Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-10 Thread John Holman
From: John Holman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP Yes, that is clearly a risk. The *whole* web application needs have no risks in order to allow http access to any of it - any sensitive link

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-10 Thread John Holman
My understanding (at the moment) is that there are two scenarios where sesssion id reuse might be safe: a) (the scenario I suggested) the *only* secure page requiring https is the login page. Accessing that using the sniffed session id will only let the bad guy login - which gains him nothing.

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-10 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
:02 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP In this scenario, the *only* page requiring SSL would be the login page that collects the username and password. (That could be either a dedicated application login page or the login page configured for form-based login. Basic

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-10 Thread John Holman
Message- From: John Holman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:02 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP In this scenario, the *only* page requiring SSL would be the login page that collects the username and password. (That could be either a dedicated

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-10 Thread John Roth
Is there an FTP connector for Tomcat? If so, I would be very interested in it. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Shah, Sanjay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:03 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Cc: 'Craig R. McClanahan' Subject: RE: HTTPS to HTTP Hello

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-10 Thread Raiden
Hi Bill, Honestly, as a user, I don't feel competent enough with the Tomcat internal architecture to write a patch. However, to me, this is a vital thing missing from the tomcat 4.1.x branch. Quite a few of the sites that I work on require that a session created under https be accessible under

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-10 Thread Dan Damon
Raiden, If you really want to maintain the session between HTTPs and HTTP you can do it by writing the link to the insecure page with the session id like this: (using JSP) From the insecure page: form method=post action=http://(youraddress/insecurepage)%=session.getId()% input type=submit

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread John Holman
Ralph Einfeldt wrote: Anybody who can listen to your traffic, can hijack a session. He just has to create a request with the same sessionid (either as cookie or in the url). So after you go back from https to http you open the session to an attacker. The risks that are involved with that,

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread David Hemingway
. Thanks for the comments regards, Dave - Original Message - From: John Holman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:44 PM Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP Ralph Einfeldt wrote: Anybody who can listen to your traffic, can hijack

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:44 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP In that case the session may as well be conducted in http (e.g. for performance reasons). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
the sysadmins session ...) -Original Message- From: David Hemingway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:08 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP Thats is my exact situation. The sysadmin section of teh site is 100% https. but the on the user side

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread John Holman
authentification to form authentifcation and the sysadmin visits the user side and somebody steals the sysadmins session ...) -Original Message- From: David Hemingway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:08 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, John Holman wrote: Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:56:16 + From: John Holman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP Yes, that is clearly a risk. The *whole* web application needs

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, John Holman wrote: Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:58:19 + From: John Holman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP Ralph Einfeldt wrote: I don't think that performance

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Shah, Sanjay
Hello Craig: I was reading one of your post in tomcat user archive regarding implementation of FTP protocol under Catalina. One of my requirement is exactly the same. In my case the FTP security and processing needs to be managed on a per customer basis, however this tends to be closely

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Shah, Sanjay wrote: Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 13:02:32 -0500 From: Shah, Sanjay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Craig R. McClanahan' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HTTPS to HTTP Hello Craig: I was reading one of your post in tomcat user

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Shrotriya, Sumit
Holman wrote: Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:56:16 + From: John Holman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP Yes, that is clearly a risk. The *whole* web application needs have no risks in order

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Shrotriya, Sumit wrote: Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:45:20 -0600 From: Shrotriya, Sumit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HTTPS to HTTP Craig, I agree with you 100% but there can

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Joel Rees
Thats is my exact situation. The sysadmin section of teh site is 100% https. but the on the user side there is nothing that sensitive and little harm they could be cause stealing someones session. It would not be worth going to the trouble of stealing the session for the benefit you would get.

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Joel Rees
I don't think that performance is a reason to keep the session after a switch because in the most applications the amount of protocol switches is quite small when compared to the total number of requests within one protocol. A possibly stupid question -- is it possible to send graphics

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Joel Rees
I agree with you 100% but there can be a simple solution to the problem that you just raised..and that is that a new session id is created and mapped in some table when moving from https--http this way user B can not get access to the admin page. Two things you'd have to be really careful

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Joel Rees wrote: Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:56:37 +0900 From: Joel Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP I don't think that performance is a reason to keep the session

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Joel Rees
I don't think that performance is a reason to keep the session after a switch because in the most applications the amount of protocol switches is quite small when compared to the total number of requests within one protocol. A possibly stupid question -- is it possible to send

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Schnitzer, Jeff
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] If you're going to switch from https-http, you are totally wasting your time messing with https in the first place. It buys you nothing except a *perception* that you are more secure -- that is not the reality. You keep repeating this

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Joel Rees wrote: Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:22:42 +0900 From: Joel Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP I don't think that performance is a reason to keep

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Schnitzer, Jeff wrote: Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:39:34 -0800 From: Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HTTPS to HTTP From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Schnitzer, Jeff
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] * The most common use case for wanting HTTPS-HTTP is to let you log on with HTTPS so your password does not go across the Internet unencrypted, but run the rest of the application on HTTP. Having to reauthenticate again means they

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Jacob Kjome
It is my understanding that if Tomcat allowed you use the same session and the session was created under https for a particular user, then once it gets to http the session id is now in clear text. This is what, I believe, Craig is talking about when he says that using SSL in this manner only

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Jon Eaves
Jacob Kjome wrote: It is my understanding that if Tomcat allowed you use the same session and the session was created under https for a particular user, then once it gets to http the session id is now in clear text. This is what, I believe, Craig is talking about when he says that using SSL

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
performance) -Original Message- From: Joel Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:57 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP A possibly stupid question -- is it possible to send graphics raw and text encrypted? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-08 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
Anybody who can listen to your traffic, can hijack a session. He just has to create a request with the same sessionid (either as cookie or in the url). So after you go back from https to http you open the session to an attacker. The risks that are involved with that, depends on the

RE: HTTPS to HTTP proxying

2001-01-30 Thread Stefán F. Stefánsson
Any particular reason you're using a proxy instead of Tomcats built in HTTPS support? (it came with 3.2 so you need to get that version if you're not already using it). Regards, Stefan. -Original Message- From: Geoff Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29. janar 2001 23:31 To: [EMAIL

Re: HTTPS to HTTP proxying

2001-01-30 Thread Geoff Lane
Because it allows us to have multiple machines serving one URL without having multiple SSL certificates. It also offloads SSL encryption to dedicated hardware. Those are the main reasons. Stefn F. Stefnsson wrote: Any particular reason you're using a proxy instead of Tomcats built in HTTPS