Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
something
Frustrating
James
I was having a memory leak using mod_jk2, and it was fixed by adding
request.registerRequests=false
to tomcat/conf/jk2.properties.
I
I am just curious in this... Where did you set the 512m? Is your Tomcat's
JVM size?
Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
something
Frustrating
James
I was having a memory leak using mod_jk2,
Adrian Barnett wrote:
Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
something
Frustrating
James
I was having a memory leak using mod_jk2, and it was fixed by adding
request.registerRequests=false
to
Message -
From: Kommuru, Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 6:03 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I am just curious in this... Where did you set the 512m? Is your Tomcat's
JVM size?
Ran out of memory
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 3:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
Adrian Barnett wrote:
Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows
Michiel Toneman wrote, On 6/2/2004 2:18 AM:
I can confirm that this works with mod_jk too.
I'm a little surprised that fixing this rather horrible memory leak
doesn't appear to be a high priority. We were almost at a point of
abandoning Tomcat altogether since we couldn't keep our test
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:48:02 -0400, Chad Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This sounds awfully similar to what we are experiencing, although I have
not determined that it is a jk2 related memory leak. Are you using some
sort of profiling tool to determine this? And exactly what does
Whatever works, right?
Does this only apply to tomcat 5 or is it applicable to tomcat 4 as well?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
Try this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-userm=107976963131361w=2
I wasn't able to get it to work myself, but maybe you can.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:04 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
300 mb sounds a lot, i've got a hibernate and struts flavored app
running with a 128 limit, and thats being generous.
I haven't measured anything but top looks happy, with 5.0.25 with jk to
apache 2.0.47. Had a bit of traffic
: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
300 mb sounds a lot, i've got a hibernate and struts flavored app
running with a 128 limit, and thats being generous.
I haven't measured anything but top looks happy, with 5.0.25 with jk
to
apache 2.0.47. Had a bit of traffic this afternoon albeit nothing
01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I have this in our startup scripts
export CATALINA_OPTS=-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128m -Xdebug
Perhaps the debug argument might reveal something. I cant be much help
on windows matters as I try
/server' to '%JAVA_HOME%/bin' directory
And
use this '-Xms256m -Xms512m'
Changa fer,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I have this in our startup
-
From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I have this in our startup scripts
export CATALINA_OPTS=-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128m -Xdebug
Perhaps the debug argument might reveal
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat 5.0.25
and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector and since I am not
actually serving up anything with apache yet I want to just bypass the
connector for 1 site and hit tomcat directly. I have to use
What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat
5.0.25
and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector and since I am not
actually serving up anything
/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat
5.0.25
and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector
: Monday, May 31, 2004 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat
5.0.25
and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may
doesnt accept -server.
Ill continue to monitor it with the mod_jk bypass in.
James
- Original Message -
From: Mark Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I've just set
PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I've just set 5.0.25 up and it will run with mod_jk/1.2.3-dev and
Apache/2.0.47 , I'll see if i get the same thing happening.
When i was having problems i was getting a decoding error written to
catalina log, which 5.0.24+ hasn't given me
20 matches
Mail list logo
