[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992930] Re: chromium won't launch at nenu when installed; lubuntu kinetic

2022-10-13 Thread Chris Guiver
 2029.529767] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727989.480:369): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4554 comm="firefox" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2029.788432] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727989.740:370): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4573 comm="firefox" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.216633] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.169:371): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4617 comm="xdg-settings" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.226352] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.177:372): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4618 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.226369] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.177:373): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4619 comm="cut" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.431479] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.385:374): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4690 comm="xdg-settings" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.438386] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.389:375): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4691 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.338418] kauditd_printk_skb: 10 callbacks suppressed
  [ 2291.338425] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.317:386): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/meta/snap.yaml" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.401821] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:387): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/doc/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.401839] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:388): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.401849] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:389): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.401919] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:390): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/doc/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.697486] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.673:391): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/meta/snap.yaml" pid=5013 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.820941] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.797:392): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/cups/" pid=5013 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.853434] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.829:393): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5013 comm="desktop-launch" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.878977] audit: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992667] Re: Application windows invisible (on DG2 graphics)

2022-10-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
you'll have a new mesa backport from kinetic to jammy in
ppa:canonical-x/x-staging soon, once all the build-deps are in order

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992667

Title:
  Application windows invisible (on DG2 graphics)

Status in linux-oem-6.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-6.0 source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  When using GNOME Shell with Wayland, all application windows become
  invisible from time to time. This usually happens right after starting
  GNOME Shell for the first time or after having a VRAM intensive
  application open, such as a game.

  I have installed the latest linux-oem-6.0 kernel and manually enabled
  support for DG2 graphics by passing the i915.force_probe parameter
  with the PCIe ID of the graphics card.

  I have attached a screenshot of the described behavior below.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-shell 42.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.0.0-1005.5-oem 6.0.0
  Uname: Linux 6.0.0-1005-oem x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Wed Oct 12 17:23:40 2022
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-10-11 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 42.2-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-6.0/+bug/1992667/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1714178] Re: Triple 4K monitor display failed (modesetting driver limited to 8192x8192)

2022-10-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714178

Title:
  Triple 4K monitor display failed (modesetting driver limited to
  8192x8192)

Status in DRI:
  Fix Released
Status in HWE Next:
  Fix Released
Status in X.Org X server:
  Unknown
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-osp1 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in xorg-server package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-oem-osp1 source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released
Status in mesa source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released
Status in xorg-server source package in Bionic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Title: Triple monitor display failed with Dell Dock (HiDPI)
  (modesetting)

  Summary: Triple monitor display failed with Dell Dock (HiDPI)
  (modesetting)

  Steps:
  1. a laptop with Built-in 4K LCD
  2. Cold boot system with Dell Dock connected
  3. Connect a 4K monitor to Dock
  4. Connect 2nd 4K monitor to Dock
  5. Go to [All Settings]=>[Displays] to have the following configuration.
  Resolution: 4kx2k@60Hz (one Built-in LCD + two external monitors)
  Mirror displays: disable

  Expected results: Triple monitor display should works without issues
  Actual results: Triple monitor display failed with Dell Dock

  Additional information:
  1. Linux distribution: Ubuntu 16.04+modesetting, 16.04.3, and 17.04
  2. Laptop: Dell Precision 5520
  3. Dell Business Thunderbolt Dock - TB16
  https://goo.gl/vFDjpi

  WORKAROUND (UBUNTU 18.04+):
  Log in to "Ubuntu on Wayland" instead of "Ubuntu".

  ---
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:

  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistributionChannelDescriptor:
   # This is a distribution channel descriptor
   # For more information see 
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
   canonical-oem-somerville-xenial-amd64-20160624-2
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Device [8086:591d] (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
     Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07bf]
     Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07bf]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-08-29 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 "Xenial" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 
20160624-10:47
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Precision 5520
  Package: xorg-server (not installed)
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.0-14-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=b79ae801-0652-4785-beaf-e8387d798948 ro acpi_rev_override quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-14.20~16.04.1-generic 4.11.12
  Tags:  xenial ubuntu compiz-0.9
  Uname: Linux 4.11.0-14-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 05/08/2017
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.3.3
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.3.3:bd05/08/2017:svnDellInc.:pnPrecision5520:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Precision 5520
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+16.04.20160823-0ubuntu1
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.3
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.10.1-1ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.7.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20160325-1ubuntu1.2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.12-1build2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dri/+bug/1714178/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991761] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.2 HWE stack

2022-10-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
needs also spirv-llvm-translator-14 to build libclc-15, or s-l-t-15 plus
spirv-headers backported

** Also affects: spirv-llvm-translator-14 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: directx-headers (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: libdrm (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-15 (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: spirv-llvm-translator-14 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: spirv-llvm-translator-14 (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991761

Title:
  Backport packages for 22.04.2 HWE stack

Status in directx-headers package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in libdrm package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in llvm-toolchain-15 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in spirv-llvm-translator-14 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in directx-headers source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in libdrm source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in llvm-toolchain-15 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in spirv-llvm-translator-14 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  WIP

  directx-headers

  libdrm

  llvm-15

  mesa

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/+bug/1991761/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992667] Re: Application windows invisible (on DG2 graphics)

2022-10-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
the backports in jammy mesa are likely somewhat buggy although some
demos etc work fine, 22.2 should work better OOTB

** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-oem-6.0 (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992667

Title:
  Application windows invisible (on DG2 graphics)

Status in linux-oem-6.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-6.0 source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  When using GNOME Shell with Wayland, all application windows become
  invisible from time to time. This usually happens right after starting
  GNOME Shell for the first time or after having a VRAM intensive
  application open, such as a game.

  I have installed the latest linux-oem-6.0 kernel and manually enabled
  support for DG2 graphics by passing the i915.force_probe parameter
  with the PCIe ID of the graphics card.

  I have attached a screenshot of the described behavior below.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-shell 42.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.0.0-1005.5-oem 6.0.0
  Uname: Linux 6.0.0-1005-oem x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Wed Oct 12 17:23:40 2022
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-10-11 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 42.2-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-6.0/+bug/1992667/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971712] Re: Add support for Intel DG2

2022-10-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Also affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971712

Title:
  Add support for Intel DG2

Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.17 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-firmware source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-oem-6.0 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu 22.04 does not support Intel DG2-based hw which is released
  later this year.

  [Fix]

  Mesa: needs a bunch of patches backported to 22.0.x, will be upstream in 22.1 
or 22.2
  kernel: use a dkms provided by Intel and integrated in the OEM kernel source, 
the module will be shipped in a separate modules package

  [Test case]

  Boot a system with a DG2-based GPU, check that native graphics drivers
  are used.

  Test mesa also on gen9-gen12 GPU's to verify that there are no
  regressions even though the backports are for DG2.

  [What could go wrong]

  The Mesa patches are only for DG2 support, should not affect other
  hardware at all. The kernel driver is in a separate package which
  isn't installed by default except preinstall machines with this
  hardware. So other users are not affected.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1971712/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992930] Re: chromium won't launch at nenu when installed; lubuntu kinetic

2022-10-13 Thread Chris Guiver
fox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4469 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2029.529767] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727989.480:369): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4554 comm="firefox" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2029.788432] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727989.740:370): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4573 comm="firefox" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.216633] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.169:371): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4617 comm="xdg-settings" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.226352] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.177:372): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4618 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.226369] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.177:373): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4619 comm="cut" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.431479] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.385:374): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4690 comm="xdg-settings" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.438386] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.389:375): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4691 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.338418] kauditd_printk_skb: 10 callbacks suppressed
  [ 2291.338425] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.317:386): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/meta/snap.yaml" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.401821] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:387): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/doc/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.401839] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:388): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.401849] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:389): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.401919] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:390): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/doc/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.697486] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.673:391): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/meta/snap.yaml" pid=5013 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.820941] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.797:392): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/cups/" pid=5013 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.853434] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.829:393): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5013 comm="desktop-launch" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.878977] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.857:394): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5048 comm="date" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.883639] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.861:395): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5050 comm="getent" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: apparmor 3.0.7-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-19.19-generic 5.19.7
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.475
  CurrentDesktop: LXQt
  Date: Fri Oct 14 06:12:40 2022
  LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Daily amd64 (20221013)
  ProcKernelCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz 
file=/cdrom/preseed/username.seed quiet splash ---
  SourcePackage: apparmor
  Syslog:
   Oct 14 05:40:44 lubuntu dbus-daemon[1290]: [system] AppArmor D-Bus mediation 
is enabled
   Oct 14 05:41:54 lubuntu dbus-daemon[1747]: [session uid=999 pid=1747] 
AppArmor D-Bus mediation is enabled
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1992930/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992930] Re: chromium won't launch at nenu when installed; lubuntu kinetic

2022-10-13 Thread Chris Guiver
refox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4469 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2029.529767] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727989.480:369): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4554 comm="firefox" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2029.788432] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727989.740:370): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4573 comm="firefox" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.216633] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.169:371): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4617 comm="xdg-settings" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.226352] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.177:372): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4618 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.226369] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.177:373): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4619 comm="cut" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.431479] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.385:374): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4690 comm="xdg-settings" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2031.438386] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.389:375): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4691 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.338418] kauditd_printk_skb: 10 callbacks suppressed
  [ 2291.338425] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.317:386): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/meta/snap.yaml" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.401821] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:387): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/doc/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.401839] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:388): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.401849] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:389): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.401919] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:390): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/doc/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
  [ 2291.697486] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.673:391): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/meta/snap.yaml" pid=5013 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.820941] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.797:392): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/cups/" pid=5013 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.853434] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.829:393): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5013 comm="desktop-launch" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.878977] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.857:394): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5048 comm="date" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
  [ 2291.883639] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.861:395): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5050 comm="getent" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: apparmor 3.0.7-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-19.19-generic 5.19.7
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.475
  CurrentDesktop: LXQt
  Date: Fri Oct 14 06:12:40 2022
  LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Daily amd64 (20221013)
  ProcKernelCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz 
file=/cdrom/preseed/username.seed quiet splash ---
  SourcePackage: apparmor
  Syslog:
   Oct 14 05:40:44 lubuntu dbus-daemon[1290]: [system] AppArmor D-Bus mediation 
is enabled
   Oct 14 05:41:54 lubuntu dbus-daemon[1747]: [session uid=999 pid=1747] 
AppArmor D-Bus mediation is enabled
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1992930/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992930] [NEW] chromium won't launch at nenu when installed; lubuntu kinetic

2022-10-13 Thread Chris Guiver
quot; 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4573 comm="firefox" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2031.216633] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.169:371): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4617 comm="xdg-settings" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2031.226352] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.177:372): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4618 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2031.226369] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.177:373): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4619 comm="cut" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2031.431479] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.385:374): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4690 comm="xdg-settings" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2031.438386] audit: type=1400 audit(1665727991.389:375): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.firefox.firefox" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=4691 comm="dbus-send" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2291.338418] kauditd_printk_skb: 10 callbacks suppressed
[ 2291.338425] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.317:386): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/meta/snap.yaml" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2291.401821] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:387): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/doc/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
[ 2291.401839] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:388): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
[ 2291.401849] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:389): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2291.401919] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.381:390): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.chromium" 
name="/run/user/999/doc/" pid=5038 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=999
[ 2291.697486] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.673:391): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/meta/snap.yaml" pid=5013 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2291.820941] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.797:392): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/cups/" pid=5013 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" 
fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2291.853434] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.829:393): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5013 comm="desktop-launch" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2291.878977] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.857:394): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/void/" pid=5048 comm="date" requested_mask="r" 
denied_mask="r" fsuid=999 ouid=0
[ 2291.883639] audit: type=1400 audit(1665728251.861:395): apparmor="DENIED" 
operation="getattr" class="file" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" 
name="/var/lib/snapd/voi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992727] Re: package linux-image-5.15.0-50-generic 5.15.0-50.56~20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992727

Title:
  package linux-image-5.15.0-50-generic 5.15.0-50.56~20.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
  exited with return code 1

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  it just said it want to report a problem

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: linux-image-5.15.0-50-generic 5.15.0-50.56~20.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54~20.04.1-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Thu Oct 13 07:00:41 2022
  ErrorMessage: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-09 (641 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, unpackaged
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3.2
   apt  2.0.9
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  Title: package linux-image-5.15.0-50-generic 5.15.0-50.56~20.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1992727/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991975] Re: dev file system is mounted without nosuid or noexec

2022-10-13 Thread Seth Arnold
Just a heads-up that SGX has been deprecated by Intel:

https://edc.intel.com/content/www/us/en/design/ipla/software-
development-platforms/client/platforms/alder-lake-desktop/12th-
generation-intel-core-processors-datasheet-volume-1-of-2/004/deprecated-
technologies/

===

The processor has deprecated the following technologies and they are no
longer supported:

Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Branch Monitoring Counters
Hardware Lock Elision (HLE), part of Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® TSX-NI
Power Aware Interrupt Routing (PAIR) 

===

I think we shouldn't put too much weight on SGX support in making this
decision.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991975

Title:
  dev file system is mounted without nosuid or noexec

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Jammy:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [ SRU TEMPLATE ]
  [ Impact ]

   * nosuid, and noexec bits are not set on /dev
   * This has the potential for nefarious actors to use this as an avenue for 
attack. see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1450960 for more 
discussion around this.
   * It is not best security practice.

  [ Test Plan ]

     1.Boot a Canonical Supplied EC2 instance
     2.Check the mount options for /dev.
     3.You will notice the lack of nosuid and noexec on /dev.

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * As of 2022/10/06, I need to test this, but don't know how to build
  -aws flavored ubuntu kernels. Instructions welcome.  I'm holding off
  on adding SRU tags until I can actually get this tested.

   * If this is applied to non initramfs-less kernels it could potentially 
cause a regression for very old hardware that does nefarious things with 
memory.  For a larger discussion about that see:
  
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YcMfDOyrg647RCmd@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64/T/

   * Low risk if a driver depends on /dev allowing suid or exec this
  might prevent boot.  That being said, all kernels that have been
  booting with an initramfs have been getting nosuid, and noexec set so
  hopefully we can consider that risk fairly well tested.

  [ Other Info ]

   * Patch is accepted into 5.17, and will drop out quickly
   * Any server booting with an initramfs already has nosuid, and noexec set, 
so hopefully

  <<< ORIGINAL TEXT 

  This is similar to
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1450960 but new.

  I discovered that my ec2 instances based off of Canonical supplied AMI
  ami-0a23d90349664c6ee *(us-east-2), have dev mounted mounted without
  the nosuid option.

  https://us-east-2.console.aws.amazon.com/ec2/home?region=us-
  east-2#Images:visibility=public-images;imageId=ami-0a23d90349664c6ee

  My usb installed 20.04.4 home machine does not have this problem, but
  it has been installed for quite some time.  My 22.04 laptop machine
  also does not have this issue.

  Reproduce.
  Start an ec2 instance based off of ami-0a23d90349664c6ee.
  $ mount | grep devtmpfs
  nosuid is not found in the options list.

  I've checked the initrd, and /etc/init.d/udev script and all places I
  know of where dev gets mounted set nosuid, so it's non-obvious what
  boot code-path is being taken that results in nosuid missing.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: udev 245.4-4ubuntu3.18
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-1020.24~20.04.1-aws 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-1020-aws x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CustomUdevRuleFiles: 60-cdrom_id.rules 70-snap.snapd.rules
  Date: Thu Oct  6 17:39:42 2022
  Ec2AMI: ami-0a23d90349664c6ee
  Ec2AMIManifest: (unknown)
  Ec2AvailabilityZone: us-east-2c
  Ec2InstanceType: t2.medium
  Ec2Kernel: unavailable
  Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable
  Lsusb: Error: command ['lsusb'] failed with exit code 1:
  Lsusb-t:

  Lsusb-v: Error: command ['lsusb', '-v'] failed with exit code 1:
  MachineType: Xen HVM domU
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=C.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-1020-aws 
root=PARTUUID=5bb90437-9efc-421d-aa94-c512c3b666a3 ro console=tty1 
console=ttyS0 nvme_core.io_timeout=4294967295 panic=-1
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/24/2006
  dmi.bios.release: 4.2
  dmi.bios.vendor: Xen
  dmi.bios.version: 4.2.amazon
  dmi.chassis.type: 1
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Xen
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnXen:bvr4.2.amazon:bd08/24/2006:br4.2:svnXen:pnHVMdomU:pvr4.2.amazon

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992688] Re: firefox deb not installed

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-meta - 1.497

---
ubuntu-meta (1.497) kinetic; urgency=medium

  * Refreshed dependencies
  * Added firefox to desktop-minimal-recommends [amd64 arm64 armhf],
desktop-recommends [amd64 arm64 armhf] as it provides dpkg alternatives
for x-www-browser and gnome-www-browser. (LP: #1992688)

 -- Brian Murray   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:37:15 -0700

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992688

Title:
  firefox deb not installed

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in firefox source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  Bug 1964036 leads me to believe that the firefox deb provides some
  important functionality (the firefox favourite icon in the gnome shell
  dock) but there is nothing that would require the deb to be installed
  (it is not seeded nor has an rdep) and the package description
  indicates that it can be safely removed. Is there some important
  functionality that it provides?

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.10.8
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.19.0-19.19-generic 5.19.7
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Oct 12 11:30:46 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-27 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bashSourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to kinetic on 2022-10-12 (0 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1992688/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992688] Re: firefox deb not installed

2022-10-13 Thread Brian Murray
I'm going to do the ubuntu-meta upload so we can get this in ASAP.

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Olivier Tilloy (osomon) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992688

Title:
  firefox deb not installed

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in firefox source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  Bug 1964036 leads me to believe that the firefox deb provides some
  important functionality (the firefox favourite icon in the gnome shell
  dock) but there is nothing that would require the deb to be installed
  (it is not seeded nor has an rdep) and the package description
  indicates that it can be safely removed. Is there some important
  functionality that it provides?

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.10.8
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.19.0-19.19-generic 5.19.7
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Oct 12 11:30:46 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-27 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bashSourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to kinetic on 2022-10-12 (0 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1992688/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990588] Re: package systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete systemd script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

2022-10-13 Thread Nick Rosbrook
It seems like for some reason systemd-machine-id-setup was not unpacked
correctly? It's trying to link against libsystemd-shared-245.so, which
is from focal. It should be linking against libsystemd-shared-249.so
instead.

It's called in systemd.postinst, so by that point the new version of the
binary should be in place. Does this issue persist? If so, what does
`which systemd-machine-id-setup` say? Is it possible you have another
version of the binary installed somewhere?

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

** Tags removed: foundations-todo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990588

Title:
  package systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: el
  subproceso instalado paquete systemd script post-installation devolvió
  el código de salida de error 127

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  updating from server 20.04 to 22.04

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54~20.04.1-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Thu Sep 22 19:00:53 2022
  ErrorMessage: el subproceso instalado paquete systemd script 
post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 127
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-28 (786 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200423)
  MachineType: Intel IC4GG
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.15.0-48-generic 
root=UUID=8859cc64-d58f-4403-a3dc-284744628c34 ro rootflags=subvol=@ 
debian-installer/language=es keyboard-configuration/layoutcode?=es 
consoleblank=60
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, unpackaged
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3.2
   apt  2.0.9
  SourcePackage: systemd
  Title: package systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: el 
subproceso instalado paquete systemd script post-installation devolvió el 
código de salida de error 127
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2022-09-22 (0 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/03/2012
  dmi.bios.release: 0.1
  dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
  dmi.bios.version: 63K
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: IC4GG
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel
  dmi.board.version: FAB1
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 9
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 0.1
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr63K:bd07/03/2012:br0.1:svnIntel:pnIC4GG:pvr0.1:rvnIntel:rnIC4GG:rvrFAB1:cvnIntelCorporation:ct9:cvr0.1:skuSystemSKUNumber:
  dmi.product.family: ChiefRiver System
  dmi.product.name: IC4GG
  dmi.product.sku: System SKUNumber
  dmi.product.version: 0.1
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel
  mtime.conffile..etc.systemd.logind.conf: 2020-10-22T18:57:27

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1990588/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992688] Re: firefox deb not installed

2022-10-13 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Olivier Tilloy (osomon)

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992688

Title:
  firefox deb not installed

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in firefox source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  Bug 1964036 leads me to believe that the firefox deb provides some
  important functionality (the firefox favourite icon in the gnome shell
  dock) but there is nothing that would require the deb to be installed
  (it is not seeded nor has an rdep) and the package description
  indicates that it can be safely removed. Is there some important
  functionality that it provides?

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.10.8
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.19.0-19.19-generic 5.19.7
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Oct 12 11:30:46 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-27 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bashSourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to kinetic on 2022-10-12 (0 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1992688/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992688] Re: firefox deb not installed

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/431530

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992688

Title:
  firefox deb not installed

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in firefox source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  Bug 1964036 leads me to believe that the firefox deb provides some
  important functionality (the firefox favourite icon in the gnome shell
  dock) but there is nothing that would require the deb to be installed
  (it is not seeded nor has an rdep) and the package description
  indicates that it can be safely removed. Is there some important
  functionality that it provides?

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.10.8
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.19.0-19.19-generic 5.19.7
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Oct 12 11:30:46 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-27 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bashSourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to kinetic on 2022-10-12 (0 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1992688/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992688] Re: firefox deb not installed

2022-10-13 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Olivier Tilloy (osomon)

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992688

Title:
  firefox deb not installed

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in firefox source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  Bug 1964036 leads me to believe that the firefox deb provides some
  important functionality (the firefox favourite icon in the gnome shell
  dock) but there is nothing that would require the deb to be installed
  (it is not seeded nor has an rdep) and the package description
  indicates that it can be safely removed. Is there some important
  functionality that it provides?

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.10.8
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.19.0-19.19-generic 5.19.7
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Oct 12 11:30:46 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-27 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bashSourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to kinetic on 2022-10-12 (0 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1992688/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988548] Re: Missing fix for CVE-2022-37434 in zlib1g in focal and jammy

2022-10-13 Thread Rodrigo Figueiredo Zaiden
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Rodrigo Figueiredo Zaiden (rodrigo-zaiden)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988548

Title:
  Missing fix for CVE-2022-37434 in zlib1g in focal and jammy

Status in zlib package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  There is a crictical security issue with zlib tracked here [1]

  The newest version in bionic [2] already has a security patch for it
  but the one in the focal [3] (and jammy) does not. As can be seen from
  their respective changelogs in the right hand side panel.

  Since zlib is loaded by lots of software, e.g. the apache weg server,
  this could be a problem. It seems that focal, jammy and bionic use the
  same base zlib version (1.2.11), so maybe the patch there could be
  recycled?

  I was asked to create a bug here after asking it as question here [4].
  Thank you very much for your hard work!

  [1] CVE: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37434
  [2] Bionic Package: https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/zlib1g
  [3] Focal Package: https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/zlib1g
  [4] Original Question: 
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/+question/703010

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/+bug/1988548/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992844] [NEW] apt download retries do not start at the 'root' but the redirect

2022-10-13 Thread axoin
Public bug reported:

I am running apt with exactly one source and with the retries=3 option
that became standard.


~ $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/raspi.list 
deb http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye main

~ $ apt --version
apt 2.2.4 (arm64)

$ sudo apt-get -oAcquire::ForceIPv6=true -oAcquire::Retries=3 install
--reinstall adduser


Now the host of the repo will reply with a mirror selection (i.e. http 302 
redirect). It so happens that the mirror selected is a ipv4 mirror and my 
machine is a ipv6 only machine, so there is no possible dns resolution. (force 
ipv6 was a trial, has no effect on my machine which is ipv6 only)

Apt tries again 3 times, but only at the location of the redirect.

For my understanding it should start at the original source, so it has a
chance of getting a _different_ 302 redirect.


Nach dieser Operation werden 0 B Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt.
Ign:1 http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian bullseye/main armhf 
adduser all 3.118
Ign:1 http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian bullseye/main armhf 
adduser all 3.118
Ign:1 http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian bullseye/main armhf 
adduser all 3.118
Fehl:1 http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian bullseye/main armhf 
adduser all 3.118
  Beim Auflösen von »ftp.agdsn.de:http« ist etwas Schlimmes passiert (-5 - Zu 
diesem Hostnamen gehört keine Adresse).
E: Fehlschlag beim Holen von 
http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian/pool/main/a/adduser/adduser_3.118_all.deb
 Beim Auflösen von »ftp.agdsn.de:http« ist etwas Schlimmes passiert (-5 - Zu 
diesem Hostnamen gehört keine Adresse). [ something wicked happened, no address 
for this hostname ]
E: Einige Archive konnten nicht heruntergeladen werden; vielleicht »apt-get 
update« ausführen oder mit »--fix-missing« probieren?

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992844

Title:
  apt download retries do not start at the 'root' but the redirect

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I am running apt with exactly one source and with the retries=3 option
  that became standard.

  
  ~ $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/raspi.list 
  deb http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye main

  ~ $ apt --version
  apt 2.2.4 (arm64)

  $ sudo apt-get -oAcquire::ForceIPv6=true -oAcquire::Retries=3 install
  --reinstall adduser

  
  Now the host of the repo will reply with a mirror selection (i.e. http 302 
redirect). It so happens that the mirror selected is a ipv4 mirror and my 
machine is a ipv6 only machine, so there is no possible dns resolution. (force 
ipv6 was a trial, has no effect on my machine which is ipv6 only)

  Apt tries again 3 times, but only at the location of the redirect.

  For my understanding it should start at the original source, so it has
  a chance of getting a _different_ 302 redirect.


  Nach dieser Operation werden 0 B Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt.
  Ign:1 http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian bullseye/main armhf 
adduser all 3.118
  Ign:1 http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian bullseye/main armhf 
adduser all 3.118
  Ign:1 http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian bullseye/main armhf 
adduser all 3.118
  Fehl:1 http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian bullseye/main armhf 
adduser all 3.118
Beim Auflösen von »ftp.agdsn.de:http« ist etwas Schlimmes passiert (-5 - Zu 
diesem Hostnamen gehört keine Adresse).
  E: Fehlschlag beim Holen von 
http://ftp.agdsn.de/pub/mirrors/raspbian/raspbian/pool/main/a/adduser/adduser_3.118_all.deb
 Beim Auflösen von »ftp.agdsn.de:http« ist etwas Schlimmes passiert (-5 - Zu 
diesem Hostnamen gehört keine Adresse). [ something wicked happened, no address 
for this hostname ]
  E: Einige Archive konnten nicht heruntergeladen werden; vielleicht »apt-get 
update« ausführen oder mit »--fix-missing« probieren?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1992844/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992690] Re: Fix large thumbnails with Nautilus

2022-10-13 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Debian)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992690

Title:
  Fix large thumbnails with Nautilus

Status in GLib:
  Fix Released
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in glib2.0 package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Impact
  --

  Copying this report from Debian.

  I have a 4K monitor with 175% fractional scaling.

  Nautilus 43 broke hi-dpi thumbnailing [1], and goes into an infinite
  loop trying to create x-large and xx-large thumbnails, consuming CPU
  forever.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glib/+bug/1992690/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992701] Re: Issue with opening module dependency file

2022-10-13 Thread Graham Inggs
What happens if you reboot after the kernel is upgraded?


** Changed in: kmod (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992701

Title:
  Issue with opening module dependency file

Status in kmod package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Tested on: Trusty, Xenial (used as recovery system)

  I'm unable to manage (modprobe, insmod) modules due following error:

  "modprobe: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:556 kmod_search_moddep() could
  not open moddep file '/lib/modules/3.13.0-24-generic/modules.dep.bin'"

  I don't know why, but it seem like in the libkmod.c was a bug that
  attempt to load an old kernel after it got upgraded (replaced with) a
  newer one.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmod/+bug/1992701/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980386] Re: `radeonsi_dri.so` driver missing on riscv64

2022-10-13 Thread Graham Inggs
** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-15 (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980386

Title:
  `radeonsi_dri.so` driver missing on riscv64

Status in llvm-toolchain-15 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in llvm-toolchain-15 source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed
Status in llvm-toolchain-15 source package in Kinetic:
  Fix Released
Status in mesa source package in Kinetic:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The package is missing the `radeonsi` driver, with the reasoning that
  LLVM is not implemented on the architecture:

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995618

  That said, it works just fine on focal, where it is still enabled.
  Without this driver there's no way to use AMD graphics cards on
  RISC-V.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.15.0-1007.7-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-1007-generic riscv64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: riscv64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  Date: Thu Jun 30 15:48:11 2022
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal:
   processor: 3
   hart : 4
   isa  : rv64imafdc
   mmu  : sv39
   uarch: sifive,u74-mc
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=screen-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=C.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: mesa
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-15/+bug/1980386/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980805] Re: Backport packages for 20.04.5 HWE stack

2022-10-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-13 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980805

Title:
  Backport packages for 20.04.5 HWE stack

Status in libdrm package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in llvm-toolchain-13 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa-amber package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in libdrm source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in llvm-toolchain-13 source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  New
Status in mesa-amber source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  These are needed for 20.04.5 images.

  [Test case]

  Boot a daily image, see that it still has the necessary stack
  installed and working.

  [What could go wrong]

  libdrm: pci-id updates, some minor api updates

  mesa: a new major release, but we'll pull the final stable release of
  22.0.x series, so there shouldn't be any regressions left at that
  point

  mesa-amber: forked from mesa 21.3.x, this LTS branch keeps old DRI
  drivers that were removed from main mesa

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1980805/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969671] Re: Misspelled Ukrainian cities in tzdata

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package tzdata - 2022e-0ubuntu1

---
tzdata (2022e-0ubuntu1) kinetic; urgency=medium

  * New upstream releases (LP: #1992692):
- Palestine transitions are now Saturdays at 02:00. This means 2022 falls
  back 10-29 at 02:00, not 10-28 at 01:00.
- Simplify three Ukraine zones into one. (LP: #1969671)
- Jordan and Syria switch from +02/+03 with DST to year-round +03.
  * Update the ICU timezone data to 2022d, as 2022e isn't available yet
  * debian/tzdata.config: convert Europe/Uzhgorod and Europe/Zaporozhye
into Europe/Kyiv.
  * debian/tzdata.templates: Remove Uzhgorod and Zaporozhye

 -- Benjamin Drung   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:26:34 +0200

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969671

Title:
  Misspelled Ukrainian cities in tzdata

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  When user is prompted to choose a city in the region 'Europe' they
  have a choice of 4 cities in Ukraine:

  23. Kiev  -> should be Kyiv
  46. Simferopol  - > OK
  54. Uzhgorod  -> should be Uzhhorod
  62. Zaporozhye -> should be Zaporizhzhia

  The 'should be' variant is the only correct transliteration from
  Ukrainian into English.

  

  Possible useful pieces of ubuntu-bug report (run in a headless
  ubuntu/latest docker image):

  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: tzdata 2022a-0ubuntu0.20.04
  Tags:  focal
  PackageArchitecture: all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1969671/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992692] Re: tzdata 2022e release

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package tzdata - 2022e-0ubuntu1

---
tzdata (2022e-0ubuntu1) kinetic; urgency=medium

  * New upstream releases (LP: #1992692):
- Palestine transitions are now Saturdays at 02:00. This means 2022 falls
  back 10-29 at 02:00, not 10-28 at 01:00.
- Simplify three Ukraine zones into one. (LP: #1969671)
- Jordan and Syria switch from +02/+03 with DST to year-round +03.
  * Update the ICU timezone data to 2022d, as 2022e isn't available yet
  * debian/tzdata.config: convert Europe/Uzhgorod and Europe/Zaporozhye
into Europe/Kyiv.
  * debian/tzdata.templates: Remove Uzhgorod and Zaporozhye

 -- Benjamin Drung   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:26:34 +0200

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992692

Title:
  tzdata 2022e release

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  New timezone data, with the following timezones impacted:
  - Palestine transitions are now Saturdays at 02:00. This means 2022 falls
    back 10-29 at 02:00, not 10-28 at 01:00.
  - Simplify three Ukraine zones into one.
  - Jordan and Syria switch from +02/+03 with DST to year-round +03.

  icu update to 2022e: https://unicode-
  org.atlassian.net/browse/ICU-22178

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1992692/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979352] Re: system frozen after sleep

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: upower (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979352

Title:
  system frozen after sleep

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in acpid package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in upower package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Linux V330 5.15.0-39-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 9 23:42:32 UTC
  2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  This is a bug that I reported with Ubuntu Mate 20.04 if I remember correctly 
but, at that time it was only apparent when I was using video ripping software 
on separate laptops and only when the machines became idle once the ripping 
program had finished.
  I don't think this bug was ever fixed and so I'm returning to it because I 
left my laptop in sleep mode over meal time to come back to a frozen system. I 
was not using the video ripping program this time, just surfing the Net. No 
other program was open.

  I run a Lenovo i7 V330-151KB and a Lenovo i5 Z50 but, the bug has
  happened when using an old Dell 1530 laptop.

  I do not believe I am unique in having this bug as someone has a
  similar bug when they have minimised Google Chrome and their system
  had went to sleep. I was also using Chrome this time but, as I have
  already said I was having this happen using another program and not
  using Chrome.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1979352/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979352] Re: system frozen after sleep

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979352

Title:
  system frozen after sleep

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in acpid package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in upower package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Linux V330 5.15.0-39-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 9 23:42:32 UTC
  2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  This is a bug that I reported with Ubuntu Mate 20.04 if I remember correctly 
but, at that time it was only apparent when I was using video ripping software 
on separate laptops and only when the machines became idle once the ripping 
program had finished.
  I don't think this bug was ever fixed and so I'm returning to it because I 
left my laptop in sleep mode over meal time to come back to a frozen system. I 
was not using the video ripping program this time, just surfing the Net. No 
other program was open.

  I run a Lenovo i7 V330-151KB and a Lenovo i5 Z50 but, the bug has
  happened when using an old Dell 1530 laptop.

  I do not believe I am unique in having this bug as someone has a
  similar bug when they have minimised Google Chrome and their system
  had went to sleep. I was also using Chrome this time but, as I have
  already said I was having this happen using another program and not
  using Chrome.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1979352/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979352] Re: system frozen after sleep

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: acpid (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979352

Title:
  system frozen after sleep

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in acpid package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in upower package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Linux V330 5.15.0-39-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 9 23:42:32 UTC
  2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  This is a bug that I reported with Ubuntu Mate 20.04 if I remember correctly 
but, at that time it was only apparent when I was using video ripping software 
on separate laptops and only when the machines became idle once the ripping 
program had finished.
  I don't think this bug was ever fixed and so I'm returning to it because I 
left my laptop in sleep mode over meal time to come back to a frozen system. I 
was not using the video ripping program this time, just surfing the Net. No 
other program was open.

  I run a Lenovo i7 V330-151KB and a Lenovo i5 Z50 but, the bug has
  happened when using an old Dell 1530 laptop.

  I do not believe I am unique in having this bug as someone has a
  similar bug when they have minimised Google Chrome and their system
  had went to sleep. I was also using Chrome this time but, as I have
  already said I was having this happen using another program and not
  using Chrome.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1979352/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979352] Re: system frozen after sleep

2022-10-13 Thread David Iterton
Maybe related to this https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-
desktop/issues/519

** Bug watch added: github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues #519
   https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues/519

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979352

Title:
  system frozen after sleep

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in acpid package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in upower package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Linux V330 5.15.0-39-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 9 23:42:32 UTC
  2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  This is a bug that I reported with Ubuntu Mate 20.04 if I remember correctly 
but, at that time it was only apparent when I was using video ripping software 
on separate laptops and only when the machines became idle once the ripping 
program had finished.
  I don't think this bug was ever fixed and so I'm returning to it because I 
left my laptop in sleep mode over meal time to come back to a frozen system. I 
was not using the video ripping program this time, just surfing the Net. No 
other program was open.

  I run a Lenovo i7 V330-151KB and a Lenovo i5 Z50 but, the bug has
  happened when using an old Dell 1530 laptop.

  I do not believe I am unique in having this bug as someone has a
  similar bug when they have minimised Google Chrome and their system
  had went to sleep. I was also using Chrome this time but, as I have
  already said I was having this happen using another program and not
  using Chrome.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1979352/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990742] Re: screen not consistently locking when lid is closed

2022-10-13 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990742

Title:
  screen not consistently locking when lid is closed

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I have GNOME configured to lock the screen when the screen is blanked,
  and to blank the screen when the lid is closed:

  org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power lid-close-battery-action 'blank'
  org.gnome.desktop.screensaver lock-delay uint32 0
  org.gnome.desktop.screensaver lock-enabled true

  This worked fine in Jammy: whenever my screen was unlocked and I
  closed my laptop lid, it locked immediately, i.e., if I immediately
  reopened my lid, the screen was locked.

  After having just upgraded to Kinetic, however, sometimes when I close
  the lid it locks as described above, and sometimes it just... doesn't,
  i.e., when I open the lid again the screen is unlocked and I can just
  keep working.

  I have been unable to determine what the factors are which control
  whether the screen locks when I close the lid.

  There is a moderate security implication here, as it's problematic for
  someone's screen not to lock when they think that it did.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: gnome-shell 43.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-15.15-generic 5.19.0
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-15-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Sep 24 17:57:37 2022
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-08-16 (1135 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 43.0-1ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to kinetic on 2022-09-24 (0 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1990742/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992692] Re: tzdata 2022e release

2022-10-13 Thread Graham Inggs
** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992692

Title:
  tzdata 2022e release

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  New timezone data, with the following timezones impacted:
  - Palestine transitions are now Saturdays at 02:00. This means 2022 falls
    back 10-29 at 02:00, not 10-28 at 01:00.
  - Simplify three Ukraine zones into one.
  - Jordan and Syria switch from +02/+03 with DST to year-round +03.

  icu update to 2022e: https://unicode-
  org.atlassian.net/browse/ICU-22178

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1992692/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907878] Re: wrong var declaration in if-up.d/resolved (nm-dispatcher[54417]: /etc/network/if-up.d/resolved: 12: mystatedir: not found)

2022-10-13 Thread Lukas Märdian
ifupdown is in universe these days, so I'll unsubscribe foundations.

** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907878

Title:
  wrong var declaration in if-up.d/resolved (nm-dispatcher[54417]:
  /etc/network/if-up.d/resolved: 12: mystatedir: not found)

Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ifupdown source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Syslog error:

 nm-dispatcher[...]: /etc/network/if-up.d/resolved: 12: mystatedir:
  not found

  I think it's because of this line:

if systemctl is-enabled systemd-resolved > /dev/null 2>&1; then
mystatedir statedir ifindex interface <- this 
is interpreted as a 'mystatedir' command and fails

interface=$IFACE
if [ ! "$interface" ]; then

  
  Perhaps the intention was to 'export mystatedir statedir ...'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1907878/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-10-13 Thread Paride Legovini
Thanks! I didn't test it, but formally it LGTM.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965076

Title:
  rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

Status in rsync:
  Fix Released
Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in rsync source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This bug causes rsync 3.2.3 to wrongly report files with an exact same mtime 
as being "newer"
  implying they would need to be transfered/sync'ed where in fact they are 
"uptodate".

  This breaks users' scripts depending on "is newer" to signal that files need 
to be sync'ed
  when in fact, they don't need to be.

  [Test Plan]

  Steps to reproduce:

  1. Create a local file:
  $ touch foo

  2. Check if rsync would transfer it using the --update option:
  $ rsync -avv --update foo .

  
  If the regression is present, "foo is newer" would be reported:

  ```
  sending incremental file list
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is newer
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0

  sent 61 bytes  received 96 bytes  314.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
  ```

  If the updated package is installed (from -proposed), "foo is
  uptodate" should be reported:

  ```
  sending incremental file list
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is uptodate
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0

  sent 60 bytes  received 106 bytes  332.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
  ```

  [Regression potential]

  The patch changes the behavior of --update so if something goes wrong, it 
could break backup/sync
  jobs. To mitiate that, manual testing of rsync with and without the --update 
option was done
  in addition to the quick [Test Plan] outlined above.

  Please note the patch restores the behavior from before version 3.2.3 and has 
been integrated by upstream
  in September 2021. It also is in Kinetic where no visible regression was 
observed.

  
  [Original description]

  rsync 3.2.3 has a broken "--update" option.See the examples below.
  The "--update" option incorrectly makes rsync say a file is newer than itself.
  Remove the "--update" option, and rsync correctly says the file is "uptodate".
  The right output should of course be "is uptodate" in all cases.
  This bug also shows up between machines if the source rsync is 3.1.3 and the 
destination is 3.2.3.
  The bug does not show up if the source rsync is 3.2.3 and the destination is 
3.1.3.
  The bug was fixed upstream in June 2020:  
https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/98

  $ touch foo
  $ rsync --update --info=skip foo foo
  foo is newer<=== THIS IS NOT CORRECT - A file can't be newer 
than itself.

  Obviously a file should not be listed as newer than itself.  Another
  way:

  $ touch foo
  $ rsync -avv --update foo .
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is newer <=== THIS IS NOT CORRECT - A file can't be newer 
than itself.
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0
  sent 38 bytes  received 96 bytes  268.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00

  $ rsync -avv foo .
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is uptodate  <=== THIS IS CORRECT
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0
  sent 41 bytes  received 106 bytes  294.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: rsync 3.2.3-4ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-35.40-generic 5.13.19
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-35-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Mar 15 22:47:44 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-16 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  SourcePackage: rsync
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsync/+bug/1965076/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969976] Re: DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with services that need dbus-daemon

2022-10-13 Thread imker
Hi,

I can also confirm that fwupd Version 1.7.9-1~22.04.1 fixes this issue for 
jammy. 
After installing the patched version, the service starts and runs as expected.

I'm sorry that I can not provide tests for focal, since I already
updated all my machines..

Thank you all
imker

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969976

Title:
  DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with services that need dbus-daemon

Status in Fwupd:
  Fix Released
Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd:
  New
Status in fwupd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in fwupd source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  Won't Fix
Status in fwupd source package in Impish:
  Won't Fix
Status in systemd source package in Impish:
  Won't Fix
Status in fwupd source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in systemd source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Updating to systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.16 has caused a regression in
  Ubuntu 20.04, that fwupd-refresh.service always fails to run.

  This has been root caused down to the changes in
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1871538

  Unfortunately this is an upstream issue introduced by stable systemd.
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/22737

  The problem also occurs in Ubuntu 22.04 with a newer systemd release.
  As discussed in 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1871538/comments/61
 it's a tradeoff of issues.  So within Ubuntu something probably needs to be 
done about fwupd-refresh.service.

  One proposal is to remove DynamicUser=yes from the systemd unit, but
  this will mean fwupdgmr refresh runs as root.  It's relatively
  sandboxed by other security mechanisms, but still not ideal.  Could we
  repurpose any other service account?  Or alternatively we can make a
  new fwupd service account that this systemd unit uses.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwupd/+bug/1969976/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991285] Re: systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144

2022-10-13 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Here's a bit more information about the service failure:

-- Logs begin at Sun 2022-09-25 00:05:05 UTC, end at Thu 2022-09-29 12:03:20 
UTC. --
Sep 29 12:02:57 autopkgtest-lxd-fexenj systemd-remount-fs[74]: mount: /: can't 
find LABEL=cloudimg-rootfs.
Sep 29 12:02:57 autopkgtest-lxd-fexenj systemd-remount-fs[59]: /bin/mount for / 
exited with exit status 1.
Sep 29 12:02:57 autopkgtest-lxd-fexenj systemd[1]: systemd-remount-fs.service: 
Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Sep 29 12:02:57 autopkgtest-lxd-fexenj systemd[1]: systemd-remount-fs.service: 
Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Sep 29 12:02:57 autopkgtest-lxd-fexenj systemd[1]: Failed to start Remount Root 
and Kernel File Systems.
FAIL

This makes me think it's bug 1576341 again. According to the git
history, that patch was not carried in Ubuntu past 2019. I will try to
find out if we ever attempted to upstream the change.

** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991285

Title:
  systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running systemd
  tests for linux/5.4.0-128.144 on focal. Whether this is caused by the
  dep8 tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be
  determined.

  Testing failed on:
  armhf: 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal/focal/armhf/s/systemd/20220929_122501_863cf@/log.gz

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1991285/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-10-13 Thread Simon Déziel
Thanks Paride for the feedback, here's a refreshed debdiff!

** Patch removed: "rsync_3.2.3-8ubuntu4.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1965076/+attachment/5623548/+files/rsync_3.2.3-8ubuntu4.debdiff

** Patch added: "rsync_3.2.3-8ubuntu3.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1965076/+attachment/5623978/+files/rsync_3.2.3-8ubuntu3.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965076

Title:
  rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

Status in rsync:
  Fix Released
Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in rsync source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This bug causes rsync 3.2.3 to wrongly report files with an exact same mtime 
as being "newer"
  implying they would need to be transfered/sync'ed where in fact they are 
"uptodate".

  This breaks users' scripts depending on "is newer" to signal that files need 
to be sync'ed
  when in fact, they don't need to be.

  [Test Plan]

  Steps to reproduce:

  1. Create a local file:
  $ touch foo

  2. Check if rsync would transfer it using the --update option:
  $ rsync -avv --update foo .

  
  If the regression is present, "foo is newer" would be reported:

  ```
  sending incremental file list
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is newer
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0

  sent 61 bytes  received 96 bytes  314.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
  ```

  If the updated package is installed (from -proposed), "foo is
  uptodate" should be reported:

  ```
  sending incremental file list
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is uptodate
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0

  sent 60 bytes  received 106 bytes  332.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
  ```

  [Regression potential]

  The patch changes the behavior of --update so if something goes wrong, it 
could break backup/sync
  jobs. To mitiate that, manual testing of rsync with and without the --update 
option was done
  in addition to the quick [Test Plan] outlined above.

  Please note the patch restores the behavior from before version 3.2.3 and has 
been integrated by upstream
  in September 2021. It also is in Kinetic where no visible regression was 
observed.

  
  [Original description]

  rsync 3.2.3 has a broken "--update" option.See the examples below.
  The "--update" option incorrectly makes rsync say a file is newer than itself.
  Remove the "--update" option, and rsync correctly says the file is "uptodate".
  The right output should of course be "is uptodate" in all cases.
  This bug also shows up between machines if the source rsync is 3.1.3 and the 
destination is 3.2.3.
  The bug does not show up if the source rsync is 3.2.3 and the destination is 
3.1.3.
  The bug was fixed upstream in June 2020:  
https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/98

  $ touch foo
  $ rsync --update --info=skip foo foo
  foo is newer<=== THIS IS NOT CORRECT - A file can't be newer 
than itself.

  Obviously a file should not be listed as newer than itself.  Another
  way:

  $ touch foo
  $ rsync -avv --update foo .
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is newer <=== THIS IS NOT CORRECT - A file can't be newer 
than itself.
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0
  sent 38 bytes  received 96 bytes  268.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00

  $ rsync -avv foo .
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is uptodate  <=== THIS IS CORRECT
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0
  sent 41 bytes  received 106 bytes  294.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: rsync 3.2.3-4ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-35.40-generic 5.13.19
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-35-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Mar 15 22:47:44 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-16 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  SourcePackage: rsync
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsync/+bug/1965076/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992369] Re: DejaVu Serif Italic capital letters and digits broken

2022-10-13 Thread Lukas Märdian
There was no change in the fonts-dejavu package between Focal -> Jammy.

** Also affects: gnome-font-viewer (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: fonts-dejavu (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss

** Tags added: jj-rls-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fonts-dejavu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992369

Title:
  DejaVu Serif Italic capital letters and digits broken

Status in fonts-dejavu package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnome-font-viewer package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After updating from Focal to Jammy, I noticed that DejaVu Serif Italic
  looks quite broken. At least the letters EFHKLMNT and the digits 1 and
  4 are affected

  Please see the attached screenshot. This was obtained from `gnome-
  font-viewer /usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf`

  As the font is the default for me in Firefox, it's quite noticeable.

  $ dpkg -l gnome-font-viewer fonts-dejavu-extra
  Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
  | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
  |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
  ||/ Name   Version  Architecture Description
  
+++-==---==>
  ii  fonts-dejavu-extra 2.37-2build1 all  Vera font family derivate 
with>
  ii  gnome-font-viewer  41.0-2   amd64font viewer for GNOME

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-dejavu/+bug/1992369/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992369] Re: DejaVu Serif Italic capital letters and digits broken

2022-10-13 Thread Brian Murray
I was unable to recreate this bug using these packages:

Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   Version  Architecture Description
+++-==---=
ii  fonts-dejavu-extra 2.37-2build1 all  Vera font family derivate with 
additional characters (extra variants)
ii  gnome-font-viewer  41.0-2   amd64font viewer for GNOME


** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2022-10-13 08-26-26.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-dejavu/+bug/1992369/+attachment/5623977/+files/Screenshot%20from%202022-10-13%2008-26-26.png

** Changed in: gnome-font-viewer (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Tags removed: jj-rls-incoming
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fonts-dejavu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992369

Title:
  DejaVu Serif Italic capital letters and digits broken

Status in fonts-dejavu package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnome-font-viewer package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After updating from Focal to Jammy, I noticed that DejaVu Serif Italic
  looks quite broken. At least the letters EFHKLMNT and the digits 1 and
  4 are affected

  Please see the attached screenshot. This was obtained from `gnome-
  font-viewer /usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf`

  As the font is the default for me in Firefox, it's quite noticeable.

  $ dpkg -l gnome-font-viewer fonts-dejavu-extra
  Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
  | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
  |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
  ||/ Name   Version  Architecture Description
  
+++-==---==>
  ii  fonts-dejavu-extra 2.37-2build1 all  Vera font family derivate 
with>
  ii  gnome-font-viewer  41.0-2   amd64font viewer for GNOME

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-dejavu/+bug/1992369/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969671] Re: Misspelled Ukrainian cities in tzdata

2022-10-13 Thread Graham Inggs
Fix committed in 2022e-0ubuntu1

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969671

Title:
  Misspelled Ukrainian cities in tzdata

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  When user is prompted to choose a city in the region 'Europe' they
  have a choice of 4 cities in Ukraine:

  23. Kiev  -> should be Kyiv
  46. Simferopol  - > OK
  54. Uzhgorod  -> should be Uzhhorod
  62. Zaporozhye -> should be Zaporizhzhia

  The 'should be' variant is the only correct transliteration from
  Ukrainian into English.

  

  Possible useful pieces of ubuntu-bug report (run in a headless
  ubuntu/latest docker image):

  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: tzdata 2022a-0ubuntu0.20.04
  Tags:  focal
  PackageArchitecture: all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1969671/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992472] Re: APT hooks do not respect the -q option

2022-10-13 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992472

Title:
  APT hooks do not respect the -q option

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  ubuntu-advantage-tools recently used an APT Cli hook
  (AptCli::Hooks::Upgrade) to add a message to the output. We were asked
  in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-
  tools/+bug/1992026/comments/9 to honor the -q (-qq, -qqq) option of
  APT upgrade, and hide the output.

  However, the hook does not expose this option, so there is nothing we
  can do from our side.

  APT could either treat those messages based on the "quietness" defined
  when running the command, or expose the flag somehow so we could
  configure our message to respect it.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1992472/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990200] Re: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

2022-10-13 Thread Sebastien Bacher
error tracker entry is
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/595467fba803f55fea2dfef4bb4b3a77a787e18e

** Tags added: rls-kk-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990200

Title:
  goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Unknown cause of this crash.  Was alerted to it after waking the
  system from sleep mode.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.45.2-3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-15.15-generic 5.19.0
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-15-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.23.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CrashCounter: 1
  Date: Mon Sep 19 19:26:29 2022
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-17 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Alpha amd64 (20220917)
  ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon
  ProcEnviron:
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  StacktraceTop:
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_assertion_message_expr () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librest-1.0.so.0
   rest_proxy_call_sync () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librest-1.0.so.0
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.1
  Title: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1990200/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992822] Re: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon:6:g_assertion_message:g_assertion_message_expr:finish_call:rest_proxy_call_sync:get_identity_sync

2022-10-13 Thread Sebastien Bacher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1990200 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990200

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1990200
   goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992822

Title:
  /usr/libexec/goa-
  
daemon:6:g_assertion_message:g_assertion_message_expr:finish_call:rest_proxy_call_sync:get_identity_sync

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
gnome-online-accounts.  This problem was most recently seen with package 
version 3.46.0-1, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/595467fba803f55fea2dfef4bb4b3a77a787e18e 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1992822/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992822] [NEW] /usr/libexec/goa-daemon:6:g_assertion_message:g_assertion_message_expr:finish_call:rest_proxy_call_sync:get_identity_sync

2022-10-13 Thread errors.ubuntu.com bug bridge
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1990200 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990200

Public bug reported:

The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
gnome-online-accounts.  This problem was most recently seen with package 
version 3.46.0-1, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/595467fba803f55fea2dfef4bb4b3a77a787e18e 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

** Affects: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: kinetic kylin-22.10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992822

Title:
  /usr/libexec/goa-
  
daemon:6:g_assertion_message:g_assertion_message_expr:finish_call:rest_proxy_call_sync:get_identity_sync

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
gnome-online-accounts.  This problem was most recently seen with package 
version 3.46.0-1, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/595467fba803f55fea2dfef4bb4b3a77a787e18e 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1992822/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992513] Re: apt will not install nvidia-driver-470-server if nvidia-driver-450-server is installed and out of date

2022-10-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
** Tags added: foundations-todo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992513

Title:
  apt will not install nvidia-driver-470-server if nvidia-
  driver-450-server is installed and out of date

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  apt/jammy

  apt will refuse to install nvidia-driver-470-server if 
nvidia-driver-450-server is installed *and* out of date. I can reproduce this 
by disabling all but the jammy release pocket, installing the old n-d-450-s 
from there, and then enabling updates and trying to install n-v-470-s (where a 
new
  n-d-450-s is available):

  # libnvidia-gl-450-server has an update available
  root@dannf-apt-jammy:/var/cache# apt install --dry-run 
libnvidia-gl-470-server -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done

  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:

  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   libnvidia-common-450-server : Conflicts: libnvidia-common
   libnvidia-common-470-server : Conflicts: libnvidia-common
  E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by 
held packages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1992513/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990200] Re: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

2022-10-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Impact:

I miss new events because I no longer get calendar notifications because
the calendar does not sync anymore when that happens.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990200

Title:
  goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Unknown cause of this crash.  Was alerted to it after waking the
  system from sleep mode.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.45.2-3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-15.15-generic 5.19.0
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-15-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.23.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CrashCounter: 1
  Date: Mon Sep 19 19:26:29 2022
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-17 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Alpha amd64 (20220917)
  ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon
  ProcEnviron:
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  StacktraceTop:
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_assertion_message_expr () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librest-1.0.so.0
   rest_proxy_call_sync () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librest-1.0.so.0
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.1
  Title: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1990200/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-10-13 Thread Paride Legovini
Stumbled on this in Triage and I did a quick review of the debdiff
(thanks for preparin it!).

The patch cherry-picking LGTM, but I think we want ubuntu3.1 in the
d/changelog version string. Also the DEP-3 headers could have a Bug:
line pointing to the upstream bug [1].

[1] https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/98

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965076

Title:
  rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

Status in rsync:
  Fix Released
Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in rsync source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This bug causes rsync 3.2.3 to wrongly report files with an exact same mtime 
as being "newer"
  implying they would need to be transfered/sync'ed where in fact they are 
"uptodate".

  This breaks users' scripts depending on "is newer" to signal that files need 
to be sync'ed
  when in fact, they don't need to be.

  [Test Plan]

  Steps to reproduce:

  1. Create a local file:
  $ touch foo

  2. Check if rsync would transfer it using the --update option:
  $ rsync -avv --update foo .

  
  If the regression is present, "foo is newer" would be reported:

  ```
  sending incremental file list
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is newer
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0

  sent 61 bytes  received 96 bytes  314.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
  ```

  If the updated package is installed (from -proposed), "foo is
  uptodate" should be reported:

  ```
  sending incremental file list
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is uptodate
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0

  sent 60 bytes  received 106 bytes  332.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
  ```

  [Regression potential]

  The patch changes the behavior of --update so if something goes wrong, it 
could break backup/sync
  jobs. To mitiate that, manual testing of rsync with and without the --update 
option was done
  in addition to the quick [Test Plan] outlined above.

  Please note the patch restores the behavior from before version 3.2.3 and has 
been integrated by upstream
  in September 2021. It also is in Kinetic where no visible regression was 
observed.

  
  [Original description]

  rsync 3.2.3 has a broken "--update" option.See the examples below.
  The "--update" option incorrectly makes rsync say a file is newer than itself.
  Remove the "--update" option, and rsync correctly says the file is "uptodate".
  The right output should of course be "is uptodate" in all cases.
  This bug also shows up between machines if the source rsync is 3.1.3 and the 
destination is 3.2.3.
  The bug does not show up if the source rsync is 3.2.3 and the destination is 
3.1.3.
  The bug was fixed upstream in June 2020:  
https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/98

  $ touch foo
  $ rsync --update --info=skip foo foo
  foo is newer<=== THIS IS NOT CORRECT - A file can't be newer 
than itself.

  Obviously a file should not be listed as newer than itself.  Another
  way:

  $ touch foo
  $ rsync -avv --update foo .
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is newer <=== THIS IS NOT CORRECT - A file can't be newer 
than itself.
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0
  sent 38 bytes  received 96 bytes  268.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00

  $ rsync -avv foo .
  delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
  foo is uptodate  <=== THIS IS CORRECT
  total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0
  sent 41 bytes  received 106 bytes  294.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: rsync 3.2.3-4ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-35.40-generic 5.13.19
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-35-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Mar 15 22:47:44 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-16 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  SourcePackage: rsync
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsync/+bug/1965076/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992105] Re: missing httpform plugin for saslauthd

2022-10-13 Thread Lena Voytek
Hi Amit,

Ubuntu 22.04 is currently sticking with version 2.1.27 + security and
feature updates to maintain consistency and stability. Ubuntu 22.10,
which is fully releasing soon, uses 2.1.28 though. The package will be
actively maintained in 22.04 until 2027 but may not experience many
version bumps.

Ah I haven't activated ARM64 on the ppa, I'll do that now.
Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992105

Title:
  missing httpform plugin for saslauthd

Status in cyrus-sasl2 package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in cyrus-sasl2 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in cyrus-sasl2 source package in Kinetic:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Hi, we noticed missing httpform plugin for saslauthd.  We are
  migrating from Centos.

  == On Centos (Notice the httpform at the end)

  /usr/sbin/saslauthd -v
  saslauthd 2.1.26
  authentication mechanisms: getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow ldap httpform

  
  == On Ubuntu jammy
  /usr/sbin/saslauthd -v
  saslauthd 2.1.27
  authentication mechanisms: sasldb getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow ldap

  
  == Potential fix

  add the "--enable-httpform" flag to the sasl2-bin package build

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: sasl2-bin 2.1.27+dfsg2-3ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic aarch64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: arm64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  Date: Thu Oct  6 14:54:13 2022
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=C.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: cyrus-sasl2
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1992105/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991553] Re: can't add a private PPA

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991553

Title:
  can't add a private PPA

Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  As per today's discussion in ~is :

  add-apt-repository has a bug when adding a private PPA. Quoting
  ~cjwatson :

  ===
  It asks Launchpad for all your personal archive subscriptions _that have 
tokens_.  But `Person:+archivesubscriptions` also shows subscriptions without 
tokens - the token is generated when you click on Viewt here for the first time.

  Instead, `add-apt-repository` should call `getArchiveSubscriptionURL` (not 
`getArchiveSubscriptionURLs`) for the archive it's interested in.  That 
generates tokens on-demand.  Either it will get an HTTP 401, or it will get a 
URL which it can parse for the username and password.
  ===

  Thanks !

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1991553/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990200] Re: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

2022-10-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer 
** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Medium => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990200

Title:
  goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Unknown cause of this crash.  Was alerted to it after waking the
  system from sleep mode.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.45.2-3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-15.15-generic 5.19.0
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-15-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.23.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CrashCounter: 1
  Date: Mon Sep 19 19:26:29 2022
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-17 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Alpha amd64 (20220917)
  ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon
  ProcEnviron:
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  StacktraceTop:
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_assertion_message_expr () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librest-1.0.so.0
   rest_proxy_call_sync () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librest-1.0.so.0
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.1
  Title: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1990200/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990200] Re: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

2022-10-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer 
** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990200

Title:
  goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Unknown cause of this crash.  Was alerted to it after waking the
  system from sleep mode.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.45.2-3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-15.15-generic 5.19.0
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-15-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.23.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CrashCounter: 1
  Date: Mon Sep 19 19:26:29 2022
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-17 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Alpha amd64 (20220917)
  ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/goa-daemon
  ProcEnviron:
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  StacktraceTop:
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_assertion_message_expr () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librest-1.0.so.0
   rest_proxy_call_sync () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librest-1.0.so.0
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.1
  Title: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1990200/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992504] Re: Update libsoup to 2.74.3

2022-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package libsoup2.4 - 2.74.3-1

---
libsoup2.4 (2.74.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release (LP: #1992504)
  * Drop 3 test patches applied in new release

 -- Jeremy Bicha   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:28:32 -0400

** Changed in: libsoup2.4 (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libsoup2.4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992504

Title:
  Update libsoup to 2.74.3

Status in libsoup2.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  New upstream bugfix release in the stable libsoup 2.74 series

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/blob/2.74.3/NEWS

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/compare/2.74.2...2.74.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsoup2.4/+bug/1992504/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 329455] Re: canberra-gtk-pl seg fault

2022-10-13 Thread Umair Ehsaan
Once I have faced this issue and I searched on google and got the solution. So 
you should try on google
Regards
 https://almotion.net//";>Alight Motion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcanberra in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329455

Title:
  canberra-gtk-pl seg fault

Status in libcanberra package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Gnome crashed on me and took me back to the login prompt.

  Messages file shows this:

  Feb 14 10:45:03 ubuntudesktop bonobo-activation-server (reece-7936): could 
not associate with desktop session: Failed to connect to socket 
/tmp/dbus-dXvoGakMY9: Connection refused
  Feb 14 10:45:04 ubuntudesktop kernel: [829984.836630] mtrr: type mismatch for 
e000,1000 old: write-back new: write-combining
  Feb 14 10:45:23 ubuntudesktop pulseaudio[8049]: ltdl-bind-now.c: Failed to 
find original dlopen loader.
  Feb 14 10:45:23 ubuntudesktop pulseaudio[8051]: pid.c: Stale PID file, 
overwriting.
  Feb 14 10:45:23 ubuntudesktop pulseaudio[8051]: main.c: 
setrlimit(RLIMIT_NICE, (31, 31)) failed: Operation not permitted
  Feb 14 10:45:23 ubuntudesktop pulseaudio[8051]: main.c: 
setrlimit(RLIMIT_RTPRIO, (9, 9)) failed: Operation not permitted
  Feb 14 10:45:33 ubuntudesktop kernel: [830013.327147] canberra-gtk-pl[8099]: 
segfault at 929dcd0 ip b727584d sp b7012f10 error 6 in 
libpulse.so.0.4.1[b7236000+4e000]

  I have no idea what else to provide - let me know  and I'll provide
  it.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcanberra/+bug/329455/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989309] Re: [FFe] new apparmor features for 3.0.7

2022-10-13 Thread Georgia Garcia
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989309

Title:
  [FFe] new apparmor features for 3.0.7

Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  We propose two new features for 3.0.7 Apparmor:

  1. parser support for user namespace mediation.

  Since the last kernel update with commit 
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/kinetic/commit/?h=master-next&id=30bce26855c9171f8dee74d93308fd506730c914
  Ubuntu 22.10 mediates user namespaces which allows for confined applications 
to have unprivileged user namespace creation, instead of disabling it 
completely.
  If we want applications to have this ability, then we need to add support on 
the parser, which is a feature we are introducing. Bug 1990064 is an example 
caused by this.

  2. userspace support for posix message queue mediation

  Kernel also has POSIX message queue mediation with commit
  https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/kinetic/commit/?h=master-
  next&id=44f28e2ccee2000c7da971876dd003d38a8232d8 which indicates that
  if admins want to allow legitimate use of POSIX message queues, then
  they will need the support of userspace tools.

  We are also adding a fix for Bug 1990692 which will make the AppArmor
  profiles for samba to be up to date with upstream.

  TESTING

  This has been extensively tested by the security team - this includes
  following the documented Ubuntu merges test plan[1] for AppArmor and the
  extensive QA Regression Tests[2] for AppArmor as well. This ensures that
  the various applications that make heavy use of AppArmor (LXD, docker,
  lxc, dbus, libvirt, snapd etc) have all been exercised and no regressions
  have been observed. All tests have passed and demonstrated both apparmor
  and the various applications that use it to be working as expected.

  BUILD LOGS

  This is currently uploaded to 
https://launchpad.net/~georgiag/+archive/ubuntu/apparmor-kinetic-ffe, build 
logs can be found on
  Launchpad at:
  https://launchpad.net/~georgiag/+archive/ubuntu/test2/+build/24518253 for 
amd64

  DEBDIFF

  The debdiff can be found in the PPA:
  
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/626954017/apparmor_3.0.7-1ubuntu1_3.0.7-1ubuntu2.diff.gz

  INSTALL / UPGRADE LOG

  The apt upgrade log is attached in:
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1989309/+attachment/5620824/+files/apparmor-3.0.7-1ubuntu2-apt-upgrade.log

  [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/AppArmor
  [2] 
https://git.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/tree/scripts/test-apparmor.py

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1989309/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 (main) from Debian unstable

2022-10-13 Thread Marc Deslauriers
ACK from the security team to sync from unstable.

Please make sure the policy overrides in policykit-desktop-privileges
still work or are converted to their equivalent JS before doing so.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972654

Title:
  [security review] Sync policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 (main) from Debian
  unstable

Status in policykit-1 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Please sync policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 (main) from Debian unstable
  for Ubuntu 23.04

  Changelog entries since current kinetic version 0.105-33:
  
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/policykit-1/policykit-1_121%2Bcompat0.1-4_changelog

  In particular, see the 0.120-4 changelog entry.

  I am filing a bug for Security Team review.
  Previously, Debian and Ubuntu developers agreed to keep using
  the last version of policykit before it switched to using JavaScript rules.

  But that was years ago. I believe Debian & Ubuntu are the only distros
  to have opted out of the new policykit. It is harder to maintain
  the old style rules when upstream rules use the new format. And it is
  a challenge to backport security and other bugfixes from the new
  series, without making mistakes or missing important details.

  There was a proposal to use duktape instead of mozjs for the JavaScript
  interpreter but I don't think that's been merged yet.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/+bug/1972654/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-10-13 Thread Jeremy Bicha
policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 is now in Debian Unstable.

Could I get a clear answer from the Ubuntu Security Team if this is
acceptable to autosync when Ubuntu 23.04 development opens?

** Tags added: block-proposed

** Summary changed:

- [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental
+ [security review] Sync policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 (main) from Debian unstable

** Description changed:

- Please sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental
+ Please sync policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 (main) from Debian unstable for
+ Ubuntu 23.04
  
  Changelog entries since current kinetic version 0.105-33:
- https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/p/policykit-1/changelog-0.120-6
+ 
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/policykit-1/policykit-1_121%2Bcompat0.1-4_changelog
  
  In particular, see the 0.120-4 changelog entry.
  
  I am filing a bug for Security Team review.
  Previously, Debian and Ubuntu developers agreed to keep using
  the last version of policykit before it switched to using JavaScript rules.
  
  But that was years ago. I believe Debian & Ubuntu are the only distros
  to have opted out of the new policykit. It is harder to maintain
  the old style rules when upstream rules use the new format. And it is
  a challenge to backport security and other bugfixes from the new
  series, without making mistakes or missing important details.
  
  There was a proposal to use duktape instead of mozjs for the JavaScript
  interpreter but I don't think that's been merged yet.
  
  It appears the Debian maintainer is considering switching Debian to the
  updated version in time for the next Debian Stable release (so uploading
  to unstable later this year).
- 
- My requested deadline is August 25, Ubuntu 22.10 Feature Freeze.

** Description changed:

  Please sync policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 (main) from Debian unstable for
  Ubuntu 23.04
  
  Changelog entries since current kinetic version 0.105-33:
  
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/policykit-1/policykit-1_121%2Bcompat0.1-4_changelog
  
  In particular, see the 0.120-4 changelog entry.
  
  I am filing a bug for Security Team review.
  Previously, Debian and Ubuntu developers agreed to keep using
  the last version of policykit before it switched to using JavaScript rules.
  
  But that was years ago. I believe Debian & Ubuntu are the only distros
  to have opted out of the new policykit. It is harder to maintain
  the old style rules when upstream rules use the new format. And it is
  a challenge to backport security and other bugfixes from the new
  series, without making mistakes or missing important details.
  
  There was a proposal to use duktape instead of mozjs for the JavaScript
  interpreter but I don't think that's been merged yet.
- 
- It appears the Debian maintainer is considering switching Debian to the
- updated version in time for the next Debian Stable release (so uploading
- to unstable later this year).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972654

Title:
  [security review] Sync policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 (main) from Debian
  unstable

Status in policykit-1 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Please sync policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 (main) from Debian unstable
  for Ubuntu 23.04

  Changelog entries since current kinetic version 0.105-33:
  
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/policykit-1/policykit-1_121%2Bcompat0.1-4_changelog

  In particular, see the 0.120-4 changelog entry.

  I am filing a bug for Security Team review.
  Previously, Debian and Ubuntu developers agreed to keep using
  the last version of policykit before it switched to using JavaScript rules.

  But that was years ago. I believe Debian & Ubuntu are the only distros
  to have opted out of the new policykit. It is harder to maintain
  the old style rules when upstream rules use the new format. And it is
  a challenge to backport security and other bugfixes from the new
  series, without making mistakes or missing important details.

  There was a proposal to use duktape instead of mozjs for the JavaScript
  interpreter but I don't think that's been merged yet.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/+bug/1972654/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971712] Re: Add support for Intel DG2

2022-10-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
you need to use i915.force_probe until maybe 6.2, but other than that it
works quite well for the most part even in 6.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971712

Title:
  Add support for Intel DG2

Status in linux-oem-5.17 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-oem-6.0 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu 22.04 does not support Intel DG2-based hw which is released
  later this year.

  [Fix]

  Mesa: needs a bunch of patches backported to 22.0.x, will be upstream in 22.1 
or 22.2
  kernel: use a dkms provided by Intel and integrated in the OEM kernel source, 
the module will be shipped in a separate modules package

  [Test case]

  Boot a system with a DG2-based GPU, check that native graphics drivers
  are used.

  Test mesa also on gen9-gen12 GPU's to verify that there are no
  regressions even though the backports are for DG2.

  [What could go wrong]

  The Mesa patches are only for DG2 support, should not affect other
  hardware at all. The kernel driver is in a separate package which
  isn't installed by default except preinstall machines with this
  hardware. So other users are not affected.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-5.17/+bug/1971712/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992667] Re: Application windows invisible (on DG2 graphics)

2022-10-13 Thread Sebastian Heiden
I've managed to reproduce this bug on an Arc A380 and Arc A770 GPU. I've
attached the requested lspci output for the A770.

Ubuntu 22.04 has already received a mesa update with backported patches
for DG2 support:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1971712

I haven't tried 22.10 yet, but I will do so in the coming days.

** Attachment added: "lspci.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-6.0/+bug/1992667/+attachment/5623860/+files/lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992667

Title:
  Application windows invisible (on DG2 graphics)

Status in linux-oem-6.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  When using GNOME Shell with Wayland, all application windows become
  invisible from time to time. This usually happens right after starting
  GNOME Shell for the first time or after having a VRAM intensive
  application open, such as a game.

  I have installed the latest linux-oem-6.0 kernel and manually enabled
  support for DG2 graphics by passing the i915.force_probe parameter
  with the PCIe ID of the graphics card.

  I have attached a screenshot of the described behavior below.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-shell 42.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.0.0-1005.5-oem 6.0.0
  Uname: Linux 6.0.0-1005-oem x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Wed Oct 12 17:23:40 2022
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-10-11 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 42.2-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-6.0/+bug/1992667/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1726129] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in widget_needs_widget_path

2022-10-13 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Indeed there are no crashes after version 42.x

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726129

Title:
  nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in widget_needs_widget_path

Status in Nautilus:
  Fix Released
Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/2457

  ---

  https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/7c06cf06fd970ce31033f0d775b3adf97559e4ea

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: nautilus 1:3.26.0-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  CrashCounter: 1
  CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
  Date: Sun Oct 22 15:30:05 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-19 (3 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Budgie 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 
(20171017.1)
  ProcCmdline: nautilus --new-window
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0x7fe0115bd2a4:mov0x380(%rax),%rax
   PC (0x7fe0115bd2a4) ok
   source "0x380(%rax)" (0x0380) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
   destination "%rax" ok
  SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  StacktraceTop:
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
  Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1726129/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989803] Re: Adjust apport for the new Ubuntu debuginfod service

2022-10-13 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Tags added: cetest

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989803

Title:
  Adjust apport for the new Ubuntu debuginfod service

Status in Apport:
  Fix Released
Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  With the new Ubuntu debuginfod service
  (https://debuginfod.ubuntu.com), and with the prospect of having the
  system automatically fetch debuginfo from the internet without user
  intervention, it is necessary to adjust apport to cope with this
  scenario.

  I had a conversation with bdmurray and he was concerned that having a
  debuginfod-enabled GDB generate the corefiles that are eventually
  submitted to Ubuntu can be a problem.

  My proposed solution is to disable GDB's debuginfod support when
  collecting the corefile.  This should keep things as is and not
  disturb the retrace service.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1989803/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp