So after I wrote that last post, I went in Nautilus to go look at the
directories where the script would change the changelogs to ending with
.old, and low and behold, they were already .old. What I realize now is,
first I did steps 1 through 4, then realized I had forgotten to do the
Alucardx
I agree with you 100percent in your comment. Everything was capitalized
based on fix IP and not NAT.
I'll stick to the GNU.ORG opinion..
One easy thing to try is the latest Linux-libre kernel, from e.g.
http://jxself.org/linux-libre/
Your answer reveal that you have not read the scientific documentation I
provided for you.
Please read it, and you will see that the cancer-risk is not only related to
V/m.
My Apologies to the rest, but my comments are directed toward that NEGRO
and his ranting BABOSO mouth. Yes, He has the right to express himself,
freely. But, when you read between the lines, How deceiving and extrovert
behavior that NEGRO carries, he is just another son of anarchy and
Yes you are correct, My apologies.
The Next time, Ill just type my comments in the form of a Morse code of
smiley..
Click on those links:
When Patents Attack!
When Patents Attack... Part Two!
As gnu.org mentions this opens the possibility that someone might charge one
billion dollars for their source code, calling that reasonable and
affordable (to use your words) because of all of the blood, sweat and tears
that went into it. They theyn get to pretend that their program is free
My reasoning behind this approach is that once even one person buys the
source code at that price, they will be able to redistribute it freely. So I
don't think anyone's freedom is harmed.
What connectors does that tablet have?
Please do not make your replies to my comments top-level. There should be a
reply link on my comments; please use those.
Bad luck. I got the same problem (ia32-libs-multiarch is not installable) on
my clean Trisquel installation. At this point I have four suggestions for
you:
Try doing
The price does still need to be reasonable. If someone did charge a billion
dollars, it realistically is never going to be bought by anyone. (If it's
bought by a billionaire, that billionaire probably isn't going to give it
away to the public, either.) And of course, if more money than
Part II: Oh, Freedom
http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/snowden/SnowdenAndTheFuture-PartII.webm
That wasn't what I was saying. I'm wondering if one could charge the same
price for both the source code and the binaries, and distribute them
separately.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've raised a bug here: https://trisquel.info/en/issues/10048
I've noticed that the current version of abrowser tells me to install flash
on certain websites, via an icon next the the address bar (just left of the
favicon).
There's a little
Thank you for your bug report. I believe its priority should be critical.
The GNU GPL license does not really suits artistic works (what is its source
code?). What about the famous Creative Commons BY-SA. The SA (for
ShareAlike) part is a copyleft (similar to GPL's copyleft).
I was told that CC is delicate because there are many different versions and
some of them allow the work to be used for comercial stuff. Please correct
me, if I am wrong
GPL is normally used for works where source and binary are the same,
like shell scripts or bitmap graphics, it works as if the work was in
source form. CC-BY-SA is not sufficient if these forms are different:
it doesn't require making the source available to users of binary
versions. (It is a
Just use a license that says Attribution or Attribution-ShareAlike, but none
of the others are libre.
Actually, you just touched a sensitive subject. Generally speaking, for a
free artwork to be compatible with a free software, it's recommended to
license it under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
license.
It's not recommended to use the NonCommercial and NoDerivs
Just this: http://neo900.org/
PS: Now I've been hit hard by Firefox OS device vs. KDE Vivaldi tablet vs.
new Neo dilemma as for seeking true FOSS-friendly drop-in replacement for
old-fashioned Symbian based SonyEricsson Cedar. (=
Footnote: Yeah, I am aware of cell tower triangulation and
A wallpaper with the NonCommercial restriction couldn't be included in
Trisquel, as then it wouldn't be legal to sell[0] copies of it.
[0] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
The notice should say enable Gnash.
Looks pretty neat.
1. What is TAILS useful for?
2. Who is TAILS designed for?
3. When should I use TAILS? When shouldn't I use TAILS?
4. Is it possible to transfer files from a virtual operating system to a USB
stick and vice versa?
5. Is it possible to run TAILS as a virtual operating system?
6. Which software
@boaz given what you say I'd go from the quoted issue where it says if it
goes wrong to run the following commands
sudo apt-get install -fy /tmp/install.log
cd /
cat /tmp/install.log | grep different from the same file on the system |
cut -d' ' -f2 | xargs sudo rm
sudo apt-get install
On 01/11/13 12:02, uedibupi wrote:
1. What is TAILS useful for?
Booting an OS to do something that doesn't require any of your own data
is the typical use case for any Live CD/DVD, including Tails.
For example, if I use someone else's computer to do casual browsing for
a few hours I might bring
An additional question: what about searching and asking at the correct place?
Thanks.
I want to remove the 'home', 'web browser' and 'help' icons from my task bar.
How can I do it?
attachment: Icons.png
You said the binary is non free but one of the Cisco PR members said if you
take the BSD licensed source and compile it, that it will match the binary
you download.
Users don't pay because only Cisco is authorized to provide a binary on their
website (Firefox will download from their
As has been explained, yes but it's problematic and really should not be
done. It'll probably raise eyebrows like what's going on in these forums. In
the case of the the source code costing the same as the binary, it's like the
person has to buy the program twice. The only reason to make
Don't be tempted - Proprietary software for the GSM modem, WiFi (at least
proposed - we'll see where that goes), and graphics. It's not much different
from most other smart phones. What we *really* need is a phone without any
proprietary software anywhere. That would be a contribution to the
You said the binary is non free but one of the Cisco PR members said if you
take the BSD licensed source and compile it, that it will match the binary
you download.
And when you download the source and compile you don't get the patent
license. You want the patent license, go download the
I think they are doing this for WebRTC and letting Opus handle the audio. I'm
in the boat where I feel Daala is the future (not VP9), but companies like
Apple and Microsoft won't include it with their OS even if it is patent and
royalty free.
But that is an old mentality where desktop apps
37 matches
Mail list logo
