Costin Manolache wrote:
No, removing jk2.properties - and removing JkMX - is a good thing.
I'll check in the webapp code, it's easier to talk about code - if
people don't like it, feel free to -1 :-)
In the same spirit, I think we could imagine having a webapp for dynamic
configuration of java
Dominik Drzewiecki wrote:
I couldn't get the attach to process thing to work, though (= without
a port). Is it supposed to be doable ?
Neither have I (I am talking of tomcat running as Windows service). It
seems that both processes : tomcat JVM and jconsole JVM have to be
owned by the same
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Dominik Drzewiecki wrote:
I couldn't get the attach to process thing to work, though (=
without a port). Is it supposed to be doable ?
Neither have I (I am talking of tomcat running as Windows service).
It seems that both processes : tomcat JVM and jconsole JVM have to be
In general the same-user, same-machine stuff works great (including with
Tomcat 5) if you specify
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
as part of the command line.
This is without any special web app or such.
What I really want to see is a nice bit of code that allows you to fire
up a JMX RMI
Remy Maucherat wrote:
For those interested in not wasting their time the way I just did, I
just found this:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/agent.html
quote
*Limitation*: On Windows, for security reasons, local monitoring and
management is only supported if your default
Jess Holle wrote:
In general the same-user, same-machine stuff works great (including with
Tomcat 5) if you specify
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
as part of the command line.
Again - remember not everyone is using Sun JDK1.5 implementation.
My understanding is Macs don't have 1.5 yet,
Costin Manolache wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
In general the same-user, same-machine stuff works great (including
with Tomcat 5) if you specify
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
as part of the command line.
Again - remember not everyone is using Sun JDK1.5 implementation.
My understanding is Macs
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: JMX Remote connection
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message - From: Costin Manolache
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
Hi,
Not sure what's the new policy for loading the Jmx RMI connector.
jk2.properties was a hack - and now that it is removed, I was
wandering if
we have any official mechanism.
At the moment, jk2.properties is still used (we're just not shipping the
default one). It should be
Dominik Drzewiecki wrote:
Hi,
Not sure what's the new policy for loading the Jmx RMI connector.
jk2.properties was a hack - and now that it is removed, I was
wandering if
we have any official mechanism.
At the moment, jk2.properties is still used (we're just not shipping the
default
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Dominik Drzewiecki wrote:
Why don't we dump the JkMX and just settle for the facilities provided
by Java 5 configurable via standard system properties:
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote alone for local JVM monioring
or
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Dominik Drzewiecki wrote:
Why don't we dump the JkMX and just settle for the facilities
provided by Java 5 configurable via standard system properties:
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote alone for local JVM monioring
or
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
I couldn't get the attach to process thing to work, though (= without a
port). Is it supposed to be doable ?
Neither have I (I am talking of tomcat running as Windows service). It
seems that both processes : tomcat JVM and jconsole JVM have to be owned
by the same user. Maybe that is the case
Hi,
Not sure what's the new policy for loading the Jmx RMI connector.
jk2.properties was a hack - and now that it is removed, I was wandering
if we have any official mechanism.
I had a small class that hooked in the connector, and I now refactored
it to a webapp - nothing fancy ( it's not even
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:06 PM
Subject: JMX Remote connection
Hi,
Not sure what's the new policy for loading the Jmx RMI connector.
jk2.properties was a hack - and now that it is removed, I
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message - From: Costin Manolache
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:06 PM
Subject: JMX Remote connection
Hi,
Not sure what's the new policy for loading the Jmx RMI connector.
jk2.properties was a hack - and now
16 matches
Mail list logo
