Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-29 Thread D.S. Ljungmark
On 27/10/16 00:15, teor wrote: > >> On 27 Oct. 2016, at 00:32, D. S. Ljungmark wrote: >> >> On tis, 2016-10-25 at 22:52 +1100, teor wrote: On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark wrote: So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-26 Thread teor
> On 27 Oct. 2016, at 00:32, D. S. Ljungmark wrote: > > On tis, 2016-10-25 at 22:52 +1100, teor wrote: >>> >>> On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark >>> wrote: >>> >>> So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, and >>> try to

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-26 Thread D. S. Ljungmark
On ons, 2016-10-26 at 15:32 +0200, D. S. Ljungmark wrote: > On tis, 2016-10-25 at 22:52 +1100, teor wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark > > > wrote: > > > > > > So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, > > > and > >

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-26 Thread D. S. Ljungmark
On tis, 2016-10-25 at 22:52 +1100, teor wrote: > > > > On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark > > wrote: > > > > So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, and > > try to balance this. > > > > To reiterate a point previously,  before I start adding

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-26 Thread D. S. Ljungmark
On tis, 2016-10-25 at 13:34 +0200, Volker Mink wrote: > Apart from your topic - what kind of internet connection do you use? > :D Gigabit dedicated fiber. //D.S. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ tor-relays mailing

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-25 Thread teor
> On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark wrote: > > So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, and > try to balance this. > > To reiterate a point previously, before I start adding more tor > daemons or servers to this, I want to know how to scale

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-25 Thread Volker Mink
Apart from your topic - what kind of internet connection do you use? :D   Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2016 um 13:26 Uhr Von: "D.S. Ljungmark" <ljungm...@modio.se> An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay So, Now I've taken some

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-25 Thread D.S. Ljungmark
So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, and try to balance this. To reiterate a point previously, before I start adding more tor daemons or servers to this, I want to know how to scale and optimise what is already there. - Set up unbound in cache mode rather than use our

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-22 Thread teor
Hi, I wanted to highlight the following parts of my reply: The Tor network is quite happy to allocate around 47 MByte/s (yes, 376 MBit/s) to your relay based on its bandwidth measurements, but it won't do that until your relay shows it is actually capable of sustaining that traffic over a

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-22 Thread teor
> On 22 Sep 2016, at 04:40, D. S. Ljungmark wrote: > > On tor, 2016-09-22 at 12:08 +0200, Aeris wrote: >>> >>> Scaling up on more hardware is always an option, but I really want >>> to >>> push the limit of the exit node, as the others won't be exits >>> (Local >>> network

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-22 Thread D. S. Ljungmark
On tor, 2016-09-22 at 12:08 +0200, Aeris wrote: > > > > Scaling up on more hardware is always an option, but I really want > > to > > push the limit of the exit node, as the others won't be exits > > (Local > > network design, really) , and exit traffic is always more > > interesting. > > When I

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-22 Thread D. S. Ljungmark
On tor, 2016-09-22 at 06:29 +1000, teor wrote: > > > > On 22 Sep 2016, at 05:41, nusenu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, how do we get tor to move past 100-200Mbit? Is it just a > > > > > waiting game? > > > > I'd say just run more instances if you

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-22 Thread Aeris
> Scaling up on more hardware is always an option, but I really want to > push the limit of the exit node, as the others won't be exits (Local > network design, really) , and exit traffic is always more > interesting. When I say another instance, it’s on the same hardware. Because Tor is not

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-22 Thread nusenu
D. S. Ljungmark: >> You have to start another Tor instance to use a little more your CPU >> > (1 other >> > core) and so to drain additionnal 150-300Mbps. > > Scaling up on more hardware is always an option, but I really want to > push the limit of the exit node, as the others won't be exits

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-22 Thread D. S. Ljungmark
On ons, 2016-09-21 at 17:29 +0200, Aeris wrote: > > > > 17 MBytes/s in each direction. > > From Atlas graph, your node is currently growing up, so wait few > weeks more to  > have the real bandwidth consumption, but don’t expect huge change. It looks as if it stabilized a while ago, and I see

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-21 Thread teor
> On 22 Sep 2016, at 05:41, nusenu wrote: > So, how do we get tor to move past 100-200Mbit? Is it just a waiting game? > > I'd say just run more instances if you still have resources left and > want to contribute more bw. > (obviously also your exit policy

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-21 Thread nusenu
>>> So, how do we get tor to move past 100-200Mbit? Is it just a waiting game? I'd say just run more instances if you still have resources left and want to contribute more bw. (obviously also your exit policy influences on how much your instance is used) >> How long has the relay been up? > > 4

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-21 Thread Aeris
> 17 MBytes/s in each direction. From Atlas graph, your node is currently growing up, so wait few weeks more to have the real bandwidth consumption, but don’t expect huge change. 17M*B*ps is 140M*b*ps and you already have a good relay :) This is around the speed expected for standard CPU (150

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-21 Thread D.S. Ljungmark
On 21/09/16 15:24, teor wrote: > >> On 21 Sep 2016, at 20:01, D.S. Ljungmark wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm looking at some traffic patterns for my Exit relay, and I'm frankly >> a bit disappointed with the utilization. >> >> Currently it's running at a load average of

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-21 Thread teor
> On 21 Sep 2016, at 20:01, D.S. Ljungmark wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm looking at some traffic patterns for my Exit relay, and I'm frankly > a bit disappointed with the utilization. > > Currently it's running at a load average of 0.3-0.5, and CPU idle at > 70-80%. > > >

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-21 Thread Tristan
In short, yes. On Sep 21, 2016 5:02 AM, "D.S. Ljungmark" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking at some traffic patterns for my Exit relay, and I'm frankly > a bit disappointed with the utilization. > > Currently it's running at a load average of 0.3-0.5, and CPU idle at >

[tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-09-21 Thread D.S. Ljungmark
Hi all, I'm looking at some traffic patterns for my Exit relay, and I'm frankly a bit disappointed with the utilization. Currently it's running at a load average of 0.3-0.5, and CPU idle at 70-80%. We're not limited on Bandwidth (tests show that our max cap is more than safe to produce),