Re: Admin webapp save-to-XML

2002-05-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 6 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 12:02:18 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Admin webapp save-to-XML > > Craig, > > I did look at the cod

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servletsManagerServlet.java

2002-05-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 6 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:16:24 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/

RE: Admin webapp save-to-XML

2002-05-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 May 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 23:41:15 +0200 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Admin webapp save-to-XML > > >This would eventually allow

Re: Admin webapp save-to-XML

2002-05-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 09:51:51 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Admin webapp save-to-XML > > > Ok, I don't want to start a fl

Re: Admin webapp save-to-XML

2002-05-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 May 2002, David Graff wrote: > Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 07:52:03 -0400 > From: David Graff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Admin webapp save-to-XML > > I'm in total agreement with t

Re: creating a custom StandardServer

2002-05-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Shane Redlick wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 15:50:41 -0700 > From: Shane Redlick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: creating a custom StandardServer > > Hello, > > Does anyone know of anyone thats ma

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Christopher St John

2002-05-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
+1 Craig On Wed, 1 May 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 13:59:59 -0700 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Christopher St John > >

Re: Problem with url session encoding - Tomcat 4.0.4 b2

2002-04-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Arshad Mahmood wrote: > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:12:48 +0100 > From: Arshad Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Problem with url session encoding - Tomcat 4.0.4 b2 >

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:59:45 -0700 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme > > > Wh

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > I'd say I hope it won't be needed, as the HEAD branch has recieved all the > bugfixes the main branch had. From the get go, I'd say it should be > reasonably stable. So at least to see where we are in terms of stability, I > really want to cut a Be

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan. > > The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is > accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1. > > > [X] +1 I approve this plan, a

Re: [COMMENTS] Tomcat 4.1 release plan draft posted

2002-04-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Punky Tse wrote: > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:08:40 +0800 > From: Punky Tse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Punky Tse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [COMMENTS] Tomcat 4.1

Daemon Thread Problem in J-T-C

2002-04-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
With the latest and greated J-T-C code, the HEAD branch of Tomcat 4 doesn't shut down cleanly. Usually, this implies that somebody forgot to mark their threads as daemon threads (or otherwise clean them up at shutdown time). Indeed, a thread dump after the shutdown command is executed shows a bu

Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence

2002-04-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:16:40 -0700 > From: Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence > > > > > Now, m

Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence

2002-04-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Personally, I don't have any problem with occasional announcements of interesting things related to Tomcat on this list, and MinTC certainly qualifies as "interesting" in my book! As for the community as a whole, consensus usually forms rapidly when the issue is aired publicly on the mailing list

Re: sip servlet API

2002-04-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, jean-francois jestin wrote: > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:44:13 +0200 > From: jean-francois jestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: sip servlet API > > Hello Guys, > > As you know, Anders Kristensen

Re: [4.0-HEAD] JSP source exposure ?

2002-04-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:09:11 -0700 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [4.0-HEAD] JSP source exposure ? > > > I had a few

Re: o.a.c.startup.EngineConfig doesn't do anything?

2002-04-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Originally, it was a placeholder for auto-config things that should be done at startup of the Engine. If there aren't any such things, it is technically unused code -- but I would just comment out the adding of the valve rather than removing the code, so people have a place to go later. Craig O

Re: FW: Unsubscribing

2002-04-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, todd tredeau wrote: > Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 19:15:52 -0500 > From: todd tredeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: FW: Unsubscribing > > The failure of an organization us

Re: Question: does Tomcat4 manage jsp/servlet threads?

2002-04-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Hugh J. L. wrote: > Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 00:15:36 -0800 (PST) > From: Hugh J. L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Question: does Tomcat4 manage jsp/servlet threads? > > Hi,

Re: EJB + Tomcat?

2002-04-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
I don't know of anyone who has expressed interest in doing this directly within Tomcat. I do know that Tomcat is (or can be) integrated with other EJB servers -- such as the J2EE Reference Implementation and JBoss -- to provide access to EJBs from Tomcat-based servlets. Writing an EJB container

Re: [VOTE] Final release of Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-03-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: > -- > Vote to release jakarta-tomcat HEAD as Tomcat 3.3.1 > > [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it > [X] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to

Re: Can Reload server.xml without restarting TC !!!HELP

2002-03-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Khurram Munir wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:19:27 + (GMT) > From: Khurram Munir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Can Reload server.xml without restarting TC !!!HELP > > Can Tomcat reload s

Re: Can I do HTTP authenticaton in my servlet?

