Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Norm, I'm planning on using the mod_jk module. I've been searching for info on the web about getting the two talking, there's plenty of info but no real, dummies guides. Mind you I don't suppose dummies like me should be tinkering with this stuff!! ;o) Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Good evening (here)... how's Monday going? What platform are you running Apache and Tomcat on, and will they be on the same or different machines? Nothing wrong with 'dummies' doing this sort of stuff if the documentation was okay; how many people know how are a car or TV works and they're used every day by just about everyone. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Norm, I'm planning on using the mod_jk module. I've been searching for info on the web about getting the two talking, there's plenty of info but no real, dummies guides. Mind you I don't suppose dummies like me should be tinkering with this stuff!! ;o) Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Monday is as usual, a struggle! The excesses of the weekend are taking their toll...grin. I'm running both on the same machine, Sun boxes running Solaris 8, if that helps any. Nothing wrong with 'dummies' snip Very true! -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 12:00 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening (here)... how's Monday going? What platform are you running Apache and Tomcat on, and will they be on the same or different machines? Nothing wrong with 'dummies' doing this sort of stuff if the documentation was okay; how many people know how are a car or TV works and they're used every day by just about everyone. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Norm, I'm planning on using the mod_jk module. I've been searching for info on the web about getting the two talking, there's plenty of info but no real, dummies guides. Mind you I don't suppose dummies like me should be tinkering with this stuff!! ;o) Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Just a tad too quick with the 'send'... mod_jk or mod_jk2? If you don't have a preference, go with mod_jk... it has only recently been updated and if you get auto config working, it only supports jk anyway. There are slots at Jakarta for the binaries for mod_jk for different versions of Solaris but are presently empty... do you 'roll-your-own' [compile] or prefer 'ready-made' [binaries]? Solaris is not on my 'accreditation list' so this will be strictly theory... But before going on, best if you nominate your jk(2) module and wether you compile or buy... Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:00 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Monday is as usual, a struggle! The excesses of the weekend are taking their toll...grin. I'm running both on the same machine, Sun boxes running Solaris 8, if that helps any. Nothing wrong with 'dummies' snip Very true! -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 12:00 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening (here)... how's Monday going? What platform are you running Apache and Tomcat on, and will they be on the same or different machines? Nothing wrong with 'dummies' doing this sort of stuff if the documentation was okay; how many people know how are a car or TV works and they're used every day by just about everyone. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Norm, I'm planning on using the mod_jk module. I've been searching for info on the web about getting the two talking, there's plenty of info but no real, dummies guides. Mind you I don't suppose dummies like me should be tinkering with this stuff!! ;o) Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
LOL... I have to say given my work situation that I'm using the ready-made varieties :O). I'm planning on using mod_jk, that seems to be the flavour of choice at the moment. I've downloaded the .so and placed it in my libexec directory. I'm currently following some instructions on http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/11/20/tomcat.html?page=2 to see if I can get things running this way. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 12:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Just a tad too quick with the 'send'... mod_jk or mod_jk2? If you don't have a preference, go with mod_jk... it has only recently been updated and if you get auto config working, it only supports jk anyway. There are slots at Jakarta for the binaries for mod_jk for different versions of Solaris but are presently empty... do you 'roll-your-own' [compile] or prefer 'ready-made' [binaries]? Solaris is not on my 'accreditation list' so this will be strictly theory... But before going on, best if you nominate your jk(2) module and wether you compile or buy... Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:00 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Monday is as usual, a struggle! The excesses of the weekend are taking their toll...grin. I'm running both on the same machine, Sun boxes running Solaris 8, if that helps any. Nothing wrong with 'dummies' snip Very true! -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 12:00 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening (here)... how's Monday going? What platform are you running Apache and Tomcat on, and will they be on the same or different machines? Nothing wrong with 'dummies' doing this sort of stuff if the documentation was okay; how many people know how are a car or TV works and they're used every day by just about everyone. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Norm, I'm planning on using the mod_jk module. I've been searching for info on the web about getting the two talking, there's plenty of info but no real, dummies guides. Mind you I don't suppose dummies like me should be tinkering with this stuff!! ;o) Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
On Monday 16 June 2003 13:20, NormW wrote: Just a tad too quick with the 'send'... mod_jk or mod_jk2? If you don't have a preference, go with mod_jk... it has only recently been updated and if you get auto config working, it only supports jk anyway. There are slots at Jakarta for the binaries for mod_jk for different versions of Solaris but are presently empty... do you 'roll-your-own' [compile] or prefer 'ready-made' [binaries]? Solaris is not on my 'accreditation list' so this will be strictly theory... i managed to get it compiled for Solaris 8 this morning after several hours of fighting with it and cursing the README file. See my earlier post from today how a run-down on how i did it. In case it does anyone any good: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ But i can't promise it'll work on other systems due to the required libs: ldd mod_jk-1.2.4.so libc.so.1 = /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 =/usr/lib/libdl.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-Engine/lib/libc_psr.so.1 -- - stephan The Guy With No Job Title [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Student: Master, you must teach me the way of liberation! Master: Tell me who it is that binds you. Student: No one binds me! Master: Then why do you seek liberation? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Good evening Kevin. Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example applications that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs once you get Apache and Tomcat working and 'see' how straight-forward the setup actually is... a bunch of settings that tell Apache what to send to the jk module and a few more settings to configure jk and how it should contact Tomcat... this is definitely not Harry Potter stuff! But the number of people who seem to look for a magic phrase... Also the configuration of Tomcat is primarily done by server.xml, so definitely read that (lots of comments) and get a 'feel' for what is used and can be used in your situation. Best of luck, Norm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Norm. I used the basic format that being offered on that website to understand what changes were required. After following them (making my own tweaks to ensure correct paths etc), I attempted to restart Apache and got the following: Syntax error on line 233 of /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Can't locate API module structure `mod_jk' in file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.3 -eapi.so: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: mod_jk: can't find symbol bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started Any ideas? (sorry to bug you with this one!) -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 12:54 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example applications that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs once you get Apache and Tomcat working and 'see' how straight-forward the setup actually is... a bunch of settings that tell Apache what to send to the jk module and a few more settings to configure jk and how it should contact Tomcat... this is definitely not Harry Potter stuff! But the number of people who seem to look for a magic phrase... Also the configuration of Tomcat is primarily done by server.xml, so definitely read that (lots of comments) and get a 'feel' for what is used and can be used in your situation. Best of luck, Norm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Still at it? Good evening Kevin. I think it's saying your LoadModule line in httpd.conf needs a tweak. It should read: LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-etc Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:17 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Norm. I used the basic format that being offered on that website to understand what changes were required. After following them (making my own tweaks to ensure correct paths etc), I attempted to restart Apache and got the following: Syntax error on line 233 of /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Can't locate API module structure `mod_jk' in file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.3 -eapi.so: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: mod_jk: can't find symbol bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started Any ideas? (sorry to bug you with this one!) -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 12:54 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example applications that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs once you get Apache and Tomcat working and 'see' how straight-forward the setup actually is... a bunch of settings that tell Apache what to send to the jk module and a few more settings to configure jk and how it should contact Tomcat... this is definitely not Harry Potter stuff! But the number of people who seem to look for a magic phrase... Also the configuration of Tomcat is primarily done by server.xml, so definitely read that (lots of comments) and get a 'feel' for what is used and can be used in your situation. Best of luck, Norm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Hi - Tomcat doesn't write out the file unless you modify server.xml to include Listener elements, one for each Server you have defined, and one for each Host you have defined. More info in my HOWTOs: http://www.johnturner.com/howto (search for Listener), and there is an example of the generated file here (at the time I used 4.0.4): http://www.johnturner.com/howto/mod_jk_conf.html Also, the file is not called tomcat-apache.conf, but mod_jk.conf. That said, there's no requirement that you generate it automatically. You can manually create the file, no problem, but you should know that the file in CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto will be overwritten any time Tomcat is started, so if you make manual edits, you will want to move the file to some other location (I like APACHE_HOME/conf/mod_jk.conf) to protect your changes. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 02:36:44 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Tomcat 4.1 most definitely supports the auto configuration option. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:22 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
The whole process, step by step: http://www.johnturner.com/howto Also: http://tomcatfaq.sourceforge.net/apache.html John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 03:47:32 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Norm, I'm planning on using the mod_jk module. I've been searching for info on the web about getting the two talking, there's plenty of info but no real, dummies guides. Mind you I don't suppose dummies like me should be tinkering with this stuff!! ;o) Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Solaris HOWTO: http://www.johnturner.com/howto John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:20:19 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a tad too quick with the 'send'... mod_jk or mod_jk2? If you don't have a preference, go with mod_jk... it has only recently been updated and if you get auto config working, it only supports jk anyway. There are slots at Jakarta for the binaries for mod_jk for different versions of Solaris but are presently empty... do you 'roll-your-own' [compile] or prefer 'ready-made' [binaries]? Solaris is not on my 'accreditation list' so this will be strictly theory... But before going on, best if you nominate your jk(2) module and wether you compile or buy... Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:00 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Monday is as usual, a struggle! The excesses of the weekend are taking their toll...grin. I'm running both on the same machine, Sun boxes running Solaris 8, if that helps any. Nothing wrong with 'dummies' snip Very true! -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 12:00 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening (here)... how's Monday going? What platform are you running Apache and Tomcat on, and will they be on the same or different machines? Nothing wrong with 'dummies' doing this sort of stuff if the documentation was okay; how many people know how are a car or TV works and they're used every day by just about everyone. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:47 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Norm, I'm planning on using the mod_jk module. I've been searching for info on the web about getting the two talking, there's plenty of info but no real, dummies guides. Mind you I don't suppose dummies like me should be tinkering with this stuff!! ;o) Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Complete HOWTO, step by step: http://www.johnturner.com/howto John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:53:45 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good evening Kevin. Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example applications that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs once you get Apache and Tomcat working and 'see' how straight-forward the setup actually is... a bunch of settings that tell Apache what to send to the jk module and a few more settings to configure jk and how it should contact Tomcat... this is definitely not Harry Potter stuff! But the number of people who seem to look for a magic phrase... Also the configuration of Tomcat is primarily done by server.xml, so definitely read that (lots of comments) and get a 'feel' for what is used and can be used in your situation. Best of luck, Norm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
John, I read your website instructions previously, most helpful. Thanks. I'm almost there, I can sense it! ;O) I'm getting output now, as you pointed out called mod_jk.conf. So that's a step in the right direction: I only have to contend with this error now: Syntax error on line 233 of /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Can't locate API module structure `mod_jk' in file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.3 -eapi.so: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: mod_jk: can't find symbol bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started But I'm going to go look up your site again and see check to make sure I've followed all the steps correctly. Thanks to Norm and John for your help so far :O) Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 13:51 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Tomcat 4.1 most definitely supports the auto configuration option. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:22 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:44:06 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Still at it? Good evening Kevin. I think it's saying your LoadModule line in httpd.conf needs a tweak. It should read: LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-etc Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:17 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Norm. I used the basic format that being offered on that website to understand what changes were required. After following them (making my own tweaks to ensure correct paths etc), I attempted to restart Apache and got the following: Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Can't locate API module structure `mod_jk' in file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.3 -eapi.so: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: mod_jk: can't find symbol bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started Any ideas? (sorry to bug you with this one!) -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 12:54 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example applications that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs once you get Apache and Tomcat working and 'see' how straight-forward the setup actually is... a bunch of settings that tell Apache what to send to the jk module and a few more settings to configure jk and how it should contact Tomcat... this is definitely not Harry Potter stuff! But the number of people who seem to look for a magic phrase... Also the configuration of Tomcat is primarily done by server.xml, so definitely read that (lots of comments) and get a 'feel' for what is used and can be used in your situation. Best of luck, Norm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- - stephan The Guy With No Job Title [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Student: Master, you must teach me the way of liberation! Master: Tell me who it is that binds you. Student: No one binds me! Master: Then why do you seek liberation? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
If the 1.3.6 in your pathname isn't a typo, my guess is you are out of luck. Apache 1.3.6 is absolutely ancient. You'll need 1.3.2x (.22?) or better for JK, or the ability to hack the JK source to make it work with older versions of Apache, which might be next to impossible. If the 1.3.6 isn't a typo, and you really mean 1.3.26, then my guess is you don't have EAPI and are using the JK .so for EAPI, or vice versa, in which case you will want to get the right one and try again. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 05:53:35 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, I read your website instructions previously, most helpful. Thanks. I'm almost there, I can sense it! ;O) I'm getting output now, as you pointed out called mod_jk.conf. So that's a step in the right direction: I only have to contend with this error now: Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Can't locate API module structure `mod_jk' in file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.3 -eapi.so: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: mod_jk: can't find symbol bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started But I'm going to go look up your site again and see check to make sure I've followed all the steps correctly. Thanks to Norm and John for your help so far :O) Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 13:51 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Tomcat 4.1 most definitely supports the auto configuration option. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:22 +1000, NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good evening Kevin AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried it personally; I get by with manual configuration. What module are you using? Mod_jk or md_jk2? Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Thanks for the reply. When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache and Tomcat talking to each other, or just that you've found another way round it? Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 11:17 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Good evening Kevin. I think you might need to read a little further.. AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used. Norm - Original Message - From: Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Hi there, New to the list, but with a hopefully simple question to answer. I'm currently trying to integrate Apache 1.3.6 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on a Solaris Unix box and have been following the instructions in the usual howto's on the jakarta site. However, there are several references to the automatically generated tomcat-apache.conf file. According to the instructions this should appear in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory...unfortunately in my case, it isn't. Tomcat is up and running in standalone mode with no problems, however the .conf file is not being produced. There wasn't a $CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto directory (that I saw being referred to in one message) so I created on in the hope that Tomcat would write out to it, but no luck this way either. Can anyone shed any light on why the tomcat-apache.conf file would not be produced even although Tomcat is running fine. Regards, Kev __ Kevin Thomas Technical Analyst Technical Authority, Deregulated Applications Utilities Group, SAIC Ltd. 5 Redwood Place Peel Park East Kilbride G74 5PB Tel: 013558 45260 ( 708 5260 internal ) mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.saic.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- - stephan The Guy With No Job Title [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Student: Master, you must teach me the way of liberation! Master: Tell me who it is that binds you. Student: No one binds me! Master: Then why do you seek liberation? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what Apache version you have? JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily spend many hours trying various binary files without results because of incompatibilities. If you tell us what you need, we can help you faster. Regarding the error message, does your Apache include mod_dir? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:41:24 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
John, Thanks for being patient so far! Doing a uname -a on the server gives: SunOS xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 5.6 Generic_105181-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise I've just downloaded 1.3.26 and I'm about to install that. Did have 1.3.6 (not .26). Cheers, Kev. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what Apache version you have? JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily spend many hours trying various binary files without results because of incompatibilities. If you tell us what you need, we can help you faster. Regarding the error message, does your Apache include mod_dir? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:41:24 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Latest issue is: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd: fatal: libpthread.so.1: version `SUNW_1.2' not found (required by file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd) Killed bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so K. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what Apache version you have? JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily spend many hours trying various binary files without results because of incompatibilities. If you tell us what you need, we can help you faster. Regarding the error message, does your Apache include mod_dir? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:41:24 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
OK, cool. Solaris 2.6 might be a little iffy for the GNU tools, so you'll probably want to stick with binaries. I had a heck of a time getting mod_jk to build on Solaris 2.7, my guess is it wouldn't be any better with 2.6. .27 is preferred, but I won't be picky. You can check my Solaris 7 HOWTO for more info if you like: http://www.johnturner.com/howto (if you've already seen it, my apologies, I loose track of some of these threads sometimes). After that, you should be able to use one of the binaries that Stephan so kindly announced this morning, at: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:07:31 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, Thanks for being patient so far! Doing a uname -a on the server gives: SunOS xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 5.6 Generic_105181-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise I've just downloaded 1.3.26 and I'm about to install that. Did have 1.3.6 (not .26). Cheers, Kev. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the latest patches? Where did you get 1.3.26? There's a 1.3.27 at http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris 2.6. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:25:51 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest issue is: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd: fatal: libpthread.so.1: version `SUNW_1.2' not found (required by file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd) Killed bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so K. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what Apache version you have? JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily spend many hours trying various binary files without results because of incompatibilities. If you tell us what you need, we can help you faster. Regarding the error message, does your Apache include mod_dir? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:41:24 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
LOL...you've probably already anticipated the answer to the first question...No, I'm afraid I can't build from source. 1.3.26 came from apache.org. I don't have access to pkgadd so 1.3.27 from sunfreeware is not an option (I don't think). -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the latest patches? Where did you get 1.3.26? There's a 1.3.27 at http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris 2.6. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:25:51 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest issue is: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd: fatal: libpthread.so.1: version `SUNW_1.2' not found (required by file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd) Killed bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so K. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what Apache version you have? JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily spend many hours trying various binary files without results because of incompatibilities. If you tell us what you need, we can help you faster. Regarding the error message, does your Apache include mod_dir? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:41:24 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk-1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Well, I think you may be stuck. Your last error is regarding libpthread.so, which is not Tomcat related, or even Apache/Mod_JK related. You can looking for libpthread.so* and symlinking whatever you find to the file that the error message mentions. I'm curious, though...you want to run Apache, that means you have root access (generally). How can you not also build things from source or otherwise access pkgadd? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:52:09 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL...you've probably already anticipated the answer to the first question...No, I'm afraid I can't build from source. 1.3.26 came from apache.org. I don't have access to pkgadd so 1.3.27 from sunfreeware is not an option (I don't think). -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the latest patches? Where did you get 1.3.26? There's a 1.3.27 at http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris 2.6. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:25:51 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest issue is: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd: fatal: libpthread.so.1: version `SUNW_1.2' not found (required by file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd) Killed bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so K. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what Apache version you have? JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily spend many hours trying various binary files without results because of incompatibilities. If you tell us what you need, we can help you faster. Regarding the error message, does your Apache include mod_dir? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:41:24 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Actually, I don't have it installed as root at all, no permissions to do so, it's a long story involving politics and it's only a dev box. :O) -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 16:01 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Well, I think you may be stuck. Your last error is regarding libpthread.so, which is not Tomcat related, or even Apache/Mod_JK related. You can looking for libpthread.so* and symlinking whatever you find to the file that the error message mentions. I'm curious, though...you want to run Apache, that means you have root access (generally). How can you not also build things from source or otherwise access pkgadd? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:52:09 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL...you've probably already anticipated the answer to the first question...No, I'm afraid I can't build from source. 1.3.26 came from apache.org. I don't have access to pkgadd so 1.3.27 from sunfreeware is not an option (I don't think). -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the latest patches? Where did you get 1.3.26? There's a 1.3.27 at http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris 2.6. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:25:51 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest issue is: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd: fatal: libpthread.so.1: version `SUNW_1.2' not found (required by file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd) Killed bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so K. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what Apache version you have? JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily spend many hours trying various binary files without results because of incompatibilities. If you tell us what you need, we can help you faster. Regarding the error message, does your Apache include mod_dir? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:41:24 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
Well, you may be stuck...the libpthread error indicates a problem with system libraries...implies the need for an admin. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:10:37 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, I don't have it installed as root at all, no permissions to do so, it's a long story involving politics and it's only a dev box. :O) -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 16:01 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Well, I think you may be stuck. Your last error is regarding libpthread.so, which is not Tomcat related, or even Apache/Mod_JK related. You can looking for libpthread.so* and symlinking whatever you find to the file that the error message mentions. I'm curious, though...you want to run Apache, that means you have root access (generally). How can you not also build things from source or otherwise access pkgadd? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:52:09 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL...you've probably already anticipated the answer to the first question...No, I'm afraid I can't build from source. 1.3.26 came from apache.org. I don't have access to pkgadd so 1.3.27 from sunfreeware is not an option (I don't think). -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:32 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the latest patches? Where did you get 1.3.26? There's a 1.3.27 at http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris 2.6. John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:25:51 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest issue is: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd: fatal: libpthread.so.1: version `SUNW_1.2' not found (required by file /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.26/bin/httpd) Killed bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so K. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what Apache version you have? JK and JK2 are Apache version sensitive. You could easily spend many hours trying various binary files without results because of incompatibilities. If you tell us what you need, we can help you faster. Regarding the error message, does your Apache include mod_dir? John On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:41:24 -0700, Thomas, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, got this error while using mod_jk-1.2.2.so Syntax error on line 233 of /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so into server: ld.so.1: /ki-sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /ki- sun4k2/export/home/apt2/ta_web/webserver/apache_1.3.6/libexec/mod_jk- 1.2 .2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started -Original Message- From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file. On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote: No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used. Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since (currently at 1.3.27). If 1.3.6 isn't a typo, you should first and foremost upgrade your Apache. If you can't upgrade for some reason, you will have to build your own mod_jk from source, and my guess is it won't be easy. i'm using Apache 1.3.x (.27 at the moment), and never had any problems building mod_jk until ~1.2.3pre. Eventually i was able to build that and 1.2.4, but had to jump through some hoops to do so. In the hope that they may save someone some effort, i've posted some mod_jk bins for Solaris 8: http://stephan.rootonfire.org/mod_jk/ a few moments ago i added a 1.2.2 and a 1.2.3pre-ish version. These bins are only known to work with Apache 1.3.27. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding tomcat-apache.conf file.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:16, John Turner wrote: Well, you may be stuck...the libpthread error indicates a problem with system libraries...implies the need for an admin. John Well going by a Quake FAQ of all things: http://www.planetquake.com/eclipse/q2bug.shtml It would seem the version of solaris being used is incompatible with the binary of mod_jk. Regards, -- Jason Bainbridge http://jblinux.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
