-Original Message-
From: Jarecsni Jnos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Tomcat-Dev
Subject: jakarta-tomcat-connectors
Hi,
I'd like to build TC40x. Where can I download
jakarata-tomcat-connectors?
The building.txt says one should download it.
You
What about adding this part in tomcat.sh (TC 3.3) and
catalina.sh/jasper.sh to help them discover JAVA_HOME on
at least Linux systems ?
If someone forgets to set JAVA_HOME and has multiple JDK's
installed, they could get a suprise. I suspect most non-beginners
would rather see an error
In Tomcat 4.0.2 and later, the above code would, I believe,
fit into the
bin/setclasspath.sh script. This script, which already checks that your
$JAVA_HOME contains a java, javac, and jdb command, would extend that
functionality. BTW, setclasspath.sh is source by all the
executable Unix scripts
Christopher,
Did you take a look at my scripts ?
tomcat3 starter :
#!/bin/sh
#
# Wrapper script for Tomcat, to be sure it will allways
# be run with correct user profile (tomcat by default)
#
# derived from stuff in tomcat.init
#
# Gomez Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Keith Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
A quick note to say that the Tomcat 3.3.1-b1
and Tomcat 4.0.2 have been upgraded to RPM release 2
TC 3.3.1-B1
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1-b1/rpms/
TC 4.0.2 + CONNECTORS
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/
The
What about renaming native2 (jk2) in JTC to mod_jk2
and jk2_module ?
+1 if you talk about the binary. -0 if you talk about directory/file
names.
No only source/binary, without touching anything in CVS layout.
It will be need to rename all non static references,
variables functions, but I
No change in CVS tree, just in source to avoid conflict
between mod_jk(s) even if one is a jk_module and the
other jk2_module
Rigth now, I'll wait for JTC developpers 'green ligth' to
do the changes in JTC native2 ONLY :)
Green light from me. It's an excelent idea.
Now a small
Might be worth forwarding it to tomcat-dev (the guy sent to
announcements)
Yep ;)
Are not the RELEASE-NOTES updated? See following secition of
known problems:
The WARP connector for Tomcat 4.0 does not support load
balancing at this
time.
and
The AJP connector for Tomcat 4.0 does
RPMs are also available :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1-b1/rpms/
Take a look at the information on how to use PureTLS, the OSS alternative
to JSSE, which use Cryptix as security provider.
May be updated in Tomcat Doc also,
BTW: What about PureTLS on jakarta ?
I am using xerces 2.0.0 in one of my webapps so I need to move xerces.jar
out of /common/lib and into /server/lib. This works just fine with
4.0.2-b2.
With 4.0.2 If I keep xerces.jar in /common/lib and use xerces.jar 1.4.3 in
my web app everything starts up just fine. But if I move xerces.jar
Hi to all,
TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/
But read the following before rushing :
Tomcat 4.0.2 in light mode need :
servletapi 2.3, regexp 1.2 and xerces 1.x, that
are for some compiled (servletapi), present in
source
One of the last changes on the connector ( the secret )
introduced a bug,
when worker_cache is enabled. The secret will not be initialized, and
that may creates all kind of serious problems.
Could you detail the problem ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at :
The new RPM packaging looks much cleaner, and this time it should be
compliant with the official standard, right ?
Yes, and I hope to see other jakarta/xml projects use these kind of
packaging.
BTW, openjmx RPM is ready, and also puretls, cryptix, cryptix-asn1
I don't know if the Eclipse configuration allows you to
specify -Dprop=value in Tomcat's startup. If it does,
I think a lot of this can be done in Tomcat 3.3.1 using
parameter substitution. I have used in server.xml
Http10Connector port=${http.port} ... /
and included
I'm wondering whether we really need to build it in to Tomcat itself,
though. Can't you accomplish the same thing by using a little
Ant script
and run a filter or replace task? All this would require
is packaging
ant.jar along with Tomcat, or requiring users that need the facility to
download
There's a lot of power in what the replace task can do.
Here's a very
simple one that replaces the string @port@ with the port number
specified by the port property:
project name=Create server.xml default=generate
target name=generate description=Generate customized
server.xml
As discussed yesterday, the binaries will include a minimal
distribution
designed to be run on JDK 1.4.
I miss the discussion of yesterday, sorry.
Did it means that the build won't require jndi/jdbcext/javamail/jaf
that caused me so many headaches in RPM packaging ?
ballot
[ ] +1 - I support
For the ZIP/TGZ packaging:
A) Full JDK 1.4: This includes everything, except the
libraries which are
already included in the JDK (including the JAXP XML parser).
I'd like to use Xerces 2.0, will it be in JDK 1.4 ?
B) Light JDK 1.4: This incluides a bare bones Tomcat
distribution which
The build doesn't require that, unless you use the full.dist
option (which
forces building everything, to prevent the release manager
from releasing
incomplete builds ;-)).
JNDI is the only API you mentioned that is required (but it's
included in
JDK 1.3+, and you dont need the JAR).
Hi to all,
You should all know that there is a very good Tomcat 3.3/4.0
plugin for the OSS IDE eclipse (www.eclipse.org), available
at http://www.sysdeo.com/eclipse/.
This plugin allow eclipse developper to launch Tomcat from
the IDE, stop, restart and configure many parameters like
I don't know if the Eclipse configuration allows you to
specify -Dprop=value in Tomcat's startup.
Yes you could set any VM and commandline args.
If it does,
I think a lot of this can be done in Tomcat 3.3.1 using
parameter substitution. I have used in server.xml
Http10Connector
It appears, for example, that the only thing you can override about a
connector is which port it's on. What happens if you want to override,
say, the maximum number of connections that your connector will accept
(the maxProcessors parameter on Tomcat 4's HttpConnector)?
Right +1 for you here
I send a copy to tomcat-dev since it's an important issue
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. The distributions you have
provided via jakarta have been very beneficial to us and our
project. We
are grateful so much work has gone into building RPM's.
Thanks ;)
Warning, the RPM goal
Seems good to me and should be applied also to Tomcat 3.3 SSL HOWTO :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
If there are any further questions or comments - just hit reply...
I like it - If noone complains I will try to commit it -
I just ask pedro to send me a plain copy, so let me take
at look at ;)
PS: Christopher and Eric should take a look also ;)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+5958 Wrong mod_jk.conf for path pattern
Easy enough to fix. The only question is if we want to change only
${Server}Config, or do we want to change the mod_jk behavior
so that the two
statements:
JkMount /myApp/foobar/* ajp13
and
JkMount /myApp/foobar* ajp13
are the same (i.e.
Hi Ray
After some testing, I have made some observations that might be worth
something, or maybe not...
I installed Redhat 7.2 w/tomcat3.3a-2. I used all RPMS to do this
(including the tomcat-mod-3.3-1 rpm.) I got the stack space
error. So,
I installed a redhat 7.1, same exact tomcat
I notice that I have a growing number of processes that are
left in a w
state according to server-status. I check using netstat and
see that there
are sockets hanging out in a TIME_WAIT state. These will
hang out for who
knows how long but I have some that are days old (when apache was last
They were on the http/https connections.
So the problem as nothing to do with mod_jk
or tomcat but on your OS settings.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If your interest in Tomcat is for developing Web Services, you will be
interested in the Java Web Services Developer Pack (version
1.0ea1) that
was just released by Sun:
http://java.sun.com/webservices
The Java WSDP includes early releases of base XML technology: JAXP 1.2
(with schema
May I recommand you to switch to IBM SDK 1.3 which is
quick and stable under Linux on kernel 2.2 and 2.4.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B
Because that's what the Redistribution paragraph of the
license that you
had to click through says you can do and not do. (See why
it's a good
idea to actually *read* these things? :-)
Craig, you've still not answered precisely to my question.
Please explain us
if what we are doing
Thanks Costin,
iSeries developpers and users are happy to see you fix
that damnt HP-UX bugs :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6056.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Costin
P.S. I can volunteer to write the Makefiles, since soon this may be the
cleanest way to build tomcat...
I hope it's a joke ?)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If your interest in Tomcat is for developing Web Services, you will be
interested in the Java Web Services Developer Pack (version
1.0ea1) that
was just released by Sun:
http://java.sun.com/webservices
The Java WSDP includes early releases of base XML technology: JAXP 1.2
(with schema
* JavaServer PagesTM Standard Tag Library (JSTL) 1.0 EA 3
= ???
http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/standard-doc/intro.html
:o)
Good another piece of stuff in OSS land :)
Thanks for the info,
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Upgrade to Tomcat 4.0.2-B2 for example, the problem is fixed.
And in TC 4.0.2-B2 you'll gain load-balancing support ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53
I have a patch that allow mod_jk to send a 'secret', the same
way as ajp12
works. It seems completely safe and backward compatible. The
code to check
the secret on java side is also trivial and unlikely to create any
problems.
I can check this in in 2-3 days ( I'm in NYC now, not sure I'll be
Maybe we should we create a org.apache.jtc.util package ? Or
org.apache.commons.tomcat ?
jtc util should be used by TC 3.3 and 4.0 ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Welcome on board.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Luby [mailto:[EMAIL
I've got a little problems with all the jars that are
mandatory to build TC 4.0, javamail, jta, jdbc-ext, jmxri.
tyrex is allready packaged and JSSE is only optional.
Could someone, may be from Sun staff, could release all of
them in a single tarball and put it on the download area ?
I'd like to clarify. I could have activation, javamail, jdbc-ext,
jndi, jta, which are Sun products, included in a Tomcat tarball
but couldn't have them included in a separate tarball ?
Yes.
And couldn't they be included in the application source tarball ?
It's unclear in the licences I
Thanks Bojan, I introduced these 2 bugs ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I could build webapp for Apache 1.3 on my Redhat 7.2 box
but build for Apache 2.0 failed :
My Linux is using a recent libtool 1.4 ...
BTW: what is the version number for this release of webapp ?
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402'
make[1]: Entering directory
Our iSeries are using now latest JDK 1.3.1
and the strange layout is still here :(
/QIBM/ProdData/Java400/jdk13
The patch is really needed ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP
For the C side, I'm working on JNI worker as a channel - that
will resolve
some of the current problems in jni ( performance, i18n, etc) and will
make the jni channel available in 4.0 too. But we still have
to update the
other server connectors, decide what we want to do about
config, etc - so
What do you think ? Henri, JFC, Kevin - I hope for an quick
answer :-)
it sounds like you're heading towards a good deal of symmetry
between the
java and c code, which is definitely good :)
Yes, and you got my +1 also :)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Bravo :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've got a little problems with all the jars that are
mandatory to build TC 4.0, javamail, jta, jdbc-ext, jmxri.
tyrex is allready packaged and JSSE is only optional.
Could someone, may be from Sun staff, could release all of
them in a single tarball and put it on the download area ?
For now
That's why jtc tag 4.0.2 b2 didn't build when you only have
jakarta-tomcat-4.0.2-b2.
Question :
- Should we retag jtc 4.0.2-b2 including these patches or
should I patch my tarball for jtc tagged 4.0.2-b2 to compile
jtc with just TC 4.0.2-B2 on path ?
Regards
BTW: Did the jtc tagged
total_read = readN(in, b, H_SIZE, len);
-
-if (total_read = 0) {
+
+// it's ok to have read 0 bytes when len=0 -- this means
+// the end of the stream has been reached.
+if (total_read 0) {
Faraj are you commiter ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Faraj Meir [mailto:[EMAIL
Not but I'm liking to try tomcat .
It's a very beautiful servlet implementation .
Only commiters could vote on release plan ;)
BTW : we need strong testers and fine bug reports
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw last e-mails concerning IPv6 and Tomcat in this place in
March. So
is it all clear?
I have installed Tomcat 4.0.1 on RedHat (kernel 2.4.14) and tried to
connect to Tomcat using IPv6. Unfortunately, I got the 400 HTTP error
Bad Request returned by Tomcat.
The form of URL wan analogous to
Hi to all,
I've got a little problem with our AS/400 since
they didn't respect the general layout for JDK 1.2/1.3
where java.home is xxx/jre or xxx/sdk and where tools.jar
live in xxx/lib
Sus Tomcat 3.3 couldn't find the needed tools.jar for
JSP compilation
Choices :
- Add code in tomcat to
Tomcat 3.3.1 Release Plan Ballot:
[X] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1 I am against this plan being executed, and my
reason is:
--
To
Bravo.
Consider also the JSSE alternative,
http://www.rtfm.com/puretls/ from Eric Rescorla,
which should be commiter by now (Craig ?)
puretls is BSD Style and use Cryptix which is also BSD
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP
Here is a quick build.xml for 1.0b1 since the one
from CVS didn't works with 1.0b1 tarball (normal)
Regards.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39
I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of
the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:
/ballot
+1 since you'll add the load-balancing
The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2
to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Remy,
A little late reply but :
Hi Remy,
What's the final goal for Coyote ?
;)
- It should be faster than the current HTTP/1.1 processor
- It should address the HTTP/1.1 items marked as later in bugzilla
- It should be maintainable
- It should be easily testable
- It uses j-t-c/util
I am playing with jk2 and I have noted that the loadNative()
in AprImpl fails:
+++
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
/home/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/jk/WEB-INF/jk2/jni/l
ibapr.so:
/home/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/jk/WEB-INF/jk2/jni/l
ibapr.so:
undefined symbol: crypt
Couldn't we have an automatic jvmRoute generated from
misc entropy if the entry is not present in server.xml ?
for example just the server hostname or ip address ?
Adding the hostname/adress should be fine for the majority of case
where only one JVM will be make run TC 4.x by system.
Or may be
Seems to be good ;)
Tks JF
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
Hi Remy,
What's the final goal for Coyote ?
;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
In few days we'll have the jk2 working, so you can play with
unix domain
sockets - that should improve a bit the performance. There are few
other optimizations there ( more agressive recycling, etc ) - and
we really need help testing it and feedback.
( I have it working on my machine, but I'm
I saw many post from this gentleman but they are never commited.
Any reasons ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
We all have encountered this kind of problem with socket
implementation (derived from the good old known BSD).
The only solution is to close the socket to have the read
aborted and so the thread awaiked ;(
And I don't speak about writing on half-closed socket where
you get no error for a
First Happy New Year to all of you.
Just back from hollidays and start to dig into my ton
of email, and so delayed some contributions like 4.0.2b1
RPM (will do the b2) and active participation on J-T-C
(but there is today many great people working on it).
Question :
- Did jk from j-t-c for
I believe someone on this list once said something like open
source development: have fun or get paid for it. I'm working
on NIO solely because it's a fun new technology in Java with a
huge potential, and if it happens to turn out useful it's a
clear win. :-)
NBIO is really an interesting
It's an excellent news :)
What about doing the same against jakarta-tomcat 3.3 mod_jk
(I will upload it to site for others win users).
Also it will be good to have you done the same for
jakarta-tomcat-connectors which cover the up to date mod_jk.
BTW: What about switching to Apache
But I'm +1 on whatever you choose. Let me know if/how
I can help - I don't have time but I could sleep less :-)
I concur with Costin here. Your pick is +1.
me2
Same for me, I'm ok for a release (security fixes are mandatory)
and will produce the RPM and binaries.
BTW, it will be fine to
Hi to all and Happy new year.
Slowly back to mail after hollidays ,(
- the stable jk1.x. We want to release it and it needs
testing - the code
is very close to what was released with 4.0.1 and 3.3, with
few additional
bug fixes, with the auto-conf generator for 4.x ( the code is there,
The script is good but not commited since :
1) It's mainly Unix related.
2) On Linux boxes supporting RPM, there is allready
.rpm released which add the initd functionnalities
which are platform specific.
But your idea is good.
So why not add specific stuff like this on a contrib
You're right, the code is correct in tomcat 3.3 mod_jk
and conform with the latest patch I submitted in this branch.
The error was introduced in the J-T-C port
/* the right place to add file storage for upload */
if((len = read_into_msg_buff(ep, r, pmsg, l,
Before my manager insists that we switch to JRun,
Arg !!!
can any of
the Tomcat
developers help with a problem of an ever increasing heap size of the
Tomcat java.exe. ?? (We are running Tomcat 3.2.3 and JRE1.3.1. and the
IIS redirector)
May I suggest you to switch to Tomcat 3.3 instead
The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
What about ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8
Session afinity is often mandatory when in situations
where parts of applications are not just data, ie
when your web-application is used to discuss with a
real-time system requiring that all the app session
came from the same JVM.
And so the session afinity must be configurable.
-
Henri Gomez
The patch seems valid and the pmsg was passed for this
purpose in previous release of J-T-C but some folks
(didn't remember who) make modifications in mod_jk
part of code and the update was lost.
Seems ok, you could commit :)
This patch fix a real problem and should be also
propagated to
there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ? What's
the status of
loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ?
Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly
there won't be
any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ?
State of the art is that today only mod_jk could
If the trafic becomes too big, we should definitely separate them, but
what is big remain open ( tomcat-users is huge, I just can't read it
without headaches - that's where a split will be most needed )
Exact, we'll have to split at some time just to be able to
see if the question is related to
could you explain us more about ping ?
Jk now has a 'ping' message type, which replaces the login and
discovery
messages.
It will send the 'ping' as the first packet when it opens the
connection,
and also every time it is asked for ( or even periodically ). The ping
will be equivalent with
Tomcat could also decide to push config data, or context
status, etc.
Ok, we could have a little overhead (network latency) during
this init
phase but it's not a big problem since it's not too common.
Which make
me think that in multithreaded env like Apache 2.0 we could avoid to
redo
+1 ( part of it has already been moved ).
But if we do that, I would propose to _move_ it, not copy.
Does it means that TC 3.3.1 will require and use part of J-T-C
instead of keeping its own copy ?
If we move more and more logic and code in j-t-c, we may need
to have soon a specific
I'm getting close with jk2, there are just few more details I need to
resolve ( and then test, update the other server adapters, test again,
etc).
One change I'm making to get the things cleaner refers to the login and
discovery protocol.
Instead of a RPC-style, where Apache sends a command and
This tries to solve the 'egg and chicken' config problem, and to
fix/enable some other things.
I want to add a second handler in mod_jk, similar with the 'status' for
apache, mod_jserv, etc. ( same security issues - i.e. users will need
access control, to use it, etc ).
good thing
The most
I am reposting that patch again - let me know if there are any
questions or
concerns.
Costin is working on a huge refactory of jk, named native2,
and in that version the jk_init is removed from child_init.
Having it in child_init was only usefull when using ajp14
to grab URIs to be handled
May I recommand you to switch to Tomcat 3.3, for strict
2.2/1.1 RI, which fixes quantities of problems like this ?
The RI for 2.2/1.1 is Tomcat 3.3 today, just take a look
at java.sun.com :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Caution, caution with security.
On many sites, the web-server is located on a DMZ so subject
to be hacked, while the Tomcats are behind firewall. Having
webapp (program) could raise many problems.
Hmm... I hope sandboxing is used for tomcat
Did you also include the requirement on Cryptix and cryptix asn ?
Nota that the cryptix-asn to be used is a patched version of
the 'official'.
from puretls announce :
==
DEPENDENCIES
JDK:
PureTLS has been developed under JDK 1.1.8 on FreeBSD. It
has been tested under JDK 1.2 on Solaris and
To clarify - this is not a replacement or an 'exclusive' mechanism.
The 'ajp14' based config, where tomcat sends notifications to apache
remains.
Seems like I was reinventing the wheel there for a while. So
AJP14 knows
how configure itself from the running Tomcat... Pretty cool in my book!
Seems like I was reinventing the wheel there for a while. So
AJP14 knows
how configure itself from the running Tomcat... Pretty cool
in my book!
Yes, Henri has added quite a bit of code for that. I did few changes to
make the 'autoconf' usable with other workers and more 'exposed' - see
-Original Message-
From: SAMY rengasamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:12 PM
To: GOMEZ Henri
Subject: RE: How to build mod_webapp for S390/Linux
A couple of days actually became a couple of weeks, sorry for the delay.
Here is the link for mod_webapp.so
The current code is using some 'interesting' tricks with the jk_pools -
it does some funny buffer allocations on the stack and use the buffer
to create a pool ( which itself is allocated on the stack ).
While this may have some performance benefits, the code is
extremely hard
to read, and
I know it well, and take a serious look even
if it will be seriously reworked in jk2...
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Cool news. However, it isn't truly superb until it runs on OSX.
Some lobbying to be conducted ;)
Not even lobbying to be done, the initial native code could be
ported to MacOsX :)
Important point, this IDE support CVS as repository .
Trully tailored for java OSS projects.
It is
It compiles with or without JSSE, and runs fine without an SSL
connector.
However, I haven't actually gotten around to doing the whole
keystore thing
here, so the (big) one thing I haven't tried (yet) is to run it with an
JSSE-SSL connection.
Nota to interested people that PureTLS require :
As you may know, Eric Rescorla is one the few specialists in SSL
in the world, author of one of the few SSL bible books and he have
also created the excellent OpenSource JSSE alternative, PureTLS.
He strike back in adapting PureTLS to Tomcat, today Tomcat 3.3, and
so I would like to propose him
](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: JK versions
After reading the commit
401 - 500 of 1169 matches
Mail list logo
