sorry i didn't have time to ask the jami team about wich port it uses but
jami works fine for me wen i dont use my firewall
so its just my lack of knowledge in gnu world
While checking the state of Jami on Trisquel 8, I got a non-blocking bug when
trying to display the keyboard shortcut window:
https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-client-gnome/issues/1120
Appart from that very minor glitch (which will probably be resolved soon
either by removing the
Hi Rached, Jami has always worked for me, on both GNU/Linux and Android/Linux
devices. Did you figure out your issue or get help from the Jami devs? If so,
it would be great if you post about your solution here, for anyone searching
the forums in the future.
I figured out what happened.
When I go to:
https://jami.net/download-jami-linux/
... and click on the Trisquel logo, a one-click installer appears for
Trisquel 8.0, which correctly provides a .deb targeted at a 16.04 base. But
the manual instructions underneath tell me to add:
The Jami devs say they:
> just tried with a trisquel 8 from scratch. Working, so I close
https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/jami-packaging/issues/39#note_16923
So as far as they're concerned it's not a problem at their end, but something
unusual going on in my Trisquel system. I'd really
i installed with gDebi and it fixed the dependency problems
why dont u try it with .deb and then it should auto upgrade now cause u add
jami in source.list
Ignore this, it seems like it was either a race conditions bug or, most
likely, user error (although I still can't figure out what I did wrong the
first time). I now have the repo added and apt update is loading from it, but
I can't actually install Jami due to dependency problems. See the
I just tried to follow the manual instructions using 64-bit Trisquel 8.0.
Everything seemed to be working until I got to:
> sudo sh -c "echo 'deb
[signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/jami-archive-keyring.gpg]
https://dl.jami.net/nightly/ubuntu_16.04/ ring main' >
Trisquel is now officially supported by Jami!
https://jami.net/download-jami-linux/
> my ufw is set to only allow dns http and https so wen i lunch jami it
> wont connect to the internet
I see. I'm not sure which port Jami uses, and I don't have time to look
into it right now. Maybe strypey can help, since he uses Jami, but it
might be worth asking the Jami team for help here:
my ufw is set to only allow dns http and https so wen i lunch jami it wont
connect to the internet
this is what i get from ufw.log:
Dec 3 08:46:12 99 kernel: [ 1674.239424] [UFW BLOCK] IN= OUT=wlp3s0
SRC=192.168.1.8 DST=192.168.1.1 LEN=30 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=1503 DF
PROTO=UDP
> cause this is about jami i will ask one more question here!
> i have installed it with the .deb but i dont know how
> to set it up with my ufw firewall
> it looks like its connecting with too many ip address
> im a bit confused about what should i withelist
> if one of u is using it and have set
cause this is about jami i will ask one more question here!
i have installed it with the .deb but i dont know how to set it up with my
ufw firewall
it looks like its connecting with too many ip address im a bit confused about
what should i withelist
if one of u is using it and have set it up
ok thank you i did that!
> are you guys planing to backport jami anytime soon or i just go and
> install from the .deb file
You might as well install from a .deb file. If/when Trisquel provides a
newer version than whatever you install now, the package manager will
know to upgrade.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
are you guys planing to backport jami anytime soon or i just go and install
from the .deb file
Really nice move, Strypey. I support that immediately & good thing I
have a GitLab account.
FYI I have opened an issue on the Jami issue board politely making the case
for making Trisquel the 8th distro that officially support and include on
their download page:
https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-project/issues/733
chaosmonk:
> Even if a package seems useless to you, you cannot be certain that it is
not important to another user.
Fair enough. I'd definitely prefer updated to removed. But I do worry about
distributing obsolete versions of software whose homepages make strong
security claims that may
> FWIW Linphone is another comms app that relies on E2EE to protect user
> privacy. The version in the 8.0 repos is 3.6.1 and seems to have a
> number of bugs when trying to add or connect to accounts on
> Linphone.org. The latest version according to Wikipedia is 4.1.1. The
> SFD lists a stable
FWIW Linphone is another comms app that relies on E2EE to protect user
privacy. The version in the 8.0 repos is 3.6.1 and seems to have a number of
bugs when trying to add or connect to accounts on Linphone.org. The latest
version according to Wikipedia is 4.1.1. The SFD lists a stable 3.7.0
> > I would appreciate being able to communicate with you on Jabber,
> > Matrix, or the fediverse if you use any of these.
>
> Jabber is usually the best way to reach me. I'll send you a message.
I sent a message to your jabber.org address. If you didn't receive it
let me know.
signature.asc
> Is there a generic version of them on the wiki? If you want to get
> more people involved in Trisquel dev, it might help to make it very
> easy to find a list of entry level tasks like this, with links to
> detailed information on how to carry them out.
The contributing guide I linked to is the
Thanks Chaosmonk for the details instructions. Is there a generic version of
them on the wiki? If you want to get more people involved in Trisquel dev, it
might help to make it very easy to find a list of entry level tasks like
this, with links to detailed information on how to carry them
> There is already a package helper for ring, so you'll be modifying
> helpers/make-ring[2] with your preferred text editor.
Sorry, link [2] is wrong. (Before I saw that there was already a
package helper for ring I was going to suggest using the one for
gutenprint as a template.) Here is the
> I understand that backporting adds a lot of work that I don't have the
> skills to volunteer for (although I'm willing to learn with some
> mentorship).
It would probably take less time for me to do it myself, but if you are
really willing to learn how to do it, I would much prefer to take the
I did see the .deb downloads. But doesn't this mean I'll have to manually
download and reinstall again every time there's a new release? Not having to
micromanage app versions is one of the reasons GNU/Linux is such a pleasure
to use compared to Windows ;)
That's why I wanted to add their
Chaosmonk:
> I think it is only worth doing this for packages whose version in the repos
has a specific problem.
I understand that backporting adds a lot of work that I don't have the skills
to volunteer for (although I'm willing to learn with some mentorship). But I
think Jami is a
> On this page,[1] you should be able to click on the link that says
> "Ubuntu 16.04 (64-bit)" or "Ubuntu 16.04 (32 bit)" (depending on your
> architecture).
In case for some reason you can't see these links (although I can see them
just fine in Icecat with JS blocked, so I can't think of a
> Also, I went to the Jami download page to try to add
> their repo, so I can get a more updated version, but
> I'm a bit confused. They only have manual install
> instructions for various versions of Ubuntu, Debian,
> and Fedora
On this page,[1] you should be able to click on the link that says
> The Trisquel 8 repos have a version of Jami so old it's still got the
> Ring branding. It's really not helpful to have this kind of thing in
> the repos. Is it possible to backport a newer version? If not, it
> probably makes sense to just remove it from the repos
Ubuntu 16.04 (and thus
Also, I went to the Jami download page to try to add their repo, so I can get
a more updated version, but I'm a bit confused. They only have manual install
instructions for various versions of Ubuntu, Debian, and Fedora, and I
suspect my browser isn't displaying the page properly, because
32 matches
Mail list logo
