> >From: Stewart, Daniel J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:34 PM
> >To: Tomcat Users List
> >Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
> >
> >Since I will be occasionally receiving messages in the
> 10Mbyte range, I
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:34 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
>
>Since I will be occasionally receiving messages in the 10Mbyte range, I
>can't read in a line at a time - it takes too long.
>
AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
Hi,
I should have thought that as a general principle it's not a good idea
to try to store the response in a byte array. I recently worked on a
piece of code that did just that (worse, actually, it then c
s on the use of the standard
library are welcome.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:30 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
Howdy,
>public void service(HttpServlet
ssage-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 September 2003 19:30
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
Howdy,
>public void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res) {
> BufferedReader reader = req.getReader(
Howdy,
>public void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res) {
> BufferedReader reader = req.getReader();
> try {
>char [] charArr = new char[req.getContentLength()];
>reader.read(charArr);
>String str = new String(charArr);
>
>try {
> File f = new File("ser
rr.println(err.toString()); }
}
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
Howdy,
Perhaps if you share your servlet which writes the message body
Howdy,
Perhaps if you share your servlet which writes the message body to a
file, we could help you write a better servlet ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Stewart, Daniel J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:31 AM
>To: [
Hi Frans!
Frans Thamura wrote:
> I think, Gomez must create tomcat-doc ASAP.
I agree completely! Let people do what they do best.
Un saludo,
Alex.
>> "Nick" == Nick Stoianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nick> I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the
Nick> open source community but this is why I think that TOMCAT
Nick> sucks:
Some of the points you're mentioning are not Tomcat specific, but
general "problems"
une 29, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: TOMCAT SUCKS
> Hi Jeff!
>
> "Noll, Jeff HS" wrote:
> > Not to get into a great big argument over OS version commercial
> > products, but if OS projects expect to be taken with the same
consideration
> > as commercial t
Ich bin bis 9.7.2001 auf Urlaub. Bitte wenden Sie sich in dieser Zeit an meine
Kollegen im Team EW2
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Petra Hora
Hi Jeff!
"Noll, Jeff HS" wrote:
> Not to get into a great big argument over OS version commercial
> products, but if OS projects expect to be taken with the same consideration
> as commercial they have to accept to be compared across the board. This
> includes documentation. You can't jus
>.As far as I understand it, there is nothing to stop a user from adding
>documentation
>to the tomcat project themselves. I'm amazed at how good the documentation
>is
>seeing as how no one was paid to do it.
Not to get into a great big argument over OS version commercial
products, but if
e-
> From: James Radvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 10:56
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: TOMCAT SUCKS
>
>
> I think openly criticising a product that many people have
> worked hard to
> create and provide for your FREE use sho
TED]]
Sent: 28 June 2001 02:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nick Stoianov
Subject: Re: TOMCAT SUCKS
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:10, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> 5th - I haven't met anybody in this mailing list who has a complex
> installation of Tomcat with a lot of virtual hosts , different ports and
>
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:10, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> 5th - I haven't met anybody in this mailing list who has a complex
> installation of Tomcat with a lot of virtual hosts , different ports and
> load balancers. So - who will help me in situation like this? No books , no
> support, no help from the
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Arnold Shore wrote:
> Well, you can always ask for your money back.
>
> But I note that per the Tomcat intro, "... Tomcat is the official
> Reference Implementation ..."
>
> A reference implementation has never been intended as a production
> version, but rather a version fro
lite well placed
question goes pretty far around here.
Cheers,
Todd V.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Stoianov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pete
Subject: Re: TOMCAT SUCKS
To all of you "tomcat fans",
Attacking me with th
Well, you can always ask for your money back.
But I note that per the Tomcat intro, "... Tomcat is the official Reference
Implementation ..."
A reference implementation has never been intended as a production version,
but rather a version from which a lot of learning can be had - both for
develo
Hey Milt,
I guess you are right.
Thanks,
Nick
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 05:23 pm, Milt Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> > To all of you "tomcat fans",
> >
> > Attacking me with these immature e-mails shows the following things:
> > 1. not accepting other people's o
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> To all of you "tomcat fans",
>
> Attacking me with these immature e-mails shows the following things:
> 1. not accepting other people's opinions and experiences
> 2. blindly repeating the same things over and over again.
[ ... ]
Frankly, you're the one
To all of you "tomcat fans",
Attacking me with these immature e-mails shows the following things:
1. not accepting other people's opinions and experiences
2. blindly repeating the same things over and over again.
1st of all - how many of you have installed Tomcat with about 30 virtual
servers w
Nick,
I just saw on the site
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2001/03/15/tomcat.html
that James Goodwill has published a book titled "Using Tomcat." Although, I
have not purchased the book, I would image that it may become another
(albeit not free) source for Tomcat product documentation.
FYI,
Hey
I agree with what pete said, for a free product Tomcat
is better than most of the servlet containers. AS for
the documentation goes, yes agree its a bit scanty but
look at the help you get from fellow developers like
us when you post a distress request, do u see such
kind of support anywere
Nick,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:53, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> 2. Virtual hosting for Tomcat is almost impossible - especially if you have
> a load balancer in front of the web server.
I find the virtual hosts work fine with the exception of port based virtuals
(same ip/name different port). Where exa
If there is a lack of documentation, that is par for the course with any
project that doesn't have paid technical writers. I don't recall seeing
a big sign on the front of jakarta.apache.org saying 'Get your complete
and comprehensive documentation here'.
If you wanted to, you could probably
> Hi guys,
>
> I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
> community but this is why I think that TOMCAT sucks:
>
> 1. The documentation for Tomcat is so bad and it covers only the basic
> server installation. HELL - usually for production purposes people
have
>
> 5. And what if you have a problem that is not in the
> documentation (99% of
> the problem with Tomcat are not even mentioned in the
> documentation)? I guess
> the only way is to post in the mailing list. And guess what
> happens if nobody
> has experienced this problem before? You have t
Well, funnily enough I've just done some stress testing with our web app
against Apache & Tomcat and Apache & Resin.
With 100 concurrent connections Resin locked up the server (a Solaris 8
Ultra 10) because the mod_caucho uses precess forking which ran out of
space.
mod_jk, on the other hand, w
At 01:53 PM 6/27/2001, Nick wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
>community but this is why I think that TOMCAT sucks:
>
>1. The documentation for Tomcat is so bad and it covers only the basic
>server installation. HELL - usually for prod
31 matches
Mail list logo
