On Monday 10 September 2001 14:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > >> This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours.
> > >> This implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly...
> > >
> > > Now, if you could agree on merging mod_webapp and mod_jk, that would be
> > > something...
> >
> > Slowwwwwww down... :) If mod_jk wants to start using APR, I believe we're
> > talking, otherwise, I'm done with cross-platform porting, I live it to
> > Ryan
> >
> > :)
>
> Mod_jk will use APR - that's certain. The only question is when and how
> to do the transition without affecting the stability of the code. Having
> an APR1.0 out is one of the requirements - I don't think we can release
> mod_jk, even from j-t-c, with dependencies on un-released library.
>
> There are already 2 proposals for how to do that - one with preserving the
> current common as a temporary solution, until we make sure it works with
> IIS/NES, and the other with removing the common utils and hoping things
> will work with IIS/NES.
>
> Right now the APR/common is not the main itch - it'll become pretty soon,
> at least for me ( I need mmap for the new connector )

I'm actually right now working on the thread locks for Windows, and then I
am going to start agitating for an APR release.  We should have APR 1.0 out
the door soon-ish.  I am hoping to have it released sometime in the next month
or two.  :-)

Ryan

______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to