Two quick comments embedded.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Rick Mann wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:40:52 -0700
> From: Rick Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Extending Server.xml configurability (for
> additiona
> Correction, put them in $CATALINA_HOME/lib and $CATALINA_HOME/classes to
> make them visible to all web applications but not visible to
> Tomcat internal
> classes.
>
> The common directory lib and classes are visible to both tomcat internal
> classes and web apps.
Oops, thanks for the correcti
"Rob S." wrote:
>
> > 2) Add those search paths myself, in my webapp's code. Keep in
> > mind that, as
> > Rob S. speculated, I know very little about the ClassLoader mechanism.
>
> When I wrote the email, I wasn't implying that whatsoever, but I can see
> quite clearly now how it could be take
> 2) Add those search paths myself, in my webapp's code. Keep in
> mind that, as
> Rob S. speculated, I know very little about the ClassLoader mechanism.
When I wrote the email, I wasn't implying that whatsoever, but I can see
quite clearly now how it could be taken. Apologies for that implicati
> So, it seems that you're saying that I don't understand the class loading
> mechanism.
What I'm saying is that right now, there's a way to get the classes you want
into the web app(s) you want. Is it really hard to have Ant or Make create
a .war with the right file(s) in it? Personally, I'm a
Rick Mann wrote:
>
> on 8/29/01 1:15 PM, Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I'll throw an idea out here, although it may well get shot down for
> > either spec non-compliance, possible security concerns, or just general
> > lack of sex appeal ;-)
>
> I think I'd complain mostly
on 8/29/01 1:15 PM, Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll throw an idea out here, although it may well get shot down for
> either spec non-compliance, possible security concerns, or just general
> lack of sex appeal ;-)
I think I'd complain mostly on the grounds of lack of sex appe
Rick Mann wrote:
>
> on 8/28/01 9:08 PM, Rob S. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>> I've seen lots of discussion on the user list desiring the
> >> ability to have
> >>> additional classpaths available to web applications, but not necessarily
> >>> available to all web apps.
> >
> > ...mainly b
on 8/28/01 9:08 PM, Rob S. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I've seen lots of discussion on the user list desiring the
>> ability to have
>>> additional classpaths available to web applications, but not necessarily
>>> available to all web apps.
>
> ...mainly because people don't take the time to
on 8/28/01 2:13 AM, Reilly, John at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't understand why you would want this - doesn't the WEB-INF/lib and
> WEB-INF/classes not already provide seperation of classpaths for the various
> webapps. Am I missing something?
Well, I need to share a class tree and/or .j
10 matches
Mail list logo
