Hi there,
New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer.
I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris
Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on
the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the
- Original Message -
From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM
Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Hi there,
New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer.
I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6
Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Good evening Kevin.
I think you might need to read a little further..
AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf
file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it
Apologies
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Thanks for the reply.
When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache
and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way
round it?
Cheers
: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Good evening Kevin
AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried
it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you
every day by just about everyone.
Norm
- Original Message -
From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:47 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Norm,
I'm planning on using the mod_jk module. I've
June 2003 12:00
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Good evening (here)... how's Monday going?
What platform are you running Apache and Tomcat on, and will they be on the
same or different machines?
Nothing wrong with 'dummies' doing this sort of stuff
-
From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:00 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Monday is as usual, a struggle! The excesses of the weekend are taking
their
toll...grin.
I'm running both on the same
://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/11/20/tomcat.html?page=2 to see if I
can get things running this way.
-Original Message-
From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 12:20
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Just a tad too quick
On Monday 16 June 2003 13:20, NormW wrote:
Just a tad too quick with the 'send'... mod_jk or mod_jk2? If you
don't have a preference, go with mod_jk... it has only recently been
updated and if you get auto config working, it only supports jk
anyway.
There are slots at Jakarta for the binaries
Good evening Kevin.
Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example applications
that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs once you get
Apache and Tomcat working and 'see' how straight-forward the setup actually
is... a bunch of settings that tell Apache what to
/apachectl start: httpd could not be started
Any ideas? (sorry to bug you with this one!)
-Original Message-
From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 12:54
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Good evening Kevin.
Takes my cue! What
16, 2003 10:17 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Norm.
I used the basic format that being offered on that website to understand
what changes were required. After following them (making my own tweaks to
ensure correct paths etc), I attempted to restart Apache and got
Hi -
Tomcat doesn't write out the file unless you modify server.xml to include
Listener elements, one for each Server you have defined, and one for each
Host you have defined.
More info in my HOWTOs: http://www.johnturner.com/howto (search for
Listener), and there is an example of the
module are you
using? Mod_jk or md_jk2?
Norm
- Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Thanks for the reply.
When you say you haven't used
]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Thanks for the reply.
When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with
Apache
and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found
...
But before going on, best if you nominate your jk(2) module and wether
you
compile or buy...
Norm
- Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:00 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file
Complete HOWTO, step by step:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto
John
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:53:45 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good evening Kevin.
Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example
applications
that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs
PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 13:51
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Tomcat 4.1 most definitely supports the auto configuration option.
John
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:22 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good evening Kevin
AFAIK Tomcat 4.1
a tweak.
It should read:
LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-etc
Norm
- Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:17 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Norm.
I used
On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote:
No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used.
Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work
with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since
(currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a
June 2003 13:51
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Tomcat 4.1 most definitely supports the auto configuration option.
John
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:22 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good evening Kevin
AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote:
No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used.
Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK
/mod_jk-
1.2
.2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found
bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started
-Original Message-
From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
On Monday
Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what
Apache version you have?
JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily
After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
K.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm
OK, cool. Solaris 2.6 might be a little iffy for the GNU tools, so you'll
probably want to stick with binaries. I had a heck of a time getting
mod_jk to build on Solaris 2.7, my guess is it wouldn't be any better with
2.6.
.27 is preferred, but I won't be picky. You can check my Solaris 7
. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
K.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what
Apache version you
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:32
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the
latest patches?
Where did you get 1.3.26? There's a 1.3.27 at http://www.sunfreeware.com
for Solaris
installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
K.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the
latest patches?
Where did you get 1.3.26? There's a 1.3.27 at http://www.sunfreeware.com
for Solaris 2.6.
John
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:25:51 -0700, Thomas
story involving politics and it's only a dev box. :O)
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 16:01
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Well, I think you may be stuck. Your last error is regarding
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:16, John Turner wrote:
Well, you may be stuck...the libpthread error indicates a problem with
system libraries...implies the need for an admin.
John
Well going by a Quake FAQ of all things:
http://www.planetquake.com/eclipse/q2bug.shtml
It would seem the version of
33 matches
Mail list logo
