg ke...@rosenberg.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2011, 17:12 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC On Nov 25, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Justin Pinnix wrote: A while back, I scored an old

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread WA7NE
...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Justin Pinnix Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 2:56 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC Nuts, A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC for cheap at an auction. Recently, I wrote

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Justin Pinnix
Rosenberg ke...@rosenberg.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2011, 17:12 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC On Nov 25, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Justin Pinnix wrote: A while back, I scored an old Compaq

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Chris Albertson
25, 2011 2:56 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC Nuts, A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC for cheap at an auction. Recently, I wrote a program for it that reads the time and health information

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-26 Thread Don Latham
Hi Justin: Unsure about the Jornada - there were numerous models. If you don't have a serial port, that's going to be a problem. Perhaps you do and it's a matter of cabling? Which model number is yours? I have a 568, and there is a serial cable, also USB for sync. I can try it out when I

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt Monitoring for Pocket PC

2011-11-25 Thread Justin Pinnix
Nuts, A while back, I scored an old Compaq iPaq Pocket PC for cheap at an auction. Recently, I wrote a program for it that reads the time and health information from a Thunderbolt and displays it in real-time. More info available here: http://www.fuzzythinking.com/projects/thunderhead/ I may

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt minor alarm - bit 11

2011-11-16 Thread Justin Pinnix
Anyone know what bit 11 (0x0800) of the Thunderbolt's minor alarm field is? My documentation stops at bit 8 (test mode). Thanks, -JP ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt GPS rollover

2011-10-19 Thread Thomas S. Knutsen
I do assume this is because of the 1024 week cycle? if so would it be possible to tell the GPS what cycle it should be? Would the 10MHz out still be accurate? BR. Thomas. 2011/10/20 Mark Sims hol...@hotmail.com: On July 30,  2017 all our Thunderbolts turn into back-dated pumpkins...

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt error?

2011-10-16 Thread Rix Seacord
Hi gang I'm getting an error message of vco near rail or vco at rail. Is this saying my thunderbolt is dying or can this be fixed? -Rix Seacord ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt error?

2011-10-16 Thread WarrenS
Rix If you are using LadyHeather, Post or send me a screen shot using W S Cr Maybe just that the min or max Dac values are not set to - + 5V, or something else easily fixed. ws [time-nuts] Thunderbolt error? Rix Seacord eseacord at verizon.net Hi gang I'm getting

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt error?

2011-10-16 Thread Rix Seacord
are using LadyHeather, Post or send me a screen shot using W S Cr Maybe just that the min or max Dac values are not set to - + 5V, or something else easily fixed. ws [time-nuts] Thunderbolt error? Rix Seacord eseacord at verizon.net Hi gang I'm getting an error message of vco

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt error?

2011-10-16 Thread WarrenS
Rix Nothing looks wrong in that snap Shot Your osc (which is the main cause of the out of range error) is working fine and under control and has near zero volts on it's EFC. Take a look at the screen when you key , that has the screen with the Max and min DAC setting info on it. Should be

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt error?

2011-10-16 Thread Rix Seacord
Warren When I had the temp set at a higher gain and the offset to center the trace, it would basically flat line then suddenly be all over the place. Are the chips available anyplace? I do have a bit of experience of soldering. Thanks again. Ewing (Rix) Seacord K2AVP Putnam County RACES Radio

[time-nuts] Original time-nuts Thunderbolt

2011-08-12 Thread Doug Hutton
Hey, folks - I have one of the first lot of time-nuts Thunderbolts for sale. It's a revision E and still works perfectly. $140. including shipping to the US. Contact me off list at w5juv at arrl dot net. Doug ___ time-nuts mailing list --

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions

2011-08-11 Thread George Dubovsky
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions Hi The real question is what's the date code on the unit? If the rev E part is old enough to have the good thermometer chip in it - that's the one to get

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions

2011-08-11 Thread Bob Camp
-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of George Dubovsky Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:23 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions All, The Label you are referring to is applied

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions

2011-08-10 Thread Bob Camp
, August 09, 2011 10:19 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions Hi, I'm brand new to the time-nut odessy thing so please bear with me. ;-) I'm in the market to buy a used Thunderbolt, I have found a vendor that's selling used Thunderbolt receivers and states

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions

2011-08-10 Thread Richard W. Solomon
' time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions Hi The real question is what's the date code on the unit? If the rev E part is old enough to have the good thermometer chip in it - that's the one to get. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions

2011-08-10 Thread Ziggy
(or even cares) where to find it. 73, Dick, W1KSZ -Original Message- From: Bob Camp li...@rtty.us Sent: Aug 10, 2011 9:59 AM To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions Hi The real

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions

2011-08-09 Thread David Garnier
Hi, I'm brand new to the time-nut odessy thing so please bear with me. ;-) I'm in the market to buy a used Thunderbolt, I have found a vendor that's selling used Thunderbolt receivers and states one can have the choice of PCB revisions A, B or E. Does anyone have any specific info or

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt is here!

