On Mon, 7 May 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
[snip]
In TC 4.0, I think about the excellent works from Bip Thelin
(TC 4.x Clustering). What make it specific to TC 4.x ?
Here lies the crux of the difficulties in sharing significant code
(beyond the kind of stuff you suggested for toolbox). I
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
There seems to be consensus growing around these three names. Does that
meet with everyone's agreement? If so, I can create the new repositories
and set up the permissions stuff later today.
+1
( Regarding the name for the third:
+0.7 for
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
* Dependence on Java2 as a base platform. This is not just an issue
of using the collections classes (although that's part of it). Consider
a few other issues:
Once again - there is no problem with using Java2 for tomcat modules in
3.x.
- Performance tuning for Java2 JVMs (particularly HotSpot) focuses
your attention on different areas than JDK 1.1. Trying to optimize
for both increases the effort required, and could lead to conflicts
where you want to do things differently on different platforms.
Well,
+1 for separate repository, but I preffer
jakarta-tomcat-modules or some common repository.
Reason: connector and jasper are just particular modules that could be
used in multiple versions of tomcat ( like 3.2, 3.3, 4.0 or 4.1 ). There
are other pieces that could be developed in the common
On Fri, 4 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for separate repository, but I preffer
jakarta-tomcat-modules or some common repository.
Reason: connector and jasper are just particular modules that could be
used in multiple versions of tomcat ( like 3.2, 3.3, 4.0 or 4.1 ). There
Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion on
collaborative development, across the various Tomcat branches, on two
major areas:
+1 for the split.
* Web connectors
* A new Jasper (the jasper34 proposal)
and efforts have begun in the HEAD branch proposals directory of the
On Fri, 4 May 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Did these CVS will be like the jakarta-servletapi and jakarta-watchdog ?
The would be like jakarta-servletapi and jakarta-watchdog in the sense
that whey would be separate CVS repositories (with a separate
checkout). They would be unlike Watchdog
+1
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion on
collaborative development, across the various Tomcat branches, on two
major areas:
* Web connectors
* A new Jasper (the jasper34 proposal)
and efforts have begun in the HEAD branch
