Aha! Well at least you know what it is. Its not so great that its
broken, but you at least know what to get fixed.
I'm actually surprised that other devices still worked well with 4
volts across them. A couple volts will probably not affect most
outputs, but 4V is pretty large for most solid
One thing to check for is to make sure replay gain is turned off. You
access this with Settings-Audio Settings-Volume Adjustment. Make
sure No Volume Adjustment is selected.
John S.
--
JohnSwenson
JohnSwenson's
Thanks,
I guess the bug with compilation albums is causing my issues.
Now I've got a good starting point to look for my strange genre tags,
too:
(- compilation albums)
Regarding my single file question:
Of course, it's impossible to define a complete album.
But a search for a tag combination of
mfw;575141 Wrote:
I'm relatively new also, but I think you could run a player, such as
Squeezeplay, on a pc and play from your server running on your NAS. If
I'm wrong I'm certain someone will quickly correct my error here.
...or confirm that you are indeed correct. ;o)
Using one of the
juzi;574935 Wrote:
I don't know if this is what you are looking for:
http://www.logitech.com/assets/30072/documentation.pdf
it will not tell you how to organise your library though...
Thanks!
And indeed, I can manage the library thing :)
--
Duffy
juzi;575180 Wrote:
Ah, yes I remember the 'setup' script also didn't work for me. I just
installed the debian package manually (dpkg -i
squeezeboxserver_7.5.1_all.deb) and the it worked...
Yep, Just did the same. Looks ok so far, at least I can see
squeezeboxserver process is running. Will
Phil Leigh;575153 Wrote:
A couple of thoughts:
1) The scan will go faster if the music files and your SBS installation
are on 2 physically seperate disks
2) Some AV software might slow down the scan
3) Tell Windows to give priority to Background Services via the Control
Panel - System -
souwalker;575142 Wrote:
Many Touch users have advised me to turn the output level of the Touch
to 100% and then let the pre amp handle the volume.
This is how I have set mine up with analogue connection to my pre/power
amp. Sounds great.
RgdsThat is the only way to assure bit-perfect
Kal Rubinson;575243 Wrote:
That is the only way to assure bit-perfect transmission.
This is true and for playback of HDCD or DTS via an external DAC this
is mandatory. However for other playback scenarios, we've established
beyond reasonable doubt that reducing the volume does not cause any
JohnSwenson;575162 Wrote:
One thing to check for is to make sure replay gain is turned off. You
access this with Settings-Audio Settings-Volume Adjustment. Make
sure No Volume Adjustment is selected.
John S.
John - as you know, RG will simply reduce the volume somewhat - it
won't cause
Phil Leigh;575251 Wrote:
This is true and for playback of HDCD or DTS via an external DAC this is
mandatory. However for other playback scenarios, we've established
beyond reasonable doubt that reducing the volume does not cause any
adverse sonic issues other than a slight rise in the signal
I'm quite keen to get this thread back to the scanning performance
issue, because I hadn't realised there were folks who had similar
libraries and hardware to me but with scan times that are 10x longer!
I haven't done anything funky to my environment to achieve this
(other than running 7.6 - and
Kal Rubinson;575259 Wrote:
Agreed.
You're agreeing with his disagreeing with you?
--
Goodsounds
Goodsounds's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14201
View this thread:
Phil Leigh;575264 Wrote:
I'm quite keen to get this thread back to the scanning performance
issue, because I hadn't realised there were folks who had similar
libraries and hardware to me but with scan times that are 10x longer!
I haven't done anything funky to my environment to achieve
iPhone;575269 Wrote:
Phil, doesn't 7.6 use the new SQLite and 7.5 still uses MySQL. Would
there not be a big difference in the times if he is on 7.5? Also, I
have noticed a big difference between scanning an internal drive versus
an external USB drive. External has always been slower.
Well
Can you already tell if 7.6 will fix the problem?
--
Konzales
Konzales's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31006
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=77342
iPhone;575269 Wrote:
Phil, doesn't 7.6 use the new SQLite and 7.5 still uses MySQL. Would
there not be a big difference in the times if he is on 7.5? Also, I
have noticed a big difference between scanning an internal drive versus
an external USB drive. External has always been slower.
There
sleepysurf;573862 Wrote:
Looks like -all- the high-end mags are now jumping on the Touch
bandwagon! Just got my October issue of The Absolute Sound, and Steven
Stone has a very favorable review of the Touch, including a superb
comparison of the Duet vs. Touch, and also comparing the Touch
Phil Leigh;575264 Wrote:
I'm quite keen to get this thread back to the scanning performance
issue, because I hadn't realised there were folks who had similar
libraries and hardware to me but with scan times that are 10x longer!
I haven't done anything funky to my environment to achieve
Hi King, and welcome to the forum! Thank you for a most enlightening
first post! Can I quote you on other audio fora?
--
konut
konut's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1596
View this thread:
ralphpnj;575306 Wrote:
I've attached a copy of the 1000 line scanner log file as a text file.
Please review and let me know why my scans and rescans take so long.
Thanks!
Scanning of the music library files takes 70:07, completing at
09:34:07, which would lead me do believe that the scan
mfw;575141 Wrote:
edmondwolfman;575139 Wrote:
I'm relatively new also, but I think you could run a player, such as
Squeezeplay, on a pc and play from your server running on your NAS. If
I'm wrong I'm certain someone will quickly correct my error here.
Frank
In installed
KingKong;575267 Wrote:
Only if you want to look like a complete moron. I find it wholly ironic
that your avatar claims No BS and yet you fell for a load of it.
Virtually everything you've quoted is complete nonsense and has no
basis in reality. If JohnSwenson has done so many measurements,
edmondwolfman;575311 Wrote:
mfw;575141 Wrote:
In installed the player on my pc as suggested and the server sees the
player and I can play music although I only get static when trying to
play a high res 96kHz/24bit music file. I'm assuming that the touch
would play them
Goodsounds;575268 Wrote:
You're agreeing with his disagreeing with you?No disagreement as along as one
pays attention to all of the conditions
each of us specified.
--
Kal Rubinson
Kal Rubinson's Profile:
Gumble;575288 Wrote:
same here. Today the Touch wanted to be updated (R9009) and after the
update, no connection to SBS any more possible (7.5.1 - r30836). Will
try HW reset - but I think the SBT update is done very well :(
EDIT:
damn, the Touch does not recognize the SBS any more! Help!
Update:
I gave up trying to get the internal Touch server to work. I had no
energy to continue trying to troubleshoot after the many failed
attempts. I ended up installing squeezebox server on my downstairs PC
along with the music hard drive. That computer is hard wired to my
wireless router.
Boy do I know that feeling... Very disappointed!
--
tony.s
tony.s's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37752
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81784
JJZolx;575310 Wrote:
Scanning of the music library files takes 70:07, completing at 09:34:07,
which would lead me to believe that the scan started at about 08:24:00.
Playlist and post processing finishes at 09:56:02, which would give a
total scan time of 92 minutes. Did this actually take
mrkd29;575350 Wrote:
Update:
I gave up trying to get the internal Touch server to work. I had no
energy to continue trying to troubleshoot after the many failed
attempts. I ended up installing squeezebox server on my downstairs PC
along with the music hard drive. That computer is hard
Can you already tell if 7.6 will fix the problem?
I'm sorry, I can't tell you.
--
Michael
___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Just updated Touch to 7.51 r9009
Now all attempts to tune in any BBC radio get error message unable to
play file type for: spdr: //bbcmsparser
ideas?
--
firedog
Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to
Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-150 amp, MF V DAC3, Devore
Ran into another issue with this release.
After reset, connected back to squeezenetwork.
I pressed now playing, it shows the album art and song that I was
playing (pandora?) before the update.
I navigated away and tried to play a new pandora station, the music
played, but the screen never
You mean I have to re-apply the new firmware after I reset the Touch if
I have this dreaded update firmware issue?
Rgds
--
souwalker
souwalker's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37673
View this
I was part of the beta group testing the Touch and continue to run the
beta server version 7.6, for which there are firmware updates to the
Touch -several times a week-. I've updated the Touch's firmware
literally hundreds of times.
I've seen very few failures of the upgrade process, and none
Hi
My Touch current firmware is v7.5.1.r8837 which is the same version as
the SBS I have in my QNAP NAS.
I turned on Touch and was informed of a new firmware v7.5.1.r9009
Reading a post by another user, he is having issues with the Touch
after the firmware upgrade.
I have the Touch working
souwalker;575378 Wrote:
Any suggestions?
Do it.
--
JJZolx
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81859
JJZolx;575379 Wrote:
Do it.
Pls see my question on the other thread about local server.
Thanks
--
souwalker
souwalker's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37673
View this thread:
souwalker;575381 Wrote:
When you say, local server, what do you mean?
A server in your home, on your local network.
When the Touch detects a firmware upgrade, is the touch detecting from
mysqueezebox.com or a local server? How do I know?
I don't think you can tell by what's shown on the
The Touch has a feature that even if the currently loaded firmware craps
the bed you can easily revert to the previous firmware, so there's
little to worry about. The flash memory of the Touch stores both the
current firmware and a complete copy of the old firmware.
To revert to the previous
JJZolx;575386 Wrote:
A server in your home, on your local network.
I don't think you can tell by what's shown on the Touch's screen, but
the notification will come from whichever server the Touch is connected
to. If it's connected to your home server then that's where the
41 matches
Mail list logo
