RE: [topbraid-users] edg import xlsx

s”. Cheers, David On 22 Sep 2021, at 10:45, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Trying to find my way in edg wrt the excel stuff I imported by target (multiclass) ontology and now wanted to import the one table sheet: Why

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: mu

Thx Andy! Op 21 sep. 2021 21:30 schreef "an...@seaborne.org" : > zanddriehoek_180_µm_63_µm Here it is µ == U+00B5 (Micro sign) which is not the same as U+03BC (Greek mu). Greek mu is allowed in prefix names. Micro sign is not in the allowed characters. Andy On Thursday, 16 September

RE: [topbraid-users] edg import xlsx

inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users

[topbraid-users] enriching the semantic table

When I have read in a semantic excel into TBC/EDG I want to convert it to a more structured ontology (ie normalize it) via sparql construct queries. In a sense I am splitting the big nonnormalized table into multiple tables. In this process I have to (I assume) create IDs for individuals that

RE: [topbraid-users] enriching the semantic table

, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: When I have read in a semantic excel into TBC/EDG I want to convert it to a more structured ontology (ie normalize it) via sparql construct queries. In a sense I am splitting the big nonnormalized

RE: [topbraid-users] malformed shacl

On Sep 24, 2021, at 3:16 PM, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Took out the prefixes there, and added 3x declare in beginning, still: Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms Scientist Specialist Structural Reliability T +31 (0)88 866

RE: [topbraid-users] malformed shacl

manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 8:17 PM To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [topbraid-users] malformed sh

RE: [topbraid-users] malformed shacl

solve such issues themselves and only need some general tips and hints that this list is designed to offer. When this is not the case (or for projects that may be too complicated to do without more intense interaction and mentoring from TopQuadrant), we can provide help off the mailing list through a con

RE: [topbraid-users] define transform rule

sources over which a rule can operate to generate new triples based on the information that exists about these resources. On Sep 23, 2021, at 2:43 PM, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:  Ok, i tried: But the query sta

RE: [topbraid-users] enriching the semantic table

ogy and data based on it. The logic of when/if to create new URIs for things is, however, entirely up to you. Re-generating the same URI many times is fine though, as triples processing means that duplicates cannot be written into the graphs. Cheers, David On 21 Sep 2021, at 11:21, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)'

[topbraid-users] sh:abstract

Hi Holger Is there any way in shacl to indicate a class cannot be instantiated? Related to: https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/78 I can see this goes against set theory but there is a need to say: "you have to instantiate a leaf". (I see people introducing own constructs for

[topbraid-users] Log4j ?

Dear TQ We are asked by our management to check own-installed software on our systems for Apache Log4j issue vulnerability. Can you say something about that for TBC? (knowing that Jena is on the list (log4shell/software at main * NCSC-NL/log4shell

RE: [topbraid-users] superclass online

s@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] superclass online You must owl:import ontologies (ie named graphs) in TBC. The ontology may be dereferenced, but not individual classes. Cheers, David On 23 Dec 2021, at 11:57, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-user

[topbraid-users] superclass online

I have an ontology with a class "Gebouw" that is subclassof the nen2660:PhysicalObject class available online: https://w3id.org/nen2660/def#PhysicalObject (ie the latter is dereferenceable, or well ... that is the intention). In TBC however I do not see the superclass:

Re: [topbraid-users] TopBraid 7.1 Public Beta Announcement

I support this view very much. I just loose my edg. Incl. the maintained importers exporters etc. Can tq tell me how much i have to invest now to get the same functionality ie kind of edg light for personal dev. use. Thx michel Op 12 nov. 2021 00:30 schreef Tim Smith : Ok... So for

[topbraid-users] sparql question

When I want to select attributes from different classes (monster & meting) that share the value of another attribute (here 'bpsStartKilometrering'), I now use the red below in annex 1. In the results I however get lines where ?meting sa:bpsStartKilometrering ?bpsStartKilometrering . is not

RE: [topbraid-users] sparql question

The way OPTIONAL and FILTER are combined in this example does not make sense to me. For example, you say that mengselType1 must be bound but mengselType2 can be unbound, but then you use FILTER to check that they are the same. On Nov 25, 2021, at 2:51 PM, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via To

RE: [topbraid-users] sparql question

Startkilometrering vs ?bpsStartKilometrering (upper-case K) ? Holger On 2021-11-25 6:56 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: When I want to select attributes from different classes (monster & meting) that share the value of another attribute (here ‘bpsStartKilometrering

