Renamed to installation medium in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team
/python-apt/-/commit/a228b5800d7850d1c7bfa9224cad87f6edbdd44f to match
live disc messaging.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Released upstream as python-apt 2.1.15
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/python-apt/-/merge_requests/52
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: hossein (moghadasi) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to
There are two hilarious bugs in here:
(1) We call _config->FindB("APT::Cache::AllNames","false"), trying to
set the default to false, but we pass a char* instead, which gets cast
to true (as it's != nullptr). So, pkgnames always runs with --all-names
(2) We accidentally exclude virtual packages,
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876495
Title:
bash-completion incorrectly shows source
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876495
Title:
bash-completion incorrectly shows
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Without including a preference file in the bug report, it's hard to say
what should happen.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Description changed:
apt-cache policy does not reflect priority set in
/etc/apt/preferences.d/*
-
- ```
- $ cat apt-bug.txt
-
@Tim Your system stability is not relevant to this bug report about apt
failing immediate configuration failing installs.
** Summary changed:
- Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected
+ Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when
"Install
Given more and more issues popping up even without multi-arch, I've
decided to downgrade the late error to a warning.
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ Installations that really succeeded would then fail because APT could not
immediately configure a package. Which is a pointless way to fail
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails when "Install
as in, the fix for this bug does not fix the Debian one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers"
@Balint The Debian bug is different - it's single arch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is
** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Won't Fix => New
** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Also affects: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
It's not really. I've reworded it so that it's more clear. It's
important to realize that this is not a regression in functionality, it
works the same way as before, you just get a warning because new
security features (which are arguably fairly incomplete) could not be
used.
** Description
That's a topic to take up with the indian mirror operators.
in.archive.ubuntu.com canonical name = ubuntu-
archive.mirrors.estointernet.in.
I'm not sure if there's a better place, but I'll reassign to ubuntu
generic, and assign the mirror operator.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
Reassigning to mariadb-10.3. Note that mariadb is in universe, and
likely does not receive much if any support.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => mariadb-10.3 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Released => Invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails when "Install
APT still needs to offer a better experience for removing protected
packages with an extra --allow-remove-protected flag instead of
(re)using --allow-remove-essential, but it's still a useful feature.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
We could mark bootloader packages as Protected: yes (Important: yes
before groovy). That would not only prevent autoremoval, it would also
add another step to manual removal as it triggers the same removal
prompts as essential packages.
Arguably top-level kernel packages, oem metapackages should
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Harsh Dudhat (dudhat-harsh) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails when
It's not clear to me how you ended up with wrong permissions on those
files, so I'm afraid without a way to reproduce this, there's not much
we can do here.
** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Diana Voicu (dianavoicu) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails with
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Black Mage Zeraf (blackmagezeraf) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation
Disk broken or kernel or dpkg bug.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => dpkg (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: pooria aghapour (pan2020) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails
Well, more correctly -1 means to all processes you can send to, and if
you're root, well it's everyone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538
kill(-1, SIGINT) kills all processes on the system with SIGINT, so this
is hardly surprising.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538
Title:
dbus
Hey people, adding "me too" comments does not add anything useful to the
bug. Please click the "affects me" kind of button at the top instead if
you want to express your being affected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
You made a typo in your sources.list
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** No longer affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Attached patch for xenial, but I can't test it.
$ pkcon install-local xterm_353-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb
Installing files [=]
Finished [=]
Fatal error: MIME type 'application/vnd.debian.binary-package'
Easiest is to just look at policykit log and see that it triggers the
untrusted action, fwiw. IMO.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882098
Title:
On it
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882098
Title:
Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and
Focal
Status in packagekit
** Patch added:
"0001-aptcc-Do-not-trust-local-debs-allows-root-privileges.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1882098/+attachment/5413161/+files/0001-aptcc-Do-not-trust-local-debs-allows-root-privileges.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
I reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1896091
but it was incomplete because apparently apport can no longer collect
dmesg log now that it is restricted in groovy.
This means you can't report complete kernel bugs, and the instructions
provided by the
The bug description states:
1) do not ask questions with two identical answers in a row
2) ask user every time if multiple versions are present
3) if the same answer was given twice in a row - remember choice
I have no idea what that means, it also has no relation to the bug
title. Flatpak and
Also, the language you have chosen for that comment is inappropriate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895382
Title:
Ability to install 2 or more versions at
The bug is about "Ability to install 2 or more versions at once", the
rest was incomprehensible
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895382
Title:
Ability to
You can't install multiple versions at the same time for dpkg/apt, but
you can with snaps, don't know about flatpaks - talk to flatpak people.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Check that you have less files in /var/lib/apt/lists than ulimit -n has
a value. You probably have too many repositories or too low a ulimit.
Otherwise, open a new bug with ubuntu-bug/apport.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
It asks apt if the package is trusted, and from apt's POV it is. which
might or might not be good, UX wise, for apt (maybe it should also tell
you that local debs are not verified), but not much of an issue there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
I found out the cause for this, but other backends are affected too probably
- basically the packagekit daemon assumes that packages can be trusted
themselves,
so backends that do not have trust information in packages need to explicitly
reject local packages as untrusted, so that PackageKit
Yup, install-local does indeed trigger package-install not package-
install-untrusted
Aug 28 11:28:53 jak-t480s polkitd(authority=local)[1744]: Operator of
unix-session:2 FAILED to authenticate to gain authorization for action
org.freedesktop.packagekit.package-install for system-bus-name::1.535
Trusty is EOL. The system in question seems to be in an unsupported
state. The apt version is old, and the upgrade seems to have been
attempted with apt instead of do-release-upgrade (as do-release-upgrade
would tell you to upgrade first).
apt in trusty does not contain the bash completion, and
Life is hard. Please read messages carefully, and keep
backups/snapshots.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => libgcrypt20 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890006
Title:
Hash mismatch on "apt update"
Status in libgcrypt20
This may be fixed now even.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1801338
Title:
apt fails to properly handle server-side connection closure
Status in apt package
Certainly not an apt bug. Feature request for like debconf, UCF, and
dpkg? Or packagekit? Don't know
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Bug is probably invalid, as this is a problem on the non-Ubuntu host?
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => libseccomp (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1627564 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1627564
Debconf crash due to assertion failure in ensure_surface_for_gicon
[gtkiconhelper.c:493] (when png loader is missing/during upgrades)
--
You
** Package changed: ubuntu => debconf (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564
Title:
Debconf crash due to assertion failure in
Is one significantly larger than the other?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892290
Title:
PXE load Focal initrd.img-5.4.0-42-generic always
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1627564 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1627564
Crash due to assertion failure in ensure_surface_for_gicon
[gtkiconhelper.c:493] (when png loader is missing/during upgrades)
--
You received
Reassigning to gtk+3.0 though I don't really know what to do here, we
need gtk operational during upgrades to show prompts.
(frontend:10148): Gtk-[1;33mWARNING[0m **: [34m16:28:16.133[0m: Could not
load a pixbuf fro icon theme.
This may indicate that pixbuf loaders or the mime database could
** Package changed: debconf (Ubuntu) => os-prober (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876506
Title:
eoan to focal upgrade hangs when lvm snapshot is
I can't reproduce this anymore, so closing it.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Incomplete
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status:
Don't see any reason for any apport collecting here.
This needs a clean reproducer or someone with the issue to do the work
to analyse what's wrong.
Looking at the bug report, the output from the reproducer matches that
of the commandline tools?
--
You received this bug notification because
Should probably be
add-apt-repository deb-src
?
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => software-properties (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
Enabling by default does not make much sense and people usually use
pull-lp-source instead which does not need sources.list entries and
pulls directly from launchpad.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
@Colin: I agree with all of that.
Our kernel-side default is not powersave, but performance, across
generic and oem, at the very least:
$ grep CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_.*=y /boot/config-5.*
/boot/config-5.4.0-26-generic:CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
We'll eventually get a retry support in apt, if updating failed, but
there are no plans to react to connection state changes.
The retry will be linear every 10 minutes or so I suppose, but can't be
sure, we'll have to see - I'd do exponential, but systemd does not give
us an option for that.
Any
This is not going to happen in apt. It's a question for desktop how to
do that, probably disabling the downloading in apt, and using gnome's
package kit refresh stuff instead.
** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug
passing intel_pstate=disable_hwp on the kernel commandline causes the
kernel to scale the Core i5-8250U down to 1.6 GHz in performance mode,
but that's still a bit off from the 900 MHz it scales down to in
powersave mode.
I believe Windows also does not run the CPUs in performance mode by
default
The performance governor is the right choice for servers, but it's not
the right choice on non-server platforms, it's also not the default
kernel setting, it was set because we have the ondemand.service in
userspace that can change it back to ondemand (or well we have the
service because of that
Andreas, I've not gotten it more isolated, the minimum I had was running
debian/tests/gnome-desktop-testing in a flatpak-builder source tree (apt
source/pull-lp-source flatpak-builder).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
The maintainer script becomes a zombie, because perl -w ...
debconf/frontend ... memtest86+.postinst is stuck in a read() from fd 9,
which is a pipe.
** Package changed: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
** Package changed: ubuntu => debconf (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876035
Title:
Automatically retry downloads on failures
I have code to fix that just need to merge it and like update tests
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
You not liking apt's solution and only realizing that after you
confirmed and applied it is not a bug in apt.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887277
Title:
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887277
Title:
apt-get install REMOVES packages without replacing
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => command-not-found (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886618
Title:
command-not-found gets stuck on locales with
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
@rbalint As said before the kernel messages and bugs are irrelevant and
wrong. They pretend like intel_pstate is different, when in fact it's
this script that is configuring it here. And yes, it needs OS config.
Nor do other distros not do this, but we do it differently. We set the
Someone probably needs to look at non-pstate systems as I have no idea
about them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885730
Title:
Bring back
Public bug reported:
In a recent merge from Debian we lost ondemand.service, meaning all CPUs
now run in Turbo all the time when idle, which is clearly suboptimal.
The discussion in bug 1806012 seems misleading, focusing on p-state vs
other drivers, when in fact, the script actually set the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872200 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872200
apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
We will not be changing the behavior here. apt-key del working if they
key was not present in the keyring is important to maintain, so that we
do not break the maintainer scripts using it (which should be tested,
and should be the only users of this).
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status:
You have enabled storing indexes in compressed form, which is a non-
default setting that does not work very well. In early days, this used
to store files in the form the server offered them, but this was changed
to recompress to lz4 in order to improve the run time performance of
apt.
You can install python-apt from apt, we do not provide python-apt on
pip. I recently got control over the pypi entry and need to do something
with it. I'm not keen on providing python-apt outside of the distro,
though (python-apt and apt versions x.y need to match), so I'd rather
just get rid of
MMap is an internal implementation detail that people have been using
accidentally when they wanted to open the cache, where they should use
pkgCacheFile for.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Yes, that's by design.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883079
Title:
The "MMap::MMap(FileFd&,
Summary is that I don't believe the option as is is sufficient, and
needs to be reworked, so I'm changing the title accordingly.
** Summary changed:
- Consider making '-o Acquire::Retries=3' the default for 'apt-get
update/install/dist-upgrade'
+ Automatically retry downloads on failures
--
The easiest way out would be to just remove tasksel once the d-i images
are gone, and it's no longer needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574287
Title:
I'm not going to add a second independent reader to apt just so that
apt-mark runs a bit faster.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219
Title:
'apt-mark
The problem is that the code that reads the state reads it into the
depcache.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219
Title:
'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show'
There are two things:
- On servers, ubuntu-server depends on mdadm, so removing mdadm also
removes ubuntu-server package, which means it's not really supported
- In general, the installers don't offer installing like that.
I don't know why we did not have a task for xenial.
** Description
That's certainly incorrect, lvm2 was fixed in focal (and hence groovy).
That only leaves xenial, but updating xenial close to its EOL for
something as unusual as this seems unneccessary. The supported
configuration for raid1 is mdadm after all, not removing mdadm and the
meta packages that depend
I was about ready to get back to reviewing this (or just saying meh, I
don't see anything obviously wrong, so just upload it) 3 months ago when
you declared that you gave up on the MR.
I don't see how creating a new tool is easier than just uploading your
changes. Both have the same effect of
A few points to think about:
1. I am not aware of anyone using that option, we don't know if it works
and how it behaves
2. Given 1, what kind of testing can we do? This needs to be thoroughly
tested, given that it's not been tested at all.
3. Switching IPs might be useful, but it's not clear
Fixed in 2.1.3, will look into adding a test case and backporting this
to 2.0 shortly.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
The regressions in bionic seem unrelated to me adding the raid1 module
to the list of modules installed to the initramfs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509717
eoan verified.
So, eoan is tougher. I installed it with subiquity and tried to follow
the steps, but failed to convert to raid1, apparently, subiquity created
the LV 1 PE larger than before or something, so it needed 1 free PE in
the original PV to be able to add the raid1 metadata, which it did
verified in bionic
Did all the steps (install vm, create pv, extend pv, remove dmadm,
upgrade).
It booted after the upgrade to 2.02.176-4.1ubuntu3.18.04.3, and it
failed again following a downgrade to the 2.02.176-4.1ubuntu3.18.04.2
from updates pocket.
** Tags removed:
** Description changed:
[Impact]
system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm
installed.
[Test case]
1. Install server with subiquity to LVM
2. Add second disk to it
3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb
4. Run vgextend ubuntu-vg /dev/vdb
5. Run lvconvert
** Description changed:
[Impact]
system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm
installed.
[Test case]
1. Install server with subiquity to LVM
- 2. Add second disk to it
- 3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb
- 4. Run vgextend ubuntu-vg /dev/vdb
- 5. Run lvconvert
** Description changed:
[Impact]
system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm
installed.
[Test case]
- 1. Install server with subiquity to VM
+ 1. Install server with subiquity to LVM
2. Add second disk to it
3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb
4. Run
sorry, working on verifying it, got distracted by other stuff.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509717
Title:
Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is
FWIW, The upload has been superceded by a security update, and will need
revalidation when 2.0.4 is uploaded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200
Title:
1 - 100 of 1703 matches
Mail list logo
