costin 01/09/09 23:43:02
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core ContextManager.java
Request.java
src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/aaa
AccessInterceptor.java
Log:
Fix 3441, small enhancement in security
on 9/10/01 12:19 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're at putting more eyballs on some bugs, if someone could come up
with a reliable test case for bug 3511
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3511), which was reported
by Jon, that would be great :)
Remy
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
Nagoya...
When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
general@jakarta) or was it done
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope... Because I check the web...
Pier, you missed the point. I'm trying to say that you and the person
assigned to the emails are potential central points of failures.
Just because you don't want to click thru a couple of pages? Make me laugh
c'mon...
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's never been changed ... even in the previous installation of
Bugzilla (that led to the first hack on Apache's web site), there were
individual names attached to Tomcat components.
On the very first installation, the one on Daedalus, I remember
Well... At the beginning bugs were sent here, then on this mailing list
people complained because of it, so we assigned them to
individuals, now
people complain of the contrary...
I'll never understand humans (Mr Spock 27500 AC)
Ok, let me say that I'd like to read the bugs state in
this
+1
JTC is the best place for this since it can be kept up to date
with an appropriate version of APR and Apache 2.0.
Mike Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/07/01 12:44PM
I agree with Costin's suggestion to remove the Apache 2.0
version of mod_jk from jakarta-tomcat for Tomcat 3.3.
This would
Hi All,
I propose to update the RELEASE-PLAN-3.3 with the schedule shown
below to finish the release of Jakarta Tomcat 3.3.
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: lunes 10 de septiembre de 2001 9:08
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails
I'm going to go ahead and call this, in the name of peace and
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/10/01 08:51AM
Hi All,
I propose to update the RELEASE-PLAN-3.3 with the schedule shown
below to finish the release of Jakarta Tomcat 3.3.
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
+1, Jon has a point. ( I was among those bad guys who sugested the current
behavior, mea culpa )
Costin
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
I'm going to go ahead and call this, in the name of peace and brotherhood :)
-
Whenever a bug is entered or modified on Nagoya
glenn 01/09/10 08:19:39
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming JndiPermission.java
Log:
No need to override equals() method
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +7 -18
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/JndiPermission.java
Index:
glenn 01/09/10 08:21:02
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationContext.java
Log:
Bug fix, add path separator between host and path
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +7 -7
There were a few reasons that I didn't include a separate mailing list
option in the vote. There seemed to be more a little more support for
just having them come here to the dev list, and it's hard to effectively
call a vote on three options instead of two, so I picked the one that
would be
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
Larry,
I will have ironed out the final bugs by Wed/Thur and will submit the code
for committing. Until then there is a patch for jk_nt_service that is
complete, if that could be committed then the Service Manager could even be
released separately. I have attached that patch. On your list of
jfclere 01/09/10 09:17:52
Modified:webapps/examples build.xml
Log:
Add mail.jar otherwise the SendMailServlet does not compile.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/examples/build.xml
Index: build.xml
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
Vote, please
-
Henri Gomez
+1
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
Vote,
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
Vote, please
+1
+1
Welcome!
Mike Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/10/01 10:24AM
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that
+1
Marc Saegesser
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] New commiter Ryan Bloom
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on
Hi,
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
Vote, please
+1.
Remy
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: lunes 10 de septiembre de 2001 18:24
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [VOTE] New commiter Ryan Bloom
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and
+1
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
Vote,
Seems like only need this should work
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/examples/build.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -r1.11 build.xml
20,21c20,21
property name=mail.jar
Hi Henri,
I appreciate your efforts concerning the connectors. My
position is that Tomcat 3.3 needs to have stable Ajp13
connectors for Apache 1.3, IIS, and to the extent we
can, Netscape. A connector for Apache 2.0 should come out
of jakarta-tomcat-connectors instead of jakarta-tomcat.
Given
+1
Larry
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] New commiter Ryan Bloom
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on
remm01/09/10 09:55:40
Modified:webapps/examples build.xml
Log:
- Forgot jndi.jar. Sorry ...
