LibertyBSD has applied if you read the
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2015-02/threads.html#00018
As for Uruk 1.0 it's not applied (unless i'm mistaken)
https://uruk.tuxfamily.org/dist/en.html#about
Librepup as well(?)but this project is often even unreachable by internet
> What do you think about these OS?
Nothing.
> Why haven't they still been approved?
Have they officially asked to be included in the list? If yes, then they just
must be patient. Of course if the process is taking years then maybe a poke
is in order.
What's worse or if any of those it's good at all it's not relevant to what I
said, you see. It's not about if Bernie or David Duke is good or bad, I'm not
interest in who's right or wrong. My business is with bias media that
attempts to control public opinion.
Because if they control
I'm not defending white supremacist, I stand for the free speech of every
one, whether he's European, Indian or a fellow countryman or countrywoman.
Me defending any supremacist is an idea excessing only in your mind full of
suppositions about me.
I'm not saying Trump is a Nazi per se. He only falls in the same pit as the
Weimar republic conservative parties did when they supported the rise of
Hitler hoping to gain power over him and ditch him when he was done. It won't
work.
Exactly, in fact. That same video could be banned in Europe even though
doesn't have a drop of hate against anyone. The same video shows cases where
pacific free speech got banned because some people had other interests.
It's just plain an simple truth that could be banned in Europe for
>"The nazism of today is alive and it has the face of GOP, Trump"
stopped reading at GOP and Trump being pro nazi. Unless you can prove that
you're not repeating the same some people says without any base then you're
just lying.
Also, question. Do you even live in America?
Then you shouldn't act against yout best interests defending extremists'
right to air time on any platform they choose to infiltrate. It's illogical.
So now you imply I'm a white supremacist?
I'll let you know that what you're doing it's no different from someone
thinking "if it's dumb must be black" You'll agree with me that, that kind of
prejudice is bad, right? Then why you don't hesitate to call me "white
supremacists" even though
I agree, but being a KKK is kinda worse...
Niemöller was talking about the Nazis. The nazism of today is alive and it
has the face of GOP, Trump and white suprecist groups fearmongering amidst
us.
I wouldn't mind if you elaborate on why it's "out of place" as you say.
I know that Niemöller quote through and through. Your quote is put place and
misdirected.
>"Because US Citizens have a taboo towards communism."
Exactly right. Because US Citizens have a taboo towards communism.
And what would happen if Bernie Sanders where to be called "former
communist"?
That would make him look bad in the US. A lot of people wouldn't vote for
him. Bernie
Isn't it obvious? Being a socialist and being a white suprematist dung basket
are hardly comparable in equality of admiration.
There's no way to even know if you are a US Citizen. No one is implying you
promote Trump... I agree about not banning certain videos when in Europe they
think that's hateful speech, when the general global consensus it might not
be...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vVohGWhMWs
Now you're implying I'm a Trump supporter even though I haven't mention a
word of him.
Why no one call Bernie "former communist" while every-time David Duke is
bring to discussion he's called "former Ku Klux Klan member"?
either answer that or stop making me lose my time in worthless
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/les-leopold/if-bernie-wins-california_b_10051886.html
>"These warmongers have exactly the same freedoms as they had before"
>"They can put up a platform[...]"
They can put a platform and what? Wait until they see how even that got
banned because of some filter?
Can't you see the danger of this new EU law? Can't you see how this new EU
rule
I said "they seemed"
Bernie is a snowball in hell. He has no chance to be lected. Why are wasting
bullets on him? Is it because trumpists must have an opponent, imagined or
real?
Because Americans have a taboo towards communism. I never implied you said
Communism was bad. That was added up by me.
"While hate speech is everything counter to the current political
establishment believes." This doesn't answer my question, you decided to
issue something else by saying
It used to be good manners in another time... Now you are a beacon of hope
for the millions if you know how to throw cheap expletives and libel at your
adversaries.
>"Tell me the difference between Political Correctness and Hate Speech"
In practice political correctness is anything the current political
establishment believes or want you to believe. While hate speech is
everything counter to the current political establishment believes.
>"Being a
Yeah, but I didn't say they will, just an hypothetical scenario
Yeah, I agree... this is making Facebook be more unstable than it already
is...
They won't ban Free Software any time soon. They even seem to agree that it's
the safest thing to have running in any computer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwRYyWn7BEo
Tell me the difference between Political Correctness and Hate Speech...
Being a communist is not a bad thing, it's just a Political Ideology. It's
not as if Bernie was Mao, or Stalin...
These war mongers have exactly the same freedoms as they had before. They can
put up a platform of their own for their rants, misogynism and xenophobia
induced hatred. As long as they don't cross the subtle threshold of targeting
a specific minority and calling for violence towards them,
I already installed the Middleton BIOS, and yet it doesn't connect through
Wifi, I have to use the Modem cable to connect to the Internet...
Yeah, that's why I thought of that hypothetical scenario. Linux nor GNU
necessarily imply communism. Both could live in either a communist or a
capitalist system.
I didn't imply that free software is communism. But rather that some people
could believe that, and ban free software too with a
Tor suggests: https://search.disconnect.me
I've read their privacy policy which stills seems not secure, because it
stores data:
Nothing in this policy contradicts the following statements:
We don’t collect any of your personal info, including your IP address,
other than information
Yeah, I installed it. I have a doubt about the SATA II, it mentions that it
doesn't transmit data 1.5 mb/s or something like that, but with the custom
BIOS is 3 mb/s. Does it mean my Hard Disk will be faster?
Quite many packages. I'm happy to see this is growing...
What do you think about these OS?
Why haven't they still been approved?
>Also, I am not a "communist", as you seem to be implying. Is it some scare
label you apy to people who disagree with you? It makes no sense.<
A ballmerism is appropriate here:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
Hi =)
I wanted to share with you this nice page:
https://www.gnu.org/manual/blurbs.html
A small description for all GNU packages
RMS has also said that he doesn't align with what he calls "right-wing
libertarian anarchists".
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/stallman-talk#comment-95157
Fuck David Duke, fuck the Klan, Fuck sanders and his socialdemocrat crap,
fuck hillary and trump.
Slava Stalin.
Yeah, that's because it's SaaSS. The only solution to this is for the
translation software to be running on your own computer and libre. You can't
solve SaaSS by creating an alternative SaaSS solution.
If anybody is interested, Richard Stallman already commented on this:
https://www.stallman.org/archives/2016-mar-jun.html
"1 June 2016 (Censorship of "hate speech")
Several "US" companies have signed a pledge to censor "hate speech", which is
a crime in many European countries.
This
Please do your best when trying to understand other people's views and post.
Don't make me lose my time by making me repeat my self. That's all I ask when
someone reply to my posts.
And when people just miss-read (some times on purpose) to make it seem like I
said something different that
SOPA and PIPA proposals don't belong here? Then how come people could talk
all day long about that here?
The reason why I condemn this EU decision is EXACTLY the same why the
Trisquel community condemned SOPA and PIPA.
> This is why people like you makes me sick
How can a harmless person on the internet make you sick? You have a big shock
in store for you in life. People often say things you object to. How you
react is important for how you behave towards others, and how they behave
towards you in turn.
Read my post again, I said that I wouldn't mind this so much if it wasn't
that isn't facebook, youtube and twitter who decided this on their own, but
the EU, that's like if you're in some event and not the event organizer but
the police decided to put you in jail not because the organizer
> I'm happy to note that I recently saw a headline asking if the Windows 10
update reminders qualify as spyware.
More like adware - it is an add nagging the useds to upgrade to Nsaowns 10.
This thread belongs to the troll hole. It has nothing to do with software.
Take it there.
Oh, OK. Well, I would say that proprietary systems supporting OpenGL is a
good thing. At the very least, it then doesn't encourage developing programs
that depend on some proprietary standard, like DirectX.
I am no hypocrite. This is not about free speech. It is about moderation
within a set of clearly-defined boundaries, on certain sites. It is similar
to how you can't just go into some event and make a speech about whatever you
want. They might choose not to host you, and that would not be an
None of that has any relevance, I point at that video as an example of this
law being unjust. If you see the video you won't see hate, you won't see
anything but facts. Facts that could be silenced with this new rule in the
EU.
And I don't need to point out why this belongs here more than
None of that has any relevance, I point at that video as an example of this
law being unjust. If you see the video you won't see hate, you won't see
anything but facts. Facts that could be silenced with this new rule in the
EU.
And I don't need to point out why this belongs here more than
He's making no secret of his views. I know he is a batshit neocon, white
supremacist, antisemite, and Ku Klux Klan member. The media is biased but
seriously, if anything it is biased against progressive causes. You are
deluded, this really belongs in the Troll Hole, if anywhere.
He's making no secret of his views. I know he is a batshit neocon, white
supremacist, antisemite, and Ku Klux Klan member. The media is biased but
seriously, if anything it is biased against progressive causes. You are
deluded, this really belongs in the Troll Hole, if anywhere.
Wikipedia and the media can be incredibly bias. For example Bernie sanders is
a former communist, but no one call him that all the time as they do with
David Duke. Also, funny how now that saying of "no matter who says it if it's
true it's true" matter now. Because I can see how you didn't
A video by David Duke? The same David Duke described by Wikipedia as "an
American white nationalist, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, Holocaust
denier, politician, and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan."
What a load of bs. The guy is not speaking the truth, just a load of
antisemitic
>"What they allow on their websites is their own business"
I wouldn't be so mad about this if it was by their own decision, but it's
because the EU has ruled them to do it.
Also, you're an hypocrite because if the decision was to ban all "communist
speech" and they decided to tag free
You don't understand the implications of this. They will put videos like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDtT_GkqrE0 under the ""hate speech"" tag
even though what he says in the video it's not hate, is truth.
This is nothing but a attempt to control public opinion.
I'm saying although Google demands manufacturers to support OpenGL, which is
free, the end result does not respect people's freedom. Sorry for not making
this clear enough.
I want to point out that moderation of comments is not an attack on freedom
of speech. What they allow on their websites is their own business. You can
voice your opinions through other means, no matter how vile and sickening
they might be. However, just remember: just because you have the
"New Online Hate-Speech Rules Threaten Free Speech (Op-Ed)"
"Web firms pledge to tackle online free speech"
"Microsoft, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook have pledged to remove free speech
within 24 hours, in support of a code of conduct drafted by the EU."
And why? Because it hurst terrorist
Hey, I am having the same issue again.
I will have to try your method when the problem is occurring again (right now
all is working well), since I think it will not be much good posting that
output when the system is normal, right?
Also, if I may ask, what marks the beginning and ending of
Hey guys.
I have been getting similar behavior of my machine again (not as frequently
but it happens), so I am "re opening" the issue.
I noticed it happens when the laptop is left unused for a long period of
time, when I use it again it has the kworker requesting CPU power again.
I will
GNU/Linux has the same problem that the Windows Phone platform has. No one's
developing for it because it has such low market share, and it has such low
market share because no one develops for it.
> demands manufacturers to implement OpenGL for fancy effects, but it is
still bad for your freedom
How is demanding that hardware manufacturers support an open standard bad for
your freedom? Their support of OpenGL might require a proprietary driver or
proprietary firmware, but that's a
The same can be true for Android, which demands manufacturers to implement
OpenGL for fancy effects, but it is still bad for your freedom, especially on
Quallcomm platforms. It does not matter that you are supporting these 'open'
technologies if it harms your freedom. In a way, I might point
I also want to inject something else here. We all know that non-free software
is bad, but when you play a game (non-free or not) on a GNU/Linux platform,
you are supporting OpenGL and Vulkan, which are both open. If you support
Windows, you are supporting the proprietary DirectX. If you are
Tor provides anonymity, but companies still receive data. :(
Windows 7 is basically the LTS release.
They come from vendors. For example:
https://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2015/12/10/the-linux-vendor-firmware-service-welcomes-dell/
But yes, your point is valid regardless of who it comes from. Time for free
firmware!
https://jxself.org/free-firmware.shtml
There is a problem arising with fwupd, in that the firmware is
user-submitted. Couldn't someone add a malicious firmware file?
The people in that thread are using Ubuntu 14.04 and can make it work, which
Trisquel is based on. Your problem is not GCC, it is something else. Try
redownloading the source code and seeing what happens. Reinstall all the
dependencies, and check you didn't fail to install one by mistake. I
This test: https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency/issues/1233
It enables me to run free software, an excuse, my excuse.
The far more important point is, in my view, should I have to install Win
first to be able to install a BIOS update. They should at least provide a way
to update the BIOS without Windows. I think there is a way but I failed to do
it
It's not. You can completely bypass the Ubuntu App Centre to install Snap
packages.
I have to wonder, what programs would be Trisquel-specific?
Being binary-compatible with Ubuntu and without custom software being written
for it, there isn't really any Trisquel-specific software, save a few small
exceptions that wouldn't be beneficial to put in Snap packages.
And here an issue arises: should I refuse to install proprietary software on
my computer (the BIOS is software)? :)
tg3: Cinnamon (buguntu based)
"Provides improved security of UEFI code and variables. HP strongly
recommends
transitioning promptly to this updated BIOS version which supersedes all
previous releases."
ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/softpaq//sp76001-76500/sp76003.html
I have always updated the BIOS when it's available -- so far
You are missing my point. Of course these "hardcore gamers" are better using
GNU+Linux. It's just that they don't represent most people. They care about
performance over free software. We should focus on people who would be happy
now on GNU+Linux, such as children, people at school, people
Why did you need to update the BIOS? Was it crap or something?
I had to install a copy of Win 10 to be able to update my laptop's BIOS. I
tried other means but failed. Maybe it was due to the BIOS password, don't
know, but the installer/updater/flasher reminded me of the password before
proceeding. I had an old HDD that I swapped in for the update and
81 matches
Mail list logo