2011-07-06 Thread Keith E. Brandt, WD9GET
I finally took the plunge and ordered a thunderbolt on eBay and it showed up on my doorstep today. Of course, I haven't saved those old emails about where to get things such as GPS antennas and power supplies. If someone could please point me to sources, I'd appreciate it. Also,

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt is here!

2011-07-06 Thread Bob Camp
Hi You obviously will need +12, -12 and +5 supplies at the proper current levels. Any GPS antenna that will run on 5 volts will work for checkout. There are good pictures on the web showing what power goes to which pins. Current levels are 10 ma on -12, ~ 300 ma on +5 and a bit under 1A at

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-16 Thread Thomas S. Knutsen
with a Neg supply less than -3 volts, It may of been able to go even lower, I just wanted to insure it was reliable with -5 volts for my application. ** [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats. Arthur Dent golgarfrincham at yahoo.com It may or may not be used for tuning voltage

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread Arthur Dent
I bougth an Thunderbolt off E-bay some time ago, to use as reference for my spectrum analyzer and signal generators. I had it connected up with a couple of power supplies and it worked as it should. Today I put together an voltage inverter to get the -12V to the GPS in order to use it with an

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread EWKehren
the -12 VDC is also used by the OCXO as tuning voltage! Bert Kehren In a message dated 6/12/2011 6:05:01 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, golgarfrinc...@yahoo.com writes: I bougth an Thunderbolt off E-bay some time ago, to use as reference for my spectrum analyzer and signal generators. I

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread Arthur Dent
Arthur Dent-The -12 VDC is used for the RS-232 so if that was giving you the problem you wouldn't see anything on your com port (note it will work at -7 VDC or so)... the -12 VDC is also used by the OCXO as tuning voltage! Bert Kehren It may or may not be used for tuning voltage but

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread Mark Sims
The -12V is almost certainly used for deriving the tuning voltage.  The unit can generate a tuning voltage of -5V to +5V.  To do this it needs a negative supply...  and there does not seem to be an on board bias generator for generating the negative DAC supply.  Becuase of this,  for best

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread ew
Thank you Mark. It is not almost certain it is a fact. Bert -Original Message- From: Mark Sims hol...@hotmail.com To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sun, Jun 12, 2011 10:04 am Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats. The -12V is almost certainly used for deriving

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread Arthur Dent
It may or may not be used for tuning voltage but what I said is 100% correct. The Andrew/Grayson units these T-Bolts were used in provided -7 VDC for this negative supply and the same T-Bolts work properly on -12 VDC. If this voltage is missing, the com port will not work. +++ Please

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread WarrenS
IF you do not need the DAC output to go all the way to neg -5Volts. ws PS I did not test for the effects with a Neg supply less than -3 volts, It may of been able to go even lower, I just wanted to insure it was reliable with -5 volts for my application. ** [time-nuts

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread Ed Palmer
. ** [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats. Arthur Dent golgarfrincham at yahoo.com It may or may not be used for tuning voltage but what I said is 100% correct. The Andrew/Grayson units these T-Bolts were used in provided -7 VDC for this negative supply and the same T-Bolts work properly on -12

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-12 Thread Arthur Dent
WarrenS-.As long as the Dac out (OSC EFC input) is than a couple of volts above the neg supply (or the EFC is positive) all worked fine at any Neg supply down to -3 volts. This is because most RS232 receivers don't need their input to swing negative. Your -7 volts statement agrees well

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-11 Thread Thomas S. Knutsen
I bougth an Thunderbolt off E-bay some time ago, to use as reference for my spectrum analyzer and signal generators. I had it connected up with a couple of power supplies and it worked as it should. Today I put together an voltage inverter to get the -12V to the GPS in order to use it with an

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt no usable sats.

2011-06-11 Thread WB6BNQ
Hello Thomas, The first question is did you measure the minus 12 output of your inverter to make sure it was not being loaded down too far when powering the Thunderbolt ? If it was working on the original minus 12 volt supply properly, then it would seem that there is a problem with your

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >