Available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/
More FHS compliant and misc fixes in spec files.
Important change from previous version, is that
the rpm didn't use no more IBM SDK 1.3.1 as
default SDK. Read the following RPM info :
---
Available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/
This rpm use external rpms from the Jpackage Project (http://www.jpackage.org)
Only needed binary rpm will be present in jakarta rpms directory :
jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.1.cvs20020612-1jpp.noarch.rpm
Hi Milt,
Anyone know anything about the mod_jk directive JkAutoMount? I've
seen some about it in the documentation, in the source, and via a web
search, but it's all a little bit sketchy. It sounds like it can be
used instead of JkMount, to have the web server query the servlet
container for
Don't take me as a definitive source as I'm not a commiter (or
even a developer) but I believe there is work to make the RPMs
for tomcat4 more FHS compliant. There is also some debate as
to how FHS compliance should be achieved (proper directory
structure, symlinking in post-install, etc.).
Second release of RPM uploaded to match update in source tarball.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/rpms/
tomcat3-3.3.1-2.src.rpm
tomcat3-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm
tomcat3-javadoc-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm
tomcat3-webapps-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm
also added latest IBM SDK 1.3.1
The TC 4.0.3 rpm have been reuploaded since
there was a nasty problem in previous upload
and only .asc file where present.
Sorry for the disturbance.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
Does anyone know how I can get the remote address if I am
using mod_proxy? I
tried mod_webapp and had too many problems - has that matured since
Tomcat-4.0? What about using AJP13?
mod_jk is now fully support in TC 4.0.2, with ajp13 and load-balancing
support :)
--
To unsubscribe:
so, what do I need to make work TC 4.0.2-2, apache 1.3.22.1-7
with ajp13
?
mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2.i386.rpm ???
seems to fail
the RPM are built against apache + mod_ssl.
I've got no problem to use Apache 1.3.23-2.8.6 + mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2
mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2 = mod_jk for Apache
What web connectors are available for connecting apache 1.3.x to tomcat
4.0.x? I recall trying to setup mod_webapp a while back but the attempt
failed in frustration and I ended up reverting back to tomcat 3 and mod_jk.
What connectors are available? (urls are good)
Tomcat 4.0.2 support now
Nice page :)
I read :
Tomcat 4.0.2 -- RPM Version
javax.servlet.ServletException: sun/tools/javac/Main
JSP examples will not execute in the default installation. To fix the problem,
you need to manually create a symbolic link between the JAVA_HOME/lib/tools.jar and
the CATALINA_HOME/lib.
You can't configure *apache* with mod_webapp and tomcat so that it
serves .html and .jsp from the same directory - right... (I
can't that's
for sure)
Via mod_jk (supported by TC 4.0.2), you could have tomcat serve
jsp/servlets and apache html, gif (everything which is not jsp/servlet)
In
De: Brown Bay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: jueves 14 de febrero de 2002 22:42
Has anyone got Tomcat (any version) running under OMVS on S390.
If you have a Linux VM on your S390 it will be easy since we package
Tomcat 3.3/4.0.2 as RPM ;)
BTW, Tomcat is a java apps which could be
I am using xerces 2.0.0 in one of my webapps so I need to move xerces.jar
out of /common/lib and into /server/lib. This works just fine with
4.0.2-b2.
With 4.0.2 If I keep xerces.jar in /common/lib and use xerces.jar 1.4.3 in
my web app everything starts up just fine. But if I move xerces.jar
Hi to all,
TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/
But read the following before rushing :
Tomcat 4.0.2 in light mode need :
servletapi 2.3, regexp 1.2 and xerces 1.x, that
are for some compiled (servletapi), present in
source
The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2
to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/
--
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list:
Tomcat 4.0.2 will support load balancing with mod_jk.
Stay tuned
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
Did you tried the RPM for TC 4.0.1 ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Steve
Load balancing can be simulate it with several warp connectors
and virtual
host, the load balancing is not more than a very good
configured pooling
connection, that's what is in 4.x
It's not totally true. VirtualHost and warp connectors didn't
do a real load-balancing.
ie: If you have 500
in my application i want two servers(tomcat 3.2.3)
you should upgrade to 3.3 ;)
residing on
two different
machines to cater to requests coming another different
machinewhich keeps
forwarding the requests to either of the servers.Pls guide how
can i achieve
the same.I have added two workers
there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ? What's
the status of
loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ?
Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly
there won't be
any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ?
State of the art is that today only mod_jk could
May I recommand you to switch to Tomcat 3.3, for strict
2.2/1.1 RI, which fixes quantities of problems like this ?
The RI for 2.2/1.1 is Tomcat 3.3 today, just take a look
at java.sun.com :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP
using mod_jk for connecting TC40 and Apache1.3 works fine for
Windows NT,
2000 and Solaris. I could easily build the connector from
source using the
download and the documentation from
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/.
The only difference between Solaris and Win is that I have
Use mod_jk for that :)
for TC 4.0 take stuff from :
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
for TC 4.0.1, ajp support is included.
In both case you should take a recent mod_jk like
the one for Tomcat 3.3
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/bin/win32/i386/
-
Tomcat is a _reference_ implementation.
I doubt it will be polluted by non-portable extensions, even
if they seem to
be useful.
Such as connectors to specific web servers? :)
What do you mean ?
While I did post this knowing I was at risk of appearing to troll, I
wasn't, and thought it
http://a.b.c.d:5476/ shows apache default page, as expected.
http://a.b.c.d:5475/ also shows apache default page.
but, http://a.b.c.d:5475/examples/ shows apache's 404 page
'Apache/1.3.20 Server at a.b.c.d Port 5476'
thanks again for your thoughts.
Using mod_jk it should be easy :
Could you
Which connector is the preferred or suggested connector for tomcat 4?
I've seen some people saying they switched back to mod_jk. Is
mod_jk more
desireable until mod_webapp is more advanced?
As a mod_jk developper, I will say use mod_jk with TC 4.0.1
since it support more WebServer and is
).
Travis
thank you,
sebastian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. November 2001 23:45
An: Tomcat Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: mod_jk / Ajp13 config fix on heavily loaded system
Hi to all
If you want a process to be independant from user connection,
disconnection on a Unix boxes (and more generally on any system),
you should make it run as a service.
For example on Linux, you make it run at init time via
script in /etc/rc.d/init.d/.
And to be sure your tomcat has nothing to do
Not necessary, if tomcat 3.x/4.0 forward the Range
information to the end Servlet
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Hi to all,
Some of you may have experienced problems on heavily
loaded system with mod_jk and Tomcat 3.2/3.3 when using
ajp13.
As you may know, the Ajp13 connection is permanent
and is created each time a WebServer task, for
example an Apache child, have to forward a request
to Tomcat.
And
It's a normal behaviour and happen when IIS didn't have
to works anymore with Tomcat (may be thread cleanup on IIS)
No problem here
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint :
It's normal, the error code is in fact a warning code,
telling you that the remote (Apache), closed the connection.
It's just informative :
PS: The latest version of Ajp13 for TC 4.0.1 from
jakarta-tomcat-connectors fix that 'bad report'
You could find the right and corrected jars at :
You could use also Tomcat 3.3 with mod_jk :
JkMount /examples/servlet/* ajp13
JkMount /examples/*.jsp ajp13
JkMount /onjava/servlet/* ajp13
JkMount /onjava/*.jsp ajp13
JkMount /web_change/servlet/* ajp13
JkMount /web_change/*.jsp
Hi,
This ques. is Reg. to Multiple Server certificate support at one
Webserver for SSL connection.
How can l map different multiple server Certificates to one
webserver?
Impossible my friend, you could only have ONE SSL Server certificate
by IP adress.
Some minor glitches appears and reported also
bu Nicolas:
RH 6.x use nobody user to run Apache HTTP server, so
I used also that one to operate tomcat but
RH 7.x use apache user to run Apache HTTP server
===
The new RPM will create a tomcat user which will run tomcat.
Other updates :
-
A little problem was discovered by Nicolas Mailhot,
in the tomcat 3.3, java part, with an incorrect tomcat
init script which wasn't used the new 'nobody' work mode.
Now tomcat run as nobody by default for security purposes.
The RPM has been updated to -2 release and the old one
removed :
Apache 2.0.18 is present in iSeries (AS/400)
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/http/services/apache.h
tm
And they use tomcat also
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/http/services/tomcat.h
tml
And to link the both they use mod_jk (ajp12/ajp13/jni)
;)
Allready answered, just search the mail archive
-Original Message-
From: Mradul Awasthi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EAPI Vs DEAPI
hi ,
i have mod_jk.so file.
i made with
/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs -o
message, but I will
report when we do more testing on it (probably later today).
I will try to switch the logging flag on, to get more error info.
thanx,
-reynir
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12. október 2001 15:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
RPMs and Linux binaries (i386) are available.
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/
You'll find mod_jk for Apache 1.3 STD and EAPI,
and mod_jk for Apache 2.0 grabbed
from jakarta-tomcat-connectors (20011123).
Why not take a look at mod_jk with TC 4.0 ?
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Typo : s/roto/root/
it's root not roto :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
From: Jonathan Eric Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 4.0 RPMs: when
What's wrong with the .zip file?
Jon
Problems with license of all the required jar (jta, jmx, ldap, tyrex).
I asked Craig to have all the jars in a
First mod_jserv, then mod_jk, now mod_webapp.
First ajp12, then ajp13, now warp.
Which Apache connector will be around in the longer term?
Should we abandon mod_jk and ajp1x?
mod_jk is here for a long time, supporting
TC 3.2/3.3/4.0 :)
...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Rams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:19 PM
To: GOMEZ Henri
Cc: Manu L'Malin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ssl performance
We just encontered a problem, when a session is started on one tomcat
and then through a load balancer it ends up on the another webserver
that webserver dosen't direct the session to correct tomcat ?
Is this a bug or isn't mod_jk supposed to work that way ?
This is working with
I heard a lot of good things about 4.0. But there are no RPMs
released:(
Can anyone comment the situation with them (or just give URL:)?
We still have problems with related jars, like jdbc2.0ext, jta,
jmx, ldap which are copyrigthed by Sun and so couldn't be
included in RPM
Hello,
I have an error, which will occure, when I refresh in the Web Client
is too fast,
Tomcat will throw an Error (or better mod_jk ?), which popup on
stdout:
java.io.IOException: Broken pipe
at
java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:83)
at
Is there a lite edition of tomcat available for using with
J2ME-CDC-Foundation profile. We want to use tomcat in a memory
restricted
environment. What are the possibilities.
Take a look at tomcat-3.3.
Costin have conducted some test on it's PALM :)
I would like to force 2 separate iPlanet 4.1 Web servers to
redirect servlet
requests to a Tomcat 3.2.3 servlet engine running on an
additional box. Is
Tomcat capable of keeping session and responding to the
correct, requesting
Web server?
Yes, mod_jk for iPlanet handle that case, I'm
I've got a couple of quick newbie questions:
Environment: Apache 1.3.20 on Solaris 8; Tomcat 3.2 (using
mod_jk); Apache
and Tomcat running on the same box.
If I configure and run multiple Tomcat workers on the same machine
(listening on different ports of course), and let's say they
are all
We are using Tomcat 3.2.3, ibm jdk 1.2.2 (aix).
(our) Tomcat has a similar symptom than the bug 1006
described in the bug database : Tomcat standlone
accumulate blocked thread and stop responding.
In TC 3.2.3 the code setSoTimeout is in HttpConnectionHandler !
Isn't it supposed to be fixed in
Thanks for the replies!
Just to be very sure, if I try mod_jk.dll then I'll have to
change this line
in /conf/tomcat-apache.conf
LoadModule jserv_module modules/ApacheModuleJServ.dll
to
LoadModule jserv_module modules/mod_jk.dll
and all of this will stil work with version 3.2.2?
mod_jk use
Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
at my RPMs :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/
-
Henri Gomez
Yes.. but the difference with mod_jk.so is that mod_jk-eapi.so
can use SSL protocol?
How many times I have answered to that ?
eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
noeapi for std apache
I use Apache 1.3.. no matter that??
Roby.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
So use directly :
http
Thanks Jan, I'll add this as readme.txt in
directory :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From:
It was answered many times before.
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09075.html
People should really take a look at :
USER LIST :
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user%40jakarta.apache.org/
DEV LIST :
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/
Hi (.*),
Hope all is well around the globe.
We've been doing some stress testing here with Tomcat
3.2.3 operating
in standalone mode and with apache via the mod_jk ajp13
connector.
We've noticed something interesting which we're not sure about.
Tomcat
Take a look at mod_jk in Tomcat 3.3 cvs or
better in jakarta-tomcat-connector.
There is a working version for Apache 2.0 :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8
Hi there!
I want to use tomcat togehter with apache+mod_ssl. However,
accessing my
servlets via SSL doesn't work at all, whereas using normal
http requests it
all works fine. In any documentation about using SSL with
apache/tomcat I
allways find configuration examples for mod_jk, but none for
In any documentation about using SSL with
apache/tomcat I
allways find configuration examples for mod_jk, but none for mod_jserv
(which I use). Is mod_jk a must when using apache/tomcat/SSL?
If not, how
can it be done with mod_jserv?
Yes, mod_jk will forward to your servlet/JSP
the SSL
mod_webapp is ONLY for Tomcat 4.0.
For 3.2 and 3.3 (or 4.0), use mod_jk instead
# httpd.conf
AddModule mod_jk.c
JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties
JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log
JkLogLeveldebug
Alias /examples /var/tomcat/webapps/examples
Directory
Thanks to forward the request to tomcat-dev instead :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From:
May I suggest you to try mod_jk with ajp13 port for Tomcat 4.0 ?
All stuff on jakarta-tomcat-connectors :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B
It appears we are fighting the same battle at the same time.
I have ripped
through this for an entire night. Not only isn't there a
build script for
solaris in the default tar, the apxs compile directions are wrong!
The build script is obsolete and you should use instead
Makefile.linux,
Is there anything I need to do with tomcat 3.2 configuration
when I turn on
SSL in Win2k IIS 5?
All of the supposely https://server/... are changed to
http://server:443/...
https://server/ should be use instead of http://server:443/
Did you install IIS connector and did you try IIS/Tomcat
I have setup Tomcat to work with Apache and it is fine. I try
to use IIS and it does not work.
The latest millenium (M4) get its IIS code from jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
But from what I see in logs I'll be for a configuration mistake.
Could you send the IIS config files ?)
Does anyone have
Could you switch to mod_jk found on jakarta-tomcat-connectors ?
It contains up to date codes and have timestamp in logs.
Write failed seems to indicate you have restarted Tomcat at some
time or may be you add too many mod_jk process in Apache compared
to available threads handling ajp13 in
-1.3
make -f Makefile.apxs
I'm obviously in over my head here being a newbie... but I'd
like to fix
that by learning why the apxs command looks like it all but
just finishes
building mod_jk before barfing.
Thanks again!
Michael
on 7/10/01 9:18 AM, GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry
I've got no idea yet.
Could you forward the question to TC dev list ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
JK_NT_SERVICE is present on mod_jk and you'll find
up to date versions on jakarta-tomcat-connectors
sub-project.
All remarks and contributions will be welcome :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD
ya but i need to get the .so file also as i want to put it on HP-UX.
.h files are missing ...
Could I recommand you grab jakarta-tomcat-connectors CVS and use
the new build system. It's using autoconf and let you build your
stuff in minutes :)
p.d.: what is the difference between mod_jk and
mod_webapp?(It is The
version of tomcat?)
mod_jk is the current reference for connecting a
web-server (Apache 1.3/2.0, IIS, iPlanet, Domino, ...) to
tomcat web-server. It supports load-balancing and all
the Tomcat release 3.1/3.2/3.3/4.0
mod_jk.so-eapi is to be used when your apache is using EAPI (mod_ssl)
mod_jk.so-noeapi when using plain std Apache
:)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8
You should take a look at J-T-C, there is a build conf stuff
which should help you
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Michael
on 7/10/01 9:05 AM, GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should take a look at J-T-C, there is a build conf stuff
which should help you
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint
unpredictable.
I can just hope that I have a good luck, not to see this happen again.
1) What's your platform ? Linux/BSD. if you're using Linux use our RPM
please :)
2) Did you do makefile -f Makefile.linux ? What's the output ?
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL
You didn't compile ALL the source files
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Anshul
I had the same problem. Someone told me to use mod_jserv
instead of mod_jk
and it works fine
May we recommand you try (and insist) using mod_jk and ajp13.
That's the current connector and if there is problem we'll fix
them.
The step are know, first try mod_jk + ajp13 and next try mod_jk +
We use mod_jk with Tomcat and Apache on a number of servers and have
never seen this problem. I honestly don't believe mod_jk has anything
to do with it.
Thanks Simon :)
mod_jk found in TC 3.3 and jakarta-tomcat-connector
handle correctly the Tomcat restart.
Could you test it ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39
The description is right, but the implications are
wrong. Due to
how TCP/IP works, these sockets will be closed by the OS within a few
minutes. I know on some UNIXs you can set this at run time
(i.e. Solaris)
and some its a compile time directive (i.e. FreeBSD). I don't
know about
I'd be willing to proofread and validate any docs for the j-t-c (i.e.
Apache/Tomcat integration). I don't have time to actually write the
docs, but I could conceivably help those who don't understand how it
works, but do have the time and patience to learn it and write docs
for it.
Be our
Not to get into a great big argument over OS version commercial
products, but if OS projects expect to be taken with the same
consideration
as commercial they have to accept to be compared across the board. This
includes documentation. You can't just pick and choose the
battles you want
The scripts should be named apache ant tomcat and should be
in /etc/rc.d/init.d/
or named httpd and tomcat.
if you're a Linux user and could use RPM, there is pre-packaged
RPM for you which take care of that :)
then you should make a symbolic link to them in /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/
in the case that
I'm going to throw my 2 cents worth in here, did you,
perhaps, stop
Tomcat after starting Apache? I seem to remember that every
time you stop
Tomcat, you must also stop Apache, then start Tomcat and start Apache.
No more a problem on mod_jk for TC 3.3-m3 :)
i have some strange entries in my mod_jk.log, generated almost
every minute:
[jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 111
[jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1
[jk_uri_worker_map.c (335)]:
jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_close, NULL
Take a look at your mod_jk.conf.
For example check the JkMount command and LogLevel
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
I have one site running three contexts with Apache 1.3.19 on FreeBSD
running against Tomcat 3.3m3 on a Solaris machine. Right now, I'm
using ajp13.
Everything seems to be going fine except every once in a while, almost
randomly, I get back a directory listing of the first context
instead
I'm having problems getting ajp13 working reliably with mod_jk
and the load
balancer. Here is my configuration:
- 4 Sun Solaris Sparc machines with similar setup
- Apache 1.3.20
- Tomcat 3.2.2
- mod_jk compiled from Tomcat 3.2.2 source
- JDK 1.2.2
- Cisco Local Director sitting in front of
mod_jk present in jakarta-tomcat-connectors allow such build
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
Hi Sergey,
With Tomcat 3.2.2 RPMS, I got some XML parser.
I suspect it is sun's JAXP implementation 1.0. It DOES NOT support
namespaces (I found it from the error messages:) so it is not possible
to use XSL in JSPs/Beans/servlets.
That's a known problem. I package these RPMs and asked
I launch that poll to see if which XML parser RPMS users want to
see included by default.
Probably no XML parser should be included. . Just document the
fact that
admin should synlink necessary jars to the tomcat lib
directory. IMHO it
is wrong idea to include parser with any java app which
The XML parser should be included in the distro since new and average
users MAY never use XML in their apps.
OK. My vote is for xerces (it is good and has same licence).
Also, it would be good to have the list of tomcat-compatible parsers.
At the moment, I tried jaxp 1.1 and latest xerces -
is there someone that knows why exists two files mod_jk.so (-eapi and
-noeapi) for LINUX?
I'm updating the mod_jk doc on TC 3.2/3.3/J-T-C
Which do I have to use? Do I have to cut the word after '.so'?
If you have an Apache with EAPI (ie mod_ssl) use mod_jk.so-eapi
and rename to mod_jk.so
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09075.html
I do not know whether it is JAXP-compatible and native but some MS XML
parser does exist...
I'm not sure we will ever saw a MS XML parser on Linux and
may never a MS Java XML Parser
I started think at this that's why my latest xerces-j RPM have a :
Provides jaxp 1.1
Great! This is a
Please make us a favor, try our RPM.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.2/rpms/
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B
You could try to increase the number of Ajp13
threads in server.xml
Also try to increase mod_jk cachesize :
worker.ajp13.port=8009
worker.ajp13.host=localhost
worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
worker.ajp13.lbfactor=1
worker.ajp13.cachesize=8
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL
I use Linux RedHat 7, but it seems that SSL options was not taken in
account with default launching of httpd (with httpd start) so I made
first some modifications of httpd conf (specially putting on comment
the
ifDefine SSL tags to make it taken in account, and made some
mistakes
maybe
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
