RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, What are you thoughts on a JBoss 4 setup? Do you still recommend staying away from Apache? I don't have thoughts on JBoss 4 setup. I recommend what I always have: evaluate your needs carefully and don't make design or deployment decisions, such as placing Apache in front of tomcat,

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Evgeny Gesin
Yoav, I use Apache in front of Tomcat a long ago and see no problems? BTW, Apache executes all static content, such as image files. Why you don't recommend Apache? -- Evgeny Javadesk --- Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, What are you thoughts on a JBoss 4 setup? Do you still

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I use Apache in front of Tomcat a long ago and see no problems? BTW, Apache executes all static content, such as image files. Why you don't recommend Apache? Again, that's not what I said. You just have to evaluate your requirements carefully. Various factors like the content mix (%static

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Evgeny Gesin
Hi, --- Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Again, that's not what I said. You just have to evaluate your requirements carefully. Various factors like the content mix (%static vs. %dynamic), scalability requirements, SSL load, and others all figure into this decision. Apache is web

Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Daniel Gibby
If only tomcat had the mod_rewrite capabilities that apache does, and strong perl and php performance, I would be glad to trash mod_jk (thus getting rid of apache as well). Are there any good rewrite-like capabilities available for URL matching / rewriting that someone could share? I'm sure a

Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Josh Rehman
Daniel Gibby wrote: If only tomcat had the mod_rewrite capabilities that apache does, and strong perl and php performance, I would be glad to trash mod_jk (thus getting rid of apache as well). Would this work for you as a mod_rewrite replacement? http://noodle.tigris.org/ (perl php support

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Apache is web server, but Tomcat is not, while Tomcat is a web server: all that a piece of software needs to do in order to be a web server is implement the HTTP protocol, which tomcat does. It is not a problem with JK connector, I don't use JK2. It's not a problem for you, and not for

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, If only tomcat had the mod_rewrite capabilities that apache does, and strong perl and php performance, I would be glad to trash mod_jk (thus getting rid of apache as well). This is a good example of something that hits on Apache's strong points: perl, mod_php, rewriting. So it's probably

Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Daniel Gibby
Also, I definitely don't want to be changing the configuration whenever I have a new partner that needs another cobranded version of the webapp (meaning I would need to give them their own hostname or subdomain... Can tomcat be setup to allow a VirtualHost to accept multiple domain names?

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Tom . Williams
Subject Please respond to RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use Tomcat Users List

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Tom . Williams
to RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] rta.apache.org

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, (perl php support in any servlet container seems...unlikely :) PHP, not so unlikely ;) http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/UsingPhp http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=108099227127507w=2 http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=223 As for perl, you can do it through CGI. Yoav

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Is Tomcat considered to *be* a web server vs *having* a web server? I thought the HTTP connector was the way to connect HTTP clients (browsers) to the JSP/Servlet container. Purely a philosophical question IMHO ;) Technically, a piece of software that can respond to HTTP requests per the

Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Parsons Technical Services
PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:40 PM Subject: Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use Also, I definitely don't want to be changing the configuration whenever I have a new partner that needs another cobranded version of the webapp (meaning I would need

Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Josh Rehman
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, (perl php support in any servlet container seems...unlikely :) PHP, not so unlikely ;) http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/UsingPhp Fascinating - I'd love to know what the web.xml looks like and what the server looks like. I'd guess the php servlet is a very simple

Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Parsons Technical Services
to press delete. Doug - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:47 PM Subject: RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use Is Tomcat considered to *be* a web server vs *having* a web server? I thought the HTTP connector was the way

Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Remy Maucherat
Norris Shelton wrote: What are you thoughts on a JBoss 4 setup? Do you still recommend staying away from Apache? JBoss 4 is alpha for now. I recommend trying JBoss 3.2.4 RC 1 if you want something more stable. -- x Rémy Maucherat Developer Consultant JBoss Group

RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Mladen Turk
-Original Message- From: Josh Rehman (perl php support in any servlet container seems...unlikely :) But don't put your money on it. Perhaps we'll surprise few peoples :-) MT. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use

2004-04-09 Thread Denis Haskin
Also keep in mind that Apache isn't the *only* thing you can put in front of Tomcat. grin While we do have Apache in the mix (for some legacy apps), we also run Squid [1] in reverse-proxy mode in front of *that* to (a) reduce response time on cachable content and (b) remove some of the load