Hi Adam,
OK, good to hear about the progress. Let us know about what you learn
and if you need additional input. I'm curious what is the cause of this
error.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 06/03/2018 04:09 AM, Adam MacDonald wrote:
> Thanks Gents,
> I ran the additional tests recommended by Poul and Magnus a
Thanks Gents,
I ran the additional tests recommended by Poul and Magnus and I concur that the
interpolator board is not the likely culprit. I reversed the input cables as
well as the pods in separate experiments to rule out those contributors with no
different results. I thought it may be a tr
On 5/31/2018 10:00 AM,
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
PS: I do not recall it being mentioned, but the 1 MOhm input pods are
horribly unstable compared to the 50 Ohm input pods, which are
basically just a stripline and a BNC connector.
One thing to note about all the 5372A pods: They should all
In message , Magnus D
anielson writes:
>Consider that you need to swap the cables to verify that it is static
>with the setup and does not follow the cables.
Run long series of measurements with the HP5372A OCXO free-running
and with it slaved to the DUT clock.
Any imperfection in the
Hi Adam,
On 05/30/2018 12:26 AM, Adam MacDonald wrote:
> Time Nuts,
> I have a nice new-to-me 5372A that I'd like to use as part of a DMTD
> stability analysis system. After getting a few odd glitches from a very
> stable source spaced 2 ns above or below the main time interval reading,
OK, so
Time Nuts,
I have a nice new-to-me 5372A that I'd like to use as part of a DMTD stability
analysis system. After getting a few odd glitches from a very stable source
spaced 2 ns above or below the main time interval reading, I decided to run the
performance verification checkout from the servic
HI
> On May 11, 2018, at 3:12 PM, Magnus Danielson
> wrote:
>
> Hi Don,
>
> On 05/10/2018 02:59 PM, Don Murray via time-nuts wrote:
>> Hi Magnus...
>>
>>
>> Appreciate any help!
>>
>> I participate in the ARRL Frequency Measuring Test,
>> and I would like to automate the measuring proces
Hi Don,
On 05/10/2018 02:59 PM, Don Murray via time-nuts wrote:
> Hi Magnus...
>
>
> Appreciate any help!
>
> I participate in the ARRL Frequency Measuring Test,
> and I would like to automate the measuring process.
>
> I have two frequencies, A and B...
>
> A is a GPS locked HP 3336B se
If want to exploit what the 5372A can do in FMT-context, you should
feed it the amplified and band-pass filtered RF (rather than some
down-converted and otherwise mangled version of the signal) and
capture timing of the actual zero-crossings and post-process that.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp
When I was working at the Arecibo Observatory and we were running the
ionospheric heater
at 5.1 MHz (think Mini-HAARP), I'd sometimes go home (about 3 miles away)
and listen to the
signal there.There was frequently substantial random fading of the
signal, suggesting that I
was hearing the vecto
Hi
Well, having actually run FMT virtually “in the back yard” of the transmitting
station …. it’s surprising
what 70 miles will do. In this case, back yard really does mean on the
premises. There is a lot that
gets into even fairly sort distance propagation.
Bob
> On May 11, 2018, at 1:52 P
By the way, if you would like some data captured during the last run, let me
know. I have an excel sheet of the peak data from spectrum lab centered on
1850hz as I use the 3586B receiver.
Regards,
Jerry
Jerry Hancock
je...@hanler.com
(415) 215-3779
> On May 11, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Jerry Hanc
If you were in Connie’s back yard or had a very stable ground wave, then yes,
you could automate the testing.
There are a number of challenges with this method as looking at the data with a
simple graph will tell. You might have large fluctuations on the high
frequency side only, for instance,
Hi Magnus...
Appreciate any help!
I participate in the ARRL Frequency Measuring Test,
and I would like to automate the measuring process.
I have two frequencies, A and B...
A is a GPS locked HP 3336B set to 455,000.000 Hz
I use the 3336B instead of the 455,000Hz BFO
signal from my GPS l
Hi,
What issues do you have?
Cheers,
Magnus
On 05/08/2018 02:32 AM, Don Murray via time-nuts wrote:
> Hello Time Nuts...
>
>
>
> Who is the resident expert on the HP5372A?
>
> I have some operational questions. ;-)
>
> email off list please. w4wj at aol.com
>
> TNX all...
>
> 73
>
Hello Time Nuts...
Who is the resident expert on the HP5372A?
I have some operational questions. ;-)
email off list please. w4wj at aol.com
TNX all...
73
Don
W4WJ
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to htt
In message , Bob Bownes writes:
>While I had the 5372a apart today to replace the battery, I noticed
>that there is an SMA for channel C on the events board and diagram
>showing a cable from there to the front panel.
>
>This suggests to me that the upgrade is a cable and a key, jumper, or
Hi Bob,
There is also the A20 board for the C-channel consisting on a series of
attenuator, amplifiers/limiters and a divide by 4 before reaching that
SMA connector. You then flip the option switching on the motherboard.
I got the C-channel on mine, but you should be looking into
05372-90016
While I had the 5372a apart today to replace the battery, I noticed that there
is an SMA for channel C on the events board and diagram showing a cable from
there to the front panel.
This suggests to me that the upgrade is a cable and a key, jumper, or memory
setting.
Anyone ever done the up
Adrian,
Thanks very much! I had no idea those scans were available for the 5371A. I'll
download them at once.
Regards,
Morris
---
From: Adrian
Morris,
you might want to download the 5371A service manuals which contain
schematics.
The 5372A being an 'upgraded' version of t
Morris,
you might want to download the 5371A service manuals which contain
schematics.
The 5372A being an 'upgraded' version of the 5371A, most of its parts
are identical.
Look for 05371-90018 (Vol.1) and 05371-90034 (Vol.2).
They should be available at www.keysight.com
The scan quality is surpris
Hi all,
I have been on a steep learning curve on my new 5372A. It's a lovely
instrument but does seem to have a higher degree of trigger jitter than I
would expect. Going on previous experience with other unrelated instruments
I began by checking the power supplies. (in fact it's hard to go much d
The main feature in the '72 compared to '71 is the hardware accelerated
histogram function. This allows you to do millions of histogram samples
a second rather than being limited to the processor to do the calculations.
The '72 have some more analysis modes. HP had this to offer:
http://www.tes
Thanks Gary,
Thanks very much for your very helpful reply. I found those 2 operators manuals
and downloaded them. The Keysight website is slightly confusing as those
manuals were not in the same place as the others I found. I now have some great
reading to catch up on!!
Morris
From: Gary Cha
Has anyone published a summary of the differences between the '71 & '72?
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 15:11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>
> In message <569fde69.2020...@rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>
>> Good, then I have not remembered completely wrong.
>
> The 5371 and 5
In message <569fde69.2020...@rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>Good, then I have not remembered completely wrong.
The 5371 and 5373 manuals are not without relevance either, and
don't overlook the app-notes and the HPJ (1989-02) articles either.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp
Hi Morris,
On 01/20/2016 09:59 AM, Morris Odell wrote:
Thanks very much for your reply Magnus,
I strongly advice you to download the manuals. It is an instrument that
is puzzling at times, so the manuals are needed. The upside is that they
are really interesting. The operators and programming
Morris and Gary,
On 01/20/2016 03:36 PM, Gary Chatters wrote:
On 01/20/2016 03:59 AM, Morris Odell wrote:
Thanks very much for your reply Magnus,
[...]
I have downloaded what's there, unfortunately there's no operator's
manual but I did the "Getting Started Guide" with the instrument. The
p
On 01/20/2016 03:59 AM, Morris Odell wrote:
Thanks very much for your reply Magnus,
[...]
I have downloaded what's there, unfortunately there's no operator's manual but I did the
"Getting Started Guide" with the instrument. The prog manual might stimulate me
to get GPIB up and running.
T
Thanks very much for your reply Magnus,
> I strongly advice you to download the manuals. It is an instrument that
> is puzzling at times, so the manuals are needed. The upside is that they
> are really interesting. The operators and programming manuals get you
> understand what it really does.
Hi Morris,
On 01/20/2016 03:48 AM, Morris Odell wrote:
Hi all,
I recently was fortunate enough to obtain one of these amazing
instruments but regrettable no copy of the main operating manual. I find
myself a bit puzzled by some of it's behaviour.
I strongly advice you to download the manuals.
Hi all,
I recently was fortunate enough to obtain one of these amazing instruments
but regrettable no copy of the main operating manual. I find myself a bit
puzzled by some of it's behaviour.
The unit is clean and passes all the self-tests. When I first got it it
seemed to work very nicely l
Since its a relevant piece of kit I've included the mail from ARNSW here.
Two units are available if anybody is interested.
Cheers.
HP 5372A and Wave Technologies DTS2070 digital time system.
Amateur Radio NSW as for sale two HP 5372A time and interval analysers.
Both are working with good di
Hi
Even back when they were new that IC was a "beyond belief" priced item. The
same goes for the input on a 5335. You can indeed rig up something to replace
either one, but I know of no direct replacements.
Bob
On Apr 15, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Jerry Mulchin wrote:
> Sorry, didn't mean to imply th
Sorry, didn't mean to imply that the 5370B was not worth owning. It is a very
nice unit as well.
I have one of these as well, but unfortunately I lost one input channel, bad
input custom IC. If
I could only find a replacement for the bad IC I would use it as well. Right
now it's just a nice
high
On 04/15/2012 11:30 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
I think I might stand up and defend the poor old 5370. It's a beast and not
anywhere as sexy as a 5371 or (better yet) the 5372. It does indeed have better
single shot resolution though.
Indeed. While the later has spiffy 68k processors with floatin
Hi
I think I might stand up and defend the poor old 5370. It's a beast and not
anywhere as sexy as a 5371 or (better yet) the 5372. It does indeed have better
single shot resolution though.
Bob
On Apr 15, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Jerry Mulchin wrote:
> Dickson,
>
> With a gate time of 10 seconds, i
On 04/15/2012 09:55 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
HI
Simple answer:
It's a 200 ps (single shot) box. That makes it similar to a 53132, but not in
the same league as a SR--620. Being as old as it is, some of the fancy math in
a CNT-90 is not included with a 5372. Still a very useful box though.
Normall
Dickson,
With a gate time of 10 seconds, in statistics mode you can see 13 digits at
10MHz easily.
While I agree it is not an SR620, it a very worth while unit to own. Much nicer
than the 5370B units
to operate, and if you get the "C" model, you can measure all the way to a
little over 2GHz.
J
HI
Simple answer:
It's a 200 ps (single shot) box. That makes it similar to a 53132, but not in
the same league as a SR--620. Being as old as it is, some of the fancy math in
a CNT-90 is not included with a 5372. Still a very useful box though.
Normally you see them with a HP 10811. I don't t
Information is on the www.agilent.com website
73s John GW3XPK
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi all,
Does somebody know the speed and stability of HP 5372A Time Interval
analyzer? in terms of the number of digit per second.
Also, what's the standard built-in frequency reference?
Lastly, what's the max number of digit when performs as a frequency counter?
Thanks and Regards,
Dickso
Hi,
I am selling my HP 5372a due to lack of use. It passes all self checks. Asking
650 plus shipping from 18840.
Have a bunch of things I'll be listing over the next day or so. Wife decrees
stuff must go.
Norm n3ykf
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-
Great I don't have one but I know the value of the eproms on this older gear
and have been sending them to Diddiers site for others.
Regards
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:03 PM, wje wrote:
> I've already purchased the eprom board. I'll try to upload them when I get
> the board.
> I got it as a spare
>Do you have any Option 030 (2 GHz) parts?
>Joe
No the unit I stripped had NO options installed, not counting the 2 54002A pods.
Eric
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
A0KCI
From: Eric Haskell
To: Time Nuts
Sent: Mon, March 21, 2011 2:08:44 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] hp 5372A Parts available
A1-A6 board have been sold to a buyer in Brazil.
The only logic bard I have left is the 05372-6008 (A8 I think).
I still have cosmetic parts like th
I've already purchased the eprom board. I'll try to upload them when I
get the board.
I got it as a spare, so I can compare the firmware versions. My current
board is an early version.
Bill Ezell
--
They said 'Windows or better'
so I used Linux.
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Bob Camp wro
Do you have any Option 030 (2 GHz) parts?
Joe
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Eric Haskell
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 2:09 PM
To: Time Nuts
Subject: [time-nuts] hp 5372A Parts available
A1-A6 board have been sold to
There is one on ebay now that is a perfect match for you leftover parts.
Greg
On 3/21/2011 1:08 PM, Eric Haskell wrote:
A1-A6 board have been sold to a buyer in Brazil.
The only logic bard I have left is the 05372-6008 (A8 I think).
I still have cosmetic parts like the the front panel top bot
A1-A6 board have been sold to a buyer in Brazil.
The only logic bard I have left is the 05372-6008 (A8 I think).
I still have cosmetic parts like the the front panel top bottom and sides. I
have all the sheet metal internal stuff and all the power supply boards and the
power transformer. I al
that.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 9:07 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] hp 5372A Parts available
I would be interested in any
; may be the culprit
>
> I would like to hear what boards you have to offer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
> -Original Message-
> From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
> Behalf Of J. L. Trantham
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 8:34 AM
sage-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. L. Trantham
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 8:34 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] hp 5372A Parts available
Eric,
I have a 5372A that has a p
oblem stays with the channel. I think I need to repair one of the boards.
Where are you located?
Joe
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Eric Haskell
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 1:42 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time
I just scrap out a 5372a. The unit was working but reporting a histogram
error. I am keeping a few parts, the rest is available. Let me know if you
need anything.
Eric Haskell
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
:04 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5372A vs. 5370A
In message <539fb2cd-a764-4825-8932-970d4253b...@rtty.us>, Bob Camp writes:
The 5371 / 5372 are never going to be as popular as the 5370 in
terms of people needing support. They just
rom: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
> Behalf Of Pete Lancashire
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:24 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5372A vs. 5370A: Thanks
>
> I second that 1000%
>
&g
looking for another).
Bob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Pete Lancashire
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:24 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5372A vs. 5370A: Thanks
I second that 1000%
Now to figure out whats wrong in the two dead 5370Bs. Glad it is them
and not the 72A !
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Bert, VE2ZAZ wrote:
> To All who have contributed,
>
> Your answers have been very informative, and I appreciate the time the people
> have taken to answer
To All who have contributed,
Your answers have been very informative, and I appreciate the time the people
have taken to answer my initial request on the differences between the HP 5372A
and 5370A T.I. Counters/Analyzers.
The bottom line I get out of this thread is that both are useful to own,
ebruary 10, 2011 12:45 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5372A vs. 5370A
I don't understand why you need something like the 537x counters for
long-term measurement.
The 200 ps resolution of the 5372A gives you a noise floor of about
5e-14
Ed,
On 10/02/11 00:00, Ed Palmer wrote:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
The Frequency vs. Time view is lovely.
The 5372A does calculate ADEV but does not provide ADEV plots.
Since they don't specify, I'm assuming that it uses the original,
non-overlapping calculation. True?
Well... it does care si
My 5372A is firmware version 3127 [12 July 1991] e/w option 040. Serial
number prefix is 3301.
Ed
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <539fb2cd-a764-4825-8932-970d4253b...@rtty.us>, Bob Camp writes:
The 5371 / 5372 are never going to be as popular as the 5370 in
terms of people needing
I don't understand why you need something like the 537x counters for
long-term measurement.