2002-03-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
This kind of question is better addressed to the TOMCAT-USER list, since it's about how to *use* Tomcat instead of how to *develop* Tomcat. On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Zhidong Yu wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:04:59 -0800 > From: Zhidong Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[E

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startupContextConfig.java HostConfig.java LocalStrings.properties

2002-03-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 14 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: 14 Mar 2002 23:58:37 - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup > ContextConfig.

Re: Running tomcat as an embedded servlet engine

2002-03-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, WATKINS, Andy, FM wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:15:28 - > From: "WATKINS, Andy, FM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Running tomcat as an embedded servlet engine >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Proposed integration of Coyote in 4.0-HEAD

2002-03-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > I think we can can deal with this by creating naming Err, that was supposed to be "creative" naming ... > of the underlying loggers, but wanted to gauge opinions before putting > together a proposal for that. >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Proposed integration of Coyote in 4.0-HEAD

2002-03-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
+1 for all, with an expansion on the last point. Currently, Tomcat components all use the internal Logger APIs for logging both container event and error messages, as well as those from the web applications that are being run (i.e. calls to ServletContext.log()). What would people think of migrat

Re: HTML : multipart/form-data

2002-03-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
y On 12 Mar 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Date: 12 Mar 2002 17:08:18 +1100 > From: Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: HTML : multipart/form-data > > I was looking for a class capable of pars

Re: pluggable security implementations

2002-03-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Trevor Nielsen wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:47:21 +1000 > From: Trevor Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: pluggable security implementations > > > > I was just wondering if anyone knew

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 11 Mar 2002, Kevin A. Burton wrote: > Date: 11 Mar 2002 01:42:39 -0800 > From: Kevin A. Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs) > >

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyoteRequest.java

2002-03-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:20:57 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/s

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4LocalStrings.properties

2002-03-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:34:38 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/s

Re: cookie retrieval

2002-03-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Paul Wallace wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:51:31 +0700 > From: Paul Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Paul Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: cookie retrieval >

Re: valueUnbound() event in HttpSessionBindingListener

2002-03-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Matt Veitas wrote: > Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:35:40 -0500 > From: Matt Veitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: valueUnbound() event in HttpSessionBindingListener > > Doing so

Re: Tomcat 4.1-dev web application management current design &proposal for improvements

2002-03-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
See intermixed. On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 10:06:59 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 4.1-dev web application management current design & > pr

Re: Tomcat 4.1-dev HEAD catalina/docs

2002-03-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 13:23:49 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 4.1-dev HEAD catalina/docs > > Are all the docs in catalina/docs superceded

Re: Etiquette, MinimalTomcat, Bug 6670

2002-03-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 1 Mar 2002, Christopher K.St.John wrote: > Date: 1 Mar 2002 08:26:02 -0800 > From: Christopher K.St.John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Etiquette, MinimalTomcat, Bug 6670 > > > I'm stuck, and not sure how to proc

Re: [4.0.3] [VOTES] Upcoming release and security fix

2002-02-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
+1 for option A and B together (they don't have to be mutually exclusive, and we can examine user behavior to see if binary patches are an idea worth pursuing. +1 for 4.0.3-b1. Craig On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:09:08 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EM

Re: Tomcat 4.1-dev Host unpackWARs not working

2002-02-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
1-dev Host unpackWARs not working > > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:18:39 -0600 > > > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: Tomca

Re: Tomcat 4.1-dev Host unpackWARs not working

2002-02-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
1-dev Host unpackWARs not working > > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:18:39 -0600 > > > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: Tomca

Re: Tomcat 4.1-dev Host unpackWARs not working

2002-02-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:18:39 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 4.1-dev Host unpackWARs not working > > The Host attribute unpackWARs="tru

Re: Class Loader Triggers

2002-02-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, James Carman wrote: > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:09:33 -0500 > From: James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Class Loader Triggers > > The documentation states (as

Re: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670

2002-02-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Tomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670 > > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:25 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Cou

Re: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670

2002-02-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
See intermixed. On 25 Feb 2002, Christopher K.St.John wrote: > Date: 25 Feb 2002 17:30:44 -0800 > From: Christopher K.St.John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670 > > Aar

RE: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670

2002-02-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Aaron Smuts wrote: > Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:58:27 -0500 > From: Aaron Smuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670 > > I'm

Re: problem in Struts sample code

2002-02-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Forwarding to STRUTS-DEV, where this belongs. Craig On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, teik wrote: > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:46:47 +0900 > From: teik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: problem in Struts sample code > > Hello, > I f

Re: Difference between Valve and javax.servlet.Filter?

