..typical of
western fundamentalists, you have two oftstated doctrinal
matrices/antithetical reference points, the economix of your
conservatism requires both:that you serve God mammonequally energetically
simultaneously, else youain't trulyred white and
blue
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:37:08
..yep, its
essentially dualistic in a certain crucial kinda way--and JC explicitly forbids
it:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:09:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..typical of
western fundamentalists,[to] have two oftstated doctrinal
matrices/antithetical reference points, the economix
..think about this
Christine--it'll get you saved
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:24:53 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..yep, its
essentially dualistic in a certain crucial kinda way--and JC explicitly
forbids it:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:09:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How many meanings do you think it has
Lance?
Do you think it should be chameleon like for ppl to
form it into whatever shape fits their doctrinal demands?
Or should we seek the Lord with our whole heart to
actually know what HE is saying so we can be a doer of
HIS WORD
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005
Corinthians
2:14-16
How many meanings do you think it has
Lance?
Do you think it should be chameleon like for ppl to
form it into whatever shape fits their doctrinal demands?
Or should we seek the Lord with our whole heart to
actually know what HE is saying so we can be a doer
Can you show me by the Word how I am misusing
same?
What other ppl do is their business. We are responsible
for what we do.
Well at last - we can agree on this at
least.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:14:28 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One but, not necessarily yours.
No but,
:35
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 1 Corinthians
2:14-16
Can you show me by the Word how I am misusing
same?
What other ppl do is their business. We are
responsible for what we do.
Well at last - we can agree on this at
least.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:14:28 -0500 "Lance
Is this the "summary of commentary" Lance?
To begin with I have said over and over that I do not
"interpret" God's Word; if He does not give understanding
we are all flailing about in the dark. This is
why there are so many theologians and theological differences.
Secondly - Yes scripture has
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 1 Corinthians
2:14-16
Is this the "summary of commentary"
Lance?
To begin with I have said over and over that I do not
"interpret" God's Word; if He does not give understanding
we are all flailing about in the dark. This is
w
while there's
(partic jts) doctrinal demandS, then there's more than one requirement for
meaning (even in her own mind)
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:14:28 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
No but, peoplewill continue to do
so.
jt
Do you think it should be chameleon
Algy met a bear. The bear met Algy. The bear was bulgy. The bulge was Algy. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while there's (partic jts) doctrinal demandS, then there's more than one requirement for meaning (even in her own mind)On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:14:28 -0500 "Lance Muir"
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:27:35 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
jtmet a bear.
The bear met jt
The bear was bulgy.
The bulge was jt[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
while there's
(partic jts) doctrinal demandS, then there's more than
yo--leaving jt
speechless for a spell, how many doctrinal demands do you detect in your own
mind set? tell us how you decide/d this: is itnone? one? more than
one?
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:45:51 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:27:35 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
My, my Lance, you've just run right off here into
another subject entirely - Let's stick with the one at hand and see
what
God has to say about it ... Those prophets are
messing with your head.
1 Cor2:14 Juxtaposes the two kinds of
wisdom - which are natural/worldly and spiritual or
and David always in possession of that ONE MEANING?)
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 11, 2005 08:23
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 1 Corinthians
2:14-16
My, my Lance, you've just run right off here
I am stunned. Lance has a tongue! (pen? Keyboard??)
iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005
6:00 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] 1 Corinthians
2:14-16
'Someone who is merely
Amen to this, Professor Muir !
jd-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:59:36 -0500Subject: [TruthTalk] 1 Corinthians 2:14-16
'Someone who is merely human doesn't accept the things of God's Spirit. They are
17 matches
Mail list logo
