This fix will be included in grub2-unsigned/2.06-2ubuntu14.1 for
kinetic, jammy, focal, bionic. Binaries have been built in
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
for kinetic.
Signing request: https://answers.launchpad.net/canonical-signing-
jobs/+question/704589
Marking as verified per test instructions, as the autopkgtests have all
passed (and the reported regression also has been fixed in a retry
apparently, hooray).
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-kinetic
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy verification-done-kinetic
I think it's better to ship slightly wrong documentation in the wrong
place than to ship the right documentation in a language users don't
understand, so that's why they don#t get updated in stable releases.
I do not think the apt.conf manual page is a good idea in the first
place. These options
As David wrote, the behavior here is correct. linux-lowlatency is a
binary package provided by linux-meta-lowlatency, for which you are
requesting the source code.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Patches are welcome but unfortunately there isn't much we can do
otherwise, this highly depends on network specifics like latency and
mtus and is never reliably reproducible.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
The entire upload will be uploaded to all older releases but we do have
a security upload already in the unapproved queues that should go out
first, but that needs approving those first, them passing the SRU
verification, a resigning against the new signing key the new shim
needs, and finally
** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to findutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973788
Title:
Merge findutils 4.9.0-3 from
The term you're looking for is workaround, not triage or fixes. Triage
is the process of understanding the bug and marking it the correct
things.
Not using the same language as everyone else and writing very long
comments makes it hard to understand.
First I thought you reported an out of memory
Hi ybdjkfd I don't really understand what you are doing and how it's
relevant. This issue should be fixed in lunar-proposed 2.06-2ubuntu16,
please only add comments if you have meaningful insights regarding the
verification of that update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
It's actually the exact same backtrace in that bug as here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
This is pretty straightforward because ubuntu-drivers-common got ported
from apt.Cache to apt_pkg.Cache to be fast enough, but software-
properties still passed it in apt.Cache.
It's the same bug as bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
I have now picked all the rhboot patches in 2.06-2ubuntu16~ppa1 in
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
and will boot that before uploading to the archive.
This *should* allow initrds over 4GB but obviously bugs could be there.
The important bit is that we are now
Tests have passed on the infra with both old apt and the new apt (I
retriggered it with u-u as additional trigger), so this is good to go.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug
It's quite clear that this *cannot* fail, so the problem must be
something else like yet another seccomp borkage.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => docker.io (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998325
Title:
Please me
Uploaded.
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notificatio
I'm setting Lunar to fix released as the fix is in 2.5.0. Despite it not
being released yet, we'd otherwise just forget about it.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Type checking fails in CI
[Test plan]
Have CI type check successfully
[Where problems could occur]
It's only a comment *inside* the function, so not really anywhere.
** Affects: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Fix Released
**
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ Large files can't be downloaded as we use a 32-bit integer in AcquireFile
constructor, this breaks e.g. command-not-found generator:
+
I'm trying to update the command-not-found indexes (bin/cnf-extract.py
$MIRROR $suite $component $arch) on the
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu Kinetic)
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997036
Title:
python-apt: FTBFS with Python 3.11
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyth
>>> acq=apt.apt_pkg.Acquire()
>>> apt.apt_pkg.AcquireFile(acq,"http://foo;, "foo", size=2875204834)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Public bug reported:
Despite support being in fcc-unlock.d
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 2c7c:030a Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd.
Quectel EM05-G
the modem remains locked and enabling it fails:
jak@jak-t14-g3:~:master$ mmcli -m any -e
error: couldn't enable the modem:
@Craig The limit in Debian is actually much lower than in Ubuntu even,
but fixing it there is even harder as that misses a lot more patches.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
I encourage flavours using Qt to fix this if they care about it.
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
Seeing the comment now, I want to point out that /usr takes precedence
over /, so if the command is available there is no overhead - only in
the error case.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
APT currently launches dpkg in the same environment as it is launched in
leaking all sorts of environment variables to it, only overriding PATH
with a sensible default.
This is suboptimal, apt should clean the environment more thoroughly or
populate a clean environment from
Removing the foundations-todo tag for now because I can control both the
removal and the bug fix.
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973830
Title:
Error upgrading f
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977630
Title:
machinectl
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pa
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank) => Benjamin Drung (bdrung)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pa
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993478
Title:
package openssh-server
If phasing upgrades are hidden in upgrade output then the output shows
you relevant info to the update only which is nice. I kind of feel like
`apt upgrade` and friends should show you only unexpected things. Like
often people install 100 packages and then miss that they also remove 20
that they
** Summary changed:
- When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should say so
+ When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should say nothing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
** Tags added: fr-2934
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842320
Title:
Can't boot: "error: out of memory." immediately after the grub menu
Status
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
2.5.4 uploaded to unstable.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Lunar)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995247
Title:
: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: High
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status: Triaged
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Importance: High
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status
I think it's a bug where update-manager installs those additional
packages which stems from its implementation of phased updates, but it's
also not a priority to work on because this only happens when an SRU
introduces a new dependency which does not happen all that often.
** Package changed: apt
Really the workaround is to set MODULES=dep in /etc/initramfs-
tools/initramfs.conf, this yields a much smaller initramfs (but you
can't take out the disk and boot it in another machine), disabling
secure boot or sgx should not be doing anything.
** Also affects: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992513
Title:
apt will not install
Impact:
I miss new events because I no longer get calendar notifications because
the calendar does not sync anymore when that happens.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
It does yeah, and obviously that's a solver bug that's going to need
some more work to root cause.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973830
Title:
Error upgrading from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04
Status
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990684
Title:
grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but
** Tags added: foundation-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982583
Title:
Fix for zlib CRC32 optimization for s390x
Status in Ubuntu on IBM z
Your /boot partition ran out of space, consider increasing its size or
cleaning it up
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1992246 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992246
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1992246
package linux-firmware 20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.5 failed to
install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script
Sponsored.
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992206
Title:
bash: non existent locale
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
As this needs SRUing presumably, as it's broken in kinetic, this needs a
description of the impact. What does it mean that the state changed, how
does it impact the user?
Is this something security team wants to address, should foundations
address this?
** Also affects: sudo (Ubuntu Jammy)
On my kinetic system, /dev has nosuid, but no noexec.
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991975
Title:
dev file
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: zram-config (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Likely same issue as bug 1974196, reassigning to apt for further
investigation.
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Adding a focal task as bug 1973830 seems to be caused by the same issue.
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973470
Title:
Ubuntu-bug command can't find Firefox on Lubuntu Kinetic
Status in Apport:
Qt frontend broken, seems to access self.cache[module_packages] where
module_packages is not a string or pair of strings, causing a TypeError.
Don't know if anyone actively maintains that.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in:
I cannot reproduce the issue in kinetic's 3.2.5, seems the issue does
not actually exist. If the issue exists in any stable release, I believe
it is minor enough to not warrant a stable release update.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug
This does not appear to be an Ubuntu system, but a pop os one. Neither
does it appear to be an upgrade to 21.04 for that matter as the bug
says. It also involves various downgrades. Either way this is all very
unsupported.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Is there anything left to do here?
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991771
Title:
[FFe] Update to 3.0.6
Status in openssl
I looked at the queues for focal and jammy but did not find any zlib
uploads as indicated by "in progress" per SRU policy, so reset the
status to "triaged".
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Triaged
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress =>
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Faisol Lutfi (lutfi87) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979244
Title:
libssl-dev : Depends: libssl3
OK the patch set here is broken, we gotta do this from scratch properly.
So I'm going to start cherry picking the rhboot patches for memory
management. I have applied so far from bug 1989446 the backport of "Try
to pick better locations for kernel and initrd" and cherry-picked from
rhboot the
Our goal should be to merge the entire patch series into kinetic, worst
case, kinetic will not be installable for some users. This means we will
have decent results from people trying that in the next 4 weeks (by Oct
27 the release has been out 1 week).
In the meantime, next week we should push
@Brian Phasing apt is not an issue, it's only when multiple SRUs depend
on each other that the issues being fixed here actually happen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
This discussion needs to be taken upstream, it's not our place to decide
what is right.
** Tags removed: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097467
** Tags removed: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990586
Title:
22.04: python3* mismatched phasing breaks dist-upgrades
Status in apt package
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991139
Title:
prompted to remove systemd-hwe-hwdb but re-installed via updates
** Tags removed: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990429
Title:
software-properties uses deprecated apt-key
Status in
Tests have passed successfully for 2.4.8 on all architectures (except
i386, which is expected):
(276/290) Testcase test-ubuntu-bug-1990586: W: Ignoring failure of dpkg
--add-architecture as it is likely due to pkg-config-dpkghook (see #824774)
P P
** Tags removed: verification-needed
It seems the autopkgtest runs have finished for 2.4.8 as well, and all
passed, so marking as verified once again.
For those stalking the test logs,
(239/290) Testcase test-phased-updates-upgrade: W: Ignoring failure of dpkg
--add-architecture as it is likely due to pkg-config-dpkghook (see
elatllat no that's non-sense on multiple levels
a) the grub update is not phasing anymore so it's not reproducing the bug, we
bumped it back to proposed. There's no phasing there so it just works anyway
b) setting the option in the config file would work around the bug too. Of
course you added
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ Phased updates with interdependencies can become uninstallable, breaking the
upgrade command (and presumably dist-upgrade), so it cannot upgrade
+ anything anymore
+
+ [Test plan]
+ We cannot reproduce the exact failure here, but we have included a minimal
-extensions (Ubuntu Jammy)
** No longer affects: python3.10 (Ubuntu Jammy)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) =&g
ub2-signed (Ubuntu Jammy)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990684
This issue seems to have been a funny bug in the solver, actually, and
not a bug in the phased update code itself.
So what happened is that we kept back grub-efi-amd64-signed, and it was
broken. So now the solver iterates over its dependencies and tries to
keep them back too. Except well, when
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
I have the fix ready in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/merge_requests/262, as well as adding support for phased
updates to EDSP, I'm just working on adding test cases (basically
minimizing the EDSP and dumping it in the dir tbh).
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =>
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1990586 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990586
The other bug has more info so marking this as a duplicate as it's the
same issue basically, same cause anyway.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1990586
22.04: python3* mismatched phasing
Ken, could you perhaps attach the /etc/machine-id or just comment the
string in it? I can't find a machine-id that would trigger the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
1 - 100 of 2205 matches
Mail list logo