2002-02-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, GuruPrasad wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:59:55 -0800 (PST) > From: GuruPrasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Difference between Valve and javax.servlet.Filter? > > What are the difference be

Re: o.a.c.mbeans.*

2002-02-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 13:05:34 -0600 > From: Christopher K. St. John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: o.a.c.mbeans.* > > > It looks like the current mbeans code i

Re: /servlets/ URL path...

2002-02-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:23:11 + > From: Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: /servlets/ URL path... > > When I invoke a servlet suc

Re: SessionListener sessionDestroyed() - session already invalidated- Tomcat 4.0.2

2002-02-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Bigwood, David wrote: > > My question is this: > > Is there a specific reason why the session is invalidated BEFORE expire > calls the session listeners, or could we move the setValid(false) call > down? > This ordering is based on what the JavaDocs say for the HttpSession

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connectorResponseBase.java

2002-02-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
02/02/20 08:29:00 $ > * > * ==== > * > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ > * > * @author Craig R. McClanahan > * @author Remy Maucherat > - * @version $Revision: 1.20 $ $Date: 2002/02/14 17:03:39 $ > + * @ver

Re: {PATCH] Enhanced JNDI realm

2002-02-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
John, Sorry it took so long to respond to this ... life has been busier than I would have believed possible. I've reviewed the patch, and the changes seem reasonable. Can you do me a favor, though, and send me a complete updated version of JNDIRealm.java? For changes this big, I get a little gu

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeansMBeanUtils.java mbeans-descriptors.xml

2002-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:01:06 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > [snip] > The addition of GlobalNamingResources and the UserDatabase slipped below > my radar somehow. I looked at the latest server.xml from CVS. I grep'd > the docs in CVS and didn't notice anything in the docs about these yet. > > The addition of G

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:53:52 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling > > Remy Mauch

Re: filter and authentication

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Natalie Vilenkin wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:58:03 +0200 > From: Natalie Vilenkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: filter and authentication > > Hello. > > To our kno

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:25:07 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling > > Currently the JDBCRealm does not use db

Re: JMX Support in Tomcat 4

2002-02-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:24:53 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JMX Support in Tomcat 4 > > > On Tuesday 12 Februa

Re: JMX Support in Tomcat 4

2002-02-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Carlos Quiroz wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:55:30 +0200 > From: Carlos Quiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JMX Support in Tomcat 4 > > On Tuesday 12 February 2

Re: JMX Support in Tomcat 4

2002-02-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, mark wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:41:04 -0500 > From: mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JMX Support in Tomcat 4 > > Hi Craig, > > Well, I grabbed last nights

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

2002-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > [X] +1 - I support this release and I will help > [ ] +0 - I support this release > [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:10:57 +0100 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line > > >I'm wonder

Re: JAASRealm

2002-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, juraj Lenharcik wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:41:30 +0100 > From: juraj Lenharcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: JAASRealm > > Hello, > > can it be that the JAASRealm c

Re: MBeans dev

2002-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Petr Jiricka wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:05:36 +0100 > From: Petr Jiricka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: MBeans dev > > - Original Message - > From: "Dav

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:31:44 +0100 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line > > >> I don't

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/coreStandardWrapperValve.java

2002-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 8 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: 8 Feb 2002 16:04:31 - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core > StandardWrapperValv

Re: pageEncoding and Jasper

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:26:51 +0900 (JST) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: pageEncoding and Jasper > > From: "Craig

Re: Aggregate Realms?

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
A third option (which of course I thought of just after pressing SEND :-) is to use the JAASRealm (HEAD branch only), and define your aggregation inside JAAS. It seems to be oriented towards this sort of use case. Craig On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Marc Tinkler wrote: > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:30:20

Re: Aggregate Realms?

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Marc Tinkler wrote: > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:30:20 -0500 > From: Marc Tinkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Aggregate Realms? > > Hello, > > Since containers can only have a single realm, I wou

Re: MBeans dev

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Renato wrote: > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:14:59 > From: Renato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: MBeans dev > > Hi all, > > I've seen a lot of development regarding MBean lately and I'm a little lost

Re: servlet-path, path-info and Filters

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
? > Where's the error? (me, Tomcat, the spec, or all of the above) :-) > > russ > Craig (this is straying into a topic for TOMCAT-USER instead of here ...) > > - Original Message - > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: servlet-path, path-info and Filters

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
which is a good thing, because different filter mapping patterns could both apply to the same request and there wouldn't be any way to tell them apart. > thanks again, > russ > Craig > > - Original Message - > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:40:21 -0500 > From: Larry Isaacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line > > I don't

Re: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:28:01 +0100 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line > > Hi to all, > >