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/examples/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Punky Tse wrote:
Seems like only need this should work
Sure: It is in the class list. (But I do not have yet the example that uses it).
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
+1
Costin
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid
You are right Christopher.
Besides the (a bit sarcastic[*]) sense of humor and besides knowing some
Latin expressions, you also make a lot of sense.
=:o)
Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me. (Seriously!)
Have fun,
Paulo
[*] Which is a plus.
-Original Message-
From:
That is worse:
Have a look to catalina/build.xml (lib/mail.jar).
I will test and commit a better patch...
Punky Tse wrote:
Seems like only need this should work
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
That is worse:
Have a look to catalina/build.xml (lib/mail.jar).
I will test and commit a better patch...
What is the problem with that change (which I already committed) ?
In my JAF and JavaMail packages, there is no lib directory, so the default
property value didn't work for me.
Remy
Hi,
You are faster that me! (And my repository was not up to date!).
Cheers
Jean-frederic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm01/09/10 09:55:40
Modified:webapps/examples build.xml
Log:
- Forgot jndi.jar. Sorry ...
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +1 -0
+1
Welcome, Slick!
- Christopher
/**
* Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux, et fondez vous en eau!
* La moitié de ma vie a mis l'autre au tombeau.
*---Corneille
*/
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
+1
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
Vote,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
That is worse:
Have a look to catalina/build.xml (lib/mail.jar).
I will test and commit a better patch...
What is the problem with that change (which I already committed) ?
No problem... Just my repository is some hours too old ;-). Next time I will
read the
Costin,
I think thats a good idea. I want it to work with all versions of TC (3.2.4,
3.3 and 4.0) and I will supply patches to their respective Service
implementations.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I spent some quality time with emacs and merge, comparing j-t-c and j-t
versions of jk.
So far things look very good, all fixes in j-t seems to be already in
j-t-c. The only big difference ( that makes difficult to comapare ) is
ajp13, but it seems we are ok there.
Henri - could we undo the
remm01/09/10 10:42:51
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
StandardClassLoader.java
Log:
- Apparently the URL class loader is not thread safe, so sync the call to the
superclass must be synced :-(
- Class loader gurus, please
remm01/09/10 10:52:45
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
MemoryRealm.java
Log:
- Fix for bug 3524 (NPE in memory realm).
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +15 -10
On Monday 10 September 2001 10:23, Christopher Cain wrote:
Thanks for the vote of confidence everybody. I wasn't expecting
such a fast turn-around time on this. I'll try not to muck things
up too badly.
Ryan
+1
Welcome, Slick!
- Christopher
/**
* Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux, et
I just finished merging all the chunked encoding
support for ajp13 into j-t-c and was about to checkin.
I'll hold off until we decide about this:
| Henri - could we undo the ajp13.c changes, for example by copying the
| current ajp13 from j-t and re-doing the autoconf changes ? Having
Keith
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
I just finished merging all the chunked encoding
support for ajp13 into j-t-c and was about to checkin.
I'll hold off until we decide about this:
| Henri - could we undo the ajp13.c changes, for example by copying the
| current ajp13 from j-t
Does this mean that the parser error under Windoze (which was preventing
the transformation) has been resolved?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
craigmcc01/09/09 21:49:52
Modified:.build.xml
webapps build.xml
webapps/ROOT build.xml index.html
Does this mean that the parser error under Windoze (which was preventing
the transformation) has been resolved?
It appears to be working fine with Ant 1.4.
Remy
keith 01/09/10 11:32:36
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/ajp Ajp13.java
jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c jk_service.h jk_util.c
Log:
Port chunked encoding input support from jakarta-tomcat ajp13.
Revision Changes
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
remm01/09/10 11:39:37
Modified:jasper build.xml
Log:
- Add tools.jar to the list. That's needed for building without anything in the
system's
classpath.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us
Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s)
Hello, I noticed the following behaviour using JDBC realms on tomcat 4.0-b7
running under windows-NT:
I have protected a directory. When I try to access it the login-form shows
up. After I have successfully logged in, the directory appears to be blank.
