RE: Tiny modem

2001-04-12 Thread Joe Finlayson
Jeffrey, At my previous place of employment, we made use of a Multitech Modem Module which was dropped into our product. My recollection is that it was apprx. 2 x 2, maybe larger. Thx, Joe -Original Message- From: Dr. Jeffrey Race [mailto:jr...@attglobal.net] Sent: Wednesday,

Philippines Certs

2002-11-12 Thread Joe Finlayson
* ...OLE_Obj... Joe Finlayson Manager, Compliance Engineering Telica, Inc. 734 Forest Street, Bldg. G, Suite 100 Marlboro, MA 01752 Tel:(508) 804-8212 Fax:(508) 480-0922 Email: jfinlay...@telica.com Web:www.telica.com

RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface

2002-10-02 Thread Joe Finlayson
Roger, Thanks for the contact. I will do just that and post the response from Mr. Bogers. Anyone want to bet a beer on this one?? ;-) Thx, Joe -Original Message- From: Roger Magnuson [mailto:ro...@tgc.se] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:07 PM To: Joe Finlayson

RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface

2002-10-02 Thread Joe Finlayson
-LDC009 [mailto:dave.clem...@motorola.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:47 AM To: 'Joe Finlayson'; TREG Newsgroup; 'EMC PSTC'; 'NEBS Newsgroup' Subject: RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface Joe, Maybe I have missed something here but how does the TNV-X vs SELV from a safety

RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface

2002-10-02 Thread Joe Finlayson
...@motorola.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:05 AM To: 'Joe Finlayson'; TREG Newsgroup Subject: RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface This whole discussion is some what of a moot point. Under the RTTE directive there are no mandatory telecom standards anyway. Dave Clement

RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface

2002-10-02 Thread Joe Finlayson
(only available to Network Operators). Thx, Joe -Original Message- From: Pausch, Robert [mailto:robert.pau...@hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:05 AM To: Joe Finlayson; TREG Newsgroup Subject: RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface Joe, my position

RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface

2002-10-01 Thread Joe Finlayson
...@nortelnetworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:57 PM To: 'Joe Finlayson'; EMC-PSTC (E-mail) Subject: RE: RTTE or LVD for Equipment with E1 SELV interface Joe, The RTTED applies to the following types of equipment: 1) Radio equipment 2) Terminal equipment. The Directive also contains

Re: FCC Part 68 and Industry Canads CS-03 Rev 8 on Web

1997-04-15 Thread Joe Finlayson
Is there any easier way to download CS-03. I found over 20 files to compile. __ Reply Separator _ Subject: FCC Part 68 and Industry Canads CS-03 Rev 8 on Web Author: David Patton pat...@primenet.com at smtp

IEC 950 / UL 1950 creepage and clearance requirements

1997-05-08 Thread Joe Finlayson
** Joe Finlayson Manager, Compliance Engineering Microcom, Inc.

Re: Part 68 Continuing compliance

1997-05-21 Thread Joe Finlayson
Larry, It is called out in the Form 730 application guide, Exhibit G. You are also required to sign a declaration when submitting for Part 68 that states you will comply with the Continuing Compliance requirement. Joe

NEBS chassis maximum depth requirements

1997-09-03 Thread Joe Finlayson
I am not able to find is the maximum depth requirements. Any and all input would be greatly appreciated as well as a reference to the pertinent section in the NEBS document. Regards, Joe Finlayson Manager Compliance Engineering Compaq

Enforcement of NRTL Mark on Telecom equipment

1997-04-11 Thread Joe Finlayson
My understanding is that it is a requirement in the US/Canada that any equipment intended to connect to the telephone network must have an NRTL Mark. Can anyone advise where this requirement is called out (NEC??) and how it is enforced? Thx,

Re[2]: TBR21 Adoption

1997-12-17 Thread Joe Finlayson
, Joe Finlayson Manager Compliance Engineering Compaq, Microcom Subsidiary __ Reply Separator _ Subject: Re: TBR21 Adoption Author: pan...@europe.shiva.com at smtp List-Post: treg@world.std.com Date:12/17/97 9:05 AM