Re: servlet-path, path-info and Filters

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Russ Trotter wrote: > Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:04:40 -0700 > From: Russ Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: servlet-path, path-info and Filters > > Does anyone here kn

Re: Filters and HttpServletResponse.close();

2002-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Glen Nakamura wrote: > Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 18:59:13 -1000 > From: Glen Nakamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Filters and HttpServletResponse.close(); > > Aloha, > > When does the HttpServletRe

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/coreStandardServer.java

2002-01-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > > > > > @@ -972,14 +973,23 @@ > > // If no address is specified, open a connection on all addresses > > if (address == null) { > > log(sm.getString("httpConnector.allAddresses")); > > -return (factory.c

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/coreStandardServer.java

2002-01-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:06:35 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/coreStandardServer.java

2002-01-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:01:48 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/

Re: shell connector

2002-01-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Oto Buchta wrote: > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:58:48 +0100 > From: Oto Buchta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: shell connector > > Dne pá 11. leden 2002 15:05 Armijn Hem

RE: pageEncoding and Jasper

2002-01-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Kevin Jones wrote: > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:37:10 - > From: Kevin Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: pageEncoding and Jasper > > So it's only used when com

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/bin jasper.bat jasper.sh

2002-01-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/bin jasper.bat > jasper.sh > > Craig, > > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > > > Patrick, the Tomcat 4.0.x equivalents of "$CATALINA_HOME/shared/classes" > > and "$CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib" are "$CATALINA_H

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/bin jasper.bat jasper.sh

2002-01-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 30 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: 30 Jan 2002 21:23:02 - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/bin jasper.bat > jasper.sh > > patrickl02/01/30 13:23:

Re: pageEncoding and Jasper

2002-01-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
The rules that cover this stuff are in the JSP 1.2 Spec, Section 2.10.1. On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Kevin Jones wrote: > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:41:48 - > From: Kevin Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat-Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:

Re: [Xerces2] Stop the Release! -- ALL PROJECTS PLEASE READ

2002-01-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Andy, I have made the changes required to compile the HEAD branch of jakarta-tomcat-4.0 with either xerces-2_0_)_beta4, or with an earlier version. Based on this experience, I believe that you are oversimplifying the nature of the problem some people might have in implementing this switchover.

Re: Load balancing in Tomcat 4.0.x?

2002-01-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:04:28 +1300 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Load balancing in Tomcat 4.0.x? > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:02

Re: Tools for Building Web Services

2002-01-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:36:00 -0500 > From: Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tools for Building Web Servi

RE: Tools for Building Web Services

2002-01-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
See intermixed. On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:00:14 +0100 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Tools for Building Web Services > > >If y

Re: Ant2

2002-01-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Josh Nylander wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:43:25 -0800 > From: Josh Nylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Ant2 > > I know little of ant and probably less about this particular issue b

Tools for Building Web Services

2002-01-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
If your interest in Tomcat is for developing Web Services, you will be interested in the Java Web Services Developer Pack (version 1.0ea1) that was just released by Sun: http://java.sun.com/webservices The Java WSDP includes early releases of base XML technology: JAXP 1.2 (with schema support

Re: Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Javabinaries uploaded

2002-01-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:04:36 +0100 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2]

RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded

2002-01-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 23:26:37 +0100 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded > > I've got a

Re: HEAD Branch Build Problems

2002-01-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:26:11 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: HEAD Branch Build Problems > > > I"ve just done a

HEAD Branch Build Problems

2002-01-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
I"ve just done a CVS update to pick up Remy's reorganization of the build process (and added dependency on jakarta-tomcat-connectors). Trying to do "ant clean" followed by "ant" fails on line 155 of the jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/build.xml file, with the compiler claiming that class org.apa

Re: Interceptor in Tomcat 4.0 ???

2002-01-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Renato wrote: > Date: Tue Jan 22 16:57:45 2002 > From: Renato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Interceptor in Tomcat 4.0 ??? > > Hi all, > > I have an Interceptor I wrote for Tom

Re: The problem with "/"

2002-01-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Peter Sojan wrote: > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 03:30:43 +0100 > From: Peter Sojan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: The problem with "/" > > > Thank you for your hint! > >

Re: sessionClosing event???

2002-01-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Matt Veitas wrote: > Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:39:37 -0500 > From: Matt Veitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: sessionClosing event??? > > I was looking through the code

RE: Alternate JMX implementation

2002-01-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:15:15 +0100 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Alternate JMX implementation > > Bravo. > > Consider als

RE: Alternate JMX implementation

2002-01-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:15:15 +0100 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Alternate JMX implementation > > Bravo. > > Consider als

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >