[Touch-packages] [Bug 1849406] Re: Ubuntu 19.10: "Cdrom" to "Physical media"

2020-10-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Renamed to installation medium in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team /python-apt/-/commit/a228b5800d7850d1c7bfa9224cad87f6edbdd44f to match live disc messaging. ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1727470] Re: [RFE] Automatically update the Ubuntu version strings in python-apt

2020-10-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Released upstream as python-apt 2.1.15 ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1727470] Re: [RFE] Automatically update the Ubuntu version strings in python-apt

2020-10-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/python-apt/-/merge_requests/52 ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Assignee: hossein (moghadasi) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails due to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876495] Re: bash-completion incorrectly shows source package names for APT

2020-10-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There are two hilarious bugs in here: (1) We call _config->FindB("APT::Cache::AllNames","false"), trying to set the default to false, but we pass a char* instead, which gets cast to true (as it's != nullptr). So, pkgnames always runs with --all-names (2) We accidentally exclude virtual packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876495] Re: bash-completion incorrectly shows source package names for APT

2020-10-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876495 Title: bash-completion incorrectly shows source

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876495] Re: bash-completion incorrectly shows source package names for APT

2020-10-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876495 Title: bash-completion incorrectly shows

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876495] Re: bash-completion incorrectly shows source package names for APT

2020-10-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901053] Re: apt preferences files do nothing re: apt-cache policy

2020-10-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Without including a preference file in the bug report, it's hard to say what should happen. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Description changed: apt-cache policy does not reflect priority set in /etc/apt/preferences.d/* - - ``` - $ cat apt-bug.txt -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
@Tim Your system stability is not relevant to this bug report about apt failing immediate configuration failing installs. ** Summary changed: - Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected + Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Given more and more issues popping up even without multi-arch, I've decided to downgrade the late error to a warning. ** Description changed: + [Impact] + Installations that really succeeded would then fail because APT could not immediately configure a package. Which is a pointless way to fail

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails when "Install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
as in, the fix for this bug does not fix the Debian one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
@Balint The Debian bug is different - it's single arch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898729] Re: shim can end up being removed

2020-10-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Won't Fix => New ** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Also affects: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522675] Re: Warning messages about unsandboxed downloads

2020-10-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It's not really. I've reworded it so that it's more clear. It's important to realize that this is not a regression in functionality, it works the same way as before, you just get a warning because new security features (which are arguably fairly incomplete) could not be used. ** Description

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899274] Re: India Ubuntu repository (in.archive.ubuntu.com) has corrupt file for libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37

2020-10-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
That's a topic to take up with the indian mirror operators. in.archive.ubuntu.com canonical name = ubuntu- archive.mirrors.estointernet.in. I'm not sure if there's a better place, but I'll reassign to ubuntu generic, and assign the mirror operator. ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899483] Re: long hang apt install mariadb-server on Ubuntu 20.04 server

2020-10-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Reassigning to mariadb-10.3. Note that mariadb is in universe, and likely does not receive much if any support. ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => mariadb-10.3 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Released => Invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails when "Install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898729] Re: shim can end up being removed

2020-10-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
APT still needs to offer a better experience for removing protected packages with an extra --allow-remove-protected flag instead of (re)using --allow-remove-essential, but it's still a useful feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898729] Re: shim can end up being removed

2020-10-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We could mark bootloader packages as Protected: yes (Important: yes before groovy). That would not only prevent autoremoval, it would also add another step to manual removal as it triggers the same removal prompts as essential packages. Arguably top-level kernel packages, oem metapackages should

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Assignee: Harsh Dudhat (dudhat-harsh) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails when

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895710] Re: Die Paketliste oder die Statusdatei konnte nicht eingelesen oder geöffnet werden.

2020-10-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It's not clear to me how you ended up with wrong permissions on those files, so I'm afraid without a way to reproduce this, there's not much we can do here. ** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Assignee: Diana Voicu (dianavoicu) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Assignee: Black Mage Zeraf (blackmagezeraf) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1897360] Re: package firefox-locale-de 79.0+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack...@fire

2020-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Disk broken or kernel or dpkg bug. ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => dpkg (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Assignee: pooria aghapour (pan2020) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2020-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Well, more correctly -1 means to all processes you can send to, and if you're root, well it's everyone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2020-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
kill(-1, SIGINT) kills all processes on the system with SIGINT, so this is hardly surprising. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538 Title: dbus

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hey people, adding "me too" comments does not add anything useful to the bug. Please click the "affects me" kind of button at the top instead if you want to express your being affected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896823] Re: possible incorrect link to apt-transport-https

2020-09-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You made a typo in your sources.list ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** No longer affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Attached patch for xenial, but I can't test it. $ pkcon install-local xterm_353-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb Installing files [=] Finished [=] Fatal error: MIME type 'application/vnd.debian.binary-package'

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Easiest is to just look at policykit log and see that it triggers the untrusted action, fwiw. IMO. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882098 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882098 Title: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal Status in packagekit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Patch added: "0001-aptcc-Do-not-trust-local-debs-allows-root-privileges.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1882098/+attachment/5413161/+files/0001-aptcc-Do-not-trust-local-debs-allows-root-privileges.patch -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896095] [NEW] apport no longer attaches dmesg, as dmesg is restricted in groovy

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: I reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1896091 but it was incomplete because apparently apport can no longer collect dmesg log now that it is restricted in groovy. This means you can't report complete kernel bugs, and the instructions provided by the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The bug description states: 1) do not ask questions with two identical answers in a row 2) ask user every time if multiple versions are present 3) if the same answer was given twice in a row - remember choice I have no idea what that means, it also has no relation to the bug title. Flatpak and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Also, the language you have chosen for that comment is inappropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895382 Title: Ability to install 2 or more versions at

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The bug is about "Ability to install 2 or more versions at once", the rest was incomprehensible -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895382 Title: Ability to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You can't install multiple versions at the same time for dpkg/apt, but you can with snaps, don't know about flatpaks - talk to flatpak people. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1089070] Re: Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_quantal_main_binary-amd64_Packages - open (24: Too many open files)

2020-09-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Check that you have less files in /var/lib/apt/lists than ulimit -n has a value. You probably have too many repositories or too low a ulimit. Otherwise, open a new bug with ubuntu-bug/apport. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It asks apt if the package is trusted, and from apt's POV it is. which might or might not be good, UX wise, for apt (maybe it should also tell you that local debs are not verified), but not much of an issue there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I found out the cause for this, but other backends are affected too probably - basically the packagekit daemon assumes that packages can be trusted themselves, so backends that do not have trust information in packages need to explicitly reject local packages as untrusted, so that PackageKit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-08-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yup, install-local does indeed trigger package-install not package- install-untrusted Aug 28 11:28:53 jak-t480s polkitd(authority=local)[1744]: Operator of unix-session:2 FAILED to authenticate to gain authorization for action org.freedesktop.packagekit.package-install for system-bus-name::1.535

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1620459] Re: package bash-completion 1:2.1-4ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/apt', which is also in package apt 1.

2020-08-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Trusty is EOL. The system in question seems to be in an unsupported state. The apt version is old, and the upgrade seems to have been attempted with apt instead of do-release-upgrade (as do-release-upgrade would tell you to upgrade first). apt in trusty does not contain the bash completion, and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887407] Re: Distribution upgrade uninstalled TortoiseHG without asking me

2020-08-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Life is hard. Please read messages carefully, and keep backups/snapshots. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890006] Re: Hash mismatch on "apt update"

2020-08-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => libgcrypt20 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890006 Title: Hash mismatch on "apt update" Status in libgcrypt20

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1801338] Re: apt fails to properly handle server-side connection closure

2020-08-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This may be fixed now even. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1801338 Title: apt fails to properly handle server-side connection closure Status in apt package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888061] Re: "Line by line difference" of config files during release upgrade is an unreadable mess

2020-08-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Certainly not an apt bug. Feature request for like debconf, UCF, and dpkg? Or packagekit? Don't know ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890332] Re: apt update fails on docker arm container 20.04

2020-08-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Bug is probably invalid, as this is a problem on the non-Ubuntu host? ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => libseccomp (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891641] Re: package unattended-upgrades 2.3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed unattended-upgrades package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit sta

2020-08-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1627564 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1627564 Debconf crash due to assertion failure in ensure_surface_for_gicon [gtkiconhelper.c:493] (when png loader is missing/during upgrades) -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1627564] Re: Debconf crash due to assertion failure in ensure_surface_for_gicon [gtkiconhelper.c:493] (when png loader is missing/during upgrades)

2020-08-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Package changed: ubuntu => debconf (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564 Title: Debconf crash due to assertion failure in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892290] Re: PXE load Focal initrd.img-5.4.0-42-generic always timeout

2020-08-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Is one significantly larger than the other? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892290 Title: PXE load Focal initrd.img-5.4.0-42-generic always

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888698] Re: package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess was killed by signal (Aborted)

2020-08-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1627564 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1627564 Crash due to assertion failure in ensure_surface_for_gicon [gtkiconhelper.c:493] (when png loader is missing/during upgrades) -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888698] Re: package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess was killed by signal (Aborted)

2020-08-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Reassigning to gtk+3.0 though I don't really know what to do here, we need gtk operational during upgrades to show prompts. (frontend:10148): Gtk-WARNING **: 16:28:16.133: Could not load a pixbuf fro icon theme. This may indicate that pixbuf loaders or the mime database could

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876506] Re: eoan to focal upgrade hangs when lvm snapshot is present

2020-08-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Package changed: debconf (Ubuntu) => os-prober (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876506 Title: eoan to focal upgrade hangs when lvm snapshot is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1801338] Re: apt fails to properly handle server-side connection closure

2020-08-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I can't reproduce this anymore, so closing it. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890006] Re: Hash mismatch on "apt update"

2020-08-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Don't see any reason for any apport collecting here. This needs a clean reproducer or someone with the issue to do the work to analyse what's wrong. Looking at the bug report, the output from the reproducer matches that of the commandline tools? -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1802718] Re: Allow people to do sudo apt-get build-dep without any further configuration

2020-07-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Should probably be add-apt-repository deb-src ? ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => software-properties (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1802718] Re: Allow people to do sudo apt-get build-dep without any further configuration

2020-07-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Enabling by default does not make much sense and people usually use pull-lp-source instead which does not need sources.list entries and pulls directly from launchpad. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-07-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
@Colin: I agree with all of that. Our kernel-side default is not powersave, but performance, across generic and oem, at the very least: $ grep CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_.*=y /boot/config-5.* /boot/config-5.4.0-26-generic:CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886161] Re: UU should work on roaming laptops

2020-07-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We'll eventually get a retry support in apt, if updating failed, but there are no plans to react to connection state changes. The retry will be linear every 10 minutes or so I suppose, but can't be sure, we'll have to see - I'd do exponential, but systemd does not give us an option for that. Any

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886161] Re: UU should work on roaming laptops

2020-07-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This is not going to happen in apt. It's a question for desktop how to do that, probably disabling the downloading in apt, and using gnome's package kit refresh stuff instead. ** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-07-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
passing intel_pstate=disable_hwp on the kernel commandline causes the kernel to scale the Core i5-8250U down to 1.6 GHz in performance mode, but that's still a bit off from the 900 MHz it scales down to in powersave mode. I believe Windows also does not run the CPUs in performance mode by default

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-07-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The performance governor is the right choice for servers, but it's not the right choice on non-server platforms, it's also not the default kernel setting, it was set because we have the ondemand.service in userspace that can change it back to ondemand (or well we have the service because of that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886814] Re: posix_spawn usage in gnu make causes failures on s390x

2020-07-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Andreas, I've not gotten it more isolated, the minimum I had was running debian/tests/gnome-desktop-testing in a flatpak-builder source tree (apt source/pull-lp-source flatpak-builder). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876506] Re: eoan to focal upgrade hangs when lvm snapshot is present

2020-07-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The maintainer script becomes a zombie, because perl -w ... debconf/frontend ... memtest86+.postinst is stuck in a read() from fd 9, which is a pipe. ** Package changed: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Package changed: ubuntu => debconf (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876035] Re: Automatically retry downloads on failures

2020-07-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876035 Title: Automatically retry downloads on failures

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Re: apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

2020-07-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I have code to fix that just need to merge it and like update tests ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887277] Re: apt-get install REMOVES packages without replacing them and with barely any warning

2020-07-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You not liking apt's solution and only realizing that after you confirmed and applied it is not a bug in apt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887277 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887277] Re: apt-get install REMOVES packages without replacing them and with barely any warning

2020-07-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887277 Title: apt-get install REMOVES packages without replacing

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886618] Re: command-not-found gets stuck on locales with non-English-like collation rules

2020-07-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => command-not-found (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886618 Title: command-not-found gets stuck on locales with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-07-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-06-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
@rbalint As said before the kernel messages and bugs are irrelevant and wrong. They pretend like intel_pstate is different, when in fact it's this script that is configuring it here. And yes, it needs OS config. Nor do other distros not do this, but we do it differently. We set the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-06-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Someone probably needs to look at non-pstate systems as I have no idea about them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885730 Title: Bring back

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] [NEW] Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-06-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: In a recent merge from Debian we lost ondemand.service, meaning all CPUs now run in Turbo all the time when idle, which is clearly suboptimal. The discussion in bug 1806012 seems misleading, focusing on p-state vs other drivers, when in fact, the script actually set the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885410] Re: apt 2.0.2 lacks * wildcard support

2020-06-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872200 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872200 apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1669517] Re: apt-key del must absolutely detect all errors, and then provide NON-zero return code and error message

2020-06-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We will not be changing the behavior here. apt-key del working if they key was not present in the keyring is important to maintain, so that we do not break the maintainer scripts using it (which should be tested, and should be the only users of this). ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883723] Re: Some official repositories changed compression method from gzip to lz4 leading to checksum errors during apt-get update

2020-06-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You have enabled storing indexes in compressed form, which is a non- default setting that does not work very well. In early days, this used to store files in the form the server offered them, but this was changed to recompress to lz4 in order to improve the run time performance of apt.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883451] Re: can't pip isntall python-apt==1.6.5+ubuntu0.2

2020-06-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You can install python-apt from apt, we do not provide python-apt on pip. I recently got control over the pypi entry and need to do something with it. I'm not keen on providing python-apt outside of the distro, though (python-apt and apt versions x.y need to match), so I'd rather just get rid of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883079] Re: The "MMap::MMap(FileFd&, unsigned long)" symbol is missing in libapt-pkg.so

2020-06-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
MMap is an internal implementation detail that people have been using accidentally when they wanted to open the cache, where they should use pkgCacheFile for. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883079] Re: The "MMap::MMap(FileFd&, unsigned long)" symbol is missing in libapt-pkg.so

2020-06-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yes, that's by design. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883079 Title: The "MMap::MMap(FileFd&,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876035] Re: Automatically retry downloads on failures

2020-06-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Summary is that I don't believe the option as is is sufficient, and needs to be reworked, so I'm changing the title accordingly. ** Summary changed: - Consider making '-o Acquire::Retries=3' the default for 'apt-get update/install/dist-upgrade' + Automatically retry downloads on failures --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 574287] Re: tasksel: forcefully removes packages when tasks overlap

2020-05-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The easiest way out would be to just remove tasksel once the d-i images are gone, and it's no longer needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574287 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713219] Re: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow

2020-05-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I'm not going to add a second independent reader to apt just so that apt-mark runs a bit faster. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219 Title: 'apt-mark

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713219] Re: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow

2020-05-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The problem is that the code that reads the state reads it into the depcache. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219 Title: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show'

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There are two things: - On servers, ubuntu-server depends on mdadm, so removing mdadm also removes ubuntu-server package, which means it's not really supported - In general, the installers don't offer installing like that. I don't know why we did not have a task for xenial. ** Description

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
That's certainly incorrect, lvm2 was fixed in focal (and hence groovy). That only leaves xenial, but updating xenial close to its EOL for something as unusual as this seems unneccessary. The supported configuration for raid1 is mdadm after all, not removing mdadm and the meta packages that depend

[Touch-packages] [Bug 645404] Re: Support Private PPAs

2020-05-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I was about ready to get back to reviewing this (or just saying meh, I don't see anything obviously wrong, so just upload it) 3 months ago when you declared that you gave up on the MR. I don't see how creating a new tool is easier than just uploading your changes. Both have the same effect of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876035] Re: Consider making '-o Acquire::Retries=3' the default for 'apt-get update/install/dist-upgrade'

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
A few points to think about: 1. I am not aware of anyone using that option, we don't know if it works and how it behaves 2. Given 1, what kind of testing can we do? This needs to be thoroughly tested, given that it's not been tested at all. 3. Switching IPs might be useful, but it's not clear

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877987] Re: apt search coredumping

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Fixed in 2.1.3, will look into adding a test case and backporting this to 2.0 shortly. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The regressions in bionic seem unrelated to me adding the raid1 module to the list of modules installed to the initramfs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509717

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
eoan verified. So, eoan is tougher. I installed it with subiquity and tried to follow the steps, but failed to convert to raid1, apparently, subiquity created the LV 1 PE larger than before or something, so it needed 1 free PE in the original PV to be able to add the raid1 metadata, which it did

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
verified in bionic Did all the steps (install vm, create pv, extend pv, remove dmadm, upgrade). It booted after the upgrade to 2.02.176-4.1ubuntu3.18.04.3, and it failed again following a downgrade to the 2.02.176-4.1ubuntu3.18.04.2 from updates pocket. ** Tags removed:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm installed. [Test case] 1. Install server with subiquity to LVM 2. Add second disk to it 3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb 4. Run vgextend ubuntu-vg /dev/vdb 5. Run lvconvert

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm installed. [Test case] 1. Install server with subiquity to LVM - 2. Add second disk to it - 3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb - 4. Run vgextend ubuntu-vg /dev/vdb - 5. Run lvconvert

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm installed. [Test case] - 1. Install server with subiquity to VM + 1. Install server with subiquity to LVM 2. Add second disk to it 3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb 4. Run

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1509717] Re: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is not loaded

2020-05-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
sorry, working on verifying it, got distracted by other stuff. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509717 Title: Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872200] Re: apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases

2020-05-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
FWIW, The upload has been superceded by a security update, and will need revalidation when 2.0.4 is uploaded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200 Title:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >