Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's jk_translate who decides if a request is to be handled by
jk ( by mapping it to a uriEnv ).
You can add a test for r-handler==DIR_MAGIC_TYPE, but don't assume
any uriEnv is set.
Actually, r-handler is always NULL in jk_translate(). At least in mod_jk 1.2.0
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
In Servlet 2.4 (Community Draft 2), it looks like the language in Section
9.10 that describes this hasn't changed. The basic rule is that you
combine the partial URLs specified in the welcome file list to the
incoming request for a directory
Isaac Arias wrote:
Hi,
I know that Tomcat is moving towards using the commons
db pool but there may be some people still using the
Poolman package to do connection pooling.
I created a PoolmanDataSourceFactory that can be
plugged into Tomcat 4.0.x and Tomcat 4.1.x to provide
Poolman
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11075.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11075.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11076.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-07-23/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.html
Buildfile: build.xml
deploy-prepare:
deploy-static:
deploy:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11076.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5899.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
And I answer (to myself :-)
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 14:47, Bojan Smojver wrote:
So, the unsolved questions for me are:
1. What is it then that jk_handler() does that makes it actually serve the
request when DIR_MAGIC_TYPE is included in the test? It must be that its mapping
is 'better' than
can any provide a link to a working draft of the spec if it is
availabe? I'd like to compare the Expression language portion against
the JSTL spec.
peter lin
Mark Roth wrote:
For those of you tracking the JSP 2.0 specification, we are pleased to
announce the availability of an Early
finally found the page for the spec.
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr152/index.html
in case anyone else doesn't want to spend 10 minutes looking for the
spec.
peter
peter lin wrote:
can any provide a link to a working draft of the spec if it is
availabe? I'd like to
remm2002/07/23 05:12:15
Modified:webapps/admin admin.xml
Log:
- Add an example of host limiting in the admin webapp.
- Patch submitted by Ian Darwin ian at darwinsys.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +8 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/admin.xml
remm2002/07/23 05:13:05
Modified:webapps/admin admin.xml
Log:
- Add an example of host limiting in the admin webapp.
- Patch submitted by Ian Darwin ian at darwinsys.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +8 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/admin.xml
remm2002/07/23 05:49:11
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
- Set manager to null before recycling.
- Patch submitted by Arvind Srinivasan arvind.srinivasan at sun.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.31
remm2002/07/23 05:49:55
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
- Set manager to null before recycling.
- Patch submitted by Arvind Srinivasan arvind.srinivasan at sun.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11076.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11076.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Quoting Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And I answer (to myself :-)
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 14:47, Bojan Smojver wrote:
So, the unsolved questions for me are:
1. What is it then that jk_handler() does that makes it actually serve the
request when DIR_MAGIC_TYPE is included in the
remm2002/07/23 07:19:19
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
- Status update for 4.1.8.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +52 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11086.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rubys 2002/07/23 07:35:54
Modified:.Tag: tomcat_4_branch gump.xml
Log:
Specify the tag on the tomcat_4_branch
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.1 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/gump.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10671.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11086.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/07/23 08:27:24
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Constants.java
Log:
- Make the agent name conform to the usual standards.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +1 -1
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the index.jsp that worries me - combined with precompile jsps.
That could be an extremely common case - and will fail with the
current implementation.
As a workaround, why don't you just include the JSP source files in the
war anyway?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
It's the index.jsp that worries me - combined with precompile jsps.
That could be an extremely common case - and will fail with the
current implementation.
As a workaround, why don't you just include the JSP source files in the
war
The XML parsers in TC4.1.x are in common/endorsed. I need these to be only
available to the server and therefore in server/endorsed. Is this supposed
to work? Also if using JDK1.4, does TC use the JDK's parser or the parser on
the classpath as preference?
Dave
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Index files ( was RE: cvs commit:
Hi, Tomcat 4 commiters,
Why didn't you take this patch?
Please tell me what I should do.
Original Message:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH]Japanese localization for Tomcat-Admin
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 01:42:30 +0900
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I post Japanese
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, David Oxley wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 17:53:14 +0100
From: David Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XML parsers and TC4.1.x
The XML parsers in TC4.1.x are in
Hi, Amy and Craig,
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Amy Roh wrote:
If I remember correctly, I believe someone sent a patch for Japanese
support in admin webapp a while ago. I accidentally deleted the email
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure it was in July, and had the word
We are using Apache 1.3.26 and Tomcat 3.2.2. We've seen some
clients to be hanging Apache on SSL read. The cause of this
hang seems to be network/TCP/IP issue. The read will eventually
times out. When it times out, here's where the problem starts.
Tomcat seems to be grabbing some buffer that
I'll apply this patch. Thanks, Moriguchi and Okamoto. :-)
Amy
Hi, Tomcat 4 commiters,
Why didn't you take this patch?
Please tell me what I should do.
Original Message:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH]Japanese localization for Tomcat-Admin
Date: Thu, 18 Jul
Hi everyone,
As Costin mentioned on the commons-dev list, is that a real test for
maven would be mavenizing tomcat (tomcat-connectors would be cool too
btw..).
Since I am volunteering and don't have commit access (and now for a whle
not fulltime tomcatting anymroe) , I want to ask for some
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 14:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there is a simpler solution for this class of problems, and
that would also work with log4j and doesn't require _any_ API change.
( only changes to the adapter implementations )
Any 'wrapper' will use:
Hello and thanks for reading!
Trying to build mod_jk2 for Tomcat4 and Apache2... with huge problems :(
Having gotten this far, I have this compile problem:
apache 2.0.39; freebsd 4.4 i386; conne4ctors 4.0.4
snip
[so] In file included from
Hello and thanks for reading!
Trying to build mod_jk2 for Tomcat4 and Apache2... with huge problems :(
Having gotten this far, I have this compile problem:
apache 2.0.39; freebsd 4.4 i386; conne4ctors 4.0.4
snip
[so] In file included from
A new test milestone of Tomcat 4.1 has just been released.
Downloads:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/test/v4.1.8/
Significant changes over 4.1.7 Beta include:
- Many Jasper 2 bugfixes
- DBCP fixes
The list of changes is available in the release notes.
Remy
--
To
Before I make any changes to the CVS, I'd like to know what everyone
thinks. So, here are the choices:
[ ] Keep it as is and send all DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to Tomcat
[ ] Keep it as is, but only if DIR_MAGIC_TYPE can be turned on/off
[ ] Remove DIR_MAGIC_TYPE handling altogether
[ ] Make
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11101.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Which version is maven in, right now?
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 15:03, Bob Herrmann wrote:
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 14:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there is a simpler solution for this class of problems, and
that would also work with log4j and doesn't require _any_ API change.
( only changes to the adapter
Hi. This patch to commons logging allow you to specify which methods
in the call stack are uninteresting when using the JDK1.4 Logger. In
Tomcat this seems to be all methods named log and internalLog. This
is based on Costin's idea of uninteresting classes, but seems to work
better for method
Almost Beta 5. It just has undergone a major refactor from b4 and has
really progressed in the mean time. Currently commons is completely
mavenezied to get rid of the bugs that may be around and probably to
solve shortcomings still found before b5 is released.
Mvgr,
Martin
On Tue, 2002-07-23
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 23:39, Henri Gomez wrote:
Before I make any changes to the CVS, I'd like to know what everyone
thinks. So, here are the choices:
[ ] Keep it as is and send all DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to Tomcat
[ ] Keep it as is, but only if DIR_MAGIC_TYPE can be turned on/off
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11105.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 06:47, Bill Barker wrote:
Before I make any changes to the CVS, I'd like to know what everyone
thinks. So, here are the choices:
[ ] Keep it as is and send all DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to Tomcat
[ ] Keep it as is, but only if DIR_MAGIC_TYPE can be turned on/off
[
1. For Log4J at least, the wrapper class is 'given' to the logger
implementation via a constructor argument.
No, it is passed on each call. Log4j is the easiest, it has all the
support we need.
1.a. Log.setLogWrapper/setAttribute isn't enough. Putting aside
design/style arguments,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bojan 2002/07/23 17:44:20
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Kick out DIR_MAGIC_TYPE from jk2_handler() since it is never given to it
anyway. This will have to be resolved later for mod_jk2.
Make sure main request gets the appropriate info when the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11086.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7052.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bojan 2002/07/23 19:36:36
Modified:jk/native/common jk_global.h
Log:
New JkOption: ForwardDirectories. If used, all unresolved directory requests
will be handled by Tomcat. By default, this option will be turned off.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +3 -1
bojan 2002/07/23 19:38:32
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Refine directory handling a bit more. Make use of the new JkOption,
ForwardDirectories. When enabled, all unresolved directory requests go
to Tomcat. This option is disabled by default.
Revision
bojan 2002/07/23 21:48:52
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Save a strcmp() call.
Revision ChangesPath
1.54 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Index: mod_jk.c
Since it seems like people have totally different needs in regards to
static files and redirection of 'ambiguous' directory requests to
Tomcat, I went with the option ForwardDirectories, which can be
specified in JkOptions. It is off by default.
When turned off, any directory that doesn't
Tobias Wunden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Provide Information on dlopen
Build on top of APR and that problem goes away. That's why APR is the way to
go, right?
Pier
--
I love introducing bug: Floating Point Exception this is Access Violation,
Access Violation, this is Floating Point
65 matches
Mail list logo
