Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 23:43, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > think "We are the > world" as sung by a chorus of tomcat developers, all holding > hands, etc). He, he, I like this one :-) Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

age- >From: Christopher K. St. John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:54 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries > > > > Another update.

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

> Where should it go? Yes go, will fix it after. You could start installing the draft doc in your own dir in jakarta (public_html). We could all check it ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves 2 de mayo de 2002 15:44 > > Speaking of having a document at jakarta, it isn't there yet. > And it won't go live unless everyone likes it (think "We are the > world" as sung by a chorus of tomcat developers, all holding > h

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

"Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote: > > > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: jueves 2 de mayo de 2002 5:16 > > For me is controversial to have a document at jakarta, that affirms > Speaking of having a document at jakarta, it isn't there yet. And it won't go live unless ev

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

>Costin, Henri, Dan , Larry , Me, and much others done the >work, so apart >from not be true, i think is offensive to all that done that work, and >contributed his time to support it.. +1 Make a quick search on tomcat-user and tomcat-dev list mailing list archives and you'll see that mod_jk as

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves 2 de mayo de 2002 5:16 For me is controversial to have a document at jakarta, that affirms that prior to webapp, mod_jk was unmaintained, mainly because we have maintained itall the time. Costin, Henri, Dan , Larry , Me, and

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

"Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote: > > > Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries pier: "There > >were some other motivations when it all started... Hmmm. The theory is that the document should be absolutely 100% non-controversial. Other parts of the e

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

On Thu, 2 May 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > I can admit all other reasons, but jk never has been unmaintained for > any period of time in the past, more, prior to webapp announce, or more > or less at the same time, Dan Milstein and Henri did a big work > documenting and studiying the sources,

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: miércoles 1 de mayo de 2002 19:44 > > webapp > >Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries pier: "There >were some other motivations when it all started... Mod_JK was >unmaint

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

"Christopher K. St. John" wrote: > > Another update. Same disclaimers as before. > Mail client mishap, second one's a duplicate, sorry. -- Christopher St. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] DistribuTopia http://www.distributopia.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additi

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

mod_jk vs mod_webapp thread: pier : "Motivation? I don't like mod_jk, I wanted to use APR as a portable runtime for an Apache 1.3 module, I believe that the WARP protocol with built-in support for auto-deployment and web-application configuration is the way to go (rather than

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

mod_jk vs mod_webapp thread: pier : "Motivation? I don't like mod_jk, I wanted to use APR as a portable runtime for an Apache 1.3 module, I believe that the WARP protocol with built-in support for auto-deployment and web-application configuration is the way to go (rather than

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

>The only limitation is that it support only 255 methods ( unless >we use an expansion ), since it has a byte as method code ( to >facilitate table-based dispatching ). 255 methods should be suffisant since we could have the generic get/set property method ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Pascal Forget wrote: > mod_jk and mod_jk2 do not work properly with Apache 2.0. And mod_jk2 is not yet supposed to work ( since it's not even alpha ). But it does :-) Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Pascal Forget wrote: > mod_jk and mod_jk2 do not work properly with Apache 2.0. mod_jk works fine with Apache2.0 - at least the CVS HEAD. If someone has the time, we should replace/update the .tar.gz we distribute, that version has a bug that was fixed. Costin -- To u

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > Ok, I'm maybe being thick here, but I want to make sure I've got this > straight. The idea is that anyone who's clueful enough to search the > archives is likely to come across the term "AJP14", so it's best to > give them a hint (even if

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Pascal Forget [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:24 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries > > >mod_jk and mod_jk2 do not work

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

mod_jk and mod_jk2 do not work properly with Apache 2.0. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

Ok, I'm maybe being thick here, but I want to make sure I've got this straight. The idea is that anyone who's clueful enough to search the archives is likely to come across the term "AJP14", so it's best to give them a hint (even if term isn't going to mean anything to somebody who just wants t

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

"Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> webapp >> >>> web servers: >>>apache 1.3 >>>others? >> >> Apache2. I think they got IIS and iPlanet - don't know what level >> of support. >> > > When webapp got support for IIS? I think webapp has got a win32 build > fo

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

"Christopher K. St. John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following document is very incomplete, and in many > cases factually incorrect. The idea is to post it now, while > it's obviously in draft form, get feedback, and then clean it > up and publish it wherever would be most useful (jakarta

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: lunes 29 de abril de 2002 0:04 > > > mod_jk > > web servers: > >domino > >apache 1.3 > >apache 2.0? > >netscape > >others? > > AOLServer ( not in the main tree ). > IIS > > webapp >

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > mod_jserv > > where to get the source: >java-jserv repository I would recommend jakarta-tomcat, the version there has been tested the most with tomcat ( there are no significant changes AFAIK ). > unerlying protocol: >AJP11

Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

The following document is very incomplete, and in many cases factually incorrect. The idea is to post it now, while it's obviously in draft form, get feedback, and then clean it up and publish it wherever would be most useful (jakarta-tomcat connectors page, or the Tomcat FAQ) I'm currently tr