The 200 ps resolution of the 5372A gives you a noise floor of about
5e-14 @ 4000 seconds. Something like the Pictic II gives you better
resolution at a fraction of the size, heat, noise, and power. Ev
In message <539fb2cd-a764-4825-8932-970d4253b...@rtty.us>, Bob Camp writes:
>The 5371 / 5372 are never going to be as popular as the 5370 in
>terms of people needing support. They just aren't that common.
>
>Getting binary dumps into one of the software packages would be
>very nice. The rest of t
Hi
The 5371 / 5372 are never going to be as popular as the 5370 in terms of
people needing support. They just aren't that common.
Getting binary dumps into one of the software packages would be very nice. The
rest of the stuff is much further down my list. Without a binary dump, you
can't do
> Here is a simple question: Why should I try to get an HP 5372A
> (or 5371A)? What
> are the benefits over the 5370A? Worth spending?
The 5370A/B is nice because its one-shot resolution is better than any other
HP/Agilent counter, prior to the release of the 532xxA models a few months
ago. Also,
Magnus Danielson wrote:
On 09/02/11 22:14, Ed Palmer wrote:
I routinely use the 5372A to make multiple 1 sec. measurements of
frequency or time interval and then dump the results via GPIB for
analysis. Standard stuff for either the 5370 or 5372 except as mentioned
elsewhere, these measurements a
Bob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Ed Palmer
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 4:14 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5372A vs. 5370A
If you've got one, it c
On 09/02/11 22:36, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
We really do need a simple app to "extend" the 5371 and 5372 for longer time
ranges. If there's one out there, I've certainly missed it as I've looked
around.
A very simple way is to trigger measurements regularly (say 10 Hz) and
then read-out the measure
On 09/02/11 22:14, Ed Palmer wrote:
I routinely use the 5372A to make multiple 1 sec. measurements of
frequency or time interval and then dump the results via GPIB for
analysis. Standard stuff for either the 5370 or 5372 except as mentioned
elsewhere, these measurements are made with no dead time
saidj...@aol.com wrote:
Hi Ed,
excellent email. You raise the SNR of this forum!
Thanks Said. It's rare that I have a chance to contribute. Many of
these discussions are way over my head, but I'm learning.
I have tried to measure the CW-12 output myself with phase noise and Allan
Devi
Behalf Of Ed Palmer
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 4:14 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5372A vs. 5370A
If you've got one, it can be hard to justify buying the other unless you
have some very specific requirements. There's a lot
Hi Ed,
excellent email. You raise the SNR of this forum!
I have tried to measure the CW-12 output myself with phase noise and Allan
Deviation equipment, and the constant cycle jumps prevent these from giving
sensible results. Both PN and ADEV plots look awful, many orders of
magnitude noi
If you've got one, it can be hard to justify buying the other unless you
have some very specific requirements. There's a lot of overlap between
them. I have a 5372A and have wondered if it's worth getting a 5370(A
or B). So far, the answer for me is no.
Here are a few things that I've used
Hi Bert,
On 09/02/11 19:56, Bert, VE2ZAZ wrote:
Hi everyone.
I own an HP 5370A. I do GPIB and Labview, KE5FX Utilities, DF6JB's Plotter,
spreadsheets etc. Always looking to improve my setup...
Here is a simple question: Why should I try to get an HP 5372A (or 5371A)? What
are the benefits over
In message <699621.92879...@web112010.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, "Bert, VE2ZAZ" write
s:
>Here is a simple question: Why should I try to get an HP 5372A (or 5371A)?
>What are the benefits over the 5370A? Worth spending?
Faster measurements (but not quite as precise) and zero dead-time
measurements.
Se
Hi everyone.
I own an HP 5370A. I do GPIB and Labview, KE5FX Utilities, DF6JB's Plotter,
spreadsheets etc. Always looking to improve my setup...
Here is a simple question: Why should I try to get an HP 5372A (or 5371A)? What
are the benefits over the 5370A? Worth spending?
Thanks in advance,
Yes, the fan is variable speed and it's 12V DC. It's described in the
motherboard section of the service manual on page 11-4 (pdf page 503).
That's why I thought it was so odd that the fan is blowing cool outside
air over the thermal sensor on the motherboard. I guess they could have
calibra
Are you sure that it has a variable speed fan? My 5372A has a pretty quiet
fan and I have never tried to change it. I am assuming that it uses the same
117V fan as the 5371A. That thermal switch may be a power supply shutdown.
I have a couple of 5371A's that are a different matter. Utterl
Now that you mention it, I don't think I confirmed that the voltage to
the fan was higher. I just assumed that it was. I'll have to redo that
test.
Ed
Pete Rawson wrote:
Ed,
From your description of the fan noise, I have one concern.
If the fan speed seems to increase without a good cleani
Ed,
>From your description of the fan noise, I have one concern.
If the fan speed seems to increase without a good cleaning
or change in the supply voltage, then it's likely that the airflow
has been decreased, an obvious speed up is not good news.
Pete Rawson
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Ed Pa
Ed Palmer wrote:
Good point about the filter, but it doesn't appear that the 5371a or
5372a ever had a filter. Unless it was just done out of habit because
other HP units did have a filter.
If you want to toss a filter on it because your environment isn't
exactly clean, it is trivial. Maybe
Mike S wrote:
At 12:44 AM 3/10/2010, Ed Palmer wrote...
It would seem to make more sense to have the fan blowing hot air out
the back and drawing the hot inside air over the temperature sensor.
The reason to have a fan blow in is so you can put a filter on it. It
also creates more turbulence
Good point about the filter, but it doesn't appear that the 5371a or
5372a ever had a filter. Unless it was just done out of habit because
other HP units did have a filter.
Ed
Mike S wrote:
At 12:44 AM 3/10/2010, Ed Palmer wrote...
It would seem to make more sense to have the fan blowing ho
At 12:44 AM 3/10/2010, Ed Palmer wrote...
It would seem to make more sense to have the fan blowing hot air out
the back and drawing the hot inside air over the temperature sensor.
The reason to have a fan blow in is so you can put a filter on it. It
also creates more turbulence inside the box
I have a question for owners of the HP 5372A (and probably 5371A) Time
Interval Analyzer.
Is the fan on the back blowing out or sucking in?
I was looking at mine to see about replacing the fan with a quieter one
and I was surprised to see that mine is sucking in. This doesn't make
sense to m
Francesco Ledda wrote:
It is easy to do.
Indeed. I had this problem with my 5372A when I got it. Replacing the
battery, doing the calibration procedure and it has been happy since.
So, don't be afraid. :)
Cheers,
Magnus
___
time-nuts mailing list
It is easy to do.
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on
Behalf Of Norman J McSweyn
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:53 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5372a error 160
Francesco
procedure is simple.
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on
Behalf Of Norman J McSweyn
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:16 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] HP 5372a error 160
Hi all!!
Bid
and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] HP 5372a error 160
Hi all!!
Bid on and got an HP 5372a. Supposed to be tested, working. Powers up to
error 160 out of sensitivity calibration. Did download the svc man from
Agilent. Spent a few minutes looking through the manual. Not sure what
to make
Hi all!!
Bid on and got an HP 5372a. Supposed to be tested, working. Powers up to
error 160 out of sensitivity calibration. Did download the svc man from
Agilent. Spent a few minutes looking through the manual. Not sure what
to make of it.
It's not obvious whether a complete cal needs to be d
From: Doug Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [time-nuts] HP 5372A Frequency Measurement Techniques
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:30:43 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi All,
Doug,
> I have recently purchased the above counter and am working on
&
Hi All,
I have recently purchased the above counter and am working on
understanding it for frequency and interval measurement. The manual
seems a bit obscure about frequency measurement techniques. I'd like
to find someone with more experience with it to ask a few questions.
94 matches
Mail list logo