After I press the reload button on my
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
++1! I didn't even know it existed anyplace other than JTC. I have
been supplying patches recently for it too. Also, having duplicate
code anyplace is just a bad idea. I am on a crusade to remove all
duplicate code from every code-base throughout the
Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, while I might technically have the ability to call for a vote on
anything, it's bad form to call a vote on something that you personally
cannot make happen. Since I do not have the ability to set up a new
mailing list, it would be the
-- Forwarded Message
From: Erich Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: method park
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:45:46 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug 3515] - Processes hanging after stopping Tomcat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded Message
From: Holscher, David M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:00:16 -0500
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-10
10:38 ---
I
It itched me a lot that to enable SSL in TC4 a standard JDK has to be modified
(copy JSSE libs into jdk/jre/lib/ext and add
security.provider.3=com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Provider).
This was not necessary in TC 3.2.x because of different class loading
semantics.
In our environment jdks cannot
Hello All,
[Super minor quibble]
While migrating to the new catalina, I see that when starting it up from
with my debugger (jbuilder4) that things won't run unless I set
catalina.base. Since the batch files properly set catalina.base =
cataline.home if catalina.base is included, is there
-- Forwarded Message
From: Holscher, David M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:16:22 -0500
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup
I'll RC2 first thing Wednesday.
___
David Holscher
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list
[X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev
Rationale is: I want other developers to look at the outstanding bugs, and
tomcat-dev is the dev list for Tomcat, so I don't see the point of
-1 for the same reasons.
Amy
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list
[X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev
Rationale is: I want other developers to look at the outstanding bugs, and
tomcat-dev
I don't have a problem with dynamically registering the SSL provider in
SSLServerSocketFactory, as is done in the patch below. There was
actually some existing code in there which did that, but it was
commented out at some point. Does anyone know why?
Unless anyone objects, I'll include the
Hello,
Does anyone know why JspC pre-compiles all jsp's, even if they have not changed?
I am using Ant to pre-compile and compile my jsps, and it is frustrating that
they are ALL pre-compiled every time.
Is this intended behaviour or a bug?
Many thanks,
Dave
Whilst on the subject of JspC...does anyone know why no output is obtained when
you run it from the command line?
I am excecuting java org.apache.jasper.JspC ... and I never get any output!
Again, is this a bug, or intended behaviour?!
Many thanks,
Dave
Even the pushy non voting bastard (me) agrees that something should
come to the dev list.
I was pushing the daily digest thing coming to dev, but after
Christopher rationale (it takes work doing it + don't ask what you
won't do) I sure agree that the practical solution is to have all
the bugs
on 9/10/01 9:12 AM, Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[X] -1I am opposed to
I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
suggestion.
:-)
-jon (runs for cover)
Jon Stevens wrote:
I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
suggestion.
:-)
-jon (runs for cover)
*sigh* ... ever the diplomat ;-)
- Christopher
/**
* Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux,
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
suggestion.
:-)
-jon (runs for cover)
Someone might call it I'm so freaking tired of it so that I just
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/10/01 9:12 AM, Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of
Are you using Tomcat 3.1.x?
From the tomcat-users mailing list:
http://www2.real-time.com/pipermail/tomcat-users/2000-October/012931.html
The easiest workarounds are...
Add this line to your $HOME/.tomcatrc:
TOMCAT_OPTS=-Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=sun.net.www.protocol
Or add this
ccain 01/09/10 13:12:58
Modified:catalina/src/bin digest.bat digest.sh
Log:
DES is not a hashing algorithm ;-)
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin/digest.bat
Index: digest.bat
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan to became more than just a contributer :
This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This
implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly...
Now, if you could agree
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Ok, so since I need to try to be the nice guy over here, let's do it this
way... It seems apparent that the mailing list want to be notified of bugs
(lots of +1 and no -1), so this is a simple one
[ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs
on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
I'm also worried about regression testing.
, whereas
there are 26 on Tomcat 4.0 currently open, and you didn't vote -1 on 4.0's
release plan... I'm not trying to
remm01/09/10 13:30:33
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
- Remove some Ant deprecation messages.
- Modernize build script (now that we switched to 1.4).
Revision ChangesPath
1.56 +141 -86 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml
Index: build.xml
on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
I'm also worried about regression testing.
, whereas
there are 26 on Tomcat 4.0 currently open, and you didn't vote -1 on
4.0's
release plan... I'm not
Even if this is a majority vote, and so far we seem to have the votes we
need for the release, I think Jon is right on not releasing unless all
the bugs are evaluated and we fix all the bugs that we think are important
and don't destabilize the release.
For 3.3 there is only one reopened bug (
remm01/09/10 13:43:33
Modified:jasper build.xml
Log:
- Remove some Ant deprecation messages.
- Modernize build script (now that we switched to 1.4).
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +19 -9 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/build.xml
Index: build.xml
remm01/09/10 13:43:57
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs build.xml
Log:
- Remove some Ant deprecation messages.
- Modernize build script (now that we switched to 1.4).
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/build.xml
Index:
remm01/09/10 13:44:35
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Remove some Ant deprecation messages.
- Modernize build script (now that we switched to 1.4).
Revision ChangesPath
1.36 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/build.xml
Index: build.xml
*sigh* ... ever the diplomat ;-)
The only sure things in life:
death, taxes and Jon's guerilla diplomacy.
=;o)
Have fun,
Paulo
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
on 9/10/01 1:44 PM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll read that as:
There shouldn't be any confirmed bugs above at major or higher severity
open in the bug database. Otherwise, I disagree with your statement.
We can still release if there are some, but that will need a vote on
I don't want you running for nothing so...
Your problem is:
- When you are wrong, you are wrong;
- When you are right, you still don't know how to prove it.
OTHO, you always make such a noise protesting that you are right that,
eventually, if you really are right, someone with better
ccain 01/09/10 14:00:06
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
MemoryRealm.java
Log:
Oops, typo ... we definitely don't want the comparison to be care insensitive :)
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +5 -5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan to became more than just a contributer :
This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This
implies that either I'm getting old, or
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
I'm also worried about regression testing.
Well, let them do their fucking job... If we gave them committer access, it
means
on 9/10/01 2:13 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, let them do their fucking job... If we gave them committer access, it
means that we trust them. If they say that 3.3 is ready to go, well, I'm not
going to stop them because FIRST I never contributed a line of code, SECOND
I
On Monday 10 September 2001 14:05, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan to became more than just a contributer :
This is the third time we agree on something in less
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, thank you Pier !
I believe I'm just being fair... We have our disagreements on most of the
technical aspects of the code, that's why, to my disappointment too, we have
TWO releases coming out in parallel, but, as I said last week to Henri, the
For what it's worth (since I can't vote), I agree with Jon. TC3.3 hasn't
had a long enough beta cycle yet to push through an RC cycle this fast. As
it is, I'm going to be lucky to have time to install RC1 before RC2 comes
out. Keeping up with 4.0 isn't a good enough reason, since I'm sure that
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This
implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly...
Now, if you could agree on merging mod_webapp and mod_jk, that would be
something...
Slowww down... :)
keith 01/09/10 14:43:36
Modified:src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp13_worker.c
Log:
Corner case for chunked encoding: if the chunk sizes and
buffers fell such that the buffer was nearly full and the
chunk size digits were too numerous to fit in the remaining
space, the
Jon Stevens wrote:
[snip]
If T4.0 FINAL has bugs not in VERIFIED/CLOSED state, then I'm going
to vote -1 on its release.
FWIW, I agree with that sentiment; but to the best of my knowledge, so
does everyone else. Given that, I really don't anticipate a problem
here. AFAIK, everyone is in
On Monday 10 September 2001 14:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours.
This implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly...
Now, if you could agree on merging mod_webapp
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
