DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34250.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
1.2.10, I awaited a 1.2.9 final release.
We just add a 1.2.9 beta
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:52:31 +0200, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate
availability of Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 1.2.10. The release
contains a significant
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34227.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21983.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/03/31 02:31:54
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
ManagerBase.java FileStore.java StoreBase.java
StandardSession.java StandardManager.java
PersistentManagerBase.java JDBCStore.java
Lionel Farbos wrote:
Some questions :
- Why don't you provide any more a binary release for linux (since 1.2.6) ?
It's up to the contributors (jk committers).
Now, my company (JBoss) has invested a great deal of
money to provide me with hardware and software needed for such tasks,
but you'll have
I could provide Linux binaries for Suse 8.0 PPC and Suse SLES 9 but
it's up to distributions mainteners to provide such binaries (via
rpm/deb).
Take a look at jpackage for many Linux RPM binaries
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:11:01 +0200, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lionel Farbos wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I could provide Linux binaries for Suse 8.0 PPC and Suse SLES 9 but
it's up to distributions mainteners to provide such binaries (via
rpm/deb).
Take a look at jpackage for many Linux RPM binaries
Yes, that is my opinion too.
We should focus on providing a solid:
'configure make
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34251.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34251.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
yoavs 2005/03/31 06:21:07
Modified:docs bugreport.html index.html irc.html resources.html
xdocs/stylesheets project.xml
Log:
Update links to download pages, regen docs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/bugreport.html
I sure would appreciate an iSeries binary release though, if I can jump
on the band wagon. We haven't seen one of those since 1.2.6, either.
Thanks
Brent Sims
Systems Analyst 2
KC Human Services
-
Road rage, air rage. Why should I be forced to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Can anyone tell me what app this project uses for maintaining the
changlog?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mladen Turk wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I could provide Linux binaries for Suse 8.0 PPC and Suse SLES 9 but
it's up to distributions mainteners to provide such binaries (via
rpm/deb).
Take a look at jpackage for many Linux RPM binaries
Yes, that is my opinion too.
We should focus on providing a
Hi,
No app. Committers individually and manually update the changelog when they
make changes.
Yoav
-Original Message-
From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:44 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [OT] Change Log app
Can anyone tell me
Thanks
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 10:03, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
No app. Committers individually and manually update the changelog when they
make changes.
Yoav
-Original Message-
From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:44 AM
To: Tomcat
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I kind of disagree...
If I want Firefox for linux - I get it from Mozilla.org. It may be a
.tar.gz or .rpm - but it is a binary provided by the software
maintainers, not by a 3rd party ( like a linux distributor ). And it is
the 'real' thing, not a
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Linux is such a mess in large part because people who write software
treat it as second-class - 'let someone else deal with compiling
binaries for linux, I'll only do it for windows and mac'. As a result
linux distributions have the freedom to mess up and 'personalize'
They should appears shortly in :
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/iseries/jk-1.2.10/
Just wait the apache mirrors to do their job.
BTW, it's for V5R3 with latest PTF.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:40:26 -0800, Brent Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sure would
Merci, Henri -- much appreciated.
Brent Sims
Systems Analyst 2
KC Human Services
-
Road rage, air rage. Why should I be forced to divide my rage into
separate categories? To me, it's just one big, all-round, everyday
rage. I don't have time for
No new votes in the last 36 hours, so I'll send the results tonight
(when time arrives).
Hen
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:22:54 -0500, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update:
6 more votes recorded, 2 in the last 24 hours:
Ian Darwin (idarwin)
Peter Rossbach (pero)
Kurt Miller (truk)
At 03:34 AM 3/31/2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
1.2.10, I awaited a 1.2.9 final release.
We just add a 1.2.9 beta
Kurt and Henri voted yes. I'd presume Mladen's vote was +1 too.
Glenn didn't vote yes, he reserved his vote for stress testing.
Mladen, could you please slow down long enough to give
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34258.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34259.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34259.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34259.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34258.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
fuankg 2005/03/31 18:58:41
Modified:jk/native/netscape Makefile.netware
Log:
added new files.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +3 -1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/netscape/Makefile.netware
Index: Makefile.netware
Hi,
Binaries can be found at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/
For now there is only a set of win32 binaries:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/jk-
1.2.10/
added NetWare binaries for testing:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Mladen,
for getting the Apache13 and Netscape connectors compiled I had to patch jk_connect.c:
http://www.apache.org/~fuankg/mod_jk/jk_connect.c.diff
if you have no better idea I would like to get that in...
This is related to MetroWerks compiler treating warnings as errors,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:34 AM 3/31/2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Mladen, could you please slow down long enough to give folks some
reasonable time to react to your candidates? (Was 40 hours from
tarball to announce.) Some reasonable amount of time, say 72 hours,
to give committers time to
19 votes were recorded, and thus the proposed Tomcat PMC is:
Keith Wannamaker (keith)
Mark Thomas (markt)
Larry Isaacs (larryi)
Filip Hanik (fhanik)
Tim Funk (funkman)
Kin-man Chung (kinman)
Henri Gomez (hgomez)
Mladen Turk (mturk)
Costin Manolache (costin)
Jim Jagielski (jim)
Bill Barker
Hi,
Where can I find the enhancements of Tomcat version 4.1.31 over 4.1.29 ?
All releases available belong to the 5.x versions and 4.* versions don't seem
to be available on the web site for me to see the change logs. Are there,
Appreciate your help. Are some of the bug-fixes from 4.1.29 -
41 matches
Mail list logo