I just added a bunch of changes to the WEBAPP/WARP sources to comply more
with WatchDog. I'll be rolling a new release of the module as soon as I get
back home...
Pier
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
This one didn't get thru...
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/
-- Forwarded Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 Jan 2001 18:45:17 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just added a bunch of changes to the WEBAPP/WARP sources to comply more
with WatchDog. I'll be rolling a new release of the module as soon as I get
back home...
Yeah yeah whatever... I screwed the build... SHIATZ! :( Hope to be able to
fix it before
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I just added a bunch of changes to the WEBAPP/WARP sources to comply more
with WatchDog. I'll be rolling a new release of the module as soon as I get
back home...
Pier
With the latest CVS code, I get compile
Another big one...
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 Jan 2001 23:11:14 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 64409 invoked
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 1/24/01 3:23 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another big one...
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing that I have asked (several times now) is that commits be made
smalle
ed at least once all the time...
Yep, makes sense...
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/
-
To unsubsc
ll be more than happy to consider anything, but right
now I have only 6 weeks and a lot of stuff to write :) :) :)
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out http://www.betaversion
the Unix and Win32
versions of Apache... I still need to deal with a couple of multithreaded
locks in multi threaded environments...
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out http://www.betaversion.org/~pier
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok,
He has been sending lots of excellent patches as well as the fact that he
already has an apache.org account. I think we should give him commit access.
We need two more +1's from others with commit access.
+1 :)
--
Pier Fumagalli
are the same way, hope, hope ;-).
The import of the ANT and TOMCAT-3.3 bugs from BugRat is linked to an alias
of [EMAIL PROTECTED], so, until those bugs don't get assigned to
a "proper" owner... When they are reassigned it'll go away (shouldn't take
long as far as I can see).
Pier
... Who did that???
GR...
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get Bugzilla to email open bugs to either the list or
interested individuals on an automated basis?
Nope, afaik, but it might be easy to do a script that queries the DB and
sends appropriate emails... Any volunteer?
--
Pier
the account on bugzilla (I believe!)
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The session handling enhancements proposed by Kief Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have been committed on the Tomcat 4.0 CVS
repository.
Way cool... Thanks Kief...
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
ith SIGHUP, SIGKILL and SIGUSR?...
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4.1 is a development branch which is temporarily abandoned.
Since it's abandoned, can't we just get rid of it?
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far the same code you wrote works with SIGHUP, SIGKILL and SIGUSR?...
Uh uh uh... So damn stupid Pier :) Now I get it, it's not because of
SIGSEGV, but it's because a SIGSEGV is raised when the VM is created... :)
Now I remember when I saw
George C. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's patch should be applied. As has been
pointed out a number of times Tomcat is the reference implementation for
the JSP and servlet JCRs.
Robert LUCIER... There's no F between the I and the E... He's not an
evil guy (or
Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have searched the archives and found a check in to jakarta-tomcat-service
but using anoncvs I can't checkout or even see if the module exists. Is this
some sort of permissions problem.
Darn... We forgot to link it to the PSERVER area :) Fixed now...
Just a brief note I thought might have been relevant for TC4 HTTP/1.1
connector...
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 21:28:46 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.0 (final release) --
[X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed
Great... They get thru... :) (Sorry for the duplicate post on TC4, had to
try it somehow!)...
They're going to come every week...
Pier (as always!)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfclere 01/08/31 03:26:24
Modified:webapp Makefile.in configure.in
webapp/apache-1.3 Makefile.in
webapp/apache-2.0 Makefile.in
Log:
Merge Ryan's changes with mines.
JF, make install doesn¹t work :) Also,
Deacon Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Are there any Tomcat fan-sites? Not support, help, etc, but _fan_ sites?
Are there any Tomcat mugs, posters, plushies, etc? One of my co-workers
threatens me she'll hurt me if I won't get a Tomcat plushie for her... ;/
I got several T-Shirts and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfclere 01/09/05 08:40:27
Modified:webapp configure.in
Log:
Correct a typo $ missing.
They just posted a bug on that (or better, reopened a completely
different one)... Check out if that's what exactly this patch fixes... Bug
#2999
We might not yet have FAN sites, but for sure this guy is going to put up a
HATE site :) :) :) Dumbass :)
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: Dennis Jay Dole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 20:33:30 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: will there ever?!
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't agree with that Pier, we must try to keep compatibility
with previous release of Apache 2.0, since there IS STILL NO
official release.
Many users are still using Apache 2.0.24-alpha (including myself),
or even 2.0.18-beta (including IBM
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Since there is no official release of httpd-2.0, I am confident that nobody
will actually care unless they're testing something... And by testing good
practice says get the HEAD of CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another ( and better ) solution - extend JspInterceptor ( well, the code
needs some cleanup - again I would recomend you do that in j34 workspace
).
Then you can add the dependencies and avoid any overhead - your XSP pages
will run as fast as a
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could stick with the last official tarball since that's an easy piece of
thing to download. So, if the latest version is 2.0.18 alpha (don't even
know since I use HEAD),
The is 2.0.25 (Thank STATUS!). 20010808 is a date...
I don't know about
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many users are still using Apache 2.0.24-alpha (including myself),
or even 2.0.18-beta (including IBM iSeries team porting Apache 2.0).
Ok, ok, I could understand your all developpers point of vue,
but let me say it appears just too elitist.
Not at
Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola Christopher:
I think this change is not good, as it does *all* passwords case
insensitive, regardles of the use of digest or not.., i think plain
passwords need to be case sensitive ..
Good catch :)
Pier
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is another point: What if one of you goes on vacation and forgets to
make the switch to assign it to someone else? The *only* thing that will
notify the list of the bug is the weekly email. What if it is a security
hole bug report and the weekly
Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, personally, would like to see the full bug report e-mails when they are
filed, like in the old days.
And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
Nagoya... Now I'm flamed because of the opposite...
I'm fucking damn
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
Nagoya...
When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
general@jakarta) or was it done
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope... Because I check the web...
Pier, you missed the point. I'm trying to say that you and the person
assigned to the emails are potential central points of failures.
Just because you don't want to click thru a couple of pages? Make me laugh
c'mon...
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's never been changed ... even in the previous installation of
Bugzilla (that led to the first hack on Apache's web site), there were
individual names attached to Tomcat components.
On the very first installation, the one on Daedalus, I remember
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s)
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
++1! I didn't even know it existed anyplace other than JTC. I have
been supplying patches recently for it too. Also, having duplicate
code anyplace is just a bad idea. I am on a crusade to remove all
duplicate code from every code-base throughout the
Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, while I might technically have the ability to call for a vote on
anything, it's bad form to call a vote on something that you personally
cannot make happen. Since I do not have the ability to set up a new
mailing list, it would be the
-- Forwarded Message
From: Erich Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: method park
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:45:46 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug 3515] - Processes hanging after stopping Tomcat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded Message
From: Holscher, David M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:00:16 -0500
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-10
10:38 ---
I
-- Forwarded Message
From: Holscher, David M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:16:22 -0500
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup
I'll RC2 first thing Wednesday.
___
David Holscher
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list
[X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev
Rationale is: I want other developers to look at the outstanding bugs, and
tomcat-dev is the dev list for Tomcat, so I don't see the point of
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
suggestion.
:-)
-jon (runs for cover)
Someone might call it I'm so freaking tired of it so that I just
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/10/01 9:12 AM, Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan to became more than just a contributer :
This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This
implies that either I'm getting old
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
I'm also worried about regression testing.
Well, let them do their fucking job... If we gave them committer access, it
means
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, thank you Pier !
I believe I'm just being fair... We have our disagreements on most of the
technical aspects of the code, that's why, to my disappointment too, we have
TWO releases coming out in parallel, but, as I said last week to Henri, the
William Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keeping up with 4.0 isn't a good enough reason, since I'm sure that
there are plenty of people like me who can't even think of moving to 4.0
until it has release-quality connectors.
I know... Working on it as fast as I can to fix bugs, and thank god
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2001 14:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mod_jk will use APR - that's certain. The only question is when and how
to do the transition without affecting the stability of the code. Having
an APR1.0 out is one of the requirements - I don't
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm new to the list, but I like to veto things too. Somebody point me
at something I can veto... :-)
You can always veto your committer status... :) :) :)
Pier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no question about APR stability or release-like quality. As long
as APR people are not certain the API will not change and don't put the 1.0
label on it.
I have insider news on this (me and David Reid hang out pretty often
together, he
Gomez Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm ok for that, may be by merging ajp14 and warp (ajp20).
Ok... I can agree with that...
We could have this protocol implementation in mod_jk
and mod_webapp :)
Sure do...
I'm serious here...
Me too...
- with mod_jk, you'll gain
Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something is indeed a little bizarre on the list today, mon ami. Maybe
because Craig isn't here to keep us in line =)
No, I believe we have to thank Jon for that... I believe that raising
another flame war at this point made us all realize that
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...now go to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Also tomcat 3...
Pier
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/12/01 4:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+source
+lt;resource-env-refgt;
+ lt;Descriptiongt;
+Object factory for MyBean instances.
+ lt;/Descriptiongt;
+ lt;resource-env-ref-namegt;
+bean/MyBeanFactory
+
-- Forwarded Message
From: Erich Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: method park
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:16:18 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug 3543] - pageContext.include() causes Illegal to flush
within a custom tag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gal, Developers,
I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0,
and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want
me to take a look?
No, I'm not yet working on those. I'm actually concentrating on
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all,
I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java,
and didn't find reference to SSL informations
forwarded from WebServer.
Should it be fixed before release since it
may break the spec ?
I could grab code from mod_jk to support
that, but I'm
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about adding warp protocol to mod_jk and
may be adding with functionnalities from ajp14 ?
I'm more than +1 about a merger between AJPv14 and WARP... The protocols are
pretty similar...
Of course in J-T-C, since mod_jk in J-T must be freezed.
Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi Gal, Developers,
I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0,
and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want
me to take a look?
(Sorry to follow myself up)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My view:
It should happen only after 3.3 (and 4.0) is released, switching to APR is
reasonably easy ( IMHO ), adding warp protocol is doable ( but require
some changes in the request representation to use the same struct as the other
jk modules
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
At the same time, since also JK is moving towards APR, but they're far
behind what WebApp does ATM, let's try to refine/update/change the WebApp
API, already based on APR, and work on it as the APR based
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Anyway, switching to APR is not that easy (IMO), if you want to take
advantage of ALL which is provided by APR (I'm deprecating ANSI-C here).
This is an incremental process, and can only increase
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a vote is in order, then.
My thinking for the current approach is as follows:
* If a JAR file is included in the official binary distribution of Tomcat,
it needs to be put there by the standard build script. Otherwise, you
end up
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all,
I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java,
and didn't find reference to SSL informations
forwarded from WebServer.
Should it be fixed before release since it
may
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, IMO, it's a win-win situation... JK can support all
web-servers and all
old protocols, it's tested, it works, we just need to make
it able to talk
the new AJPv14/WARP protocol and can be used as the strong
foundation.
WebApp will talk only
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where could we find even mod_webapp code ?
The JAVA code is compiled in... The C code comes from J-T-C and there's not
yet a tag... There are few NASTY-NASTY-NASTY bugs I need to fix before going
out...
Pier
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0.
To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at
jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE.
Yes, will do... Check out # 3510...
You'll have also to grab other information
like cipher suite used and bit
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0.
To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at
jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE.
Yes, will do... Check out # 3510...
You'll have also to grab other information
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all,
I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java,
and didn't find reference to SSL informations
forwarded from WebServer.
Should it be fixed before release since it
may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3611.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Release TC 3.3/4.0
DOH! :)
2) Start to think on how to merge AJP14/WARP
Let me know when
3) Add the AJP14-WARP protocol to mod_jk and mod_webapp (adaptation)
I'll keep track of the protocol modifications in TC4 and WebApp
4) Add APR to
Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the code for the TC Service Manager. Would anyone like to check it
into jakarta-tomcat-service? ...or even just take a look at it.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave, I'm going to check it out after I finish tackling my WebApp bugs
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
server_rec-hostname , the server rec is passed to you in all config
functions, and the virtual host name is in there (check out mod_webapp.c in
the Apache 1.3 directory, or mod_jserv)...
mod_webapp requires the VirtualHostName in httpd.conf does
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG
Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pier,
I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with
mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for
mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only?
It's still DSO-only... Any
Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pier,
I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with
mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for
mod_webapp with a statically linked
Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I've just noticed your post at Bugzilla. Nice touch ;-)
If I don't post it there, I'll forget about it in less than 5 minutes :) Now
it's in my reminded bugs default query :)
No hurry at all (I'm not even using TC 4 yet, just keeping my options
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
4.0 final integration.
GO for me... Still to do, fix Apache 1.3 under Windows (C-code in JTC
only)
Pier
Paxon Maina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After compiling mod_webapp.so and copying this file to the libexec
directory under apache ... on testing with apachectl configtest I get the
following error .. what could be the course ...
Syntax error on line 976 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3681
Summary: javadoc errors
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.0 Final
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Robert Daugherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the recommendation of Ted Husted I'm submitting this question to the
Developers list. Please let me know if you believe it belongs elsewhere.
I have recently installed Tomcat release v4.0 on a server that was already
running apache. I would
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 01:11:29AM +, Janek Bogucki wrote:
Hi,
I may have solved (or at least worked around) the the missing
'pthread_sigmask' symbol error encountered when trying to use
mod_webapp.so. From the mailing list it appears to
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Implementing a nice administration/configuration interface (as a
web app), talking to server components through a JMX interface
(so that Tomcat can be managed by any JMX compliant tool). Some
time ago I published some functional requirements
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not yet decided how we'll release the new modules, but the main
idea is to keep the 'base' version as small and clean as possible, and
all features to be 'add-ons', outside of the base distribution, and have
only bug fixes in 3.3.x-releases.
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I would be more in favor of releasing a 4.1 before that, focusing
mostly on small refactorings of the core (like the error report refactoring
I just did) and optimizations.
More specifically, that would include:
- the Service stuff (if
Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to nominate Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] for committer
status. His recent contributions include several security-manager-related
patches and documentation help, and appears keen to tackle the Admin Apps
functionality as well. I
On Thursday, October 18, 2001, at 10:37 am, Kazuhiro Kazama wrote:
Pier,
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WebApp Module daily snapshots available...
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 03:19:05 +0100
In theory (if everything goes right as expected and I didn't
screw up with
my SH
jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have started to add SSL support to mod_webapp. I have prepared a test patch
for client certificates, it works.
I will now add the missing part and improve it a little:
Storing the ssl_cert and other in a substructure of wa_request
It's working :) :) :) :)
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:00:00 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WebApp module daily run
### Started at Thu Oct 18 10:00:00 PDT 2001
### Updating CVS tree in /home/pier/WebApp/webapp-module-
P
Mark Buffington at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to ascertain if there is a fix for this error? I have
downloaded the Jakarta/Tomcat src from the site and I am receiving this
error when untarring on my Solaris system.
As I said 12 million times now, it's a bug in Solaris'
REPORT #745 Details.
Project: Tomcat
Category: Bug Report
SubCategory: New Bug Report
Class: webbug
State: received
Priority: high
Severity: critical
Confidence: public
Environment:
Release: 3.2.1
JVM Release: N.A.
Operating System: Solaris
OS Release:
Philipp Klaus at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
please find attached a fix for an bug in the WarpConnector of Tomcat4. I
had the problem that when uploading a picture (JPG) using a HTML form
(with input type=file tag) I got broken pictures on the server.
After comparing the two files
Marc Saegesser at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Vote: Tomcat 3.2.4 Release Plan
[ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
[X] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it
[ ] -0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm01/10/19 16:09:00
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
HostConfig.java
Log:
- This file had serious CRLF problems (at least under Windows).
Hopefully, this will fix them.
AFAICS this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nacho 01/10/20 12:07:22
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Tag:
tomcat_40_branch HostConfig.java
Log:
Solved CRLF problems ( Again )
Revision ChangesPath
No
1 - 100 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
