Re: mod rewrite, RequestDispatcher and intercepting requests to the server

--- Michael Tickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am attempting to intercept all requests to a server so I can extract information from the header. I would then like to pass the request on to the server for it to display the user the requested page. Sounds straightforward. I am led to

Re: mod rewrite, RequestDispatcher and intercepting requests...

--- Michael Tickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am currently using apache to sent all requests to my servlet with RewriteRule ^(.*)/(.*) http://win2k:9090/servlet/redirect?To=/$2 [R,L] so my servlet gets the parameter To and knows what page the user requested. That needs to have some

Re: help: no stack trace in standard out

--- Jon Crater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but i can't get a stack trace printed to the standard out to save my life. any ideas? Whether or not a stack trace gets printed is not a function of the logging level. A stack trace will be printed under the following conditions: If an uncaught

Re: Macintosh and Java

--- S Lafredo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. I am running MacOS 9.x, MRJ 2.2.4 and downloaded jakarta-tomcat-3.2.1 I clicked on the Tomcat Start and a Java console opens and displays 2001-02-25 12:40:09 - PoolTcpConnector: Starting HttpConnectionHandler on 8080 So it looks like it is

Re: TC3.2.1 - response commit on included JSPs

--- Incze Lajos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it's not correct in general but the JSP 1.1 syntax contains the flush="true" attribute - obligatory in case of jsp:include. So, it's inconvenient but tomcat3 is an jsp 1.1 implementation. Am I missing something? incze The JSP 1.1 spec

RE: TC3.2.1 - response commit on included JSPs

--- Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: to the spec. Your discussion below about the JspWriterImpl seems to be something different. So rather than quess, let me ask exactly what are you referring to when you say, "dynamic include of a JSP page"? Is this jsp:include...,

Re: POST Method

I'm encountering a slightly different problem with POST. I'm using tc3.2.1 and apache 1.3.17 on win32 for dev purposes (we haven't yet setup the linux boxes that will be used for production). When send a request from a form method=POST... to tomcat via Apache, it gets invoked okay, but the

Re: Aliases/Rewrites (was: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

--- Jan Labanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is my (and others) experience that mod_jk has to be loaded BEFORE mod_rewrite for it to act responsibly. In your case the mod_rewrite is linked statically, i.e., loaded before mod_jk. I would suggest to make both mod_jk and mod_rewrite DSO,

mod_vhost_alias.c

I realize this is an apache question, but... could someone give me a link to a download site for mod_vhost_alias.c ? I can compile src if necessary for solaris and linux, but I need a precompiled binary for NT. Everytime I try to search the internet for mod_vhost_alias I get a zillion links to

Aliases/Rewrites (was: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

Filip, --- Filip Hanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, if I could just get someone to tell me why apache Alias and Rewrites are not working with tomcat... tell us what you are trying to do and send us some sample config files and how your environment is setup. is becomes much easier

Re: mod_vhost_alias.c

/ApacheModuleStatus.dll #LoadModule usertrack_module modules/ApacheModuleUserTrack.dll I don't see mod_vhost_alias.c anywhere in this. Do you? Mel --- Steve Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mel Martinez wrote: I realize this is an apache question, but... could someone give me a link to a download

Re: mod_vhost_alias.c

--- Steve Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm... Try searching the web for ApacheModuleVhost or something since that is probably what the DLL if it exists would be called.. good suggestion. I thought they were making an effort to at least keep parallel functionality in the win

Re: mod_vhost_alias.c

that there is no version of mod_vhost_alias available for the win32 version of apache. Hopefully someone will pop-up with a correction to that. Mel --- Mel Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Steve Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm... Try searching the web for ApacheModuleVhost

ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for a jkmount statement in the auto-generated mod_jk.conf-auto file? I.E., it always generates statements like: JkMount /myapp/servlet/* ajp12 JkMount /myapp/*.jsp ajp12 I've even tried disabling all reference to ajp12 from

Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

al Message - From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:32 PM Subject: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for a jkmount statement in the auto-genera

apache AliasRewrites vs tomcat?

I'm trying to assertain just how Apache and Tomcat interact regarding aliases and rewrites. I'm using Apache 1.3.14 and tomcat 3.2.1 with mod_jk.c. I don't know if the latter is the 'latest' version. If I have apache configured to apply an alias or a rewrite rule to a reqest, I can tell from

Apache + tomcat: help w/mod_alias

Hi, First off, I'm using Apache 1.3.14 (win NT and linux) and tomcat 3.2.1. If I need to upgrade I will, if I know that it will fix this. I'm trying to setup tomcat with an existing apache web server. I'm having trouble figuring out the best way to handle an otherwise simple Alias mapping.