RE: [topbraid-users] sparql question

ql question Is this a typo ?bpsStartkilometrering vs ?bpsStartKilometrering (upper-case K) ? Holger On 2021-11-25 6:56 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: When I want to select attributes from different classes (monster & meting) that share the value of another attribute (here ‘bp

Re: [topbraid-users] Validating owl:Classes or sh:NodeShapes

he locally defined classes for validation/inferencing. Don't have to have a/rdfs:subClassOf* in my queries when validating all our defined classes. I suppose it's a style/judgment call. Steve On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:59 AM 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topb

Re: [topbraid-users] Validating owl:Classes or sh:NodeShapes

Cant see why you would need an owndefined owlclass in your no owl rdfs Just type your random classes as rdfs class and subclass them wrt your rootclass itself also of type rdfs class. Op 28 okt. 2021 20:49 schreef David Price : Hi Steve Rdfs subclass is between RDFS Class as a set

RE: [topbraid-users] error for shaclgeneration

eers, David On 3 Nov 2021, at 10:15, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Dear TQ When I convert my fairly simple RDFS ontology (attached) to shacl (in TBC-ME) I get: Resulting in an near-empty shacl file (only prefixes and on

RE: [topbraid-users] Validating owl:Classes or sh:NodeShapes

rae.org/standard223/1.0/validation/schema> ; sh:select """ SELECT $this WHERE { FILTER (NOT EXISTS {$this rdfs:label ?something}) . } """ ; ] ; ] ; . Steve On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 1:00 PM 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users m

[topbraid-users] 7.1 jena update?

Small question on jena. Is in 7.1 the jena bug resolved that made number-starting names use the prefix correctly? Thx Michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms Scientist Specialist Structural Reliability T +31 (0)88 866 31 07 M +31 (0)63 038 12 20 E michel.bo...@tno.nl

RE: [topbraid-users] 7.1 jena update?

Holger On 2021-12-10 6:09 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: No, do not dare to upgrade because i might loose edg functionality. Considering pros and cons now Michel Op 10 dec. 2021 01:19 schreef Holger Knublauch <mailto:hol...@topquadrant.com>: Ha

Re: [topbraid-users] 7.1 jena update?

No, do not dare to upgrade because i might loose edg functionality. Considering pros and cons now Michel Op 10 dec. 2021 01:19 schreef Holger Knublauch : Have you tried it out? Did it change? Holger On 2021-12-10 1:07 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: Small

[topbraid-users] linking images

Is there a more specific annotation than rdfs:seeAlso to relate an image to a class? (ie in skos, dcterms, etc.) Thx for advice, Michel Ps Foaf:Image seems only ok for instances (since domain being owl:Thing) and we do not want to introduce punning... Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms Scientist

[topbraid-users] union in sh

I now have: nen2660:QuantityValue a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:allValuesFrom xsd:double ; owl:onProperty rdf:value ; ] ; . People want tof lex this into a double or a decimal In owl its clear But in this shacl I get: nen2660:QuantityValue

RE: [topbraid-users] linking images

ronment seems like a good thing - anyone got such a thing already that can be shared? On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 22:40, David Price mailto:dpr...@topquadrant.com>> wrote: On 20 Jul 2021, at 13:26, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>>

[topbraid-users] sh:nodeKind

What was the best practice for nodeKind in case class or datatype are already specified (hence type could be inferred to be blankorLit/blankoriri) Assert or not? Thx michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms Scientist Specialist Structural Reliability T +31 (0)88 866 31 07 M +31 (0)63 038 12 20 E

RE: [topbraid-users] union in sh

ity 1 sh:xone owl:disjointUnionOf sh:node/sh:or/sh:not Cheers, David On 21 Jul 2021, at 09:40, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: I now have: nen2660:QuantityValue a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a ow

[topbraid-users] owl>shacl for oneof?

In owl I have: nen2660:AggregationStateType a owl:Class ; owl:oneOf ( nen2660:Solid nen2660:Fluid nen2660:Gas nen2660:Plasma ) ; . What would be the shacl variant here?: I had: nen2660:AggregationStateType a sh:NodeShape ; sh:property [ sh:path

[topbraid-users] shacl for range only (in case of implicit targets)

I have in rdfs: x:hasUnit a rdf:Property ; rdfs:range qudt:Unit . Can my corresponding shacl with implicit targets simply be?: x:hasUnit a sh:NodeShape ; sh:class qudt:Unit . or do I need some sh:targetObjectsOf? nen2660:hasUnit a sh:NodeShape ; sh:class qudt:Unit ;

[topbraid-users] RE: shacl for range only (in case of implicit targets)

