Re: [topbraid-users] singleton

Just realized that I made a small mistake: ex:SingletonShape a sh:NodeShape ; sh:targetNode ex:SingletonClass ; sh:property [ sh:path [ sh:inversePath rdf:type ] ; sh:minCount 1 ; ] . The mistake is that rather than making the shape the class, it

Re: [topbraid-users] singleton

Well, there is no way to say this in OWL :) So, the options are: 1. Invent your own way of saying this which would not be in OWL because OWL has no support for this 2. Use a standard way of saying this in SHACL. > On Apr 30, 2019, at 11:26 AM, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users >

RE: [topbraid-users] singleton

s@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Irene Polikoff Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 16:15 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] singleton I do not see how this could be one in OWL, but you can do it in SHACL. ex:SingletonClas a owl:Class; a sh:NodeShape; sh:path [ sh:in

Re: [topbraid-users] singleton

;mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of dprice > Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 12:36 > To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] singleton > > > > > On 30 Apr 2019, at 0

Re: [topbraid-users] singleton

> <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of dprice > Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 13:13 > To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] singleton >

RE: [topbraid-users] singleton

to the electronic transmission of messages. From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of dprice Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 13:13 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] singleton On 30 Apr 2019, at 11:52, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mai

Re: [topbraid-users] singleton

googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of dprice > Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 12:36 > To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] singleton > > > > > On 30 Apr 2019, at 09:44, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid

RE: [topbraid-users] singleton

r in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of dprice Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 12:36 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] s

Re: [topbraid-users] singleton

> On 30 Apr 2019, at 09:44, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users > wrote: > > I there anyway to restrict a class to one instance in OWL? Make an enumerated class with only one individual that is of type the class. See https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Enumeration_of_Individuals

[topbraid-users] singleton

I there anyway to restrict a class to one instance in OWL? (ie singleton) Thx Michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E michel.bo...@tno.nl