To David Miller:
What BJ (Bishop John) said herein is that which I
was getting at re: your visit to 'the campus'.I suspect you already know
that as we've spoken of it previously.
IMO, this 'conversation' falls into the same
category as so many 'exchanges' do on TT. Persons just share
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/23/2005 10:45:02 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Another darn Questionere!
Once again, you cannot remember what it was that I was responding to. And I am not going to tell you so I guess it will just have to
- Original Message -
From: Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/24/2005 2:16:42 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Another darn Questionere!
DAVEH: Do you really think it is appropriate to discuss such personal things on a public forum that is known for its lack of taste at
guess it will just have to be a secrewt from now on.Hey BUD we'll have NONE of that around here! I will report you to the Authorities.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Once again, you cannot remember what it was that I was responding to. And I am not going to tell you so I guess it will
Go FigureShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Leaders arent People???From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:51 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Emailing:
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/23/2005 11:04:35 PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Book of Enoch
A friend is reading the Book of Enoch from the Apocrypha. Does anyone know if any of it is inspired, or is it all false teaching? Izzy
cd: I
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/23/2005 10:40:29 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Romans 1:18-32 and beyond
24"Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment." ~Jesus Christ
cd:2 Do you not know that the
The cults love itwhat does that say about it? Not even the RCC believes this one! UFO Cults love it http://www.bibleufo.com/enoch7.htm http://www.bibleufo.com/gospel4.htm Besides thay R 'gods' like LDS There can be no doubt that the incredible realities of the gospel Jesus brought to mankind
Pride is the highway to utter apostasy. . . . Mark those that are proud in any town, or any company of professors of piety; and if any infection of heresy or infidelity come into that place, these are the men that will soonest catch it. Richard Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Bill, remember
Judy, your belief system is unlike any that I have ever encountered. You are so quick to critic anything written by those who are on your hit list, yet, you fellowship a whole church of Calvanists (something you supposedly detest) and have very litle in common with the BSF assembly except
AND it is OBVIOUS, that you will make your stand, withoutany scripture to back up your Philosophy too.Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am content to stand alone if I must, Kevin; although it is obviousI will not have to.Bill- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To:
And Lance dances on QLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To David Miller:What BJ (Bishop John) said herein is that which I was getting at re: your visit to 'the campus'.I suspect you already know that as we've spoken of it previously.IMO, this 'conversation' falls into the same
Bill:
May God's peace be upon you.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 24, 2005 08:46
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
corrector/revisor
AND it is OBVIOUS, that you will make your stand,
withoutany scripture
JD wrote:
The translation presents the reader with a
completed task when that is not the case.
No it does not. The translation is
present passive. You keep trying to portray falsely that it is past
tense. Nothing in this translation indicates whether our sanctification is
completed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Judy, your belief system is unlike any that I have ever encountered. You are so quick to critic anything written by those who are on your hit list, yet, you fellowship a whole church of Calvanists (something you supposedly detest) and have very litle in common
Bill wrote:
Per this verse, it is our sanctification
which is not yet complete.
How do you read this into the text? Nothing
in this passage indicates that our present sanctification is somehow
incomplete. Granted, our sanctification may be ongoing, but to argue that
a present tense
What would makeBill so staunch in a belief without Scriptural evidence?David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JD wrote: The translation presents the reader with acompleted task when that is not the case. No it does not. The translation is present passive. You keep trying to portray
Lance Muir wrote:
How can one person be so
consistantly wrong? Do you make these idiotic statements just to get
attention? No one misses Debbie or Jonathan. No one understands G.
John doesn't quite know what he believes and Bill has no ability to
communicate with anyone who does not
Now we are getting to the heart of the matter!David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill wrote: Per this verse, it is our sanctificationwhich is not yet complete.How do you read this into the text? Nothing in this passage indicates that our present sanctification is somehow
How tacky!
ShieldsFamily wrote:
You know I'll tell! :-)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 1:17 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Another darn Questionere!
DAVEH: Do
Bill wrote:
Sure, a present tense verb conveys an action that
is not yet complete; in other words, it is not yet a
past tense. As I said before, it is unfortunate that
the KJV misled you here, understandable though
it may be, but now you need to move on to accepting
that the original
self admiration societyNow that is funny, Thanks for the laughs! Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lance Muir wrote: How can one person be so consistantly wrong? Do you make these idiotic statements just to get attention? No one misses Debbie or Jonathan. No one understands G.
Hi Bill. I appreciate you taking time to
explain how you differentiate the middle from passive voice in this
passage. My point in asking you to review this is to remind us that it
takes some interpretation on our part concerning context. Syntax
alonein this case does not give us the answer.
cd: In verse 28 God gave them over to a reprobate mind to do those things mentioned in v.29-he takes the gift of understand (discernment) away from those people mentioned in v.27. So then v29 is the result of v.27.
Consider what Adam Clark has to say on the matter:
Rom 1:28 -
They did not like
I don't read Rom. 15:16 as indicating "present and ongoing" action even
though the syntax is the same. The context causes me to understand "being
sanctified" very similar to "having been sanctified." It is only a short
cut _expression_, kind of like a pronoun-verb contraction. Thanks for
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:44:51 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, your belief system is unlike any that I have ever
encountered. You are so quick to critic anything written by those
who are on your hit list, yet, you fellowship a whole church of Calvanists (something you
Do you make these idiotic statements just to get attention?He is dancing on Q - There is no end to defending myself -- so I won't get started. If the context of my statements do not resolve the issues, nothing else I will say could possibly help. Please note, however, that nothing in what I
If there were a verb meaning "to believe falsely," it would not have any significant first person, present indicative!Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aw, Bill, you know this passage is not the same. This is a perfectparticiple "hegiasmene" not a present passive, so I'm not sure what your
myth ("Bill is
happy," is presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the happiness is
transitory which also squares with human experience; therefore, the present
tense'happiness' is incomplete)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:02:32 -0500 "David Miller"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:|| Present tense
This is what Lance calls 'concise?'
Passing judgment that is void of understanding -
critical spirits masquerading as some
kind ofbent wisdom?
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:37:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (the options
are false; thewriter'selimination ofdifficultyis
You highlight the problemwith leaving off the
present passive aspect of this participle, David; hence loosing track of the
unfinished- or incompleteness of it. Do you presume to have finished the race,
while waiting for the likes of Paul to catch up?
Bill
- Original Message -
Good comments, below. I havelong believed, i.e. Ro 1:18-29, that the most damaging of all realities is the one tied to this statement by God, "You are on your own."
Understand, also, that God , although pictured as being actively involved in His departure, is - in reality - not the"active
Not laughting at you , David, but I am laughing at the quetion !!! Out of compassion and reason comes the death blow if you get my drift. :-)
jd-Original Message-From: Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:19:14 -0700Subject:
World vs faith? The choice is NOT Difficult You have already resolved the conflict, whether one agrees or not NO Need to halt between two opinions. He knows what side you are on. Indifference is active oposition in His book!He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not
Izzy's options are scriptural and you Gary are in the
void so far as understanding goes ie
"But Christ as a Son over His own house,WHOSE
HOUSE WE AREIF we hold fast
the confidence and the rejoicing of
the hope firm to the end" (Heb 3:6)(which is faith)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:01:37 -0700
VENGENACE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY SAYS THE LORD
(Romans 12:19)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:26:10 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good comments, below. I havelong believed, i.e. Ro 1:18-29, that the most damaging of all
realities is the one tied to this statement by God, "You are on your
If Linda is talking about assumed perfection, a consideration on the part of God toward us, AMEN.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:31:58 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
World vs
my point is that
they are false--they have nothin' to do with reality
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:31:25 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Izzy's options are scriptural
||
Ah, yes, God isthe Boss and has putyou and Kev in charge Preach it , baby -- but LOOK no one is listening.
Do you realize, Judy Taylor, that 12:18-19 is actually a statement AGAINST the ankst of personal retaliation?
" If possible, as far as it depends ON YOU, be at peace with all
Your drift is incomprehensible JD and there is no
"death blow" because FYI
Hebrews 10:14 does not refer to any race ... Oh what a
tangled web we weave...
Vs.14 here relates to Hebrews 10:9,10 ie: "Then He
(Jesus) said "Behold I have come
to do Your will, O God" He takes away the first
that
Your own personal reality maybe but then that is all
about you and she was referring
to His Kingdom which is a different
reality.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:41:11 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
my point is that
they are false--they have nothin' to do with reality
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005
Get ready for the nasties, Mr G !!! Save yourself !!
:-)-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:41:11 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
my point is that they are false--they have nothin' to do with reality
On
I understand the setting JD and just because you
don't like it why lie about noone listening; you are not
EVERYONE
God's righteous judgment ALL THROUGH
SCRIPTURE is that every man will be rewarded according to WHAT
HE HAS DONE. The sinners in Romans 1:18-29 went
over the line as did the
Sorry , Judy, you have lost me entirely. I am committing on Bill's statement below and you are doing what ?? This is a great question: Do you presume to have finished the race, while waiting for the likes of Paul to catch up?and it got ahearty laugh out of my otherwise demonical countenance.
dualism dominates
andyou love to speculate, too
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:48:51 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your reality
maybe.. she was referring..to..a different reality.
||
I know what you are commenting on JD;
However, Bill's statement is way out there someplace
and has nothing at all to do with Hebrews 10:14
where this thread began. Bill hasgone from
Greek verbs to some race none of which have anything
to
do with 'being sanctified' as per Hebrews 10:14.
If you understand the "setting," why not practice the wording ??!! When Isaid "no one is listening," I was talking about you and your message, not God and His message. They are not the same, you know. You quoted Romans 12:19 as if God is telling you to continueyour brand of vengeance when, in
myth (it's not what
you think)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:05:16 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill's statement is way out there someplace and
has nothing at all to do with Hebrews 10:14
"Bill is [sad]," is
presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the [sadness] is transitory which
also squares with human experience; therefore, the present
tense'[sad]ness' is incomplete
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:52:51 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth ("Bill is
happy," is
So tell me Mr. myth man - what do I think? You
seem to think you know better than me.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:09:53 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (it's not
what you think)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:05:16 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Bill's statement is way
I know I'm wasting my time with this ... sigh!!
I don't have a message JD.
Romans 12:19 is God's message in the New
Testament - the same message as all through the
rest
of the Bible which you summarily reject because your
God is not the avenging kind. Oh well!!
What Paulteaches hereis
RACE. What is that about?how do you get a race outthis? I remain confused. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:05:16 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
I know what
show somemore
love, M'am--back off a little (like this)sowe cantalk about
it--privately, if you prefer--preferrably polite but perceptive protestant
prodding probing, positively, persistantly powerfully
G
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:23:43 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..what
Well, it certainly does appear that you understand the point of 12:18-19.So, why not let God do his thing while you do what He asked you to do? -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 24 Nov 2005
Bob Rose, a Gainesville radio talk show host, called me yesterday and
interviewed me for more than 10 minutes about my work at the University of
Florida. Some of you might be interested.
I created a web page of news articles over the last two weeks at:
http://www.InnGlory.org/uf.htm
The radio
"Bill is
[sanctified]," is presumed, and, at best, [though eternal], (is) now; therefore,
the [sanctified-ness] is transitory [for now]which also squares with human
experience; therefore, the present tense'[sanctified-]ness' is
incomplete
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:21:34 -0700 [EMAIL
myth (it's a trick
eliminating your thinking from reality)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:44:02 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't have a message
JD.
(hey DaveH--a new
TT record for concatenating responses, eh? :)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:49:56 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Bill is
[sanctified]," is presumed, and, at best, [though eternal], (is) now;
therefore, the [sanctified-ness] is transitory [for now]which also
squares
(Christinie oughta
be rofl by now--eh? :)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:08:10 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(hey DaveH--a new
TT record for concatenating responses, eh? :)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:49:56 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Bill is
[sanctified]," is presumed, and,
Do you presume to have finished the race, while waiting
for the likes of Paul to catch up?
and it got ahearty laugh out of my otherwise
demonical countenance.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:34:16 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RACE. What is that
about?how do you get a
race
Eh? Got relatives in Canada eh?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 24, 2005 12:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
corrector/revisor
(hey DaveH--a new
TT record for concatenating responses, eh? :)
On
yesirrreeebob
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:38:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eh? Got relatives in Canada
eh?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 24, 2005 12:08
Subject: Re:
yo/ftr,
do any
of us Canuckistanis deny that sanctification is emotional?
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:38:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eh? Got relatives in Canada
eh?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
The book is not inspired. Only late manuscripts are known.
Nevertheless, it is worth reading from a historical perspective. We have a
copy of it on our website in the library, along with the book of Jasher.
It should be read in the same way one might read any textbook or extra biblical
perhaps..
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:01:11 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..do
any of us..deny that sanctification is [not merely]
emotional?
||
You
know I'll tell!
DAVEH: Wow Izzy..I am rather surprised to hear you say that!
But it is nice to know you are not so hypocritical that you would not
be willing to post on TT such personal things as you expect me to
share. Now that I think about it Izzy, I'm sure it would be much more
Perhapssomeone should consider that I am not. -Original Message-From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:54:24 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 1:18-32 and beyond
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Ah. Now I see. Why the race? Well, i guess I should defer to Bill, although I think I understood the point. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:20:48 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
DAVEH: So far I've only responded to my own post just once. I can
tolerate that, but in the future one can assume any double responses to
be a measure of my advancing senility.
:-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whileintuition
suggested you wouldn't
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:36:17
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/24/2005 10:26:10 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 1:18-32 and beyond-JD
Good comments, below. I havelong believed, i.e. Ro 1:18-29, that the most damaging of all realities is the one tied to this
DAVEH: To me it seems a bit too dogmatic to see folks going to
ridiculous extremes to validate their position. (That's not to say I
haven't been accused of such myself!) But I really do appreciate your
point about digging deep and discovering new and interesting things.
Sure, I can see a
DAVEH: LOL.Yeah G. But I noticed you tried to top him with
your P's post to Judy. I'm just surprised you overlooked prayerfully!
+++
show
somemore love, M'am--back off a little (like this)sowe cantalk
about it--privately, if you prefer--preferrably polite but perceptive
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/24/2005 10:26:10 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 1:18-32 and beyond-JD
Good comments, below. I havelong believed, i.e. Ro 1:18-29, that the most damaging of all realities is the one tied to this statement
Kevin, you speaking out against the use of "idiot" is like Hitler preaching against murder. You are the single most prolific verbal assassin on this forum -- including Jduy !! -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 24 Nov
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/23/2005 11:30:49 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 1:18-32 and beyond-JD
-Original Message-From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:54:30
No it does not Perhaps this is true in your case. I am not sure you understand the problem, but I think you do. Others, clearly, do not and that is my point. The average reader will see this as a completed action. Kevin and Judy have made such arguments and prove my point. IN THAT REGARD,
David -- I do not understand your logic here. If you admit that our sanctification is ongoing - how could you possibly argue that it is, at the same time, completed?"I am being made a better person" presents an action that is not completed and that appears to to be obvious, to me. Why is this not
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/24/2005 1:55:32 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 1:18-32 and beyond-JD
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/24/2005 10:26:10 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans
I was taught, in first year greek , that a present tense verbgives us activity "with no end in sight."The conclusion or end of Bill's happiness is not in view with a present tense verb. -Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 24 Nov
Lance wrote:
What BJ (Bishop John) said herein is that which
I was getting at re: your visit to 'the campus'.
...
IMO, this 'conversation' falls into the same
category as so many 'exchanges' do on TT.
Persons just share polarized opinions of a matter
whilst imbedding their comments ... with
I have to disagree with one thing you said, Terry. I MISS
DEBBIE! :-)
Peace be with you.David Miller.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 9:00
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Another darn
Judy wrote:
I pointed out to you that weak and wrong are
not one and the same. A baby believer is weak
but they will get stronger as they feed on God's
Word and grow so it is wrong to judge them or
to put a stumbling block in their path. It is also
wrong to use this one incident as
Matthew 11:29-30(29) Take my yoke upon you, and learn
of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your
souls.(30) For my yoke
is easy, and my
burden is light.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
If Bill's happiness were transitory, then you would be right, but it is
possible that his happiness is found in eternal life,and if that were so,
then it would not betransitory. The point is that we do not know
from the statement whether his happiness is complete or not.
Suppose I said,
Bill wrote:
You highlight the problem with leaving off the
present passive aspect of this participle, David;
I have not left off the present passive aspect. In English, we don't
conjugate the participle this way, but the phrase is clear enough for those
of us who understand English. It
Gary wrote:
... the [sanctified-ness] is transitory [for now]
which also squares with human experience;
Speak for yourself, Gary. My sanctification is complete, yet also ongoing.
I don't expect you will understand. I do not live by human experience, but
by the Word of God. I count my human
DaveH wrote:
As you've pointed out before, the punctuation
can have a big effect on the meaning.is it not
the translator who determines the punctuation?
And if so, then are we not left to wonder/hope/
presume he was duly inspired at the time he put
his spin on the Message?
I think your
cd: This is really scary in leu of level of debate on the Greek and English
languages. The Bible say a child can understand the Gospel-yet side B of
this room are concerned about the present tense and passive voices of a
dead language to explain the Gospel and the brethren have to go there to
David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
As you've pointed out before, the punctuation
can have a big effect on the meaning.is it not
the translator who determines the punctuation?
And if so, then are we not left to wonder/hope/
presume he was duly inspired at the time he put
his
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/24/2005 3:45:42 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
David -- I do not understand your logic here. If you admit that our sanctification is ongoing - how could you possibly argue that it is, at the
Amazing those that argue against JD, always just end up proving his point in his mind.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:No it does not Perhaps this is true in your case. I am not sure you understand the problem, but I think you do. Others, clearly, do not and that is my point. The average
Can you flesh this out more?David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lance wrote: What BJ (Bishop John) said herein is that which I was getting at re: your visit to 'the campus'. ... IMO, this 'conversation' falls into the same category as so many 'exchanges' do on TT. Persons just share polarized
cd: This is really scary in leu of level of debate on the Greek and Englishlanguages. The Bible say a child can understand the Gospel-yet side B ofthis room are concerned about the present tense and passive voices of adead language to explain the Gospel and the brethren have to go there tohelp
Hardly. J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005
12:16 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Izzy's Sexual
Experiences
You know I'll tell!
DAVEH: Wow Izzy..I am rather surprised to hear
DAVEH: Which begs the question..To which category do you think you
belong, DavidM?
And.I'm rather curious about why you feel that it might be
better for Bill and me to fall back toward vs 4 more often? Was not my
response to Izzy about her sexual experiences much more entertaining
CD: The question ere I sent out last week got good results from most of the group. It was designed to help me understand how much Calvinism has influenced our pure religion-and view the results of the Mormons in this area. Thebelief behind this test has beginnings with Augustine of
cd: Where is our monitor? Charles?
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/24/2005 10:16:54 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Izzy's Sexual Experiences
Hardly. J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DaveSent:
Ooops! I transposed my numbers in talking about this. I think
many linger too much toward verse 5, and perceive Bill DaveH to be better
at hanging toward verse 4, but would be better sometimes to move toward 5.
Sorry for the confusion.
Let me put it in plain language. Bill Dave tend to be
I liked Dean's analogy of a house. A house is complete and ready to
live in, but it also can be fixed up more and expanded and maintained.
The Bible teaches us that Jesus never sinned. He was completely
sanctified even as a child, but the Bible teaches that he grew in wisdom and
stature,
Proclamation of ThanksgivingWashington,
D.C.October 3, 1863
By the President of the United States of America.
A Proclamation.
The year that is drawing towards its close, has been filled with the
blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are
so constantly
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
