Well, if you are doing this in the command-line, then generally it would
be seen as strange if something GUI wise popped up. And especially so
would it be useless if you were in the console with no GUI or you were
using apt as a dependency of another program. Then this popup might
become quite a nu
** Also affects: ubuntu-gnome
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Also affects: ubuntu-gnome
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692561
Title:
Version 4.5 has been released
Statu
** Summary changed:
- Version 4.5 has beel released
+ Version 4.5 has been released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692561
Title:
Version 4.5 has been rele
Public bug reported:
Version 4.5 has just been released so it would be nice to get it into
the repositories some time soon: https://github.com/shadow-
maint/shadow/releases/tag/4.5
** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification
I have also found this issue in gnome-builder so I believe it to be a
GTK+ issue.
** Project changed: gedit => gtk
** No longer affects: gedit (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
@Phillip, Wayland actually does accommodate it, I have an Arch system
where it works perfectly fine with running GParted as root. The reason
it doesn't work on Ubuntu is not completely because of Wayland, but
rather because of how Wayland has been set up by the Ubuntu GNOME team.
Which is intention
@Phillip, This is an intended policy and it is there for security
reasons so rather than decreasing security standards, I think it would
be best for GParted to simply meet them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
I have found that on Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 with GNOME 3.22 that I am unable
to remove signing keys in the Authentication tab. If I select a key I
wish to remove and click the Remove button, either nothing will happen,
or it will ask me for authentication, upon giving it the corre
** Project changed: gnome-terminal => gtk
** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in
This update fixes the issues for me and there are currently no
noticeable regressions on my Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 GNOME 3.22 64-bit
system.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags added: yakkety
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Attachment added: "Gobbledygook name in Nautilus sidebar"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1638245/+attachment/4794160/+files/Screenshot%20from%202016-12-19%2021-14-42.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
I tested this in an Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 GNOME 3.20 64-bit VM and found
that with the new update the issue goes away and the problem here is
fixed. Although it should be noted that after updating to the new
version it shows any mounted partitions with a long gobbledygook name in
the sidebar when runn
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638245
Title:
Files in the root of a folder on anothe
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638245
Title:
Files in the root of a folder on anoth
** Also affects: ubuntu-gnome
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633824
Title:
nautilus ignores trash on external
** Description changed:
For some reason I often find that if I try to report a .crash (which the
GUI for some reason didn't alert me about) file this will happen (this
happens with all the Apport tools to report a crash, this just so
happens to be the apport-cli example):
-
*** Send
Public bug reported:
For some reason I often find that if I try to report a .crash (which the
GUI for some reason didn't alert me about) file this will happen (this
happens with all the Apport tools to report a crash, this just so
happens to be the apport-cli example):
*** Send problem report to
After communicating with the upstream GNOME Shell project it has been
found that this issue is more likely in UPower:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774717#c7
** No longer affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: upower (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Bu
This issue is no longer present on trusty.
** Tags removed: trusty
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
I have tested the packages from -proposed on both Trusty and Xenial and
I can confirm that they both solve the problem with no currently
noticeable regressions.
The package versions I tested were:
- Xenial: 0.6.40-2ubuntu11.3
- Trusty: 0.6.35-0ubuntu7.3
I tested the Xenial one in an Ubuntu GNOME
** Patch added: "FixLogoutTimesInLogin-HistoryTrusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1443052/+attachment/4770694/+files/FixLogoutTimesInLogin-HistoryTrusty.debdiff
** Summary changed:
- User accounts login history showing incorrect history
+ User
The patch does not seem to be compatible with the version of
accountsservice on Precise, however I have adapted it for Trusty and
tested it in a VM and it works. So here is a debdiff for it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is s
** No longer affects: unity-control-center (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443052
Title
You're welcome! It seems as though I accidentally gave it a .patch
extension when I should have given it a .debdiff extension. Shall I
change that or just leave it as it is?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to acco
** Description changed:
+ Impact
+ ---
+
+ Logout times for users are correct if user logs off and then shutdown
+ from GDM, however logout times are wrong if user shutdowns directly
+ from the user session, because DEAD_PROCESS record is missing in that
+ case and BOOT_TIME record is used in
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nikita Yerenkov-Scott (yerenkov-scott)
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nikita Yerenkov-Scott (yerenkov-scott)
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) =&g
** Also affects: ubuntu-gnome
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
So this update should be backported in to prior releases as I can
confirm that it does now fix the problem, I think that it didn't work
for me immediately because of a local issue on my system caused by
something else earlier.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
** Tags added: yakkety
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592177
Title:
Built-in search almost impossible to use in GTK file chooser
Status in GTK+:
Confir
Public bug reported:
Since upgrading from Ubuntu GNOME 16.04.1 with GNOME 3.20 to Ubuntu
GNOME 16.10 with GNOME 3.22 I have found that whenever I am installing
something which needs to:
Processing triggers for libglib2.0-0:amd64 (2.50.0-1) ...
That I get the following message immediately aft
Now this is very strange, I restarted my machine, it didn't work. But
after restarting it the second time for some reason it started working
as it should so I assume that the patch does work, just something odd
happened somewhere, but it is all fine now.
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
** Tags added: yakkety
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
I tried it in my Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 with GNOME 3.20 VM.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443052
Title:
User accounts login history showing incorrect
This update still doesn't fix the issue for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443052
Title:
User accounts login history showing incorrect history
** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nikita Yerenkov-Scott (yerenkov-scott)
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nikita Yerenkov-Scott (yerenkov-scott)
** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nikita Yeren
You're welcome!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178402
Title:
tracker-extract crashed with signal 5 in g_malloc()
Status in Tracker:
Fix Released
Status
** Patch added: "FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowXenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1178402/+attachment/4758339/+files/FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowXenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is su
** Patch added: "FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowTrusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1178402/+attachment/4758338/+files/FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowTrusty.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is su
I have made some small improvements to the changelogs of the patches and
am reuploading them.
** Patch removed: "FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowXenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1178402/+attachment/4758204/+files/FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowXenial.debdiff
** Patch re
** Patch added: "FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowXenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tracker/+bug/1178402/+attachment/4758204/+files/FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowXenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
Does this issue even occur on Precise?
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178402
Title:
tracker-ex
** Patch added: "FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowTrusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tracker/+bug/1178402/+attachment/4758205/+files/FixPossibleGIFIntegerOverflowTrusty.debdiff
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
Due to large differences in code I do not currently have a debdiff for
Precise, but I will upload my Trusty and Xenial ones now.
** Description changed:
+ * Impact
+ An integer overflow occurs when tracker-extract comes across an extremely
large GIF image or one which is specifically crafted.
+
Also it seems as though the fix is already in the version on Yakkety. So
just backporting it into the previous releases.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117840
An upstream fix has been released, I am working on making debdiffs for
this now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178402
Title:
tracker-extract crashed with
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #758315
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758315
** Changed in: tracker
Importance: Medium => Unknown
** Changed in: tracker
Status: Confirmed => Unknown
** Changed in: tracker
Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #771184 => GNOME Bug Track
** Patch added: "openjpeg2FixCVE-2016-8332+CVE-2016-7163Yakkety.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg/+bug/1630702/+attachment/4757533/+files/openjpeg2FixCVE-2016-8332+CVE-2016-7163Yakkety.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
T
** Patch added: "openjpeg2FixCVE-2016-8332+CVE-2016-7163Xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg/+bug/1630702/+attachment/4757534/+files/openjpeg2FixCVE-2016-8332+CVE-2016-7163Xenial.debdiff
** Changed in: openjpeg2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
**
This was my conclusion after looking through the CVEs in the list for
openjpeg2:
CVE-2014-7945: Half done but unconfirmable (some files are so different I am
unable to find the relevant lines in them).
CVE-2014-7947: Can’t find patch.
CVE-2015-8871: Seems a patched.
CVE-2016-1923: Can’t find patc
I have just started working on applying the patches and making a debdiff
for openjpeg, however I have got a slight problem, none of the files I
am trying to patch seem similar enough in the 1.5.2 version to actually
be patched, I just can't find the right places to insert and remove the
code so I a
Right, I don't really have any way of testing whether the patches have
been applied correctly so I will just make the debdiffs and upload them.
But I will have to do this at the weekend because I do not have any time
to do this now. I will be away from my computer until then.
--
You received thi
Seth, I can make the debdiffs for all the releases if I can find patches
which I can apply. However I'm not sure that I really know enough to
actually test if the vulnerability is still exploitable with the patched
version. So I don't think that I would be able to test them. Would it
still be worth
I can create said debdiffs if there is nobody else better to do them.
I'm just not incredibly experienced with this sort of thing (though I
have successfully made debdiffs in the past and had them accepted) and
in the past I was able to provide a debdiff which would then be altered
by the person in
** Also affects: openjpeg2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openjpeg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1630702
Title:
CVE-2016-8332 allows an out-
I assume that I should create a debdiff for this anyway. What do you
think? And do I need to make one for each release or do you think that
someone else can deal with altering my debdiff to be able to be in any
release they want it to be in (if there is somebody to do that that is)?
--
You receiv
Seth, I will take a look at those soon after I have created a debdiff
for this (that is if nobody else has done so by the time I do it, which
hopefully will be some time tomorrow).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
** Description changed:
A security vulnerability was recently disclosed in openjpeg and assigned
the CVE number of CVE-2016-8332.
The vulnerability is described here (http://www.zdnet.com/article
/openjpeg-zero-day-flaw-leads-to-remote-code-execution/):
"
Cisco Talos researchers
I can't find a package under the name of openjpeg2 in the repositories,
all I can find is openjpeg5 which is not at this version. Could someone
please confirm what is happening with this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
** Summary changed:
- Backport in patch to fix CVE-2016-8332
+ CVE-2016-8332 allows an out-of-bound heap write to occur resulting in heap
corruption and arbitrary code execution
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-8332
** Tags added: precise trusty xenial
** Tags added: yakkety
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openjpeg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
A security vulnerability was recently disclosed in openjpeg and assigned
the CVE number of CVE-2016-8332.
The vulnerability is described here (http://www.zdnet.com/article
/openjpeg-zero-day-flaw-leads-to-remote-code-exec
** Description changed:
- It would be really useful if you could at least set it so that Ubuntu
- does not suspend in a certain amount of time whilst an application is
- fullscreen. As I have found this very annoying when streaming, because
- even though the program is fullscreen and I am watching
This issue is still present on Trusty.
** Summary changed:
- Suspending while a program is full-screen
+ Suspending while a program is fullscreen
** Description changed:
It would be really useful if you could at least set it so that Ubuntu
does not suspend in a certain amount of time whilst
I find that on most times the bug occurs, but not always. Though it has
caused me some problems before with /boot filling up and me being forced
to manually remove the old kernels.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
As Vim 8.0 has now been released:
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/vim_announce/EKTuhjF3ET0 This
version should be backported into currently supported releases.
** Affects: ubuntu-gnome
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: vim (Ubuntu)
Im
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #771184
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771184
** Also affects: tracker via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771184
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
I now experience this issue constantly and many many times a day.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178402
Title:
tracker-extract crashed with signal 5 in g_
I am running Ubuntu GNOME 16.04.1 with GNOME 3.20 and I just experienced
this issue.
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Status: Expired => Confirmed
** Tags added: xenial
** Also affects: tracker (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu)
Status:
Public bug reported:
I have noticed that after upgrading from Ubuntu GNOME 15.10 to 16.04
with GNOME 3.20 that searching for files and folders in the Activities
Overview takes much much longer when previously (before upgrading) it
would find them almost instantly as it currently does with applicat
I also experienced this issue, first on an Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 VM, now on
my Ubuntu GNOME 16.04.1 installation. In my case the files also appear
identical.
** Also affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: New => Confirmed
** Also affects
** Description changed:
Ever since Nautilus had that little thing in the top bar indicating how
long it would take to copy or delete something, Nautilus has always
behaved strangely, normally showing "Preparing" for the entirety of the
time and then magically disappearing when it is done a
@Severus Tux, Yes, I am getting the same, I think it time I did file a
bug report against that package, this is getting a little bit too much.
Though maybe I will have a look at the dconf-editor and gnome-tweak-tool
options first because I was sure there was something about touchpad
usability area
Also, I have just noticed that when I install this package, although it
fixes the problem it does something crazy to the mouse sensitivity
(possibly) and speed, but no matter what I do with the speed settings I
can't stop it just jumping and shaking all the time even if I'm not even
trying to move
** Also affects: gsettings-desktop-schemas via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766964
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gsettings-desktop-schemas
in Ubu
Wait, I understand that this issue is affecting all distros, so is this
a downstream issue or an upstream one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gsettings-desktop-schemas
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
@Jeremy,
Yes, installing that and then logging out and in again solves the
problem and even adds a new section to the gnome-control-center's Mouse
& Touchpad settings. This package should really be installed by default
and as a dependency of something.
** No longer affects: gsettings-desktop-sche
Public bug reported:
I think this is just the touchpad, though I don't have a mouse to test
this with so it could also be affecting the mouse or a wider range of
settings. But I have found that after upgrading to GNOME 3.20 on Ubuntu
GNOME 16.04 that all my gsettings for things like natural scroll
Right, sorry, don't know how that mistake got in there, but with the
correct version it doesn't really work that much better. I see a small
black box (I adjusted the URL to a proper one) which upon being enlarged
does a while flashing stairs like pattern and flashes the top and right
side when I tr
The output of running that is:
file:///home/tester/test.qml:2 module "com.canonical.Oxide" version
2.12 is not installed
And then it just exits.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu.
h
I am now running Ubuntu GNOME 15.10 with GNOME 3.18 and know for a fact
that I did not type anything wrong, I simply executed 'sudo apt-get
dist-upgrade' and this is how it went:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calcula
Well, glxgears runs fine without error.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574322
Title:
"webbrowser-app: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.s
I have checked and that file is present:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Apr 23 12:42 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/mesa/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2.0
I have tried reinstalling it with the command you gave and it
reinstalled successfully, however the error when webbrowser-app is run
remains the same.
Yes, that package is already installed on the VM.
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Changed in: oxide
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573762
Title:
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - webbrowser-app does not launc
No, it does not, if I try to launch it I get this #1574322.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574371
Title:
Launching pre-install Amazon app on Ubuntu
Sorry, I thought it would link to that bug automatically, but that is
the ID for the bug on LaunchPad.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574371
Title:
Public bug reported:
I have recently found that when launching the pre-installed Amazon app
on Ubuntu 16.04 that it launches the webbrowser-app which flashes
uncontrollably until quit. When running it in Terminal with "unity-
webapps-runner --amazon --app-id=ubuntu-amazon-default" the first output
Public bug reported:
I have recently found that on Ubuntu 16.04 (in a 64-bit VirtualBox VM)
that the webbrowser-app application does not start when launched from
the launcher (it flashes for a little bit but then stops and does
nothing else). If I however try to launch it from Terminal I get:
I am testing this on Ubuntu GNOME 16.04 with GNOME 3.19, but no matter
what I do, I don't seem to be able to install your PPA's version of the
gnome-control-center over the current version, not even removing the old
one and reinstalling, it just reinstalls the old one.
--
You received this bug no
@Tim, Ah, that might be it, I didn't look at the versions in such
detail...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556684
Title:
gnome-control-center.real
I have tested your fix and I still get this as the output but no
Japanese install:
** (gnome-control-center.real:3528): WARNING **: Ignoring launcher gufw
(missing desktop file)
** (gnome-control-center.real:3528): WARNING **: Ignoring launcher
landscape-client-settings (missing des
@Gunnar, Yes, that's what I started off by doing. Everything was up-to-
date when I tried this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556684
Title:
gnome
@Tim, I have tested again using the updated packages in your PPA and now
it crashes immediately as I open the "Region & Language" section, I
don't even see the section, as soon as I click the button to go there it
crashes and the output in Terminal is this:
** (gnome-control-center:1762): WARN
@Tim, Ok, I have tested your version on Ubuntu GNOME 16.04 Beta 1 with
GNOME 3.18, and though it hangs longer, it still gives a similar output
and a segmentation fault. I can provide the core dump if you want?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded p
Public bug reported:
I have recently noticed that when running Apport, if one presses the
little "X" to close Apport during the time when it is collecting or
sending the bug information, instead of it behaving as though you have
pressed "Cancel" and closing, it becomes unresponsive and I am asked
I have now also filed a report upstream on this issue:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762565
** Summary changed:
- Content indexing spamming syslog and logging personal information (emails etc)
+ Content indexing spamming syslog and logging personal information (emails
etc) - there s
This issue is still present under Ubuntu GNOME 15.10 with GNOME 3.18.
** Tags added: wily
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477489
Title:
Content indexing s
So clearly it does not properly provide the schemas in that package and
that is probably where the bug is.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523929
Title:
"N
I already have that package installed.
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523929
Title:
"No suc
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo