Nothing logical about it. Thats all you get with shitty connection
On Dec 4, 2016 1:43 PM, "Rana" wrote:
OK thanks, this is beginning to sound logical. What you are saying -
correct me if I am wrong - is that since 3 DirAuths gave me fast/hsdir
flags while the other 5
Thanks, Teor and SuperSluether.
That's just what I needed, that TorProject:trusty syntax. Looks like it's
working.
-Greg
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 5:34 AM, SuperSluether <supersluet...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> For Debian-based systems, on the top of
> "/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattend
Hi,
I'm very interested in setting up unattended upgrades for tor. I tried
searching for instructions on how to do it. But the only instructions I
could really find didn't work (on the Library Freedom git project).
How do I write the config so that the tor repo (or whatever it's called) is
updated
Awhile ago Tor blocked relays from running on Amazon AWS (after there was
an attach that originated from Amazon-hosted nodes). Google GCE was also
blocked. See this thread about it from last year when I tried to run a node
on google's cloud:
I tried going to ba.com today from a non-exit relay, and it works now! (
ba.com redirects me to www.britishairways.com.) Thanks, Pascal.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> On 20 May 2016 at 12:32, Dionysis Grigoropoulos wrote:
> > On
),
it'd be useful to have a visual indication of which column is sorted,
and in which direction.
o Sorting the uptime column, it looks like it sorts as a string and
not as a number. So it sorts to: 107d, 12d, 15d, 20d, etc.
-Greg
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:20 PM, I <beatthebasta...@inbox.com>
*Again, sorry for any inconvenience -
Oh no worries. No one used it anyway-
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of Karsten Loesing
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 7:56 AM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays]
Wow – I’m looking to see if mine has been taken over. How do I find that file
below on mine?
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
Percy Blakeney
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:07 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd:
OMG - I had the same thing happen to me back a few years. What I did was
completely destroy ALL computer equipment with a hammer. The weird part
about it was it keeps coming back now even 10 years later.
On May 29, 2016 3:23 PM, "Percy Blakeney" wrote:
> I did just that.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:38 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/04/04/472992023/when-a-dark-web-volunteer-gets-raided-by-the-police
>
> He/they gave passwords and let govt search (and perhaps even index,
> hash, and copy, knowingly or not
http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/04/04/472992023/when-a-dark-web-volunteer-gets-raided-by-the-police
A Seattle exit node operator is visited by local police over a child
pornography warrant... Is this out of the ordinary or is this to be
expected when running an exit from your
UFONet
On Mar 22, 2016 7:55 AM, "mick" wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:08:29 +
> Dhalgren Tor allegedly wrote:
>
> > All traffic originated from China.
> >
>
> But that does not necessarily mean that the attacker was in China,
> merely that he/she/it
Brian,
That's all quite interesting. Thanks for sharing. I hope this work
goes well. It would help move Tor forward toward the cloud-based
software model that's becoming more and more popular.
Greg
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Brian 'redbeard' Harrington
<redbe...@coreos.com> wrote:
Brian,
This sounds like a great effort. I wanted to point out 2 things:
1) I think that GCE IP addresses are blacklisted (due to an earlier sybil
attack,
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-August/007656.html).
2) How do you see your work relating to and differing from the
I'll kick in a few month also...
On Mar 8, 2016 5:26 PM, "Michael McConville" wrote:
> elrippo wrote:
> > I will also chip in with some funding.
> >
> > DO you accept Bitcoin or Monero, i do not like to you use PayPal for
> > funding an TOR relay ;D
> >
> > If so, please post
No
On Jan 22, 2016 7:05 PM, "Roots Babilonia" wrote:
> Please send me bridges
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
Hi Robert,
Do you know how we could push forward with that? File a ticket/bug?
Thanks for you interest!
Greg
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Robert E Dial <red...@autistici.org> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> This sounds like a good idea to me, that we could extend upon.
>
&
be adding a note next to the
graph that they aren't expected to work with newer relays? It's pretty
confusing as it stands.
Thanks,
Greg
>
> Some others relays have no 1 year consensus graph or later, but bandwidths
> graph are ok.
> See https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/
> 2EBD
I asked about running an exit there (though I currently only run a
non-exit), and he said that I should buy a "Two" ($18/mon) and limit it to
100 Mbps (compared to the 1000 Mbps they advertise). I've run my non-exit
there on a "One", limited to 100 Mbps and had no issue. I haven't tried
running
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of Miguel Barbosa Gonçalves
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:38 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node with Onion Pi
On 10/07/2015 03:21 AM, Alex Haesche
-new-relay
Use the arm command to monitor your relay traffic and to check for error
messages.
Errors can sometimes arise from typos in your torrc file or local issues on
your machine.
On 14 Sep 2015, at 18:51, Greg Moss <gmos...@gmail.com
<mailto:gmos...@gmail.com> > wrot
Comcast modem is in bridge mode with ASA doing the NAT (showing at times
upwards to 6,000 connections. Believe the ASA is rated to 10,000 + currently
showing 220 connections). It's a Comcast business line with relay having its
own static IP. I will have a look at the link provided.
gm
Starlight - I see your advertised BW is 7.26MB = 58.08 Mb with globe
showing 2 to 4 Mb traffic. Maybe I will up the advertised BW on the relay
and see if that helps.
gm
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of
has no traffic
You should see ToS of Comcast, maybe It could be making Tor Slow.
http://business.comcast.com/customer-notifications/acceptable-use-policy
in technical restrictions, they say something about encryption circumvention
devices.
D.
El 14/09/15 a las 12:26, Greg Moss escibió:
> Comc
My middle relay seems to have minimal traffic. Is there something I need to
do or is my damn IPS (Comcast) blocking me.
Node name is gmojo02
gm
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Patrick,
Do you mind adding this info to the "good/bad isps" wiki? I'm looking
around for hosting as well and thought we could improve that page a
little.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs
Thanks,
Greg
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Kenneth Freem
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the advice. Regarding the AS numbers, is there a better way
to find out a hosting provider's AS number than just googling for it?
-Greg
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, NOC noc@babylon.network wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The wiki is indeed
(trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13421)
I'm happy to use one of the ones I listed, so this is more of a
request to update the wiki for everyone :)
Thanks,
Greg
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:56 PM, teor teor2...@gmail.com wrote:
12xBTM, did you accidentally encrypt this message rather than signing it?
On 25
I will
probably go with one of those. I thought I'd just try out a remote relay on
GCE to start with.
-Greg
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:26 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Philipp Winter p...@nymity.ch wrote:
I wonder if we wouldn't be better off with GCE
.
If that's the case, then that was a year ago. Hopefully directory
authorities would be okay with removing the ban. Is there a process for
requesting that?
Thanks,
Greg
T
On 20/08/2015 06:00, Greg wrote:
Hi, I tried to spin up a relay on GCE a few days ago, and I found
that it was outright rejected
that there was an attack on the tor
network originating from GCE, and that's why it got blacklisted. I'm not
finding that thread now. But is GCE going to be removed from the blacklist?
I realize it's not a very economical place to run a relay.
-Greg
___
tor-relays mailing list
Ya mine hasn't done shit for a year lol. No its maxed 200KB
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of starlight.201...@binnacle.cx
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 2:40 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-relays]
that traffic and ports used
assuming it doesn't wrap and tunnel it though the Tor service.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of Ryan Getz
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 12:23 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re
@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Oubound Ports
On 14-07-11 08:59 PM, Greg Moss wrote:
Alright - traffic is picking up a little after 24 hour. Netfow is
showing a bunch of outbound SSH connections but for some reason cant
see it in the syslog going out. Added ACL for outbound SSH
Alright - traffic is picking up a little after 24 hour. Netfow is showing a
bunch of outbound SSH connections but for some reason cant see it in the
syslog going out. Added ACL for outbound SSH and will watch. Not sure WTF
all the SSH traffic is all about.
gm
-Original Message-
From:
Newbie to Tor but have a Debian server up and running as a relay. Do I need
to filter outbound traffic from the tor server on my firewall. If yes what
ports would I need to open. I am also have a good look a Tails any
suggestions would be helpful.
Thanks -
gm
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Oubound Ports
On 7/11/14, Greg Moss gmos...@gmail.com wrote:
Newbie to Tor but have a Debian server up and running as a relay. Do
I need to filter outbound traffic from the tor server on my firewall.
If yes what ports would I need
: Re: [tor-relays] Oubound Ports
On 7/11/14, Greg Moss gmos...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the help. I have my ORport and DIRport defined in torrc and
forwarded through the firewall up to the Tor Relay. I was just
wondering in regards to outbound traffic from the server itself.
What type
It is firewalled. I should have said connection attempts in my first
email.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Tora Tora Tora t...@allthatnet.com wrote:
On 02/28/2014 11:14 AM, Greg W wrote:
Are you suggesting that the IP's making the connections are potentially
exit nodes (they're not, I've
What are the IPs connecting to you? I've been watching my firewall logs
here recently and see several hosts from several distinct subnets
consistently trying to connect to TOR related ports.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:50 AM, I beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote:
One of mine is being DDOSed today.
be
sending some abuse emails and writing a new fail2ban rule!
Thanks,
Greg
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:39:55PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2014-02-27 23:12, Greg W wrote:
I turned on some logging on my firewall today
Are you suggesting that the IP's making the connections are potentially
exit nodes (they're not, I've checked) or that abuse email volume in
general should be lowered regardless of the nature? Just trying to
understand your sentiment here :)
Thanks,
Greg
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Roger
of
connection attempts on that port?
Thanks,
Greg
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
(I'm quite new here, but...)
If you only run 1 node, is there any reason to set the Family? My
reading of https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en
(MyFamily, NodeFamily) suggests that it's not relevant for the 1-node
case.
Thanks,
Greg
2012/1/5 Tor Relays at brwyatt.net t
44 matches
Mail list logo