Or. Can I be implicit but needing a sh:property :hasUnit a sh:NodeShape ; sh:property [ sh:path :hasUnit ; sh:class qudt:Unit ; ] . Or is this nonsense ( something being a rdf:Property and a sh:NodeShape at the same time) Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms Scientist Specialist

RE: [topbraid-users] shacl for range only (in case of implicit targets)

a sh:NodeShape ; sh:targetObjectsOf ex:hasUnit ; sh:class qudt:Unit . Holger On 2021-07-27 9:17 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: I have in rdfs: x:hasUnit a rdf:Property ; rdfs:range qudt:Unit . Can my corresponding shacl with implicit targets simply

[topbraid-users] small shacl example question

Wrt to following fragment in https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/ (or later: https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/) * At most 5 values of ex:property? * Shouldn't that be ex:digit? The following example illustrates the use of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint to express that a hand must have

RE: [topbraid-users] superclass online

from my iPad On 24 Dec 2021, at 11:29, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:  Hi David I now remember an earlier discussion on this wrt qudt. In the end I also had to import qudt graphs despite them being made dereferenceable by Ste

[topbraid-users] typed as property and class?

Background In our NL standard we model quantities ('stroefheid for some asphalt lanesection/strookvak') like: :stroefheid rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:domain :Strookvak ; rdfs:range nen2660:QuantityValue ; nen2660:hasQuantityKind quantitykind:FrictionCoefficient ; . So they

Re: [topbraid-users] typed as property and class?

13:57, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: Background In our NL standard we model quantities (‘stroefheid for some asphalt lanesection/strookvak’) like: :stroefheid rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:domain :Strookvak ; rdfs:range nen2660:QuantityValue ; n

[topbraid-users] RE: spreadsheet import issue in tbc

e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users Sent: dinsdag 8 maart 2022 21:46 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [topbraid-use

RE: [topbraid-users] spreadsheet import issue in tbc

essage. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googleg

[topbraid-users] RE: spreadsheet import issue in tbc

nner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users Sent: dinsdag 8 maart 2022 21:57 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [topbraid-users] RE: spreads

[topbraid-users] spreadsheet import issue in tbc

I have a tab-delimted file with content like: Time out_1out_2 out_3out_4out_5out_6out_7 out_8 out_9out_10 out_11 out_12 out_13 out_14 out_15 out_16 out_17 out_18 out_19 out_20 out_21 14-06-2021T14:41:26.000 -0.00 -0.00

RE: [topbraid-users] HTML Documentation Generation from EDG

Hi Holger HTML is (was) perfect for documentation being not bound to any software tool… You cannot expect everybody to have or buy EDG for this. Think also about the successful ReSpec documentation here (https://respec.org/docs/). Gr michel Michel Böhms Data Scientist Unit Buildings,

[topbraid-users] error on delete in edg

When i want to delete an ontology in edge I get: (thx for advice) An internal error has been reported: Exception in SWP Servlet. Stack trace org.topbraid.core.servlet.HttpErrorException: Exception in SWP Servlet at org.topbraidlive.swp.servlet.SWPServlet.run(SWPServlet.java:220)

[topbraid-users] uri-generation issue shacl/sparql

Why no Meting_1 result executing: [cid:image001.png@01D82E52.B7C84120] When I delete the 3rd part I get (it right): [cid:image003.png@01D82E53.770D4030] So do I miss some function for the 3rd component? Thx Michel Michel Böhms Data Scientist Unit Buildings, Infrastructure & Maritime

RE: [topbraid-users] uri-generation issue shacl/sparql

Cheers, David On 2 Mar 2022, at 15:36, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Why no Meting_1 result executing: When I delete the 3rd part I get (it right): So do I miss some function for the 3rd component? Thx Michel

RE: [topbraid-users] uri-generation issue shacl/sparql

generation issue shacl/sparql Likely you need to cast ?time to be xsd:string. CONCAT requires strings. [cid:image003.png@01D82E61.112F2F40] Cheers, David On 2 Mar 2022, at 15:36, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Why no Meting

RE: [topbraid-users] uri-generation issue shacl/sparql

ested then check the other variables. You may need to BIND them outside the CONCAT so you can see their datatype. Cheers, David On 2 Mar 2022, at 17:12, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: ?time is already string… Michel Böh

Re: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

I very much support this comment. I hope TQ comes with a solution soon... Michel Op 4 feb. 2022 22:55 schreef Tim Smith : The bummer part of this product architecture change is now it is impossible to utilize the excellent model driven application capabilities that have always been a part of

RE: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

rs, David On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: I very much support this comment. I hope TQ comes with a solution soon... Michel Op 4 feb. 2022 22:55 schreef Tim Smith mailto:smith.ts...@gmail.com>

RE: [topbraid-users] sh:targetSubjectsOf question

to. If you delete the target, the shape will apply to nothing. Holger On 25 Oct 2023, at 11:48 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Is a sh:path for a s:targetSubjectsOf not redundant? Like in: https://otl.waternet.nl/def/99

[topbraid-users] sh:targetSubjectsOf question

Is a sh:path for a s:targetSubjectsOf not redundant? Like in: https://otl.waternet.nl/def/9962886e-9ab8-4a31-8286-38925258cb17-Shape ash:NodeShape ; sh:property [ sh:datatype xsd:string ; sh:path

[topbraid-users] question wrt qualified constraint

I have a qualified constraint question. To define a meronomy (typical hasPart hierarchy) we now use in OWA/OWL: :Vehicle a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minQualifiedCardinality "0"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ; owl:onClass :Engine ; owl:onProperty

Re: [topbraid-users] question wrt qualified constraint

validation at all, so you can leave the sh:qualifiedMinCount out, if you only intend to use it to indicate relevance. Holger On 10 Nov 2023, at 10:23 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: I have a qualified constraint question. To define a meronomy (typical hasPart

Re: [topbraid-users] question wrt qualified constraint

schreef Holger Knublauch : In both cases the constraint isn't doing any validation at all, so you can leave the sh:qualifiedMinCount out, if you only intend to use it to indicate relevance. Holger On 10 Nov 2023, at 10:23 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: I have a qualified con

Re: [topbraid-users] instantiatinga property with range rdfs:Resource (in tbc)

that *some* of the values must be strings, but not all. For that you need to use owl:allValuesFrom. Holger On 30 Aug 2022, at 9:29 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Hi Holger How can I instantiate a property with range rdfs:Re

Re: [topbraid-users] instantiatinga property with range rdfs:Resource (in tbc)

auch mailto:hol...@topquadrant.com>>: The OWL snippet below only declares a qualified cardinality constraint. That means that *some* of the values must be strings, but not all. For that you need to use owl:allValuesFrom. Holger On 30 Aug 2022, at 9:29 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite

Re: [topbraid-users] visualisation issue

is the only option. Cheers, David On 19 Sep 2022, at 16:10, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Is there any way to get it more user-friendly: They use no prefixes. And skos:preflabels (no rdfs:label). (can I infer rdfs:labels?

[topbraid-users] star

Before I start reformulating/simplifying some of my ontologies (including objectifications of values to attach meta-data) to rdf-star... Would TDB support code like: EXAMPLE 9 :a :name "Alice" {| :statedBy :bob ; :recorded

RE: [topbraid-users] star

] star TBC doesn't support any of this. Holger On 17 Mar 2023, at 12:36 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: My try is attached. But then….how in tbc: Can I add the 2 meta-data items date and author for the age=23?

RE: [topbraid-users] star

in the Source Code panel when you for example reify sh:minCount constraints. Holger On 17 Mar 2023, at 9:13 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Before I start reformulating/simplifying some of my ontologies (including object

RE: [topbraid-users] star

://datashapes.org/reification.html You can see the supported shorthand syntax in the Source Code panel when you for example reify sh:minCount constraints. Holger On 17 Mar 2023, at 9:13 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Before I

RE: [topbraid-users] star

: Re: [topbraid-users] star I invite you to just try it out please. Holger On 17 Mar 2023, at 12:01 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Thx, all clear Ps wrt example, I meant the Turtle counterpart for the actual yello

RE: [topbraid-users] unexpected query result

. Holger On 6 Apr 2023, at 10:55 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: What could be wrong here? Empty bpsStartKilometring in query result…. The data is there (not always but I put ‘optional’). Why is data like 1250 fr

RE: [topbraid-users] unexpected query result

pbraid-users] unexpected query result Try SELECT * - I think the variable names are spelled inconsistently. Holger On 6 Apr 2023, at 10:55 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: What could be wrong here? Empty bpsStartKilometr

[topbraid-users] unexpected query result

[cid:image001.png@01D9687E.BAD305A0] What could be wrong here? Empty bpsStartKilometring in query result The data is there (not always but I put 'optional'). Why is data like 1250 from row example being an integer not shown in query result? Thx for advice, Michel Ps Data was imported

RE: [topbraid-users] How to reference a property of an Object Relation?

This is weird. Yesterday I made an example and I was in doubt whether to check if I did it right here. “ A SHACL coding example for the fact that the underlying datatype for the attribute ‘dbl:numberOfBuildingUnits’ for a dbl:Building is an xsd:integer: dbl:Building a rdfs:Class,

[topbraid-users] RE: html generation question

When downloaded from Sharepoint to desktop it works again, so it must be Sharepoint! (and you will use I guess relative paths) Gr michel From: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users Sent: donderdag 11 mei 2023 11:35 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [topbraid-users] html

[topbraid-users] html generation question

When I now generate HTML, because of the absolute paths it seems, I cannot transfer the HTML folder to another place without breaking links. Is there a solution for this or am I doing things wrong? (I copied the workspace HTML folder to a sharepoint location and it did not work anymore) Thx

[topbraid-users] "skos+shacl"-only question....

I encounter an existing ontology that: * Uses skos for terms * Use shacl for shapes on instances that has a certain skos item as dct:subject * No use of rdfs/owl Like: otl-patroon:Aalgoot a sh:NodeShape ; sh:closed true ; sh:description "Basispatroon voor het

RE: [topbraid-users] "skos+shacl"-only question....

e, rather than a human then that concern probably does not matter as much. Cheers, David UK +44 (0) 7788 561308 US +1 (336) 283-0808 On 29 Dec 2023, at 13:22, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: I encounter an existing ontology that

Re: [topbraid-users] dash:abstract

[ sh:inversePath rdf:type ] ; sh:maxCount 0 ; ] . Holger On 17 Jan 2024, at 12:07 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: Would it be possible to expres dash:abstract somehow in pure/standard shacl code? Thx Michel Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel) Scientist

[topbraid-users] dash:abstract

Would it be possible to expres dash:abstract somehow in pure/standard shacl code? Thx Michel Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel) Scientist Specialist Mobility & Built Environment T: M: +31630381220 E: michel.bo...@tno.nl Location

RE: [topbraid-users] Composer EOL?

In the same line: transition options incl. pricing would be very welcome, michel From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Jan Campschroer Sent: woensdag 6 december 2023 11:46 To: TopBraid Suite Users Subject: [topbraid-users] Composer EOL? I heard the whisper that TB Composer is end

RE: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question

er On 31 Jan 2024, at 2:06 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Importing a versionIRI that is not defined as base-uri seems to result in error. Is it always needed to publish explicitly also versionIRI’s? (so, have the vers

RE: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question

On 1 Feb 2024, at 3:09 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: I found: https://community.stardog.com/t/owl-versioniri-not-resolved/450 quoting: “ If O contains an ontology IRI OI and a version IRI VI, then the ontology document o

[topbraid-users] versionIRI import question

Importing a versionIRI that is not defined as base-uri seems to result in error. Is it always needed to publish explicitly also versionIRI's? (so, have the versionURI in ontology clause is not enough?) Thx Michel Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel) Scientist Specialist Mobility & Built Environment T:

RE: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question

o: 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question I don't see where we have special handling of owl:versionIRI, nor is it required for anything. What error do you get and with what file? Holger On 31 Jan 2024, at 2:06 pm, 'Boh

Re: [topbraid-users] question wrt qualified constraint

Too many extra classes that are nonsemantical...would my proposed solution not be more natural? Op 13 nov. 2023 23:28 schreef Holger Knublauch : Can you not simply introduce a superclass :VehiclePart? Holger On 13 Nov 2023, at 6:09 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote

RE: [topbraid-users] question wrt qualified constraint

2023 09:34 To: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] question wrt qualified constraint On 13 Nov 2023, at 11:42 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Too many extra classes that are nonseman

RE: [topbraid-users] question wrt qualified constraint

fied value constraints are a pain to work with, either in OWL or SHACL. I have no recommendations for them as I almost never use them. I would just introduce a property :hasEngine and get rid of :hasPart. Holger On 10 Nov 2023, at 1:09 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mai

RE: [topbraid-users] linking glossaries to ontologies ( or taxonomies)

Note, we also addressed this issue in EN 17632-1 Semantic modelling and linking standard in CEN TC442 WG4. (iso “Glossary” we use the term “Dictionary”* and we indicate how dictionary (in SKOS) and ontology (in RDFS/OWL/SHACL) can be modeled separately and linked) connecting the string and

RE: [topbraid-users] linking glossaries to ontologies ( or taxonomies)

Fully agree. In SML the proposed “maps-to-term” relation is reusing rdfs:seeAlso. Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel) Scientist Specialist Mobility & Built Environment T: M: +31630381220 E: michel.bo...@tno.nl Location

<    1   2   3   4   5