[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061708] Re: Yubikey stopped working after noble upgrade

2024-04-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I don't recommend running with pcscd, it's much more stable to run with direct access, but I do not know why it doesn't seem to work for you, it certainly does for me. It failing with pcscd is nice, it not telling us why and how to fix it is bad UX though. ** Changed in: gnupg2 (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061214] Re: [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822

2024-04-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yeah sorry folks this was a bit awkward, to avoid respinning other images we temporarily spun out software-properties-qt into its own package (0.99.48.1) and fixed it there, and hence there was no bug closure or anything. This will fold back into the main package in a zero-day SRU in 0.99.49. **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062979] Re: unable to create ubuntu-noble image due to dictionaries-common config failure

2024-04-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I'm unsubscribing as I only did a no-change rebuild. I'd generally advise against using LC_ALL=C in any setting however, it's generally a bad idea and you should use LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061214] Re: Software sources not correctly updated after upgrade and/or new installs

2024-04-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The last comment made me realize we are talking about the Qt frontend here, and yes, sure, we only ever implemented deb822 for the Gtk frontend and the Dbus backend. The Qt frontend needs to gain a deb822 entry editor dialog, possibly some rendering fixes for deb822 source entries, and swap on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063101] [NEW] Update apt override from important to required

2024-04-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: APT is currently overriden from required to important, this is causing it not to be installed by default when bootstrapping with mmdebstrap. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061214] Re: Software sources not correctly updated after upgrade

2024-04-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Please attach a tarball of your /etc/apt/sources.list and /etc/apt/sources.list.d ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060721] Re: APT 2.8.0: Promote weak key warnings to errors

2024-04-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060721] Re: APT 2.8.0: Promote weak key warnings to errors

2024-04-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags added: block-proposed block-proposed-noble ** Tags removed: block-proposed-noble ** Description changed: + ⚠️ Only land this in the release pocket after PPAs have been resigned + (This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number system, with 2.7.x being the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-04-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060578 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060578 This was fixed in u-r-u in bug 2060578 ** No longer affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2024-04-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951491 Title: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image

2024-04-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04 ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060581] Re: stop shipping debian-installer package hook

2024-04-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060581 Title: stop shipping debian-installer package hook Status in apport package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image

2024-04-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059550] Re: autopkgtest failures on 1:5.0.3-2ubuntu3 (Noble)

2024-04-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Sponsored, thanks ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059550 Title: autopkgtest failures on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060721] Re: APT 2.8.0: Promote weak key warnings to errors

2024-04-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: (This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the only change left for the 2.8 release) (This will be uploaded after the beta and may be released before noble release, as

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060721] [NEW] APT 2.8.0: Promote weak key warnings to errors

2024-04-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: (This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the only change left for the 2.8 release) (This will be uploaded after the beta and may be released before noble release, as a zero day SRU

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2024-04-06 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Thanks for the bug report, unfortunately this has become quite convoluted and I've identified at least 3 different strands of discussion in here that are not related. Some stuff, like "runuser" in a cron job is clearly never going to work, but I don't know how the other two instances - sessions

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988819] Re: When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should list them separately

2024-04-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Geekley I personally agree and would go a lot further and hide even most dependencies (you don't really care which libraries you are installing, just about choices made, e.g. if there's an a | b dependency it should tell you that it picked a). So if you want to think about it that terse mode

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059853] Re: apt amd64 2.7.14 is missing on Ubuntu Noble?

2024-03-31 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You may have heard about the xz-utils backdoor, compromised binaries have been removed and replaced with older ones, and a partial amd64 rebuild is ongoing. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057792] Re: Some Games are crashing linked to a vm_max_map_count too low

2024-03-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Uploaded procps with the file; leaving gamemode task open because maybe dynamic enhancements there still make some sense in 24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057792] Re: Some Games are crashing linked to a vm_max_map_count too low

2024-03-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I'm agreeing with desktop in following Fedora to bump to 1048576, the precedence makes this safe, and this I consider this a bug fix for crashing software and not a feature request. ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057792] Re: Some Games are crashing linked to a vm_max_map_count too low

2024-03-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Subscribing Canonical desktop team to get their input. Basically the ask is to ship this file: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/blob/f39/f/10-map-count.conf I believe if we do it should be shipped in procps; or possibly, gamemode should set that option? ** Also affects: procps

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates

2024-03-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
jammy is green too now ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995790] Re: regression: ?garbage does not work correctly in install commands

2024-03-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
jammy is green too now ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053228] Re: software-properties-gtk does not start

2024-03-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053228 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995790] Re: regression: ?garbage does not work correctly in install commands

2024-03-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The regressions on mantic have cleared up and the tests of apt have passed so this is verified there. Still clearing out a regression from update-manager:i386 on jammy- ** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates

2024-03-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The regressions on mantic have cleared up and the tests of apt have passed so this is verified there. Still clearing out a regression from update-manager:i386 on jammy- ** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054716] Re: package polkitd 124-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed polkitd package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-03-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054716 Title: package polkitd 124-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed polkitd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038925] Re: Many hangs during apt full-upgrade

2024-03-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
If it gets stuck maybe look at top to see if it spends CPU anywhere do do a ps faux or something to see the process tree. I wonder if it's a debconf frontend socket being stuck or something ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047447] Re: No valid source.list found while upgrading from mantic to noble

2024-03-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The comment one is fixed in noble, I'm not sure what Xavier's ubuntu.sources is about though, there's probably subtle errors in there that get lost in the comment. So... Suffice it to say, this is a rather niche issue as 23.10 did not actually ship with ubuntu.sources, so it affects a few people

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047447] Re: No valid source.list found while upgrading from mantic to noble

2024-03-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047447 Title: No valid source.list found while

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055193] Re: [FFe] APT 24.04 crypto policy update

2024-03-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Sorry Łukasz, this has landed in 2.7.13 in proposed back in February, with the caveat that it is a warning for now. This will essentially close the bug and we should probably consider the FFe to be switching that to an error once everything landed. Arguably some consider any of that work a bug fix

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053228] Re: software-properties-gtk does not start

2024-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
While the patch makes the application run it also breaks the functionality it's patching for deb822 sources by just ignoring them. More work is needed and I do have it scheduled for this pulse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053165] Re: [noble] Version 2.7.5 causes software-properties to crash

2024-03-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2053228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053228 Please do not delete files, certainly not ubuntu.sources, or you will no longer get updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885646] Re: RM ring FTBFS

2024-03-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nettle in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885646 Title: RM ring FTBFS Status in nettle package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in ring

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055717] Re: Acquire::http::proxy ignored / used inconsistently?

2024-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I mean that's good to know that systemd does not load system-wide environment variables but it's their design choice and not a bug in apt (or systemd). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-03-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Apologies, I saw the same issue locally fixed it but must have forgotten to build a new .dsc:/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055889] Re: E:can not open /var/lib/apt/lists/ppa.launchpadcontent.net_cappelikan_ppa_ubuntu_dists_jammy_InRelease - fopen (13: Permission denied), E:The package lists or status

2024-03-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There are occasionally permission issues in APT like this, but sadly we never managed to reproduce them so we never have been able to figure out where it skips setting the right permission. If you can find a clean reproducer we can investigate further, but otherwise it's sadly not actionable. **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055717] Re: Acquire::http::proxy ignored / used inconsistently?

2024-03-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi there, the bug tracker is not the right place for user support. APT does not suddenly pick different proxies when running as a service. It does respect your http_proxy and no_proxy variables. Please note that while http_proxy does not override Acquire::http::proxy, no_proxy does. It sounds

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055711] Re: Cannot set APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists

2024-03-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You probably have /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20auto-upgrades or another file later in the search order that overrides the setting, 20auto-upgrades is what unattended-upgrades configures. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On root@known-seal:~# apt policy debootstrap debootstrap: Installed: 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7 Candidate: 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7 Version table: *** 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages 500

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The regression in debuerreotype is expected due to the included change from the previous SRU (LP: #1990856), packages are now extracted in a different order for the test case, hence some time stamps shifted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054319] Re: System installed from jammy point release iso cannot upgrade to noble

2024-02-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Deferring tracking to the other bugs ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019026] Re: systemd /tmp cleaning is suboptimal

2024-02-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I agree with Nick, regular cleaning *and* cleaning at /boot is best behavior. ** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053228] Re: software-properties-gtk does not start

2024-02-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I must have forgotten to actually move this into the correct pulse to fix it, so it's in the 2 weeks starting the week after next now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055193] Re: [FFe] APT 24.04 crypto policy update

2024-02-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: gnupg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Package changed: gnupg (Ubuntu) => gnupg2 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055193

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: gnupg2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908 Title: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055193] [NEW] [FFe] APT 24.04 crypto policy update

2024-02-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: I don't know if this will land before the feature freeze but I'm filing this in any case: Our goal for 24.04 is to reject 1024-bit RSA repository signing keys. Work is ongoing in Launchpad to allow dual-signing PPAs and then resign all PPAs with a 4096-bit key. This needs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055146] Re: Upgrade from Jammy to Noble breaks

2024-02-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dash in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Slrry I can make this clearer too by adding a mantic task and marking it as fix released. ** Also affects: base-files (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: debootstrap (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: debootstrap

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap for Noble Numbat. Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib, /lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log, it fails to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925 Title: Debootstrap fails for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap for Noble Numbat. Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib, /lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log, it fails to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925 Title: Debootstrap fails for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: - The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful - debootstrap for Noble Numbat. + [Impact] + The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap for Noble Numbat. Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Remind me to add negative Recommends to apt at some point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908 Title: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix Status in Auto

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
As a workaround, --no-merged-usr probably should work fine in old releases. It might be easier to add this to the script as a special case for > noble than backporting new logic we don't need anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I forgot we can't rely on preinst in bootstrap so backporting the debootstrap change it will have to be. ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I wrote instead but of course it's in addition, I think that's probably the easier outcome than trying to workaround it in the base-files preinst. Consulting with helmut -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Let me move this to debootstrap tasks instead, I guess we should fix the LTS debootstraps. ** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Steve I'm sorry but I cannot reproduce this. I have verified this countless of times during working on this and I am also unable to verify this here: # apt policy debootstrap debootstrap: Installed: 1.0.134ubuntu1 Candidate: 1.0.134ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1.0.134ubuntu1 500 500

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Steve - it is a server package for hosting a web key server, it's entirely reasonable for it to depend on a mail transport agent. A WKS server, upon uploading a key, sends confirmation emails to the UIDs in the key, before publishing it, so that it only published keys with consent. It's

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gnupg is pulling in gpg-wks-server which pulls in postfix

2024-02-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
gpg-wks-server is not a new dependency so upgrading will of course pull in a newer version until you remove it. The images will be fixed eventually when they get rebuilt from scratch. For upgrades, we can quirk this to avoid upgrading it only for it to become auto removable later. ** Changed in:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054719] Re: base-files, glibc lockstep migration blocking bug

2024-02-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apt and bzip2 have migrated, so we are ready to land them in the next britney run. ** Tags removed: block-proposed ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054719] Re: base-files, glibc lockstep migration blocking bug

2024-02-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags added: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054719 Title: base-files, glibc lockstep migration blocking bug Status in base-files

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054719] [NEW] base-files, glibc lockstep migration blocking bug

2024-02-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: With the new changes I'm uploading, taken from Helmut's patches on Debian bug tracker, base-files will own the /lib64 symlink, and /lib64 in libc6 will move to /usr/lib64. Special care has been taken to not break upgrades: You can upgrade the two in any order. However,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054319] Re: System installed from jammy point release iso cannot upgrade to noble

2024-02-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** No longer affects: tracker-miners (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054319 Title: System installed from jammy point release iso cannot

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054450] [NEW] apport arm64 autopkgtest flaky

2024-02-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: The following failure can sometimes be observed on arm64 in noble, for example, with gnupg2 and sensible-utils: 360s === FAILURES === 360s __ T.test_core_dump_packaged

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053228] Re: software-properties-gtk does not start

2024-02-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052951] Re: ncurses/i386 autopkgtest failure

2024-02-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This failed to build due to missing update-maintainer, I'm adding this and uploading it but wondering how it was tested: dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: error: Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address E: Failed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988819] Re: When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should list them separately

2024-02-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
2.7.11 is in proposed now. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988819 Title: When apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995790] Re: regression: ?garbage does not work correctly in install commands

2024-02-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Description changed: - The awesome apt has a some wonderful tips on their EXAMPLES section - (printed below). The choice of name to "garbage" might

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates

2024-02-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
SRUs uploaded. Setting to Fix committed for internal tooling tracking needs (I understand normally SRUs should be In Progress, but then the tool reopens the task...) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates

2024-02-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Also cherry-picked to the ubuntu/mantic and 2.4.y branches for mantic and jammy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051181 Title: apt cannot upgrade phased

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates

2024-02-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Noble) Importance: Critical Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank) Status: Fix Committed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates

2024-02-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Fixed in apt git. ** Summary changed: - apt cannot upgrade packages if the current security version is same as updates + apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates ** Description changed: - When I finished installation with Jammy 22.04.3, I noticed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988819] Re: When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should list them separately

2024-02-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Proposed fix in: https://salsa.debian.org/apt- team/apt/-/merge_requests/327/diffs?commit_id=483e3b5c49762306c0a9f54117fd70cff43af4be The corner case with kept back packages not due to phasing ends up with a notice before the prompt: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree...

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade packages if the current security version is same as updates

2024-02-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995790] Re: regression: ?garbage does not work correctly in install commands

2024-02-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995790 Title: regression: ?garbage does not work correctly in install commands Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051512] Re: apport ftbfs with Python 3.12 as the default

2024-02-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052297] [NEW] Please add opt.keybase.keybase profile

2024-02-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: Like the other Chrome binaries, Keybase also needs a profile: abi , /opt/keybase/Keybase flags=(unconfined) { allow userns create, } Keybase is heavily used for security and boot engineering for cross-vendor communication and broken without it ** Affects: apparmor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051541] Re: unattended-upgrades ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-02-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: ftbfs rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045455] Re: add-apt-repository crashed with --- in _request()

2024-01-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Nevermind, a non-existent or private PPA has been tried to add and software-properties should properly surface the error to you. ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045455] Re: add-apt-repository crashed with --- in _request()

2024-01-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Presumably the add-apt-repository command failed while trying to add a private PPA here due to you not being authorized to access it (maybe not logged in?), can you tell us which PPA did you try to add? ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2050033] Re: gettext: msgfmt --java2 does not support Java 21

2024-01-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Unsubscribing ubuntu sponsors as already subscribed to the merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2050033 Title: gettext: msgfmt --java2 does not support

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049540] Re: hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version 0.142ubuntu10 and version 0.142ubuntu11

2024-01-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049529] Re: Extra ZFS-related log line with `useradd -m -R /path`

2024-01-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects: shadow (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1838372] Re: 'ubuntu-bug -w' doesn't work under wayland

2024-01-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838372 Title: 'ubuntu-bug -w' doesn't work under wayland Status in apport package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1838372] Re: 'ubuntu-bug -w' doesn't work under wayland

2024-01-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Needs some investigation whether this is possible, Wayland has a security focused design where I'd expect it not to be. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838372

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1728616] Re: using 'devel' in sources.list causes apt-get update to fail

2023-12-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We need to add some Aliases field(s) to release files to allow matching that, but that may be hard to do fully correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728616

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047453] Re: Error message missing compared to `apt-get update`

2023-12-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You'll have to investigate the individual items to see why it failed. It's generally not advisable to use the "apt" module as it is badly abstracted, use "apt_pkg" instead. ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046356] Re: Update URL for Support information in MOTD message

2023-12-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Dropping the foundations-todo task as we expect debdiffs to sponsor to be provided by Lucas. I expect the patch pilot program to handle this quickly, but please do fill out the SRU template in the bug description. ** Tags removed: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046356] Re: Update URL for Support information in MOTD message

2023-12-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046356 Title: Update URL for Support information in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2022927] Re: Busybox mount fails to mount Snaps

2023-12-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I agree that this patch should be shipped but if upstream doesn't accept it we also would have no way to drop it again without breaking users, so this seems risky. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to busybox in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044104] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuilding initramfs even with zdev:early=0 set

2023-12-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-ff-incoming rls-jj-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Medium Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) Status: New ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Medium

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043713] Re: TestApportValgrind.test_valgrind_min_installed fails on armhf: Invalid write of size 4

2023-12-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043713 Title: TestApportValgrind.test_valgrind_min_installed fails on armhf: Invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1831747] Re: fixrtc hook requires e2fsprogs package, but that is not a dependency

2023-12-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Low Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045899] Re: More amdgpu crashes: pagefaults, ring timeouts and parser bugs

2023-12-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Waiting for 6.5.13 to actually build but on 6.6.0-14 from proposed now which is based on 6.6.3 which probably has all the fancy patches too -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045899] Re: More amdgpu crashes: pagefaults, ring timeouts and parser bugs

2023-12-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
These ones I don't remember seeing before: [drm:amdgpu_cs_ioctl [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Failed to initialize parser -125! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045899

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045899] Re: More amdgpu crashes: pagefaults, ring timeouts and parser bugs

2023-12-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I saw similar messages in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2032386 but that only caused hangs and not block the entire desktop (and Firefox is good now so I don't know) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >